L-Mao

Oct 8, 2017 2:40 AM

SpareMacaroni

Views

154238

Likes

3046

Dislikes

69

Pretty sure he killed more of his own people than Hitler did the Jewish population. Yet not too many people know this douche.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you believe there are young adults alive today that call themselves Maoists? Communism is the real plague.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

John Woo would need another animal to release in every movie?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its surprising how Hitler is the epitome of evil but Mao and Stalin both killed more people.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Birds eating seeds us just a trear, a payment for their services of eating grasshoppers.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes, but what about the mosquito populations? Did it work much?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Lmao /a/gqGIq

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was not just the sparrows, they killed anything that flew. When u visit the countryside it is still eerily quiet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yeah, my last names means sparrow in Russian, and I'm glad this proved how important we are.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should've eaten dem grassjumpers

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

You stop that mao.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And they had to import sparrows from east Germany

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

TIL there's a website called ChinesePosters.net

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically that'd be Locusts : Win Mao : TKO Sparrows : Destroyed

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the sparrow in the last photo is invasive where i live.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FUCK SPARROWS v Shame about the Tyrells though...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also, leave the little birds alone. The ones that are actual birds, not the small children with knives that stab up old men.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Probably doesn't take the blame

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

“A biblical punishment for dumb decisions”

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Unintended consequences suck. Antibiotic overuse, over-engineering rivers, things like that.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I call BS on people keeping sparrows from landing ANYWHERE 24x7. No way any died this way.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You would be suprised. They would get exhausted and fall to the ground, where they would be immediately killed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"It took years to control this special (gu)-pest"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I don’t get it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I need to read more on Chinese history. I had no idea they have endured this many genocides and tragedies. I mean 40 million people... Damn

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

in about 40 years... pretty shocking.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dont forget the taiping rebellion. There was a big series of famines around then too, so those combined with taiping killed maybe 100 mill

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

mongolian invasion, opium war and invasion by western powers, japanese occupation, communist shenanigans

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(2) portrayed as victims of american "imperialism"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The japanese ocupation is wierd. The japanese by all accounts committed mass genocide all around asia. Yet in movies and media they are (1)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ya they deny their war crimes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My history teacher described the great leap forward as a few steps back

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

A few?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On mobile so second half didn't load. Thought it was a Chinese censorship joke.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

I'm glad this doesn't happen to only me ever so often

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honey from around the world is contaminated with pesticides now that affect bee health. Minuscule counts now, but.

8 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 8

Neonicotinoids are the worst.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that's different because instead of one person ruining the ecosystem it's 'the market' (/s)

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

And that's another brilliant example of how communism is complete shit.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 13

I honestly can't believe this is being down voted. Who the hell can morally defend Communism?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I downvoted him because this was a problem of dictatorship. Using it to attack Communism itself was an odd choice.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Particularly because Communism has plenty of things one could choose to criticize it on that don't require a maniacal dictator.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

more an example of why dictatorships are awful, economic system nonwithstanding.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

This is like saying Hitler had some great ideas, if only he was just a Nazi instead of a Dictator it might have worked!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

My point being that a core tenet of nazis is ethnic cleansing- the mass murder is kind of the point. Communism has no such tenet, and-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

doesn't really need to include "and also murder millions if people" as part of the process.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A: I'm not seeing it. B: I'm nazi-ing it. C: Nazis did make some solid roads right? So we got one thing at least.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just don't see how anyone could defend an ideology that murdered hundreds of millions is such a short span.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was thinking it was more like we managed to salvage something from a huge shitshow. Building roads doesn't excuse Nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the many reasons dictatorships are a bad idea. Leaving shit like this for one man to decide makes for bad decisions.

8 years ago | Likes 831 Dislikes 15

That's why a technocracy with a committee of ethics would be the best thing ever.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Dictatorship is a great idea for the dictator. I'm sure Mao and pals ate well even after the sparrow incident.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

One word: Lysenkoism.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Realistically Mao didn't actually have as much power as is commonly made out, his position was much weaker than Stalin or Hitler's

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i'd say the bigger problem than just the decision being made by one person was the lack of scientific consultation.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Theoretically, it'd be possible, but he'd have to be the most well-read, most well-meaning, incorruptible, selfless and likely sad man ever.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

