June 2023

Jul 5, 2023 11:24 AM

Now with better sourcing!

I think this would be easier to interpret if it were only two box colors: green for 0, purple with a number for mass shooting

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Thumbnail looked like a board game or something fun, not this.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not telling you how to run your society buuut you guys over there should probably keep all the colors except green down a bit.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Thank you for doing this.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think it is sad we even have to track stats like this.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Had me for a moment

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

if you didn't post it i would have

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Look, no shootings at all on the last days of February, March, and June! Guns ok!!" -- MAGAt gunhappys

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Fourth of July overshadowed by 16 mass shootings across US : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/05/fourth-of-july-mass-shootings-gun-violence

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yea but like, thats a whole FIVE DAY period so we'd actually see some orange and red in there

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG which country?!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lol

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was playing the game codenames with my niece over the holiday. She associates school with shooting. None of the adults were able to figure out the clue. There is definitely a gun problem.

2 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 4

At this point it’s not even a fun problem. It’s a money problem. No one can stand against the dollars from the gun lobby.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

* gun problem

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you don’t mind my asking, how old is she?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whole new meaning to Green Day

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Awww yis the last 3 days of febuary were a nice relief....... wait

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Hey I wonder if giving every single one massive publicity makes it more or less likely to happen?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is like the last fun game of tetris

2 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

So April is *not* the cruelest month...

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The NRA just see you as targets. They make the profit from gun sales and you got a country full of moving targets. They’re happy they got your money and use it to buy politicians.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anti gun activist tried lumping in gang violence and random mass shootings, as a result now everyone just cares even less about mass shootings.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Damn, that’s sad aye

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A lot of countries manage to go years without a mass shooting. The US can't even manage one week.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

A lot of countries don't send a few hundred thousand people into bankruptcy over medical bills each year either.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Remind me again what makes America "the greatest"?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Delusion.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I suspected as much.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hmmm so statically speaking the safest day is the 24th of the month and the most deadly is the 26th. I’m not sure what to do with this information.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Quick Wiki search: the US has 7 definitions of mass shootings/killings. That alone is horrifying.

2 years ago | Likes 571 Dislikes 4

That's like how Star Wars has to have different categories of canon. Because there's entirely too much Star Wars

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember if it didn't occur within the mass shooting region of the US, it's just a sparkling bloodbath

2 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 2

Also depends if it’s spelled with an additional “e” before the “y”.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It it only involves minorities and poor people then it's called gang violence. /s

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's only a Mass shooting in Massachusetts, USA. (a state that starts with "Mass" which is a not uncommon shortening of the name. Boston is there)

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

(Explaining the joke after the joke using parenthesis kind of makes the joke less funny)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not everyone is familiar with American geography.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do those definitions fall into George Carlins "soft language" categories?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The horrifying part is that the definition is continually being redefined to create a larger number of “mass shootings”

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

“I don’t know if I’m more scared that it happened, or that it happens often enough we have a phrase for it”—Broken Arrow

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate it here

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They keep redefining it to bring the numbers down.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It has never been legally defined specifically for this reason--so gun advocates can use the most finicky data model and point to it and say it's not a problem.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Innu people: "We have 7 different words for 'snow'." Americans: ...

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It's like Inuit people and words for snow

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Eh, kinda. It works sort of like German where descriptive words are joined onto the root word. It’s why German can have those insanely long words. So while we would say “packing snow” or “powder snow” as two words, Inuit people say it as “packingsnow” and “powdersnow.”

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Someone mentioned that last month, so on this months update I specified exactly which definition of mass shooting is being used by the source.

2 years ago | Likes 177 Dislikes 1

Understood but it isn't a criticism. My point was that in the UK we have 1. The disturbing part to me is how the US cannot do the same without annoying the pro gun lobby.

2 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 2

Curious if the other 6 definitions have their own terms in the UK.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Any discussion of mass shooting upsets the gun lobby. The different definitions are used to support differing claims and desired actions, even amongst groups trying to sort the problem.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They can't even research the problem. They're fucked.

2 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

FWIW, the Dickey Amendment did not prevent research into gun violence at all. It did forbid the use of tax monies for political advocacy relating to gun control. Not offering a value judgment there, but there's a considerable difference.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Sounds like you bought into the Republican lies. Tell me, how have you white-washed Rhonda Santa's behavior in florida?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Enactment of the 1996 Dickey Amendment, which prevented the CDC from using its funding "to advocate or promote gun control," largely shut down research into gun violence in the United States. — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickey_Amendment (so the end result was exactly the same)

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah, each group that tracks them has their own definition of mass shooting.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Some groups distinguish whether victims were random or targeted, some do or don’t include the shooter in the death toll, some have different counts for what’s considered “mass”… it’s almost like it’s a tough subject that doesn’t really fit in a nice and simple chart.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's why I default to the FBI definition. Other groups don't like that the FBI definition specifies fatalities instead of all injuries. FBI definition btw, is 4 or more fatalities. The infamous FBI Miami shootout was, by their definition, a mass shooting.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Time frame also comes to mind to distinguish between a mass murder and a serial killer.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thanks for including the specific definition you're using. The way we have multiple definitions makes it difficult to get intelligible statistics

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Top 10 States of happening based on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_in_2023

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I wonder what this looks like as a ratio of gun ownership per capita

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The visualization of dots on a map is pointless. It correlates to population density. The only discussion to be had is whether the rates of gunshot injuries in the US are too high. Most GRA's won't answer that question. Or they will say that the solution lies in enforcement of (unspecified) existing laws.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you can find the data, we can see.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 consecutive green days in April? Must've felt like a holiday

2 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 1

they made up for it in May

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had no idea we even had '0' days, tbh

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

April 24th is when Fox News Fired Tucker Carlson. Is it just a coincidence? I don't know, I'm just asking questions.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

April had 18 in a row. Jesus

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could we extrapolate to see when the last green day will be?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's cancelled out by the four consecutive purple days the same time the following month, unfortunately.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Which actually was a holiday

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, we had green days?

