Awesome

Oct 20, 2019 6:22 PM

smoove6801

Views

141557

Likes

4536

Dislikes

233

I wonder if this tech will be suppressed, it'll probably never touch a tesla, and this is the last you'll hear of it for 50 years lol. Still an extremely awesome battery!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7592485/Father-eight-invents-electric-car-battery-drivers-1-500-miles-without-charging-it.html

Bullshit

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah... this is bs

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's so obvious to me that this is crap. Why do people fall for this conspiracy thinking?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was the National Enquirer too busy with Elvis and Bat Boy to pick this one up?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The daily mail is not credible.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Overhyped clickbait article. Did you know that almost every technology is built by a huge group of people not some 'inventor' working alone

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Tell that Newton who single handedly invented gravity.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just love how op already thinks that this shit works without ever seeing a prototype. I need what you are smoking op, It's some good stuff

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Daily Mail? I don't believe it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If stuff like this doesn't hit the market, it's not suppressed. It just sucks in some way (e.g. too expensive or dangerous)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wow. Reading the article is exactly like reading every bullshit pseudoscience article ever. He drinks the catalyst that works with low grade

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

aluminum? And that will power a car for that long? My ass. It's almost as bad as fusion (there is a reason we've yet to see net gain there)

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have seem immense strides in fusion technology actually. It is just very complex and appreciated by less than 0.001% of the population.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This isn't a new technology and there are drawbacks.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So... it’s a fuel cell, not a battery, so not rechargeable, and one could go 2700km with a Tesla S-sized pack, then needs to replace it all?

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Primary cells are batteries if hooked up in series or parallel.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As far as I can tell you can get away with only replacing the anode, but a total replacement would be inevitable at some point.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sounds like you enjoy a good baseless conspiracy theory

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

“Suppressed inventions” is the stupidest of all stupid conspiracy theories

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

And some of the oldest. How many times have we heard about Nicola Tesla & his billion-dollar technology that no one wanted for some reason?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Some version of the "amazing suppressed vehicle tech" conspiracy has been around since before I was born.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Meh. I'll believe it when it's actually in production. We've heard this story before, many times, including the "suppressed" bullshit.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

The tech's real. I had a fist-sized car booster built around al/air. It worked, until I unplugged it like an idiot and it died instantly

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are a fucking idiot.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Totally legit. Like the guy who build a car that runs on water. Or on dead cats. I collected dead cats for years. Still can´t fuel my car.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The battery technology is real. There's a dead al/air battery in my dad's basement, bought from Canadian tire 15 years ago for 20-something

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it works, you can bet it'll be commercialized.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HahahhA! Ask the inventor of NiCad batteries, who sold excluaive use of them for Auto use to GM. That said,this new thing doesn't work.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The new NiMH doesn't die like the old NiCAD did, but isn't THAT great either.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lithium is so light and efficient we use it for things that used to be fantasy, like portable electric heating elements.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aluminum-air batteries are nonrenewable and would just result in E-waste. Plus they take far more energy to make than you get.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

E-waste, they don’t save energy, and people need to keep buying them?? Sign me up!! -Joe Capitalist.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They could be usable as an emergency battery- a one time use pod that can get a car off the side of the road. But not a primary service.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I thought this too, but then I looked at the actual diagram of the battery, and it's enormous. (Not what he's holding in the pic).

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Laws of thermo dynamics, I very very very much doubt this

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It's possible. The tech is real - I've seen examples - and al has a huge fuel value. But it's also finicky and restricted to niche apps.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which law? Chemical reactions releasing usable energy is a pretty basic concept in chem/physics.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My dad had a one-use emergency car booster based on al/air. It worked, until I unplugged it like an idiot and the bat instantly died.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's real, it will be used. EV manufacturers have every motivation to extend range.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's not a battery, it's a recyclable fuel cell, and intended for a European market. Plus, secret formula means no competition/expansion.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Secret formula? There's a dead one in my dad's basement, bought from Canadian Tire for $20-something 15 years ago.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Secret non-toxi and non-caustic electrolysis solution.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Almost certainly the same or close to that used in lithium batteries. Same problem, corrosive electrolyte.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

European market? UK won't be in the European market for long.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True, but the point being it's intended for consumers who don't travel very far/very often, UK being the prime example.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure they will, it's not like it will be illegal to buy British products once they leave the EU

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn’t need to be “surpressed”, a battery that cannot be recharged is useless in a vehicle.

