Regarding the latest butthurt snowflake outrage

Sep 15, 2022 10:58 AM

SenseiTheDefender

Views

69226

Likes

1305

Dislikes

135

Meanwhile, Nigeria is banning white people from being shown in advertisement to "preserve heritage". The irony is palpable.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, what you're saying is swapping the race of a fictional character is ok, right?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 9

All I care about is keeping the red hair. Go gingers (of any race)!

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Disney thanks you for the free advertisement.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Pff not focusing on the real issue.. Where is the shell bra?!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She could be white and I still wouldnt watch it

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Is it just me or are you getting tired of movie remakes? So hard to put a PoC in something new? Or even anything new at all? lol

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Honestly IMO it's less the remakes and more that they're shitty live-action cash grabs.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That’s a good point. I wonder, production wise, if they are a lot cheaper to produce. I have no knowledge in that area…

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What kind of dye does she use to keep her hair red underwater

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuck Disney for throwing a young actress into the PR-meat grinder. She will be harassed.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Sure thing. But if someone dare to change a black character it's racist, right?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I believe the term "white-washing" is used in the same way as the reverse card in Uno.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is all to make you not think about the fact that Sebastian is going to be a realistic-looking crab, instead of, you know... expressive.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Will he still be Jamaican

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huh, for some reason I always thought he was supposed to be a lobster, I think it was his long ass face XD

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All I see is the admission that the writers cannot come up with a character of their own and they have to ride the coattails of a classic.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Its Didney remake so its shit no matter who is lead

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I wish they would stop remaking movies, haven't been a fan of any of them.

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

They only exist so they can keep the IP. They aren't meant to be good.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Then why not make a 39 second short and release it

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fair.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

One one hand I agree. On the other, just don't watch it.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Every single Disney remake has been worse than the original. Why don't they remake the movies of theirs that didn't do well and need it?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

because they're not artists, they just hire artists to make money for them

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they need to do something with them or the copyrights expire. Disney is notorious for trying to extend them infinitely.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

kids mostly love them and it sells tickets, d+ subscriptions, dvds and in home purchases, as a parent keep them coming

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want her to have shark teeth and blodthirsty murderous streak, like cannonical mermaids did not this "little mermaid " fanfic BS

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

There’s a show called Siren on Freeform that has exactly that.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If Disney was going to make this no matter what, there are worse things than making Ariel black. Giving Melissa McCarthy work is one thing.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Ok, but she was actually very funny in Thor 4

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I completely forgot she had a cameo in that.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironically another miscasting, original Ursula was based on a drag Queen, Divine (RIP), which would’ve been awesome to see.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I like her but she's not a good fit. They really should've given a drag queen a chance to play Ursula since she was modeled after Divine.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I keep coming back to the idea of Titus Burgess, but if you know of a good drag queen that can sing I'm willing to adjust my head casting.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a few things to say on this. Firstly, I really hate the "what do mermaids look like in real life" or "it's fantasy" arguments, becaus

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 8

They are shit. Always have been, always will be. They are made by people who either don't understand the issues people have or just don't

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Care and don't want to understand. Yes, people are aware mermaids aren't real. It doesn't fucking matter. Yes, its fantasy. However, it is a

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Character based off a certain authors fantasy, and in said fantasy the character was based in Danish culture and since people often write

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

But the original Story was clearly set in the Caribbean, the Danish West Indies. A white Ariel makes no sense.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't have to make sense according to how you would write it. (I mean the people you are implying are common in the carribean were moved

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Their own experiences, the character would represent that culture. So here we are, once again spitting in the face of that fantasy and

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Hiding behind "its fantasy" as if that means you can change whatever you like in any novel because of its genre. If you want to write a

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Disney don't care if the remakes suck. Soon as it extends their IPs to keep that toy n junk selling shit flowing

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

People say they suck, but they make millions of dollars, meaning they're at least good enough that people other than you enjoy them...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sadly yes

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because millions of people exist who pay 30 bucks to watch "eh" movies instead of fans who'd criticize the movie. Disney wants those drones.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You sound like the kind of guy who was okay with Morbius. Whatever, your shit taste is your problem.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You sound very upset over the idea that some people like movies you don't.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nothing beats the OGs

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I legit don’t understand. She looks amazing.

3 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 15

No one cares half as much as the money Disney is making pretending people give a shit.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Racism.

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

Over a kids show? For little girls to feel seen? It’s so disheartening :( but you’re right. It IS just racism.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

For crying out loud, dude; they got upset over a fucking M&M. If you have any hope for these people, discard it.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Guys can we focus on the real issues here? Those being DISNEY MAKING LIVE ACTION REMAKES THAT ARE HOT GARBAGE?

3 years ago | Likes 306 Dislikes 6

Thank you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I personally LOVED the Aladdin live action

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And look like realistic dull garbage. Nature documentaries havd more vibrant color pallettes.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they want to remake some movies, remake some vintage classics that could really use it. Like Bedknobs and Broomsticks.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GARBAGE DAY

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I was about to ask that because how many of these remakes have actually been good? I mean I actually kind of liked the Jungle Book

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

remake but I haven't ever seen the original Jungle Book so maybe the story was just that strong.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aladdin was fine, but characters and all it was just the first movie but less exaggerated, less bombastic

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's kinda all of em...why can't they remake Atlantis or Treasure Planet. Hot damn would these be awesome.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's actually the real issue. I see very few people actually mad about the actress. I see people using that as an excuse for criticism.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Billions.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And now when it fails at the box office, they can say it's from this astroturf bullshit instead of it being because they suck at movies now