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Scattered amongst this boulevard of broken dreams, yes

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Ahhhhh.....dookie

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mass Shootings UK 2023

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I lol'd

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now overlay with holidays. Curious if there would be any correlation (understanding it doesn't necessarily tie in with causation)

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

May & June were all on the weekends.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just looked at the worst day in June and uh.

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Someone took the wrong cats I suppose.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Take your CAT? Oooohhh, i thought it was take your GAT."

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What a bad way to visualize an epidemic. Here, I fixed it:

2 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 8

its like the red line follows the blue lines

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Might even be better to do a tree chart informed by per-capita population locally.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ya I imagine some areas of the USA probably aren't as affected as others

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...why is there a recognizable two week spike?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now do a pareto by weekdays

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's a bit outta my expertise, sorry

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now do a heatmap of shootings by country

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oof that's a lotta work, how about I just steal from this site https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-deaths-by-country

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't realize Venezuela was all about that pew pew life

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pew pew life lol ya i didn't realize Greenland was either

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A country which has a weekly average mass shooting indicator ...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh that was optional, I can just delete that trendline, then it's like it doesn't exist!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Problem solved - hooray!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now graph it over the last 50 years with another line for population and maybe one more for number of people living in poverty.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol that sounds like a lotta work, man! This article can help you out tho: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199901/

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tho it would probably be more striking to graph the number of people shot per day from mass shootings

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Or just number of people shot per day.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ya maybe!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cant tell ya how many times iv tried to explain to no avail that chicago is the far from the worst city lol

2 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 2

Chicago has a dense population *and* they border the state with some of the laxest gun laws in the country.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The highest chance of violence *per capita* is in rural areas, IIRC. Cities just get shit because there's more people.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

As someone who lives near Chicago... There are shootings, but they're not as common as you think the way media portrays them. Also remember additional context: Chicago is population dense, so yeah shootings will happen more often here because there is more people in general there, but also Chicago, relatively speaking, is a very progressive city, and most of the negative reporting is coming from conservative sources.

2 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 3

I live in a city around 800k and we also get shootings every other day. But 99% of them are gang related, most often infighting. But stray bullets damage homes, injure, and sometimes even kill people every couple years. Frankly, conservatives just like to bash on progressive cities.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im with ya i live in elgin so people talk about it alot and i show numbers and go dude whats going on with the media right now is a slam campaign because rich people dont like illinois favoring the majority rather than the 1% and it never sinks in lol

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’ll never hear those sources point out how close Chicago is to Indiana, a state where you can buy a gun in a convenience store. (Hyperbole, but barely)

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I live in Chicago and I actually accidentally drove into Indiana on one occasion. The metro area extends across the state border. The idea that Indiana policies don't affect Chicago is absolutely ridiculous.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Idk what neighborhood but I lived 2 stops from midway for about 6 months. Not the most gunfire I've heard in my life by a long shot

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chicago has a population of c. 2.5m, England and Wales have a population of c. 60m. In 2022 E+W had 696 murders and Chicago had 695. That is a murder rate 25 times higher.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It would be more apt to compare Chicago to other major US cities as that is the comparison people make when calling Chicago dangerous.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

According to that website in 2022 Illinois had the most shootings at 57 total shootings and a total of 304 total victims killed or injured.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that is the highest in the nation followed by Texas at 283 and California with 246. The last two would make sense as they have the

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

highest population in the country.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

44 of the 57 shootings that took place in IL took place in Chicago. So according to that website that it is the worst city

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please tell me where that is ill give you a hint that site doesnt name any state in any way have some reading material that does https://www.populationu.com/gen/most-dangerous-cities-in-the-us

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I downloaded the data in CSV format and counted how many times each state was listed in 22. Then I counted how many times chicago was listed. Il had 57 mass shootings and 44 being from Chicago. There were 50 people killed, 254 injured with a total of 304 total.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also California had a total of 246 total deaths/injuries while Texas had 283. Texas has around 1 million registered firearms in the country while california has 400,000. So while texas has a little more total, when you look at total population and how many firearms it shows that gun control has little effect on total gun violence. Esp when you look at IL when it comes on op at 304 total victims and its a very strict state when it comes to firearm laws.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again all this data is coming from the website that OP is getting his numbers from

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is the worst city and which is the safest?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

False. Black bear.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, one month a few years ago New York was so safe that it had a lower murder rate than London.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Seems like the more the poverty, the more violent crime? Linked? You betcha.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Missouri killing it with 3 appearances in the top ten!

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, it is Missouri-ble there. 😁👍

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interesting, with how fast Josh Hawley can run away from danger, I thought it might be lower. Maybe his cowardice doesn't extrapolate to the state as a whole.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0