Question for people supporting ban on abortions

Jul 18, 2022 1:18 PM

Grogu007

Views

114910

Likes

1910

Dislikes

88

That is actually the Republican solution to everything “fuck you”

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

"Can't catch me that easy!" says the christofascist nutjob. "Making embryos outside the womb is a sin; those embryos deserve to burn!"

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Fuck me? Well that's exactly how we got in this mess in the first place

3 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 5

My wife just asked me if it's murder to have her period...

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Oh silly the correct GQP answer is neither - throw some books in the fire before leaving.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

"Thought experiments" don't work on people who do not think, and believe it's wrong to think.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You lost em at "thought experiment"

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I pick not living in the states because fuck that

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

If the people supporting bans on abortion could read, they’d be very upset. “fuck you” was because the person didn’t know what was written

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I feel like the obvious solution would be to throw a full gas can into the room and run.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even IF the fetus is the same as a human (it's not), I decide when to use my body to carry it. End of story.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Stop blotting out the identity of the evil.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

People don't need to be doxed. It accomplishes nothing other than to maybe force them to dig in their heels even further.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then how do I know it wasn’t a ghost account and the whole exchange staged for our liberal amusement?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Easy. Leave the kid and the embryos to burn and prosecute the parents and doctors for their crimes.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I find that thought experiments make people even angrier than the far more complex reality lol

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm bout to open a clinic in my state called "Abortions "R" Us" just to piss of all these inbred Bible bangers

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The abortionplex 2!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe buy a van and get that lettered on the side a d drive around. Mobile Abortion Clinic " Buy one, get one free"

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

another good one to ask these fuckwits. i can freeze an embryo for decades then produce a baby but what happens when i freeze a baby?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Why take out the names?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm honestly surprised that they don't say "Obviously, the jar". They hate children and are not interested in caring for them after birth.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I am 5000% sure this is the answer I'd get from the Republicans I know from work. '1000 viable embryos? That's way more than one kid.'

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the five year old is too stupid and lazy to run out of the burning building and expects someone to carry them, they deserve to die! /s

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Hey, kid, grab those embryos and let's go!"

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

As someone that did IVF, if it was a 5year old I'd grab them, but if it was a decrepit baby boomer I'd let them burn and grab my embryos.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Those are hella expensive to retrieve.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

You literally can

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Successfully?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is it ok if I just scream and run around in circles until my hair catches fire?

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Ah, the The Sims approach

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

in general, how does the pro life crowd feel about artificial insemination? I would assume that goes against "God's plan", re: infertility

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Logical consistency is not a component of pro-life argument from faith.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

that's kind of why I'm asking - hypocrisy or consistency

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

From my understanding, invitro is up on the chopping block next the be “abolished” by this theocracy.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a Christian, there’s no problem with invitro. Helps you get pregnant, who cares?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I tried this argument once. Guy completely missed the point and thought I was comparing fires with abortions. Not bright people.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

But... what?? He thinks people are aborting 5 year olds?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHEN LIFE BEGINS. THIS ARGUMENT IS A DISTRACTION. BODILY AUTONOMY IS NON NEGOTIABLE

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LIVE OFF A NON-CONSENTING HUMAN BEING'S BODY. THIS INCLUDES THE UNBORN

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

What about the unborn child’s bodily autonomy? The bodily autonomy argument can only stand by pre-supposing the non life of the fetus

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

It's a parasite. You are not required to be forced to save a life. No different than being forced to donate blood

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LIVE OFF A NON-CONSENTING HUMAN BEING'S BODY. THIS INCLUDES THE UNBORN

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

If a fetus was alive, I'd be able to claim it on my taxes.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

Fetuses are most definitely "alive", the disagreement is whether they are separate and unique persons.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You know what I meant.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Given the overall insanity of this subject, one can't make assumptions like that.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Ohhh that's a good idea...create a thousand embryos and claim them all as dependents...keep them frozen forever and a tax rebate every year.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Do I really have to take either? Can I just yell “BOOTSTRAPS!” in the doorway and make a run for it?

3 years ago | Likes 653 Dislikes 7

Nobody can stop you

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Hey. I just wanted you to know that you can't just say the word 'bootstraps' and expect anything to happen."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

TRICKLE DOWN!!!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, you do not have to. You have an inherent right of self-preservation. unless, I guess, you're a pregnant woman in the red US states

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I had no idea you posted here, Mitch McConnell.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, yell "THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS" instead

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, that's the proper conservative response.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we assume they're Republican, they'll just shout "but her emails!" and let the child die.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Found the Uvalde cop

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

They didn't go into the doorway though.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How. Dare. You. I said I’d yell in the doorway. That has to be at least State Trooper level.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

By christian logic, shouldn't we punish god for all the periods, miscarriages of fertilized eggs the body rejected

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Christians believe god can murder whoever the hell he wants because he's god and he's allowed to do that.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

This. It is even blasphemy and a sin to question the morality of God's killing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They want to get closer to God so they can murder all the people they want too. It's his mysterious plan after all.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

at what point does a woman lose the right to control whether a third party can user her body against her will?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

the correct answer is "never"; it makes no difference if the 3rd party is a virus, rapist, dying relative that needs a kidney or a fetus.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

she has the right to say no even if she may have previously consented. it is her body & she is the one that gets to decide.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I don't GAF when "life begins" - it is entirely irrelevant.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It will be interesting to see whether they extend the precedent to forced organ donations by compatible matches.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you can't even legally take organs from a dead body without the prior consent of the deceased. corpses have more rights than live women now.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The true Republican answer is save yourself and no one else

