It even says on the dang statue...

Dec 31, 2020 1:27 AM

Tbf, it doesn't look like it at first glance....

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Things change and public art should better represent the changes: get over it, that statue is not great.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean now that I see it i do understand why its being moved, not a great image when you look at it objectively

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This really is a shitty statue.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

To be fair, I'm only a European but this looks like a reasonably easy to misunderstand statue

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You realize that their ancestors wanting to create it, and wanting to get rid of it now, are not mutually exclusive right?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Notice republicans aren't arguing about this removal? They dont want their party associated with helping black people.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe I read somewhere although it was paid for, the exact content and pose were not agreed between the artist and the fundees.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The sculptor did not convey the right message.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Humility is the answer to the question of life. Ask before reacting. Learn before acting, and you can avoid making harmful mistakes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Trump's Wall or his golf vacations are paid for solely with taxpayers' money. Should we all like it for that fact? This statue is shit.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Apparently Emancipation is too big of a word for the woke club.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

Lincoln wasn't an abolitionist, and opposed black people having the same rights as white people.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kind of hard to show he’s rising up...cuz it’s a statue. Mostly looks like he’s just crouching, inferior to Lincoln. We can do better

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I would have liked to see a statue of an emancipated slave standing shoulder to shoulder with Lincoln rather than on the gound like that

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter if it was paid for by emancipated slaves, it was a mistake to make it that way at the start, it should be corrected

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We're still slaves today... Just of different sorts. We're slaves to aggressive manipulate corporate capitalism. Ask the device in your hand

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its a copy of the original monument and was removed "after the city agreed with protesters who say the memorial is demeaning and -

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

- lacks proper context." It's just a Google search away..

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Dolly Parton!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It looks like I businessman is blessing a guy kneeling. Not sure how this is supposed to be interpreted as 'rising'.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Context died in 2016

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All these incompetent tardballs throwing the word "woke/wokesters" around not even able to spend 15 seconds to search and find the (1/?)

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

statue has literally been controversial from the very placement of it. Oh stay classy you knuckleheads lol. (2/2)

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Didn't you know? Every controversial issue is just a modern product of the Woke SJW Libtard Starbucks Cancel Culture crowd overreacting!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The main idea of town statues is to set an important reminder for the younger generation. Ask your kindergarteners what do they see is...

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

going on between the people portrayed in this statue - their answers might surprise you. If children do not get it right, it's a bad design.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I like this out look. I tend to side with keeping statues as reminders of our past but you have changed my mind a bit.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thank you for saying that

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The ignorance of the woke crowd is quite sad.

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 46

Have you honestly read and thoughtfully considered any of the criticisms that led to the decision?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

How do you feel about removing Confederate statues? That will tell us all we need to know about your statement on "woke" culture.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Public opinion changes with the times. The history of a monument doesn't override the how a physical monument is received by us.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Just because it was “paid for by freed slaves” doesn’t mean the artist/sculptor did a good job depicting what they wanted.

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 19

The ignorance of all humans makes me sad. When I find that I am ignorant I find that cringe.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

"What I want to see before I die is a monument representing the negro, not couchant on his knees like a four-footed animal...

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

...but erect on his feet like a man." (Fredrick Douglass, regarding this statue)

5 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

He seemed proud of it, actually: https://edan.si.edu/transcription/pdf_files/12955.pdf

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If he was erect it would have to be in a separate category

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As far as I can see they're both pretty black

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, obviously modern woke kids understand slavery and racism better than actual freed slaves.

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 51

Modern woke kids need to go outside and play "hide and go fuck yourself"...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Times. Change.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Could have also been the racist older generation trying to get rid of all evidence of slavery being bad.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

It could have been

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you think the freed people got to choose what the statue looked like? Or just had to settle for what people would allow to be exhibited?

5 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 12

That is exactly correct. Former slaves raised money for a statue, but the design was chosen by committee that was 100% white

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Just because it was “paid for by freed slaves” doesn’t mean the artist/sculptor did a good job depicting what they wanted. It was criticized

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 10

by Frederick Douglas for these exact same things back when it was first installed.

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

It feels like a perpetuation of the "white savior" trope.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Douglas seemed proud of the statue in his speech: https://edan.si.edu/transcription/pdf_files/12955.pdf

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Read it again. He wasn't unhappy with the Lincoln statue. He was unhappy Grant didn't get one as well.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Frederick turned his back on John Brown, who literally took up arms against slave owners so.......

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Just because it was “paid for by freed slaves” doesn’t mean the artist/sculptor did a good job depicting what they wanted.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 21

Douglas seemed to disagree: https://edan.si.edu/transcription/pdf_files/12955.pdf

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pretty fuckin' sure if they hadn't they would of asked for their money back until they got what they fucking paid for...Fuck your feelings.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

They were former slaves, and black people to boot. Do you really think that they would have gotten their money back during that era?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The "fuck your feelings" crowd is sure having a lot of strong feelings in this thread

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But the point remains that its meaning is not that of support for slavery. Shouldn't exactly be high on the "burn it down" woke list.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

That's only true if people know about it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So people should act out of ignorance?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's ability to convey knowledge is primarily through the image. The image does not look great.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

One would think that a statue portraying the man who freed the slaves would cause someone to question whether it was intended racism.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you expect people to be able to read with the state of the American education system?

