Their hobby is to lobby

Aug 28, 2023 7:45 AM

Lobbying (bribing) is way cheaper than I expected

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m not from the US, but I would have thought that the NRA would have made this list. No?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the NRA has to be next on that list

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's hilariously bad because the industries of those top companies on that list are explicitly the ones holding the U.S. back from actually using its utterly massive wealth from improving the country.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is there a reason gun lobbying is not on the list?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"And it's not even close" - proceeds to show a chart where it is very much close

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Whatever do you mean? You mean the same pack of trash that feasted on the 2008 housing crisis and set off untold misery to this day for proper home ownership is not reputable? The same garbage that would sell a place like this? https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2993-S-Willow-Dr-Lehi-UT-84043/2056479412_zpid/ All yours for such a low price and don’t even think of entering the garage currently being investigated!

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All the "middle men" industries lobby...so that you must use their services. The world doesn't need real estate agents nor do they need car salespeople.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isnt housing a problem in most of the western countries? Maybe because of the 2008 crash (less building) + low interest (investing) + declining sizes of households (lots of singles living alone)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would think, to keep things on the same plane, that the "Blue Cross/Blue Shield" should be combined with all other insurers, and "Facebook" should be a combination of social media sites. Otherwise, you're comparing an entire industry against individual companies.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Big oil isn't even on the list?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Housing should not be an investment. Unfortunately, decades of public policy have encouraged that point of view and now the government will do everything it can to prop up house prices, extending this bubble even longer and making the inevitable pop that much more damaging.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chamber of Commerce is not your friend, those people have fucked over America so hard. Because they lobby on the local level for the interests of local businesses. Ever wonder why a project got green lit that was really dumb or fucked over a bunch of other people. Look no further than the friendly people at your local Chamber of Commerce.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And on a longer timescale, wage stagnation was enabled by sending the jobs overseas. Unions need paying headcount so they can afford to play in the battleground (court room).

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

to be clear they only care about volume so I guess you can thank them for record low interest rates?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, not just that. Real estate is one of the easiest investments. Just as with anything else, members of Congress often profit from their decisions.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The homeless can't even get into the House.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 of the biggest spenders are healthcare. We need lobby reform so we can get healthcare reform

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait are we ignoring #2, the government lobbies itself?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that why you can have an empty house for 240 days and not pay taxes? So these companies can just let houses stay empty and sell slowly manufacturing a supply shortage? Would explain all the empty houses in Orem utah that are not on the market.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Get money out of politics. Even if you just read this so you recognize an opportunity to jump on let’s do it: wolf-PAC.com

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well they haven't helped me.. my house has been for sale since May, and we are pulling it off the market soon.. the housing market is crap...

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In my area the housing market is still hot as shit. Not as good as last year but still houses are turning over within a week or 2 at or above ask.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sorry to hear that. Market by me homes last maybe 2 days with 20 to 30k overbids every time.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We've dropped 45,000 ... had it sold early on and the deal fell thru because the other person's house couldn't sell..

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where are you located? If marketed and priced well it should sell.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Middle of Michigan.. Morley area

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Listed at $325,000 we've already dropped by 45 grand

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Middle of Michigan

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a factor. Another factor is build volume and density. A really major factor, though, is commercialization of residential property. I'm talking about AirBnB. If I can pull $100 a night on something with a mortgage of $1k, and potential rent of $1.3k, then the "value" of the building becomes the equivalent of $3k/mo. I would pay whatever price at or below that level, because it's worth it. AirBnB slum hotels need to be banned in every major city.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an aside, I would also support a regulation stating that nobody can own and rent a house, except in noted tourist areas I guess, and that renting requires multi units.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, corporations buying up residential property. That's a big deal. Regulation should deal with that. Houses should be owned by people, with rare exception [charities, noted tourist areas, etc.].

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is the US Chamber of Commerce lobbying the US government? I thought the CoC was a government entity which now I assume is inaccurate

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The CoC is basically a "union" but made of the boss class to keep workers down.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It looks like an agency name, but that would be the “Department of Commerce”. This is simply the national level org repping your local CoC.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

correct, was never a government entity

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

next, guess what moms for liberty do not support..

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They do that on purpose. It is a lobbying group for large corporations. They write the bills to make the congressman's job nice and easy

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Realistically, every large lobbying group will offer "draft language" to the lawmakers. One egregious example that came to light was Bush's (I think it was him anyway) Energy Policy. Apparently copied verbatim from Exxon's "suggestions".

