Get Learnt 22

Sep 21, 2020 11:32 PM

screaminmeemees

Views

130076

Likes

5393

Dislikes

93

The general idea of traveling faster than the speed of light comes from John W. Campbell's 1931 novel 'Islands of Space' in which a device called a warp drive is used to travel throughout space. This idea of "warp speed" was popularized in other science fiction writings, most notably in the Star Trek series, and quickly became a well known concept to the general public.

But it's just a work of fiction right?

WELL

Over the past few decades, scientists have been hard at work trying to prove otherwise. And while we still can't say for sure quite yet, there's been tons of proposed methods on how we might be able to achieve light speed.

So hang on to your photons and tell physics to go fuck itself as we take a look at some of these theoretical machines and how they might help us beat the laws of the Universe harder than a red headed step-child

Now there's A LOT of complex information when it comes to this subject, but I'll try to make this shit as easy to understand as I can.

To start things off, in order to better understand how and why these concepts actually work you need to know a few things about space, time, and velocity

so grab a Capri-Sun and tighten your tard harnesses kids, you might actually learn something.

The speed of light in a vacuum (space) is 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers) or roughly 670,616,629 mph (1,079,252,848 kph). At this speed, you could travel from the Earth to the Sun in roughly 8 minutes, or around the Earth 7.5 times in a single second, which I'm pretty sure is too fast for your body to even shit itself in surprise.

Now when it comes to the idea of traveling at/near the speed of light, it's important to understand the quantum nature of our Universe and how the various forces work together. In fact, the "speed of light" is less about light, and more about the speed part.

When measuring a force, what you're really measuring is the effect of an electromagnetic field. Thanks to the Lorentz transformations, a set of equations in relativity physics that relate space, time, and velocity together, these measurements will be consistent. Einstein would later find that the Lorentz transformation tells us that length, time, and mass depend on the relative motion of the observer; and that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant and independent of the motion of the observer or source.

This is the Special Theory of Relativity, which leads us to the next topic:

Time Dilation

The toddler-grade image above shows how a spaceship traveling at the speed of light experiences time much slower than a person observing them from the ground. Time Dilation is a little difficult to wrap your head around, so if none of this makes sense just leave Special Relativity a bad Yelp review and bully Einstein off Twitter

So according to Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity, time can speed up or slow down depending on how fast you're moving relative to something else. For example, if you traveled away from the Earth at the speed of light, you would experience time about 60% slower than someone observing you.

This distortion of time is called Velocity Time Dilation and has actually been recorded to occur with astronauts at the International Space Station, albeit at much smaller magnitudes, with some experiencing time 20 milliseconds slower than people on Earth.

Dilation can also occur as Gravitational Time Dilation. The more gravitational force present the slower time goes by, with less force speeding time up. Astronauts on the ISS also experience this as well; As their velocity slows time down, their decrease in gravitational force speeds it back up

you know, just not enough to fully counteract their velocity dilation.

So in the lamest of terms:

Higher relative velocity = slower time

Higher relative gravitational force = faster time

In order for a spaceship to achieve light speed, it would have to rely on the manipulation of mass in some form or another. Photons make up light and have 0 mass, which allows them to move at their speed. So for a ship WITH mass to achieve light speed, some weird shit's gotta happen

And with that, let's check out some proposed methods

Alcubierre Drive

Proposed by Miguel Alcubierre in 1994, this warp drive concept proposes changing the geometry of space itself by creating a wave that would cause the fabric of space ahead of the spacecraft to contract and the space behind it to expand. In the center, the ship would then ride the wave inside a bubble of flat space called a "warp bubble". Within this bubble, passengers would experience no true acceleration or forces.

This method would theoretically allow for faster than light travel, and due to the warp bubble of flat space present, variables such as time dilation wouldn't affect the passengers the same way they would with other methods of light speed travel.

However, the Alcubierre Drive has ran into its fair share of problems, the main one being fuel.

While the amount of fuel needed isn't considered unobtainable anymore, it's still a lot. For most proposed methods of light speed travel, the biggest issue is the amount of fuel needed to operate. Because of this, it's suggested that these devices require exotic matter for fuel. Exotic matter are hypothetical particles and states of matter that defy current laws, such as having negative mass.

