Thinking about the protests in Russia and Hong Kong

Aug 16, 2019 4:59 PM

Trowe

Views

141296

Likes

3988

Dislikes

154

Source: From Eddie Izzard's magnificent 1999 stand-up 'Dress to Kill'

Cake or death!?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 1

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 3

You must get up very early in the morning!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay, well what if we got invaded because we don't provide healthcare to our citizens? That's abuse through neglect. It's about sovereignty

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That's a big stretch, statistically incorrect, and hypocritical in a "stop oppressing us from oppressing our people" kind of way.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

One of the greatest stand-up performances of all time, imo.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Chinese gearing up for Hong Kong right now

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cake or death?

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

We're gonna run out of cake at this rate.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh! Didn't know that was an option. I'll have the cake.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

YOU SAID DEATH!!! AAAHHHHHH! Oh very well, give him cake. We're gonna run out of cake at this rate. Cake or Death?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

His diary must have looked odd. "Death, death death, shower. Death death death, quick lunch, death death death, afternoon tea."

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a fellow history enthusiast, I love Eddie Izzard!

6 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 6

Advocating war against China and Russia, sounds reasonable, we should listen to comedians and take action

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

He’s actually been working actively with the Labour Party for a minute and has been is the head of Labour’s National Executive Committee

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is from 1999

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

v

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

His ‘99 comedy special still holds up today.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I've invented a maneuver.

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

I never thought I'd see a four word post that could cause me to instantly crack up by pushing a well-hidden memory button with a long stick

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

what are you? a tank commander now?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's more of a gesture really.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I need the me maneuver!!

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Username of relevance

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know that a serious quote but has anyone see his Death Star skit https://youtu.be/7p5KpjR93SE

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You all know he’s running for mayor of London next year

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would you have the western nations instigate a nuclear holocaust over a political decision that was made decades ago?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Cake or death?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I live in Canada and anytime there’s a disaster the headlines are like “Canadian Man Killed In Earthquake” then in small print

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

“5,000 people dead”. I mean, at least it’s only one Canadian right? That’s all that matters. Not like we’re all human beings. /s

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Eddie Izzard +1, Executive Transvestite.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Funny I don't remember hearing this when we rescued the people from Saddam Hussein

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yeah! There's a successful war. Why don't you list the others: Nam, Afghanistan, .........

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Hitler never played RISK as a kid." LOVED "Dressed to Kill".

6 years ago | Likes 211 Dislikes 1

My 2nd favorite after ”Glorious”. ”It was always weird when your grandma called your granddad granddad. Like, what he’s your granddad too?!”

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can't get ze fuckin trees..DAMN!! I will kill everyone in the world.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Australasia that was the one!

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

hehehe.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I got a new idea I got a new idea I got a new idea nooo it's the same idea it's the same idea it's the same idea...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

hehehe.+1

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an all time best stand up performance. Izzard is such a great actor and comedian.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I saw him at The Pearl in LV years back. Crowd got a bit salty cuz he was goin' off on Dubya, who was still in office at the time. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You'd be surprised how conservative Nevada is. But I was laughin' my ASS off. I got a "I poked a badger with a spoon" t-shirt.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And Hopefully future mayor of London

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dressed To Kill, Definite Article, Glorious = The holy trinity

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Seconded!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Complain when US interferes, complain when they don't.

6 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 13

For once, the usa hasn't created this problem. They should keep it that way

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Just not invading random countries that happen to have oil would be a nice start.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

For the most part US interferes because of political/economic reasons, rather than humanitarian reasons. (1)

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Wah, wah, wah.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Foreign policy does not reduce to whether or not you should intervene or be isolationist, it's a complicated matter. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

'the US has to stop being the world police' ' ok we'll stop' 'USA... pls... help.....'

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Yah we stopped Hitler because he “killed some people next door”. This guy is about as profound as the rain/bathtub quote.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 18

It's a comedy routine done on stage. He's not trying to be profound. He's trying (successfully) to make people laugh.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I think he has a point.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hitler killed a lot of Austrians and Germans too...

