Republicans hate democracy

Jan 31, 2022 12:36 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

103309

Likes

1426

Dislikes

69

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/30/georgia-county-purges-democrats-from-election-board-and-cancels-sunday-voting

I'd really hope these were the Republican death throes, but it's been like this for centuries. :(

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 0

Governance without representation leads to very ugly things. Somebody should remind those fuckwits.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where are the 2nd amendment peeps? Is this not the fantasy they seek?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fun Fact: Since 1988, the Republicans have won the popular vote for president ONCE (in 2004), they cannot win by majority, they know this.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I thought these people had to be voted in how the hell are they allowed to kick other members out?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They didn't?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

There's no democracy in America

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We have more democracy than Belarus.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Republicans are the only party that wants it to be illegal to vote.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

And dems arent stopping it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

they only want white people to vote.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Republicans are fucking cowards

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Time for the.......

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And they are allowed to do it, that "each state on their own" bullshit is what makes some people think America deserves what is happening.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 1

"Get assistance jumping out of window" -Putin

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

This is the way...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remind me why in 233 or so yrs we as a nation have no laws to against this?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Republicans make it legal. Then they systematically rig everything to make it impossible to do any good in this world.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because you guys idolized your constitution even though it makes no sense in modern times

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At this point, I'm starting to think voting isn't gonna solve much in 2024.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We need to vote even harder. Yes, they are cheating, but we have to make our numbers count.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why are "judges" allowed to select new "judges"? Why are they not elected or appointed? Why are seats reserved for parties? Just askin'.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We weren't even supposed to have political parties in the first place.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For balance. The FCC for example has a split of 3 majority party and 2 minority party heading it, this way the agency isn't fully controlled

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

by whoever is the majority party. In this case, the judges in question normally flipped a coin and whoever won had someone from that party

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

be selected. The law changed so that it came down to a vote by the county judges and the vote was won by the republicans.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is effectively Authoritative. They are Nazi's in every sense of the word. How would they like it if Republicans were purged to vote?

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

No votes were purged, they just cancelled Sunday voting.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Let's try it, im down.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

"How would you like it" isnt going to stop them

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They should be tried for treason, betraying the Constitution is a serious act.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Your constitution is a joke and needs to be modernized. Your country is falling apart these words on a paper wont fix it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You think the GOP gives a shit about the constitution?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Why? They don't represent their people. What republicans are on the fence? Democrats? Whose mind needs changing?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Soo how about the UN comes in to supervise elections and bring in democracy....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mad about this? Get involved with Stacy Abrams' voting rights organization, Fair Fight: https://fairfight.com/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When does the violence start?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We had a good run. Well actually we didn't, but I was overconfident in our ability to fight against fascism.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

WHAT THE FUCK!? I'm not giving up that easily!

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Fight for your democracy. Whatever it takes. Once it’s gone, it’s gone.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You should start fight them for real. Confront, harass, shame them. Personally, not virtually.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that America was so chill with fascism when Germany was doing its thing should have been telling about the future problems.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It wasn’t “chill”. Geopolitics is complicated. Taking an economic stand against the human rights abuses is what got US dragged into the war.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There were an awful lot of unpunched Nazis wandering around the country at that time.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok seriously, it's time to start arming for war. This is so blatantly corrupt, these fuckers need a bullet to the head.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What is happening to this country holy shit

4 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

My fear is we won’t be able to get out of this peacefully

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fascism.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Republicans.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

What *happened*. Bush v Gore was ultimately when this happened.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

The exact thing that was always going to happen after Republicans enacted their Southern Strategy

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hunter called it years ago

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

He checked out at the right time.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 17

The 3/5 compromise was also how they, well, compromised on the voting issue

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"Ankh-Morpork had dallied with many forms of government and had ended up with that form of democracy known as One Man, One Vote.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"The Patrician was the Man; he had the Vote." -- Terry Pratchett, Mort

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is plainly false

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The antebellum South, slavery and the EC suck to varying degrees. But that quote is inaccurate US history.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

...well, no. The 3/5ths Compromise was the solution at the time.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It was instituted by the framers of the constitution, so your "quote" is rather misleading with the use of the phrase "during slavery"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The founding fathers all owned slaves.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And slavery still exists today. Just saying that "during slavery" is vague.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree that the Electoral College needs to go, but what that guy says is completely wrong. Don't spread misinformation to score points!

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 6

Except he is pretty spot on. 3/5th compromise and all that (Although that also applied to the house of reps and not only to the EC).

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

Exactly, it was the 3/5 compromise how they solved the voting issue

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

And the 3/5ths compromise factors into the Electoral College. So he's still right.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

He's still right, but not fully correct

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Right. The US Senate was the solution... that and the 3/5 rule to get more representation in the House.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

…..so the solution existed prior to the problem?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, the slave states knew they would be outnumbered by the North and wouldn't ratify the Constitution otherwise

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't forget the US Senate... the slave states would never have ratified a Constitution that didn't give them veto power over civilization.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nah, Virginia was the most populous state at the time, other states wanted a check on that.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

293K of which were slaves. Without them, it is the same population as PA... So, basically, the state was a crime against humanity.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah it was something else. We weren't much better across the river in Maryland, mind.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The senate was proposed by a northern state though

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The idea of the Senate was proposed by Madison (from VA)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He understood that the most populous states would railroad legislation through if there wasn’t a mechanism for small states to slow them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean rule by majority? Heaven forbid! They might have made slavery illegal. What monsters!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wE aRe a RepUbLiC NoT a dEmOcrAcY

4 years ago | Likes 431 Dislikes 6

Hahaha spot on.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Big oof

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

https://thebaffler.com/latest/were-a-republic-not-a-democracy-burmila My favorite response to that bullshit

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Ed Burmila is great. He has gin and tacos on Facebook and the Mass for shut ins podcast.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was an amazing article, thank you.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what Madison calls a republic is what every other country calls representative democracy? Why does America insist on being non-standard?

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

We're the manic pixie dream girl country. "Lol, so random!"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... *holds up spork*

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Surprise we are actually hybrid of both be we are a Democracy Republic. But Republicans dont like to be called a Democracy because

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

People are downvoting me because they hate hearing the truth but here. https://act.represent.us/sign/democracy-republic

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its close to sounding like we are Democrats and that pisses them off

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They'll be happy to know the US is classified as a flawed democracy, and trending down.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A republic is a kind of democracy, it's just not a DIRECT democracy.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

And there are very very few direct democracies. Off the top of my head, Switzerland is the only country that comes close.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Eeerrg... "republic" is where the state derives its authority from and "democracy" describes the participation in the political process. A >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

republic can be a democracy or it can have no democracy (like Conducius ideal statesman: 'Ruling on behalf of the people, not on the whim

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

of the people'). A non-republican state would, for example, be a classical monarchy, where power is not derived from popular sovereignity,>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is also the wrinkle of different definitions of republic. In the sense of systems of government it means having an elected head of 1/

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

state (often called a president but not necessarily so). In the classic more philosophical sense it means a country where the supreme 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

authority is the law, not the government. For example, Canada is not a republic by the former (non-elected, hereditary head of state 3/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily a democracy at all.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

re·pub·lic /rəˈpəblik/ -noun- a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's a very poor definition you found yourself there. The Peopls REPUBLIC of North Korea, and it is a republic. Get a better source.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Case in point: The Democratic Peoples' Republic of Korea is technically all those things while being a Dictatorial Necrocracy.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

in theory sad to admit in our current climate

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, dictionaries are descriptive not prescriptive. Use something with a little more depth and nuance. Strictly speaking a republic...1

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1