Anti-Paparazzi scarf that ruins photos by affecting flash photography.

Feb 7, 2017 1:20 AM

Legacies00

Views

304822

Likes

7785

Dislikes

189

But damn tho

Being black helps too..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ok now what about regular photography

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He blinded me with SCIENCE!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Want one that says fuck you

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then suddenly: accidental kkk

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Dark Man X

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How did they take the picture on the left ????????

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, uh, how did they take the photo on the left? Just don't use a flash?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

X gonna take it from ya

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Guys im lost, can you please tell me where the hood at?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but it seems wasted on DMX...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is it weird that I just want that scarf? It's a dope ass scarf, Jared!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nevermind, it's £300 :/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol how'd you find out?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That shawl gonna make me lose my mind, up in here, up in here.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Gray for cycling at night, too.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Of course, this will only matter if the photographer has the camera on auto and uses flash.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would it work the same way on a white person? Black ppl have a hard time showing up in photos anyways.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that DMX??

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Nope. Its Morgan Freeman.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks like him

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr grrrrrrrrrrr ruff ruff

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This rap shit is mine MOTHA FUCKA

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dog Murdering Xenophobe.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

All the new paparazzis pics will be done with skyhigh ISO, ultra-grainy and shit. Wow.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

look like me and nobody ever will bother to take a photo of you.Easier that explaining why they have a photo of a potato 6ft tall and rotten

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

You should probably talk to someone. Maybe a friend or loved one.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That works only on paparazzi-grade flashes and not even that well

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Actually works on regular flash. If you have a pair of Adidas NMDs you'd know. Same type of flash respondent.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have a friend with a jacket like this and it works with an iPhone flash.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But it works only with black people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't that just 3M lol

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

3m what? they make lots of things.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah I was thinking the same thing ahhaah. big deal over something that really isn't new at all

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't just wow them, dazzle them with geometry.

9 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 2

And if that doesn't work you can blind them with science (HF + H2O ⇌ H3O+ + F−)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simperu geometry.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Geometric Dickbutt.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He blinded me with mathematics!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it should say "fuck you in your face" so they can't even print it

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They'd just black it out

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and then?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd buy THAT for a dollar!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now you're thinking with geometry!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

dazzle them with geology - throw rocks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can see the scarf but where the hood at?

9 years ago | Likes 147 Dislikes 2

Yo yo yo yo yo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have that papz in the cut, where the wool at?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I upvoted it, well done sir.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This one is a gem, and it needs more appreciation.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

WHAT!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HOW DID YOU TAKE THE FIRST PICTURE?!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Asking the right questions.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Turn off the flash. Or don't use ttl/automatic mode.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Retroreflective material. No matter the angle of the material, light is always reflected back to the source. The extra light throws off 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

The spot metering of the camera, causing it to underexpose the rest of the image.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

meter, aint no one spot metering a flash

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But what happens if you know... they don't use a flash...as we see in photo A

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude, it's photo-shopped to shit. https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/ (load the image and error analysis)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually a decent example of how ELA can tell you what part of images are OBVIOUSLY edited.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That just made the picture look blocky and with extra contrast. No obvious editing shown.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That just made the picture look blocky and with extra contrast. No obvious editing shown.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That just made the picture look blocky and with extra contrast. No obvious editing shown.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did you clic the error level analysis thing on the right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So it doesn't work if you don't use AE like any good street shooter would.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily because if you expose for the shooter manually, the scarf will still be Overexposed. The only true option would be

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bracketing which is hard to do with a moving subject

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Depends on the camera and glass. I shoot f1.8 with crazy AF and a very fast sensor.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

things i will never need.

9 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 2

Don't work, it's basically useless

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You could use it for going out around at night. Car headlights and stuff.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Family events with that one aunt who doesn't understand why you don't want your picture taken!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

that sounds like an interesting story.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a picture taking obnoxious aunt whom likes to "strike" at holiday parties.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also works great for security systems with flash

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Speed traps ain't got shit anymore!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Paparazzi won't take photos of you if you're not famous.