One proposed form of exotic matter is dark energy / dark matter, which may provide gravity repulsive negative mass. This could work, but only if the negative mass behaves the way the Drive requires it to.

Krasnikov Tube

Proposed by Sergei Krasnikov in 1995, A Krasnikov tube is a method for space travel involving the warping of spacetime into permanent superluminal tunnels. This would create a wormhole with the endpoints displaced in time as well as space. The Krasnikov tube would be several light-years long and allow for a return trip that takes travelers back to the time right after they left.

This allows for speeds close to that of light

In the image above, we see that by the time a ship on a 1.5 year flight through the tube arrives at the end, 1,500 years have gone by on Earth. However, going BACK through the tube on another 1.5 year flight puts the ship only 3 years in the future; the exact amount of time spent traversing the tube. If no tube is used to return, the time passed on Earth doubles.

Make sense?

Similar to the Alcubierre Drive, the Krasnikov Tube encounters a problem when it comes to its fuel, as it would require much more advanced technology as well as exotic matter.

There's also another issue.
In theory, if a ship created a tube from point A to point B, and rather than return through it, created ANOTHER tube back, C to D, the two instances could be used as a time machine, allowing travel from the past to the future and vice versa.

Helical Engine

The most recently proposed on this list, the Helical Engine is a concept created by David Burns in 2019. The engine is designed to work by exploiting the way mass can change at relativistic speeds, most notably speeds near that of light. The engine itself would use no fuel, have no moving parts, and instead would contain loop-shaped structures shaped like springs that contained ions.

The idea is that if the mass of weight increases in one direction, it would create a greater push in that direction, generating thrust.

Now according to the principle of the Conservation of Momentum, this shouldn't be possible because without external forces, things remain constant

Unfortunately, Special Relativity doesn't give a fuck.

In Special Relativity, objects increase in mass as they reach light speed. This would manipulate the ions into circling around their spring shaped container, losing mass on one side while gaining it on the other. In theory, the Helical Engine should be able to achieve 99% light speed.

BAM, propulsion.

But of course, there are issues. Firstly, the input to output ration of energy required is extremely poor. It could work in the vacuum of space but there's no telling how well it'll perform yet. Secondly, a lot of David's math hasn't been fully examined by experts, so there's bound to be an oopsie or two.

If anything, the groundwork has been laid for the progression of this technology. So we're sure to see updates in the future.

Black Hole Starships

Strangely, this concept seems like the most infeasible on the list but it's still an idea with work behind it so tah-dah.

First discussed in science fiction, notably in the book Imperial Earth by Arthur C. Clarke in 1975, the concept of a Black Hole Starship involves the formation and utilization of a black hole for energy.

The concept was discussed in 2009, where the idea of a parabolic reflector used to deflect Hawking radiation from the black hole was suggested. While the idea was found to be very close to possible, unknown quantum gravity effects could either make it possible, or entirely impossible.

Using a black hole as energy would be remarkably efficient, the only issue is how to obtain one. Generating a black hole, while a massive undertaking, doesn't require any new physics.

And it’s not like the black hole would have to be large at all. It’d actually only be 0.9 attometers in radius which, take my word for it, is fuckin’ small as fuck.

According to researchers, a black hole to be used in space travel needs to meet five criteria:

1) Has a long enough lifespan to be useful
2) Is powerful enough to accelerate itself up to a reasonable fraction of the speed of light in a reasonable amount of time
3) Is small enough that we can access the energy to make it
4) Is large enough that we can focus the energy to make it
5) Has mass comparable to a starship

How we'd get a black hole, contain it, and use Hawking radiation as propulsion is still way up in the air. But funny enough, the idea seems to be almost possible.

Unfortunately, this thing is only theorized to go around 10% the speed of light.

Which is STILL fast

just not fast enough

Well look at that, you actually managed to read this to the end you huge fucking winner

In the end, I guess we can’t travel at light speed

YET

So don’t give up hope, we’ll get there some time. Just, you know, LONG after you and I are dead.

boo

I know the world isn't too fun to exist in right now, so hopefully I was able to pull you from your mortal hell for just a few minutes.

Take it easy and stay safe out there

Until next time my dudes

===================================================================================

Check out my other Get Learnts if you love SCIENCE!
https://imgur.com/user/screaminmeemees/favorites/folder/3979605/get-learnt-collection

Through blackest day,
And blackest night.
I'll post some science,
'Cause this shit's tight.
Make your day?
Well bitch I might.
The time is nigh,
Get Learnt tonight!