3 years ago | Likes 1285 Dislikes 8

"shoot the kid to shut them up" is also acceptable to a Republican

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The R probably started the fire and wouldn't want to rescue any witnesses

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A living child? The republican would be fine to just let them die. Like they do with all the school shootings.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The Republican answer would also depend on if the child is nonwhite

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

God's plan.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also "republican" you started the fire and locked the fire escapes. And will blame antifa somehow.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, the true republican answer is to throw furniture across the exit on your way out so that nobody else can escape.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I managed to escape. They said I couldn't do it. Nobody else did. It, you know, you know they say, it's, only the best people escape. I did.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was shoot the kid and get the embryos to Trump in case his covid acts up again

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah right? the scream wouldn’t have stopped them from running to the exit in the first place

3 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

But not before getting hand sanitizer and checking their phone.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dont be so sure - that could be a potential rape victim, if they're quick.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

[childrens screams have been redacted]

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They probably started the fire.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When questioned later they'll claim they tried to save them but a Democrat interfered and wouldn'

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The kid and the embryosshould pull themselves by the bootstraps

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And then complain about how the Dems didn't save that kid or the embryos.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

And tell the family they are in their thoughts and prayers.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

But also that this is not the time for fire safety legislation, as that would be politicizing the issue. Now is a time for unity.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

“I got mine!”

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait outside for 1hr before having someone else make a decision for you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t understand why the embryos don’t just stop being poor? Surely they could stay on a friend’s sofa for a while…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Beat me to it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeah, you set the fire after all and deaths will help to sell that it was an accident to insurance for the money.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

you're getting sued no matter which choice you make

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Unless you caused the fire...not in the slightest

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

save the baby, owners of the can sue you. save the can, babys parents sue you. save no one, errbody sues you. die - property owner sues fam

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're just a random person in this situation you're not beholden to do anything in this situation. Morally you should do something.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No the real Republican answer is rape the child and them tell everyone you saw a Democrat eating the embryos

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 3

Chef's kiss

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This comment should be edgy and overkill, how worrying is it that we all connect this so easily with typically republican behaviour

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Shouldn’t there be a gun and a certain amount of racism mixed in there some where?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

…Didn’t say how and what child.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Normally yes, but the smoke is rising and there isn't enough time

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

An armed black child, and mexican embryos? Is that ok?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2022 8:08 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2022 8:07 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2022 8:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

OK, the embryos are in a newly designed container that will allow them to develop. Are you going to let the 5yr old burn?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 20, 2022 12:56 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not gonna DV, but does that fusion deserve more rights than the mother?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wait until you learn how often viable embryos are miscarried without the women even knowing she was pregnant

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also, you're for aborting ectopic pregnancies, and any other where the embryo won't grow into a viable baby?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So the sperm and egg were dead cells before?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 20, 2022 1:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So it's not that "life" starts at conception, but individuality. So explain twins, are they one individual? Or a chimera, are they two?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My 10 month old son spent 2.5 years as an embryo in a freezer. Could you put a baby in a freezer for that long?

3 years ago | Likes 407 Dislikes 8

oh snap!!!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure, but it won't taste as good as a fresh one

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but they're better served fresh.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Could, yes. Should, no.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we find an embryo that's been in deep freeze for 35 years, we got ourselves a new President. Frozen Embryo 2024!

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Mafa. Make America fetus again.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not with the cost of electricity these days

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, that's just Texas electricity.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When he acts up you should threaten to put him back in

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

He’s been a literal angel so I’ll hold off on that for now ?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I would be so flexing like I was a Clone Commando from Star Wars if that was my backstory.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep, they keep pretty much indefinitely.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I hope you called him Fry ?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope, Quint

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Reverse Shark Attack

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unused footage from the original. It was a dream sequence for the shark, he felt bad for chomping Shaw

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

your kid is 40 months old according to republicans

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So is your child 10 months or 3.5 years? According to the right they should be talking and walking by now

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 Months. His brother, harvested (in embryonic sense) is 3 years and 3 months old, although they were fertilized the same day, mins apart

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

pretty sure you have to call him a toddler now. Hope he's walking he's almost 4

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Can he buy alcohol when he's 18.5?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it's actually not the freezing that's the problem, it's the thawing that kills.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s ice crystals shredding cell walls, it’s sorta both.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why you've got to use the defrost setting in the microwave. Keep it low and slow.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, not a live one...

3 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You can put a live one in, but you won't get a live one o ut

3 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

How fucking nice would it be if you wanted a night off from their bullshit and you could just freeze them for a day Sci-Fi style.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Ripley froze her cat when she went to LV-426. The future is coming.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Lister did just this.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would like to freeze myself on the chance the future might be brighter

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Brighter as in better, not as in nuclear bomb explosions

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats called The Grandparents' House

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That's not an option for everyone.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Freezing them isn't an option for anybody. If you can't make your own grandparents, though, store-bought is fine.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0