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Definitely. Though nobody fought a war over that, it was technically the invasion of Poland that got shit rolling.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also the bit that anyone not in the Third Reich and not killed in the Final Solution would be a slave race.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not so much. No other countries really cared all that much until they were forced to by the war. We may care now; they didn't at the time.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not for the US though. Pearl Harbor is what got them off the couch and putting some pants on.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah, and the USA had a hard time to manage that the Japanese were successful with their attack.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you have a flag?

6 years ago | Likes 868 Dislikes 3

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

Whooooosh

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Le singe est sur la branche

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I still think about this special all the time. I can't see a scooter without thinking 'Ciao...'

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's my message tone

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Running jumping climbing trees, putting on makeup while you're up there

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Why? Are you mr Stevens ?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

No flag no country. These are the rules I have just made up.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

There's no one here!! Excuse me, excuse me.... There's no one here!!

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Scuse me do you have any food? Love all this, lovely idea.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Cake or death?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cake please.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry I'm afraid we've run out of cake

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wasn't expecting a rush, huh? Then I'll have the chicken.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alright, I’m putting this under top the comment because no one’s mentioning it. You all know he’s running for mayor of London next year

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Really?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, he has the labour head’s endorsement

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He’s always been pretty involved in politics but he got reputation a couple years ago for calling out Boris on why Breexit was a dumb idea

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Which you know his family is from Northern Ireland and he lived through the Troubles might have understood the steaks better then Boris

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No flag, no country. You can't have one!

6 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 0

Tell that to Sealand

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rules that i just made up

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

And I'm backing it up with this gun that was lent from the national rifle association

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Fun fact: they gave him a water pistol.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Put it down or else!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Or else what? You have a gun, I have gun, that guy who technically doesn't have a gun has a gun. If we all shoot each other, then we all die

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No flag, no country, according to these rules I've just made up.

6 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

You're from the nasty nati too!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And I’m backing it up with this gun

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

War. War never changes.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Pol Pot killed more than that and Stalin killed over than 10 million so Communism yeah! Put socialism in there too. Starving people.

6 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 57

Yeah, because capitalism hasn't killed anyone...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You’re an idiot. Get outa your own anus and look around. Socialism everywhere, often successfully.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Ussr population somehow raised continuously in his time, beside wwii.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Europe is socialist, and they federal workers arent waiting in line for a free meal.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

god damn bernie sanders and his free healthcare! He's gonna kill us all!

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Bernie is more right than swedens most right party

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Free? How naive are you?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

and it was those damn commies who eventually stopped pol pot, right?

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

Yes, but then again, a Nazi killed Hitler and we're not cheering for him.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 32

Not exactly. Pol Pot invaded Vietnam, and lost. More of a standard territory war rather than ideology. Communists were still in charge.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

ok but the fact remains that the Vietnamese communists were the ones who overthrew Pol Pot, whatever their motivations may have been.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I'm not here to argue about communism or make any statements about the OP, I'm just here to say that "DarthDragon7" is factually incorrect.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Republicans aren't stupid, they're liars.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 25

not an either/or. They can be both.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Democrats are both.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 14

Yup! overrated. your insult game is weak.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Once again, communism is when the workers control the means of production. The USSR (and China) just called themselves communist 1

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because it sounded better than totalitarian regime. I mean look at North Korea. See how bad a Democratic Republic is. 2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same with the word Socialist. Second, social programs, or even a social democracy, is not the same as total socialism. What's being3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

portrayed is two different meanings of the same word being passed of as the same to keep period from wanting to tax the rich to help 4

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the masses. The "socialism" we want in America is not the same "Socialism" they had in China and Russia. But you're being told they are.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"You pretend to pay us and we pretend to work."