6 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 6

Not even suppressed. I've seen products using this technology. It's a niche use and doesn't stick around

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So the energy source for your vehicle that cannot be recharged in your vehicle is "useless" right... What does that make gasoline/petrol?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The article talks about switching the batteries out in 90 secs at grocery stores, just like propane tanks. 9x more energy dense than Li Ion.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then you throw the battery away after a single use? That's extremely inefficient. I can see use (e.g. military drones) but it's limited.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily. If you could fast swap the battery pack for one with a charge, it doesn’t matter if the pack is recharged

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

They you have the problem of environmental waste.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

The aluminum in the battery would “probably” be easier to recycle than aluminum cans. Since cans are coated.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aluminum is highly recyclable.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Its also highly energy intensive to recycle, oftentimes taking more energy to recycle than it does to make from new.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Reread, recycling the battery, not just the aluminum. That I'll give you.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bullshit. "Aluminum. Recycling of aluminum cans saves 95% of the energy required to make the same amount of aluminum from its virgin source"

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And these batteries can't be recharged, so they'd only be good for a one-shot emergency power pack to get you to a normal charger.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's the Mail on Sunday, closely related to the infamous Daily Mail. I'm not even sure if this is true yet

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's a real thing, but there are quite a few issues with its adoption industrially.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There’s no “closely” about it. MoS is the Daily Mail.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I meant they are the same in all but name and day of publication, apologies if that wasn't clear

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By suppressed, do you mean, was over hyped by the media and is actually useless?

6 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 2

Calm down fascist, we're not taking over with our leftard technology.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

We had an emergency car booster with aluminum/air battery. I unplugged it by accident and it died without charging the car.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

all tech news not currently in your hand is useless

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No he means conspiracies like the water motor and perpetual motion machines

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It prooooobably is. This tech comes up once in a while, fails to find a niche use, and is forgotten about again.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Companies are there to make money, if the new thing works, it will make money, so why the fuck do people think it ever gets burried?

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Because believing in tinfoil hat conspiracy is better than admitting that their life is not where they want it and it's their fault. Common.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 22, 2019 12:46 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Suppressing tech is not new.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aluminium–air batteries are primary cells, i.e., non-rechargeable.

6 years ago | Likes 433 Dislikes 6

So, you just add more fuel.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As long as they could mostly recycle them, the price might come down eventually.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why can't these be in addition to the rechargeable cells instead of replacing? The article doesn't go into it but primary cells are used to

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Backup rechargeable cells all the time in all kinds of applications. And they hardly ever get used up before years have past by.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That might actually make it more marketable. I can imagine battery replacement taking the place of oil changes.

6 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 9

Or imagine never going for oil changes, or to the gas station and just charging at home with cheap clean energy. Oh wait, that is a reality.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean . . . if you're cool with paying thousands of dollars for an oil change, sure

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Every 1500 miles instead or 5000? I cant.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

But you don't need to stop for gas every 300 anymore either. If swapping the battery was simple and easy it'd be worth it.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Does that seem good for the environment? Rechargeable seems better..