Thanks for the interesting read

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

“So hang on to your photons and tell physics to go fuck itself” really got me good.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Hang onto your photons and tell physics to go fuck itself" is my new favorite science line. Thank you for this.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where we're going, we don't need eyes to read about honest attempts to circumvent the light speed barrier. Thanks!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

how will any of these impact causality?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They all break causality. If you require that physics makes sense (is causal) for all observers, you naturally find FTL impossible.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Unfortunately, Special Relativity doesn't give a fuck" ?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

"That means Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space. Now! Serviceman Burnside! What is Newton's First Law?"

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Couldn't we possibly use your mom's gravity well positioned in front of the ship to create the necessary acceleration?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

the Alcubierre drive is actually pretty close to how the mechanics of warp drive in Star Trek function

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 5

Oh I laughed til I cried. Perfect.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ahhhhh. There it is.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Beat me to it. Nice.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Nice.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Tldr, I'll accept this gif as the only explanation needed.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Related to the Helical Drive: There's a neat paper on movement by deformation https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1081406

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wasn't it shown that the measured thrust was basically the cables interacting with Earth's magnetic field?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was the Cannae Drive iirc. The linked paper isn't about the Helical Drive, btw, but rather about a neat property of curved space-time.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But can the Kessel run be done in less than 12 parsecs?

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Break the physics and we can do anything.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That’s not a thing, though..

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Physics is just human understanding and our calculation of objective reality. There are still unknown unknowns. Perception is subjective

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Agreed. It’s just that new understanding improves physics. It doesn’t break it. IMO anyway...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed. I would interpret the original comment as "breaking" a law and not physics as a whole.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

So, turtles all the way down?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

*my tortoise agrees*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*oh wait nvm he just had to poop*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or we bribe the aliens with free tacos if they teach us the secrets.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

But what if we learn first, are the aliens, and get free space tacos

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Larry Niven's "Known Space".

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ooooo... good idea!!!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good read, still hoping to bone aliens

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What I never understood with FTL travel, is how do we travel faster than any capability of detection. At that speed, a grain of sand 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's why the ships in Star Trek have the glowy deflector dishes on front. They provide a 'bow wave' sorta that moves stuff out the way

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That, and space is so big that even finding a grain of sand would be highly unlikely as most of it is completely empty.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

will have enough energy to blow up half of the ship. And we can't possibly detect everything from here. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What would an impact even look like at that speed? Would the grain of sand just get vaporized? Would is punch a straight grain sized hole?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would blow a large portion of the ship clean off. For reference, eraser size debris at 15k mph https://i.redd.it/mw4l9zm847i21.jpg

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the impact size being that of a grapefruit. Now if you scale the speed up to near-lightspeed or faster, you can scale the Impact even more.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is the quality shit post Imgur needs more off. v

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To reach lightspeed we would need infinite amount of energy. It would me more viable bend spacetime to travel than actual propulsion

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not to mention that lots of places in lightyears are pretty fucking far, so it will still be quite long to certain places. Bending can help

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i think my favorite would be the half sphere around the sun, pushed by solar radiation, pulled by gravity, slowly accelerating the sun

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Are you referring to a Dyson Sphere?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not FTL.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh. Right. I got too focused on space zoomies

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds like a fucking terrifying spaceship!!!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plowing through planetary systems, freezing or incinerating planets or tearing them apart with tidal forces... a "death star" if you will...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

... though I'm not sure you wouldn't just end up with a titanic solar sail that produced zero stellar acceleration.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Look up a fusion candle drive for a smaller example on the scale of, say, Jupiter. Watch the turns, she doesn't corner for shit.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sure, just need a rocket with infinity +1 power and fuel.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Let's not underestimate the amount of fuel. You would need it all, plus some.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Infinite power would be required and that just does not exist in the known universe.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Details schmetails. If you get all the needed fuel to me, I'll arrange the power system.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I find that source, I will come to you first. We'll make a fortune!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the sky is the limit! .. well.. actually no. The sky is just a point of origin, with no limits

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You just need a way to make power from stupidity, plug it online and voila. Infinite power. Scotty we need more power, throw in flat earth