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. We own the company so we paid what we earn - not the CEO et. al.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t know who this “We” is. Several US institutions despised it. Hell we fought several proxy wars to stop the spread of their ideology

6 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 39

I'm pretty sure Eddie Izzard is British

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stopping the spread of their ideology is a far cry from stopping them. Stalin was free to do whatever he wanted as long as he stayed in 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 his own back yard and the US could keep up in the arms race. Start to do more than that, that's where we have a small problem.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And how many dictatorship did the US gov either support or installed in the power? It never was/is about helping.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It’s a stand up comedy routine. We is humanity as a whole.

6 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Oh thanks for the context.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Proxy wars being the key. If they really cared they’re put their own necks on the line, out in the open. Not fighting thru a third party.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

As long as we didn't directly go all in, we could try to keep the USSR from going all in. If both went all in, you may have had nuclear war.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

America fought to prevent the spread of communism and to protect capitalism. If some lives got saved in the process then that was simply 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Icing on the cake. You only need to look to South and Central America and see the sorts of regimes the US supported to understand this. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

All for some bananas.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is also one of the stronger argument for accepting the asylum seekers. The US is to blame for the conditions they're fleeing.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They wanted their own puppet governments they didn't give a shit about the ideology. It was about "broad spectrum dominance"

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 8

How is having any far weaker ally any different than a puppet government? Suggesting there is much of a difference is naivety of geopolitics

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Better a fascist dictator than a democracy that could turn communist.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

This dictatorship is brought to you by the land of the free.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Most of those proxy wars supported brutal dictatorships disguised as “ideologically democratic”.

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

Panama anyone?

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

what about papers?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I am talkjng about Noriega, and yes I know U.S. invaded Panama in 1989 to depose him, after they helped him to power in the first place.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

it's the guys you were fighting in vietnam who eventually stopped pol pot. pretty sure the us indirectly supported him

6 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 8

Bombing Columbia during the Vietnam war definitely didn't help anything at all.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

The hmong? They were specifically trained by the US to fight NVA

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The more you read about the Vietnam War and the origins of the Conflict the less justified the US' involvement becomes. Which also epxlains

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*explains why none of my history classes ever went into the fine details of what led us to get involved in the Vietnam War.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

that sounds like any history class

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we fucked up from the get go by supporting the French. Ho Chi Minh asked us to help him set up a western style democracy, but the...

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

French wouldn't give sovereignty, and we wanted to keep them happy so they'd continue to NATO. Then when he went to the communists for...

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

help, there was no way we could be on his side while leading the fight against the spread of communism.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I wish the US were to stop giving a shit about allies and other countries(unless we do it for the reason I think we might.)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It's crazy that they fought off france, america, then overthrew pol pot, and then fought off china. crazy country

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Hmong, love these folks

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nah, it was the Communist Government of Vietnam that ended Pol Pot. And what did they get? Sanctions!

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

something else to think about

6 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 26

Ironic considering MLK managed to spearhead the greatest social change this country has ever seen yet I’ve never heard this mans name.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tl;dr a prominent member of the american civil rights movement in the 1960s

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kind of a dumb thing to say, since King was highly influential.

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

And was assignated

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Nigga what

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m gonna assume you’re stroking out and meant assassinated. Just like Lincoln. And JFK.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is a dumb comment because the quote said nothing about Kings influence.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

the quote was made during the struggle when it was nowhere close to clear that King would "win."

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which quote are we talking about here, the one i posted or the one in the OP?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes it did, it said nonviolence wouldn't work. But it did!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's almost like America has a conscience and DID change XD

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The millions of dead or displaced in the Middle East probably disagree with you.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The quote is from the mid-60s. I think he was wrong about how little of a conscience the US had. I also think Kings nonviolence has been

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

overplayed by history. There was a lot of rioting and activity going on in the background as well, as there was with Ghandi.

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Ghandi was a nazi sympathizer who molested women, he's hardly relatable

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Really. Ghandi doesn't have anything to do with King. Do tell us more.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We still fighting the same fight today...