This is why I'd be willing to vote for a robot president if the option ever comes.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Too be fair he was balls deep in sex slaves the whole time. hard to pay attention to much else like that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*looking at the USA* Well, at least the people didn't ELECT the man with bad ideas.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

please see: the Ukrainian famine in Soviet Russia

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Difference is, it was on purpose.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know if Communists are really bad or really good at the whole famine thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because outsourcing these decisions to market forces has proven to be so much better for our own, CLEARLY sustainable society.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Can't argue with that logic. Clearly we should abandon our way of life and install an autocratic government.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, no democracy would ever allow one man to make bad decisions ;)

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 7

Well, it's possible, but there are ways to slap the leader's hands away from the controls if he's being a moron.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh it has happened, but democratic nations sometimes install systems explicitly to limit the power of the leader.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Democratic nations rarely have all the power situated in one office. Can you name one that doesn't balance powers to check Executive branch?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually a dictatorship is most likely the best form of government with a leader who has his shit together mentally and takes good advice.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless that man is the best man. With the best plans. Who is going to make America great again. Just watch.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

'I don't care how much vegetables cost, ban the Mexicans. I'd rather pay $6 for lettuce and be loved by a few haters!'...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Vegetables are for my food to eat anyways

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

he is NOT dictator ... he is cuntish orange offspring of cheeto and frog with no empathy and with anticuated views on world and he seems to

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

have no idea of governance but he is not dictator

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

...yet, he has all of the requisites should the opportunity 'present itself'

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Groupthink is just as bad. Nobody wants to go against the grain. Nail that sticks out gets hammered down. Japanese / Pearl Harbor, e.g.

8 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 17

Groupthink of the most acclaimed scientists would be amazing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didnt we use to have that? Scientist proposed washing hands between operations, group think said he was insulting people by claiming they 1/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Filthy. Drove him to financial ruin despite later being proven correct by someone else. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1/3 At least groupthink sometimes allows for a margin of error. True that it's hard to go against the grain but when someone DOES say some-

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

2/3 thing the rest of the crowd who ALSO feels that way suddenly realize they're not the only ones, and sometimes logic prevails.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

3/3 Dictatorships allow for no such thing, especially fascist dictatorships: You do what I say right or wrong or die.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Both situations require the person with the most power to be open minded to the ideas of others

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's pretty much antithetical to a dictatorship, however.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A non-dicatorship allows other people than the one guy with power to minimize his influence though.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

But it still requires them to be open minded and 1 non open minded can ruin it for everyone by just not cooperating.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And now ccp is rewriting history and spending billions in propaganda in so called soft diplomacy all over the world.

8 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 9

Thought you meant the developers of EVE Online, then realized it was the Chinese Communist Party.

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

I thought he meant the Союз ССР ie the USSR

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So did i...was like EvE CCP...whow those guys are busy.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

CCPlease, not the sparrows!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My God it all makes sense. They were the real puppet masters all along.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They don't need to re-write shit. US didn't need to re-write that mistakes were made that led to the Dust-Bowl. Own your mistakes.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Seems more like a blatant exclusion of history more than re-writes to me.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Take note of how Fox News makes a point of how well slaves were treated when they built the White House.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

As an educator, no we don't own our mistakes at all... even at elementary school we start white-washing crap big time. Esp in the south

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Over in Idaho out history books ignore negative results of conservative actions. So much on liberal policies though, even well received ones

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should own them and contrast with Communist China.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sorry what?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They should say "Hey, we made these mistakes but at least we're man enough to admit them... unlike some countries *cough*communist-china*"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Attempts to rewrite history is hardly new, it happens in the west a lot as well sadly.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

Only within a political faction, competing sides of political issues are actually really good at bringing up history back to public forum.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

true but not as true. in teh west it's more lies by omission. in china it's more outright re-writing, orwellian style

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Columbus

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have lots of attempts to re write history, our public is just able to shut them down. Ex the USA history book erasing slaves got shutdown

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perhaps you simply don't know the truth because everyone believes the lies so thoroughly. Much deep. Great thoughtfulness.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Quite, as a Brit, I find my nation's nostalgia for the "glory days" of the empire deeply disturbing.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Kinda like people longing for the good ol' days in the US of legal spousal rape and blacks at the back of the bus. Creepy.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's where it goes both ways, things have been generally made more negative and the worse bits highlighted

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's a good thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Not trying to start an argument, but I'm genuinely curious why you feel the unwarranted gradual demonizing of an entire group is good?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0