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Captain, ship can’t handle that much, we are already feeding Obama birth facts to it.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh man, if we could harness power from stupidity the world would be an amazing place! Think of the technological advancements!!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yes, fully automated TV chairs that get you perfectly cooked hod dog just by thinking it, Fox News and 4chan at same time.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#1 Lot of poepel say the Alcubierre requires Two Circles : one in front and one in back

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

#2 Antimatter engines

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the new more efficient design. The one shown above is the original version, which was later proven to be impossible.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow, you put a lot of time and effort into this. Thank you. I believe FTL will be possible but not with existing thinking. We will evolve.

5 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 11

We need matter/antimatter annihilation drives first. Fuel cost will always be the primary issue with FTL travel.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To keep the speed of light you’d need so much energy that it will transform into mass. You’ll end up having infinite mass. So, impossible.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not really convinced, since there's stuff like causality. Lack of FTL isn't a huge issue of you have longevity, though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

46 and 2 just ahead of me

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We will evolve IF the planet doesn't snuff us out first

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You think AI will play a role?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In some way, yes. Perhaps even, if I dare suggest, a hybrid.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like man/machine? Aren’t there a hypothesis out that suggests this as humanity’s only possibility of survival?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A human brain integrated into a 'Robot'. A Cyborg. Yes, the theory has been around for decades, of course.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This has also been suggested as the solution to the problem of batteries: Hybridize biological organisms with technology to act as a 1/

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Depends on what you mean by AI.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dunno.. A singularity? Or a digital augmentation of the human intellect? Or something else?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the issue with a question like this, how should anyone have any kind of opinion on it when you can't even define the question?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s an open question. If you think any kind of AI would play a role, be welcome to share. If not, then the answer is no.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is an SF short story on this. Famous author. Super super computer trying to find the ultimate question. Can't recall it yet though ..

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Will it be distinguishable from just assembling some atoms into a spaceship?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I don't believe it will but I still believe we have a good chance at colonizing the galaxy. I think with increase life spans and some

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2) biotech we mind individually see the destination of our trip. But even at light speed it takes 100k years to cross the milky way

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To paraphrase Arthur C Clarke, 'It will be magic"

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Thats what i think, too. People thought flight was impossible, being faster than sound, leaving earth, landing a human on the moon....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yup. Also don't preclude the possibility of achieving. Version of immortality in our lifetimes. That would change a lot.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

It would change a lot but immortality will not happen in our lifetimes. Our life expectancy may increase but it will not be infinite.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're more confident than the phd physicist I was talking to yesterday about this. Why do you say so?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You just happened to be talking to someone yesterday with a PHD in physics and they just happened to be talking about something not at 1/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

all related to their field? In the interest of conversation; we cannot cure the most common of diseases/viruses. Until that happens, 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Interesting line of thought.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Digitizing our consciousness would be a step in the right direction.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We would need to tread with caution. I fear this kind of knowledge would be very bad in the wrong hands

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most proposals for that mean copying the mind, not actually transferring consciousness. The observer that is you would still die, and a

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

different observer would experience a brain like yours but digitized.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I recently had a whole argument with a friend about this. He was of the opinion that consciousness is bound to the physical brain (1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And can't be transferred at all. I disagree very much with him.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But what if you hit something?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

In the immortal and sagacious words of Albert Einstein, "Don't."

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Doesn't the possibility make FTL impossible from the get-go, or maybe only possible outside solar systems? Even then...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I saw a show where it was claimed that ships needed a shield that was able to withstand a nuke. Byt one could claim if the spaceships a la

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Star Trek was possible they would have a perfect dodge ability

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that's what the deflector is for in the first place. But I could be wrong.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Deflector?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's exactly what the main deflector dish is for. It's basically a cattle scoop for interstellar debris.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

its also a ram scoop iirc, gathers up space dust to be turned into the matter part of the M/AM reaction and replicator fuel

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then it's gonna be a short trip.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Do you want an Event Horizon? Because that's how you get an Event Horizon!

5 years ago | Likes 286 Dislikes 4

I won’t ever forget the first time I walked through a tunnel like this I nearly vomited.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even when you know it's an illusion and tell this to your brain it is still hard to stand or walk.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes! I don’t even get motion sick, but taking 3 steps into that did me in. It’s fascinating how that works!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We'll send in the Doom Slayer first.