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

TIL. This seems... important.

2 years ago | Likes 412 Dislikes 0

Real estate agents are often some of the worst NIMBYs too. Their commissions are enormous. A giant rent-seeking industry.

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

For those that wonder why they'd be NIMBYs. Developers that put up new apartments tend to rent them out, meaning they can't muscle in on transaction fees for selling units. They're also against a perceived lower cost per unit, once again, commissions per sale falling. And finally, they tend to be invested in "neighborhood character" and just don't like any changes that aren't just a mansion remodel (more commission per sale again).

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

How exactly do real estate agents control housing prices? This entire post is weird.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's way more complicated than simply "control" of prices. They are fiercely territorial though and collect somewhat fixed percentage commissions. They tend to block housing which means more limited supply and higher prices. They also have a lot of sway over both what bids are made and are accepted and have incentives for higher prices on both sides (did you know that the agent assisting the buyer is actually considered an agent of the selling agent and does not have your interest at heart?!)

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lol who are you? None of this is true.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They pour this money into politics for a number of reasons. Number one is to protect their license monopoly on the industry and compensation structure as well as barriers to entry, etc. Additionally, as it is a very flexible schedule kind of job, agents are very involved in local politics, including running for office. Check out how many RE agents are candidates on your local ballots. Similar for card dealership owners.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I am all for making lobbying illegal.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If those numbers are right it looks like Pharma lobby gate keeps affordable healthcare for all Americans for a measly 25 million $ a year...

2 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 1

World's best return on investment is a congressman

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tbf, they don't need much. Republicans are already pretty much sold on the idea of letting people they think are inferior die.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bribes are never anywhere near as big as you think they are. That said, it's a little more complicated than just dollars spent on lobbying. Many lobbying groups give representatives cushy or even outright sinecure positions after they retire as a kind of deferred bribe, essentially cashing in their political connections. Likewise, there's probably a good deal of insider trading going on, but that's almost certainly masked.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The promise of a cushy job post-politics is an extremely effective way to bribe a politician. They only need to target the high-level partisans, who then make sure their party votes in lock step with them. Maybe they even make a couple deals to get some votes from across the aisle. It's infuriating.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also doesn't hurt that a lot of politicos do actually genuinely believe the stuff they're peddling.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pharma 25.95, hospitals 24.44, and health insurer 23.62, so around 74 million just from 3 companies.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Those three industries aren't just three companies... And 74 million is *nothing* compared to their revenues.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Our lives are bought cheap.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

This is just what they report for tax purposes. Dark money PAC contributions, donations to charities that happen to be aligned with the interests of certain politicians, promises of cushy "advisor" jobs after leaving office, etc are all unreported and do the heavy lifting. The reported lobbying $$ is probably just the people who draft legislation and talking points for politicians.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Reported $25M. Surely there is significantly more greasing those palms.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To get a real idea, you'd need to do some forensic accounting. Where did their charitable donations go? How many former politicians are employed in high-paying jobs not doing shit? There are lots of ways to influence politicians that don't have to be reported as "lobbying."

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't seem too expensive for corporations to buy a handful of politicians to sway opinions.

2 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

I’d also not be surprised if the money they invest into lobbying isn’t also a massive tax write off….

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It functionally is. Lobbyists get all kinds of tax loopholes and financial kickbacks/giveaways put into legislation, so it's as much actively making profits for them as it is avoiding other costs. So long as they can keep buying politicians for a pittance as they have been, it's essentially an infinite money engine for them.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's the part that especially bugs me about it. Betraying the people and selling out their authority is bad enough, but the fact that they're doing it for fucking chump change is an extra layer of insult. I've seen politician donation logs that are clearly bribes from lobbyists which basically shuffle out to being a buck-and-change per constituent backstabbed.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is notoriously easy to buy politicians. They are super inexpensive actually.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Best I can do is three fiddy.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sold. Who's rights would you like to trample?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well we usually allow women and children first...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, it's worse. Here's 2023's numbers thusfar of the top 20:

2 years ago | Likes 231 Dislikes 0

I endorse Nation Assassins of Realtors.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You know we're f*cked when the Realtors are spending more than the pharmaceutical lobby.

