Gopfop

Aug 7, 2016 11:34 PM

JGsK

Views

65185

Likes

1773

Dislikes

250

Hey I'm only 135...kg...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you didnt post that last tweet, I would have said it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sexy as fuck she is

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 6 feet tall. At 120 pounds I would be thinner than most Victoria's Secret models...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But wait...that's a health o meter...she's clocking 141.4 HEALTH-OHMS

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'9 and supposed to be 135-140lbs. They really should include height if they wanna play bitch.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yah or you know, eat a fucking cheeseburger!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some people are actually so stupid they don't understand being taller means being heavier

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130 pounds is like 59 kg for the rest of the world.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the numbers were the height in centimeters. It really didn't make any sense though, thought they didn't like dwarfs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're reposting this again? 100 times in 24 hours is enough.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

To be fair, she's 5' 11".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 4'8'' and 150. It's not the size but where your body carries your weight.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think there are many ways a 4'8" frame can carry that much weight

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm about 145 and 5'3 on a good day, and I look damn good in leggings. This shit is stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While the socks and the body are definitely not the same person, the girl is probably still over 130. I'm ok with that.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

130 is *tiny*.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If I live to be 120, I will wear whatever I feel like wearing (or not wearing as the case may be)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That girls legs are shaped kind of fat just saying.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

5' 10.5", haven't consistently broken 100.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fucking repost. You should at least 3 days before repost

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

How many times do i need to see this point whoring crap?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I always thought they meant kg

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WTF, 130 pounds is like what, 65kg? Ridiculous.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Google tells me it's not even 59. Even more ridiculous. What you all after, 14 year olds?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That girl is not 141 pounds

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

reposttttt

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Doesn't matter. Terminal thickness is always approved.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tf? 4 years later?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thickness has no expiration date.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha i was just wondering how you ended up here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I assumed those numbers were ages, which really changed the whole tenor of those comments.

9 years ago | Likes 364 Dislikes 7

Yup

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ditto

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I was so happy to see people mocking that kinda shite, then the penny dropped.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Same lol..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those socks are not worn by the same girl in the full picture lol, unless she got a tan in between pictures and has swollen ankles

9 years ago | Likes 214 Dislikes 18

Lol I noticed those kankles immediately too and thought the same thing

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Hey, maybe she has some CHF...lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

angles and lighting my friend.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She just looks bottom heavy to me. The skin doesn't seem too different considering the change in lighting.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

This is what the internet was made for, detectiving the shit out of everything

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

That, and over-analyzing the shit out of everything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But I have to say I think a tweet like that would have some girls sending selfies n others cursing him out but hey u take the good w the bad

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The chick with socks looks like she's wearing shin guards

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

That was my thought. Socks look to bulge out evenly.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, I'm one hundred pounds over that and I still wear leggings. So what if I'm a guy

9 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 1

Yeah, fight the power!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strut it

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm dead lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130 lbs would be underweight for someone about 5'9".

9 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Aug 8, 2016 10:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not according to any medical measurement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heck, I'm 5'6, 130, and people tell me I'm too skinny all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My wife is about 5'11" 145 lbs and looks like she's carved out of wood.. Not making a point, just bragging.

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 2

Congrats on the megasex

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just glad I clear 6' tall so it doesnt look weird when we go out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pfft. Gf is 6' even and I'm 5'7", people don't give a fuck. Most are jealous of me for pulling someone out of my league

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm 6 foot. If I was 130 I would be skeletal. I look Damon fabulous at 200 though!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm 6 foot I looked the best I ever have at around 200.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 6ft and yeah 130 would be insanely tiny for us

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's really not as small as you would expect, I'm 120 and 6 foot

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a 5'9 lady and 120. Can confirm I'm a fucking stick. People dont realize how height and weight go together

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

how u doin

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I'm 4'8'' and 150. It's not always about the size but where your body carries your weight.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

yeah im 5'10" around 220. I dont look "fat" especially from the front. Side view i got a belly though

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Same

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'11" and was around 130 in highschool/college. Really, really thin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'10" and 140, still very stick like. Weight alone is a poor body type indicator (up to a point)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. I'm 6 feet and at my thinnest and my biggest I've always had an hourglass figure. I couldn't be a stick even if I tried :(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trade you!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha I would!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rule of thumb is 5 lbs. for every inch over 5 ft is healthy.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

So if you were 4ft 11in you should weigh negative 5 lbs?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't seem right at all

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

What's baseline though? What is a reasonable place to start measuring weight. Genuinely curious.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think it's 100.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep I left that part out. +1 to you MerryPhysics

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1