5 years ago | Likes 881 Dislikes 19

Apparently not

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Dude I fuckin read that as "statue of the american education" and was very confused. "Why do americans use statues like this?" I thought.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

edu...edma... THAT SOUND LIKE A SCHOOL WORD! GIT 'EM BOYS!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man I sure wish I knew what this said.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Add to that: you expect people to read after getting repeatedly punched in the face? You can’t expect reasonable from people you’ve been unr

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unreasonable to... they just want to punch you back. A thing almost none of us are capable rising above. Even tho it’s our best interest!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"I not read good. But dis tell word 'American' so it must been compliment. So, Thanks! America! America!" -`mericans

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't blame the education system for willful ignorance

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea and I’m boston, one of the most well-educated cities in the world

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

In*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ahh, that’s unfortunate. You almost had it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well I don’t live in Boston so yea

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

boston doesn't live in Boston?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently it's always been controversial, Frederick Douglass criticised it. And it's just being moved. Removed implies discarding it.

5 years ago | Likes 685 Dislikes 24

Yeah, but why would the Post report accurately when it could just stir up some clickbait culture-war BS?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The original is a few blocks from my house here in DC. Slaves paid for it, but the committee that chose the design was 100% white.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

Moved to a more prominent position hopefully.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the ny post, nothing to see here, move along people. Giving them attention is what they are after

5 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 2

That right there is bait. That's what the NY Post deals in. It baits people into fighting each other.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Do you expect people on the Internet to care enough to actually read about it and find out it's not true?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He seemed proud of it in the speech he gave when it was unveiled: https://edan.si.edu/transcription/pdf_files/12955.pdf

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The npr article is so wildly biased and out of context with history they should be ashamed of printing it. The post.. has no shame...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The famous quote everyone cites to say Douglas was unhappy? It comes from him complaining about Grant not getting a statue too.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, moved to "storage". Out of sight, out of mind. It will eventually end up in the Smithsonian's "Failed Art Museum" along with ...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... Confederate flags and statues.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who finds it controversial, the KKK?

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 25

Frederick Douglass to name one.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 13

That would be false.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

He liked the idea of it but he said, "The negro here, though rising, is still on his knees and nude, What I want to see before I die -

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

-is a monument representing the negro, not couchant on his knees like a four-footed animal, but erect on his feet like a man." So he did -

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could see the objection to it. The kneeling implies subjugation. Even if they were appreciative it’s maybe not the best message for today.

5 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 15

It’s a symbol from abolitionist movement of the time.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It was used widely in letterheads.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Honestly them shaking hands would probably have made for a much better statue

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

Maybe Lincoln giving him a hand to stand up would've been a better image

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

That could then be seen as "The White Man helping the lesser Black man stand because they can't on their own" imagery of statues has to be-

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

very careful about things because they are going to be around a lot longer then the people with the correct context for them. -

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I can see it, it kinda has a "white saviour" vibe to it.

5 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 13

Whole white emancipator vibe

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

This

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Imma get down voted into oblivion, but if anyone is a "white savior" it's fuckin Lincoln.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Freed. Slaves. Literally. Commissioned. And. Paid. For. It.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 17

I assume some of them, not collectively. There might be some who don't like it.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

And? No one likes everything and everything shouldn't be liked, but anyone that says this is racist is just shamelessly virtue signaling.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Social. Norms. And. Opinions. Are. Not. Fixed. Points.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 9

What the fuck does that even mean in relation to what we're talking about?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

What the actual fuck though? Who are we to stay that its offensive to oppressed people when oppressed people commissioned it!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But he kinda was their saviour no? He literally abolished slavery. If whites can be blamed for enslaving, he hasto have credit for unslaving

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The problem is that in order for the white savior, you had to have the white oppressor. But there are no statues of that.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But isn't he supposed to be in the process of standing up, not kneeling?

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 3

It's meant to be this but it's not the first impression it gives unfortunately.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

anyone seeing that would think kneel. that's the issue. honestly, can't see how the original made it through concept.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The pose is not at all clear. That’s a big deal in art: you need to make sure your character’s gestures are very clear and immediately >

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

>obvious. Avoid the “vague silouette” problem where you can’t easily tell what it’s trying to convey.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes but it looks like kneeling. There’s no good way to show someone unkneeling in frozen statue

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are, pick a pose that doesn't make sense in only one way. An "inbetween resting poses" pose

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He is. But as a foreigner seeing this for the first time I thought he was a shoe cleaner. Lincoln could have been bending down and 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

I don't know... Maybe read the plaque before making uninformed judgements could be a thing.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

You know the saying, a picture says more than a thousand words. This is a bad picture. No matter what it symbolizes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

offer an arm or hand as support. Knowing what it is now I appreciate the statue but it could have been executed better. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

^that would have been a better interpretation. More symbolising a helping hand.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Frederick Douglas approved that specific monument.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

He dedicated t at the unveiling and then wrote a letter critiquing. I don't think he was on the board of western sanitary commission

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He was on the board that approved the *plan*, but when he saw the actual statue he was pretty annoyed.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Out of context. Seriously

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd be happy to learn the truth if I have it wrong, but you'll need to provide me with better historical evidence than "you're wrong"..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s false.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I could believe it, but would you mind providing any references?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wikipedia isn't a *primary source* or anything, but his includes some nuance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Memorial

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

> After delivering the speech, Frederick Douglass immediately wrote a letter to the editor of the National Republican newspaper in /

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And was critical of it: "The negro here, though rising, is still on his knees and nude...what I want to see before I die is a monument 1/

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

representing the negro, not couchant on his knees like a four-footed animal, but erect on his feet like a man." 2/

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Literally on the board that commissioned it.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

This article is wildly out of context... they should retract it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Also the monument was paid for by freed slaves.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

There’s also a ton of context being missed by us today that had a lot more meaning then in the composition of the piece.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A statue dedicated to Abraham Lincoln was commissioned via donation by former slaves, but they didn't decide what it looked like.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should really read that article above

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0