2 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

They already got what they want.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It’s a who is who of people out to screw America.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, legalised bribes.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Was expecting more military in there

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Different budget I guess...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sauce?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Looks like it's from opensecrets.org

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Bingo!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks @kittyfajitas

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And numbers from 1998 to 2023:

2 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

Big oil is surprisingly far down the list. So much for them secretly controlling all the politicians. We should have been worried about the medical companies instead.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No NRA ?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They are too far down the list to be in the Top 20.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even the NRA doesn’t have this kind of money

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

the NRA actually doesnt spend that much money on lobbying directly. They prefer the "schmooze and buddy up" approach.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even then, the NRA is chump change. Compare the three. https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/national-rifle-assn/summary?i00000082">https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/national-rifle-assn/summ">d=D00000">00000082">https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/national-rifle-assn/summary?id=D000000082 https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/national-assn-of-realtors/summary?id=D000000062 https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/us-chamber-of-commerce/summary?id=D000019798

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why? What specifically are they lobbying for, and to what degree does this affect housing prices compared to banking practices/regulation, gentrification, rich people buying multiple homes, city planning, developers buying single family homes over asking price in cash to build townhouses, companies like McDonald's buying up land as real estate investments, etc etc etc. Housing is a complex (heh) problem... not saying this isn't an issue, just need to know more to have an appropriate opinion.

2 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 7

This is the question here: Why? Just throwing out a statement and some numbers doesn't automatically build a bridge to your assertion. That's like saying, "Look at all the money the Teamsters union has and how big they are, and we wonder why cars are so expensive."

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Top of my head, changes to housing density, taxes on 3rd+ houses: crippling landlords, changes on foreign buyers: stop investor builders,

2 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

The biggest barrier to housing development in desirable areas and reduced home prices are existing homeowners and nothing else is even close. These are the constituents that politicians are responding to with shit like restrictive zoning and all the rest, with the goal of maintaining or increasing existing housing value to the benefit of homeowners. Easiest way to get turfed out of office is to enact a policy that hurts home values.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

They lobby to keep their standard 6% commission and to make it easier to buy a house. They don't care about price, just closing deals.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure what your experience is that leads you to this conclusion, but the 6% thing has nothing to do with lobbying, or Congress. It's also not a guaranteed number, for either the buyer or the seller agent.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why do Realtors want higher housing prices? Sure, they'll make more on each sale, but wouldn't less sales mean they would male less overall? Is it just that they want to cut out going directly to builders? Renters aren't paying a Realtor. I don't understand it.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

To a fair extent, I DON’T think Realtors WANT higher prices. As a Realtor myself, I’ve seen too many instances where someone has been priced out of purchasing a home in this last year alone. I’d rather see lower rates and/or prices than what is happening right now with multiple offers on nearly every home. BUT, the other HUGE problem is inventory. Our population continues to grow while housing supply has remained fairly stagnant since 08, thus keeping prices high now. It’s a real mess out there.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hear me out … perhaps you could take these questions and plug them in to google …

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 26

Because most of the google results are oversimplified and usually wrong.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That is such an incredibly complex thing to research. You could've just not responded and it would've been a net positive for the world.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Good point, batter to just wait for some guy on Imgur to give you the shortest reductive answer possible

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The things you listed to compare against lobbying are literally what they lobby to keep happening.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

No, most of those policies are of no benefit to realtors.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Really? I thought city planning, banking regulations, Devs raising prices of housing and corporate land buying would be of huge interest to realtors, doesn't all of that translate to $ for realtors?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What's of interest to realtors is not being directly regulated, and an active housing market. Corporate land buying would hurt them, city planning is irrelevant to them, banking regulations only matter insofar as buyers can buy, realtors generally move existing stock not newly developed stock, etc.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ahhh yeah just read your other comment, sorta makes sense to me but also doesn't at the same time which I guess is part of the package. Thank you for the info mate, appreciate it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention that almost none of this stuff is governed by federal / congressional regulation.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The ELI5 version is that there's a concerted effort to stop us "plebs" from owning land/housing. The goal is for everyone to rent and be in perpetual debt. Basically a return to serfdom.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

you're not really understanding whats going on here at all

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Realtors get paid for each house sale - they want houses to be trading hands constantly, not sat on by a couple of corporations that rent them out until the end of time.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why would realtors lobby for fewer home sales?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because having a healthy and functioning housing market isn't the end goal.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The end goal should be something that seems to generally benefits realtors, which a restricted market does not.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're trying to apply logic to capitalism. This is a system where you can fire so many employees a company will stop functioning, and yet this will result in a (temporary) rise in stock value and you can walk away with a huge bonus before the company collapses.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2