6 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

It would require a system for replacing the anode and recycling the aluminum byproducts backs to a usable state.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also rechargeable batteries have a finite life span and require disposal, recycling.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rechargeable are toxic as fuck and a nightmare to recycle. Not sure about normal batteries.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

lithium is way less toxic than lead-acid, nicad, or nimh.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Read the article as I did. The inventor drank the electrolyte in front of the investors.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

the electrolyte is just salt water for Al-air batteries iirc.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But the materials are 100% recyclable

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno the actual science behind it, but aluminum/air sounds safer than lithium/polymer, or lead/acid

6 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 4

Why?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hazarous chemicals... can be dangerous and pollute badly...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Probably because they've heard of lithium battery fires and also the acid part of lead acid just sounds bad

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Rechargable has 6-10yr lifespan or something like that. Plus lithium and lead battery is highly toxic and difficult to dispose of.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Wait, do you think lithium is a highly toxic metal? Or that it is hard to get rid of?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is mass infrastructure to recycle Pb acid batteries. Most Pb that's used today is the stuff that was mined back in the early 1900s

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends what the end result is. If it's Al-oxide and an electrolyte that can be regenerated, it might be better than Li-ion.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It can't be regenerated. It has to go through the Hall–Héroult process.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The "closely guarded secret" electrolyte, not the oxide. I'm familiar with aluminum production from alumina.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The idea is to use one battery, go your 1500 miles or so, then part exchange it for another. Most would only change it every 3-6 months.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

If they can get costs down to a couple hundred pounds, it should be cost effective (haven't the details to do math)

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

So 50 bucks a week? Fuck that ill keep my 300bhp petrol engine thanks it costs less.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Al-Air cells also have really bad self-discharge issues, so I imagine that 1500 miles is an "all in one go" estimate

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The average American drives 13,000 miles/year, you'd be changing it once a month.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Just refuelling it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Source: US Department of Transportation https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/bar8.htm

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The northeast being below average and most places west of the Mississippi being above average. If anyone was curious.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

wtf? id go through 2 a month

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

So what? How many times do you have to stop at a gas station currently? Better have 2 replacements at home, then buy another 2.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Hello fellow American who lives outside of the Northeast....

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You drive a hundred miles a day, every day? That's so much to me. Are you US?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For many of us in the states that arent urban we drive 50 miles daily without much issue. Add a job a little ways a way and 100 is easy

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I drive 62 miles from my driveway to my parking lot at work. 104 miles per day and that doesn’t count other errands.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I drive 84 miles round trip to work, more when I stop to run errands or have to detour because of traffic.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jeez, how long is your commute?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

my job takes me to different locations around the city. 60 miles/day is about average, and thats just for work

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Damn. You at least get paid mileage?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most people commute 20 miles a day or less, just really slowly. My step-dad used to drive 300 miles a day though.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The aluminum batteries arent rechargeable, so how will it work?

6 years ago | Likes 451 Dislikes 3

Yes they are, you just add more fuel, like you do now with petrol.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It will work by getting money from investors and then spending that money on a yacht.

6 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

They’re also much more expensive than typical batteries. As such buyers are usually Industrial and military customers.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd imagine this working best as a backup to a rechargeable batt that's good for your average driving. This could kick in when you want to

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go that extra bit between charges. It could last year's that way.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, aluminum air batteries are well known but until we figure out how to make them rechargeable they're not practical for cars

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Aluminum is fairly easy to recycle and is often recycled with nuclear or geothermal energy so it's not totally insane -- huge transport tho

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How's that a factor? Gasoline also isn't rechargeable. You use it, expel the waste product, and put in new gasoline.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you read the article? They work like fuel cells, and they're made of recycled aluminium.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And weigh 100 pounds and need to be swapped out

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to the artivle there's 90 second swap system

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the effort is worth it, the environmental benefits alone are incredible

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funny enough I was talking about EVs the other day. I imagined if we had to build them with disposable batteries, how stupid it would be...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unlike the current global standard of disposable hydrocarbons?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didnt say EVs are stupid, in fact I quite the fan, I drive an EV myself. But building them with disposable batteries, and engineer worth

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their salt immidiately knows that is a dumb idea.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to the article you’d have to replace a several hundred pound pack every 1500+/- km, depending, when it’s spent.