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

What? Instead of segregation, blacks now have special privileges, like affirmative action. And no institutional barriers at all.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can't tell if you're being serious or not...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, those are facts.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not quite the same, no, unless you claim literally no progress has been made from the start of the Civil Rights Movement to today.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

saying we've made progress does not make it a different fight, I think

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No.....not even sort of, or do you see the fire hoses being turned on black protesters that I don't?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the Voting Rights Act of 1965 did not in fact end the fight against Jim Crow laws, literacy tests and poll taxes, we've got issues.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

right cause Dr. King didn't achieve anything. You people say one thing about history and out comes the socialist anti-american quotes XD

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

I'm asking you to think of this in the context of Russia and China, not reflect on whether it worked 50 years ago in a different country

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's called being 'edgy'

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

right my bad XD

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Ironic considering MLK Jr. leaned socialist economically, by his own admission.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

but not anti-American he never trucked with the part of his followers that hated the country

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll bet you ten Stanley nickels, you don't have a clue what socialism actually is.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's when you talk to people at parties and stuff.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I'll bet you 1500 unicorns or 500 leprechauns that that you're making a huge ass assumption that is meant to deride and not at all (1)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

meant to have an actual debate. That your comment is useless trolling to cover what is likely a hardcore inferiority complex (2)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i'm all ears...please by all means..cut and paste the Wikipedia definition of socialism...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So....you respond a month later with what? assuming my understanding of socialism is wikipedia based? bold strategy XD

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and for the record, the man quoted? avowed socialist hence why I called him one, he identified that way (3)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simplifying it that much is a disservice. Look at the reaction every time America DOES intervene in another country. It's a tricky position.

6 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 13

Sir, this is a McDonalds drive thru

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

This ain't the old days, guys. Many of the bad guys got the wherewithal to turn the earth into a smoking cinder . Gotta tread carefully.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This post literally robbed me of 10 IQ points. It’s that dumb.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I son't think you can afford to lose them.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I son’t think you’re in any position to make that judgement.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Of course I,m not. Why would that stop me.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How many times have they put in more than a token effort and not had ulterior motives though? Genuinely asking - I can't think of much.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Imagine if Hitler had access to Nukes. Do you think he woulda gone quietly in his bunker. Can't afford to poke the wounded bear any more.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sir, once again, this is a McDonalds drive thru.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Contrary to a popular belief, US is not the only country in the world. There's around 200. Besides, US "intervening" often means invading.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 22

Meh, just look at the budget spent for the military. It's easier to ask help to one instead of organizing a coalition of more countries.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok I'd love to hear your idea of what other countries will intercede against china and what that intervention looks like. Because (1)

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

sanctions didn't exactly help the Ukraine now did it? (2)

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But what country would step up when they all expect US to do it plus what country would China even listen to

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

pretty much America and Russia....unless the UN got some teeth magically and Europe as a whole acted....even then not much

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just for the sake of conversation, how do you propose the US or any other of the 199 countries help with the China situation?

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Evacuation and asylum - but seeing how we've been dealing with that, good luck.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the Andaman sea. That would be feasible, then wait and see what the mainlanders do when the economy shrinks (2/2)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's actually a well thought out idea! I think the economic consequences world-wide would prevent it from happening though unfortunately.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sanctions. UN should provide security. Would be a start.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

UN providing "security" is not an invasion how? and Frankly? Sanctioning China getting them to change? lots a luck

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Got any better ideas buddy?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Wont work, China has Veto power along with Russia, france, UK and the US

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Glad someone here has a brain. +1

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's an odd concept. Vetoing your own sanction. "We're going to do this it you don't stop" "no"

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Economic sanctions, and a naval embargo of oil shipments and fishing trawlers heading to china by means of the Philippine sea and (1/2)

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The US is currently trying to stop oil shipments to China but Iran is still selling it to them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Economic sanctions raaaaarely work, I mean crap look at our sanctions on Russia and the Ukraine still happened. Also an naval embargo?(1)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that's.....a literal act of war O.o (2)

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What do you suggest will work (and remaining idle is not an option since Taiwan will be next)?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3