Jun 6, 2017 8:17 PM
Brewskie
245
1
7
Politiwrong
benovere
0 != null
Butmuncher
Technically right.
GarythGoat
Sure, if we were talking about programing. But if a thing does not exist, there is zero of it.
He had the right idea with what he was saying, but it's technically incorrect. Hence why half true instead of false.
A tax rate, even of zero percent, is a defined entity. An entity that is not defined has no rate, not zero percent rate.
The real world is not object oriented. 0% of ppl's income was directly taxed before 1913 by the U.S. Federal gov. You are technically wrong.
Correct, but there was not a defined zero tax rate as stated by Paul. His statement is still technically wrong.
No. You're acting dense. These rules you are arguing are irrelevant and do not apply to the material world as they do programing matrices.
benovere
0 != null
Butmuncher
Technically right.
GarythGoat
Sure, if we were talking about programing. But if a thing does not exist, there is zero of it.
benovere
He had the right idea with what he was saying, but it's technically incorrect. Hence why half true instead of false.
benovere
A tax rate, even of zero percent, is a defined entity. An entity that is not defined has no rate, not zero percent rate.
GarythGoat
The real world is not object oriented. 0% of ppl's income was directly taxed before 1913 by the U.S. Federal gov. You are technically wrong.
benovere
Correct, but there was not a defined zero tax rate as stated by Paul. His statement is still technically wrong.
GarythGoat
No. You're acting dense. These rules you are arguing are irrelevant and do not apply to the material world as they do programing matrices.