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

Rip. And tear.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Until it is done.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Walking across that platform would make you feel drunk. Also quite difficult to do backwards without holding onto the railing. There's a

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

place in Edinburgh called Camera Obscura that has something almost identical to it, it's pretty cool.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yes so cool

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The Toronto Science Centre had one a while back too. Super trippy! But just close your eyes and you're fine. Or ripping them out works too!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

do you see? DO YOU SEE?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes I see. - *starts the detonation*

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What is that?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Trailer: https://youtu.be/OVlnER8SxfQ

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Scene from Event horizon. Worth a watch

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

A movie you should watch!

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

A scene from Event Horizon

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Great movie.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Liberate vosmet ex inferis

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

(unspeakable horror) ... "we're leaving"

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Save us we are in hell ?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In the movie I think he says "Liberate tuteme ex inferis."

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He does. But it's grammatically incorrect. Liberate is plural, tuteme (a rare term, too) is singular. It should eiter be 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

libera temet or liberate vosmet. I chose the latter because he's speaking to everybody and not just one person. German Wikipedia

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Save yourself from hell.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is actually a theorie that Event horizon is a prequel of Warhammer universe.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

I thought that was pretty much canonized by Games Workshop.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Explain

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And in addition to my other comment, it would be completely plausible because that's just the very beginning of warp travel. Other stuff too

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Think about it, it's a flying space cathedral of a ship that takes faster than light shortcuts through hell. It's basically 20k.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

In event horizon they went through a wormhole without a gellar shield allowing all the horrors of the warp to come in.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Shorter version: No.

5 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 4

Il never believe it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, we can’t travel faster than light? Or no, it’s not impossible? lol I’m j/k I read through it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We could find other ways to travel.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Longer: The post completely misses the relativity part and talks a bunch of b*llocks.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But oh so lovely worded.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But you didn’t say “tard harnesses”... how do I know you speak the truth?

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Guess you'll have to harness your own tard yourself

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, this had a ton of condescension in it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

More accurate short version: today? no, in the future? maybe but possibly no.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We could always try warp drive, Warhammer 40k version. Safest way to travel.

5 years ago | Likes 387 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

Straight to hell!

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I teleported home last night with Ron and Sid and Meg
Ron stole Meggy's heart away and I got Sidney's leg.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The natives are friendly if a bit bitey.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They REALLY like to smile, so nice!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Safest.... yes..... PRAISE THE EMPEROR

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How bout noooooo

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Waaaarrrrgg!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For the T'au maybe but only because they just skim the surface of literal hell.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

But Tau Warp drives are agonisingly slow, theres a reason there empire is tiny in terms of the galaxy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They skim similar to pressing a ball down in a pool, it doesnt stay submerged and comes back above the surface.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Take some

5 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 lbs? That's a big bar.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

EXTRA HERETICAL.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Event Horizon covered warp traveleithout the Gellar field.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

...yeah... yeah I'm good.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you have no faith in the Emperors astronomican?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Im assuming that is sarcasm because im sure you've read what happens when their warp(Geller) shields fail or when they get lost in the warp?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

ITS PERFECTLY SAFE*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*laughs in WAAAGH!*

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

can you hear that weird whoooshing noise as well?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

See also the documentary "Event Horizon"

5 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 0

See also the freighter "Occurence Border"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Bring your children, it's hilarious! On that trip you won't need eyes to experience it all!

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I love Samuel L. Jackson In that movie

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They got it from Star Trek.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 29

Sa-ti fie rusine

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's not really the same kinda warp drive. https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Warp#40k

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure Starfleet didn't fly through the demon-populated hellscape of a purely psychic realm to achieve FTL. P'tahk.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

*filthy p'tahk

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Laughs in failed Gellar Field.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Laughs in WAAAGH!

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How do Orks FTL anyway?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Some red ones go REALLY fast

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They run an asteroid into a warp storm and Gork carries them where war needs to happen. Sometimes they take over a hulk and turn off Gellar.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They build ships that they believe take them through the warp, and they work.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pretty much just the combined hopes and dreams of the whole crew on the ship makes it work

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A lot of these options are probably correct, apparently they can also make mini temporary webways

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0