6 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 3

No, you just add more fuel, like you do now with petrol.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Where are you seeing that, and what fuel? That article is saying to me you replace the whole thing like a giant alkaline battery.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fuel as in aluminium you do understand how an electrochemical cell works yeah?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but you can't exactly pump aluminum like a liquid, so how is it replaced other than replacing the unit?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It need massive infrastructure for that kind of swapping and it's probably temporary. Look for graphite battery. Better successor for Li-ion

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Doesn’t the article say MPH?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Quite so, it's Britain so I was thinking kms.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that reminds me of a book i had when i was young that was like "the future is going to be awesome" it put forward the idea that electric

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

cars would have swapable battery packs so you just go to a petrol station and robots (future rite?) swap it out and recycle the old one

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ummmm i dont even brush my teeth that often

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

You don’t brush your teeth every 1500km? Why not?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No teeth.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because then i wouldnt travel as far

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This article says differently - https://techcrunch.com/2019/07/12/naval-veteran-aluminum-air-metalectrique

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What's different?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds like it's terrible for the environment

6 years ago | Likes 352 Dislikes 7

Trust me its better than trying to recycle poisonous cobalt in lithium batteries.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And poisonous lithium

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cobalt and lithium doesn't need recycling every 1500 miles though.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to the article it's very easy to recycle, aluminum usually is, therefore easy on the environment.

6 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 3

How does aluminum get recycled. What’s the process?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Melt it. Melts real easy, you can even do it in a nice hot fireplace. Process for impurities & just re-cast.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yea. I remember reading a while back that most of the aluminum ever mined is still in use.

6 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

Aluminum needs ridiculous amounts of power to smelt, most smelters have their own power plants, but is ridiculously easy to remelt scrap.

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Recycling isn't exactly a free process either though I dunno how much is involved.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Recycling aluminum is almost comically easy, you just remelt it. Takes MUCH less energy than processing fresh ore.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

easy to recycle doesnt mean evironment friendly... it takes energy to recycle aluminium

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

FAR less than smelting it from ore, tho.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where'd you get "several hundred pounds"?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're comparing it to either the size or weight of a Tesla Model S battery, which is several hundred pounds.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, gotcha. The article didn't state a given weight, but that the battery could be swapped "in 90 seconds" which didn't give much info

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if it's 1/10th the weight of the S pack, I just don't see swapping something that size in 90 seconds. Something here don't math right.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well they said the aluminum ones are significantly lighter but I still think that exchanging them isn't going to be easy

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Indeed. A Tesla S pack is 1200lbs, so even at a tenth the weight that’s still 120, ain’t exactly gonna plop that in a shopping cart.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a hard pass, from me. That's fucking stupid. 1500km is nothing. I drive that in a few days.

6 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 13

So I'm guessing you are a trucker or something?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

i mean....you replace several hundred pounds of fuel in that same timeframe....

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A few days? So you're commute is like 200 km?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My insurance covers me for driving 12k a year, so I'm looking at a battery every month or so? Not too bad if that's my fill up.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Sounds incredibly wasteful and fucking expensive. Also daily mail is generally bullshit

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

Aluminum batteries are easy to recycle, and you have no idea how much it would cost when applied refilling formula.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

You are dense, it clearly says MILES not kilometers. So it would go for 2414 kilometers. Sounds like you travel an absurd amount.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Never been to Texas huh?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. Not yet but I plan to visit

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well then I'd really hate to tell you about gas refills and oil changes.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You wont be happy with any electric car then. I can see that work for people with short commutes though.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So I'm guessing you are a trucker or something?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2414km. It said 1500 miles. That's on average 1 change per month in the US

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Look at it like filling up the tank. You go to a service station and swap out packs

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I assume this is the first generation. Maybe btter to spend focus on developing this further than existing solutions.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Might actually make it MORE appealing to legacy car makers. Dealers could then charge to change packs instead of change oil.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Article says battery exchange in 30 seconds, and they're negotiating with supermarkets to provide that service. Cost/mile about ½ of petrol.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Per cell. Hundreds of cells per vehicle. Thousands per bus. That is not viable unfortunately, and every 1500 miles? Bordeline retarded imho

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Something about that's not clear tho, they're elsewhere comparing to a "Model S-size/wight" pack. Ain't getting that from the bread aisle.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0