9 years ago | Likes 5982 Dislikes 21

I'm already in love with this meme..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This meme has grown on me.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Passive countermeasures :) I think I might go active though. One of those real powerful strobe flashlights or something

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Passive countermeasures :) I think I might go active though. One of those real powerful strobe flashlights or something

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's how I avoid the paparazzi

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anti paparazzi lifestyle.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

What's the name of this meme?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 663 Dislikes 5

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This truly be an Aurum of Fornication.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

can someone explain me the joke?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Au is the symbol for Gold (Periodic Table)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The picture says this is fucking gold

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

All this time I thought it was a strange joke about fucking Australia.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now i get it ! This is fucking gold!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This is fucking Australia?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is fucking wolf?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Where did you get ''wolf'' from that?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think that they're saying that the "au" is a wolf's howl. Not sure though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gold is being fucked by this?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Right?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is fucking gold

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

v

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This meme is my new favorite thing right now.

9 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 6

This meme trendy!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Thank you! :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who else thinks this?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's how memes work

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

what is it from tho

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Comedian plays a guy called Roll Safe in a spoof called Hood Documentary on YouTube, all the memes are from there

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have no idea but I have been riding this meme wave

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure about the scene itself but the show is called Hood Documentary

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and people raise their profile by having pictures taken...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Isn't that Smart Stupid instead of Stupid Smart? I dunno, I'm asking for a friend that's Stupid Stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perfect reason to make it expensive for celebrities.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 3

Incorrect usage, but a valid point. Good work.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Worked great on the left pic

9 years ago | Likes 1748 Dislikes 36

Shot in raw & modified? Or no flash.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

guessing a lot of famous people don't mind having their pic taken -- they just don't want constant flashes going off (shit's bright, yo!)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mostly for when youre out at night. Not a whole lot you can do during the day

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Aw, fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know it looks black too

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 2

Joke so dark I can't see it with a scarf.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 8, 2017 1:45 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Really?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That photo wasn't taken by a paparazzi.

9 years ago | Likes 424 Dislikes 3

Can't argue with that logic

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This comment isn't getting the appreciation it deserves

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 8

4 hours later, it totally is. But you were inb4, and I respect that.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Wasn't taken with flash.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1000st like

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Only works with flash, basically useless

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ARe YOU REALLY THAT DUMB?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 20

Rude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Rude

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good point. What the fuck?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

FLASH photography

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No flash used I'm assuming

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

You're a smart one.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

I know I was impressed with that deduction.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's some true detective shit.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Stupid question to begin with though?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Okay, we get it, shit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bad joke is bad

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What question?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yo true. Downvote time

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope, pretty sure it was a joke.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good joke. Much laughter had.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lmao i guess u just got to turn off the flash??

9 years ago | Likes 416 Dislikes 7

Hey, who turned off the lights?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or set the exposure manually

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 7, 2017 2:57 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Uhh dude spoilers asshole.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

S3 incoming.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Don't fuck with me please

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I do believe it's actually in production.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But then your exposure is fucked and by the time you get a decent shot it's blurry AF and you still can't see shit

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 3

So instead of a paparazzi taking a decent shot and leaving you have paparazzi swearing at their Canada and trying for hours.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Camera (autocorrect guessed it wrong)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's hilarious :) Thanks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I prefer to live in a world where, when pissed off, paparazzi curse Canada

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bump up the ISO and you're done.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Only if you've got a really superb imager.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you'll get this

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've seen The Sun used one with worse noise and blur so this is actually normal

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

with a enough paparazzi someone will get a good shot

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Drives some away since if they can't get a good shot they'll find someone else. Assuming they need the flash constantly.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think paps usually use flash, because people don't stop and pose so they have to use fast exposure times.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure, back when film was still a thing. This century we're using something called a CCD. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

CMOS, Mr. President. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_pixel_sensor.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exposure times and f-stops are still a thing. Less light = More time. CCD's and CMOS do not escape these fundamental properties of cameras

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The were using CCD back in the late 80s. So that's 2 different centuries. Which century are you talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I still use an analog camera and when trying to snap quick photos I just put super sensitive film in, no problem whatsoever

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And where do you get that film from? From a "brick and mortar" store?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Interesting! One advantage film still has over digital.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1