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Alladin and Beauty and the Beast were good. Haven't seen any others.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I just realized today that the actres is Halle BAILEY, not Halle BERRY. I was so confused by her face for several days.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah i honestly don't give a shit about the mermaid's complexion it's the repeated ruining of the legacy animated movies that annoys me

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

How is it ruined? I have no interest in these films, but their existence does not detract from the animated films.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

It's hit or miss. I liked LK, Smith genie was kinda depressing tbh, RiP Mr Williams, but malificent was pretty good honestly. Idk about 2.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Faithfulness to the source? There's some valid complaints but tbh, it's all got layers of sources now, so faith to which one is an issue too

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like it's a love story but they'll fine a way to add fighting scenes and explosions.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which still doesn't detract from the animated films.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Or that they cast a black actor as a token because they didn’t redesign the character to match. IE: the neon red hair looks like shit.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

If they actually cared about the casting choice they would tailor the designs to fit the pick. Instead of putting brand ahead of them.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Looks a normal color in the movie (not this drawings) to me

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The close ups I’ve seen are terrible. The red doesn’t work in general and they dyed her scalp.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disney has run out of ideas for new/quality movies and are just recycling everything.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Arent there any folktale left to Disneyfy?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the part that pisses me off... there are tons on unexplored myths and legends from around the world. Tell me new stories dammit!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're remaking them just to keep their copyright and trademark statuses.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno. Lion King was tepid garbage.. It was my least favourite film of 2019.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

*Slaps desk* THOSE WERENT REAL FUCKIN LIONS, IT WAS CGI AND NOT LIVE ACTION.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they really screwed themselves with the photorealistic lions looking generic AF and not reusing the original voice cast

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Savagely disagree. Dumpster fire. But hey, that’s just like, my opinion, man.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

To be more specific. It's the kind of garbage when you remove it from the bin, leaks. So you have to double bag it.. Leaving behind a stink.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats the thing, they know its bad but they want you to focus on "everyone being racist" making the movie immune to critics

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"Immune to critics" sounds like the sort of bullshit some bigoted moron would say to try to immunize against being called a racist.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Be mad about recycled content, they should have come up with something new.

3 years ago | Likes 129 Dislikes 4

They won’t, so you do it.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

Honestly I am mad about this change simply because black people deserve new, not handydowns.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

This is such a flaccid argument. Books/film/tv have been recycling content since storytelling began.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but when books do it, it’s called “second edition.”

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or just let the original be.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

But that takes EFFORT. Why not just re-do the same story over and over? Much easier!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But that means the IP could fall in to the public domain and they can't have that.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They could still be transformative with it, though. Change the location, adapt using other folklore. Look what they are doing w/ Namor.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now see, THAT would have been cool. Its normal to recycle base story plots, but changing the aspects of the story (setting, character 1/

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

motive, even genre etc) is what can really make it its own piece. 2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The IP STARTED in the public domain, then Disney did what Disney does.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The IP IS STILL in the public domain, you just can't use Disney's depictions of the characters.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Indeed.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there is only so many fables/legends they can adapt XD

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

If only there was a way to create new fables?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

that would require to make new ip and new ip don't sell as good

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but the copyrights!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Little Mermaid is public domain. So is Cinderella and Snow White, the Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But not Disney's version of the characters and story.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My whole thing is this.. don’t black people deserve ORIGINAL content ?

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

This is how a lot of people have felt about this. Why not give them a truly original thing? Seems rude to just be like "here, have a >

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

crappy live-action remake that a bunch of racist crybabies are going to make a huge stink about!" They should be working diligently to >

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

create a new story, a new set of characters, and a new idea...at the end of the day that would be/feel so much better.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Why are you acting like it's a binary? They can do both at once.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Can =/= should

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's been my position. Corporate pandering w recycled content is gross. Im a 38yr old dude that loved Moana for it's uniqueness specific..

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

..to culture. This Mermaid repackage is lazy cash grab that dismisses criticism as "ur racist"

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Moana is legit one of the best Disney/Pixar animated movies in a long time. Love that movie.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Black girls deserve an original mermaid . Why can’t she be Ariel’s friend . Why do we have to change existing characters ?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Ah yes, the inspiring story of The Little Mermaid...'s friend. Stop phrasing this in terms of "giving" black people something. They cast a >

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

black actor to portray a character whose skin color is irrelevant to the character. And the world kept turning.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"They can have their own mermaid. A separate mermaid! Separate but equal!" - The whole 'make an original character' argument

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is even a black and deaf "?" mermaid in ariel. But making it good and not blaming racism when it tanks is hard.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also now that i mentioned it that would have been a good/decent movie if it was made right.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seems like i was wrong. She was Latina.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do not plan to watch it therefore do not care.

3 years ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 15

Im just waiting for a black Tarzan remake.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if I planned on watching it why would I care?1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also valid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I base my viewing habits somewhat on how mad conservatives get at a show or movie. They're like reverse oracles and my viewing signals to

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the only conservatives that would actually get mad relating to you watching or not are the shareholders that don't want rich people taxes

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Producers to keep making stuff that pisses off snowflake cons. Win win.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I want what every self-respecting person who watches Little Mermaid wants... Pervy Easter eggs.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfathomably based.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Fathoms... Under the sea

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

gonna be honest. I've RARELY cared a great deal about movies. So I've never looked at trailers. I had no idea this came out til imgur memes!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I still have not seen anyone actually complain about this. Must just be some fringe bullshit.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Try opening twitter,it's rampant

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Fair enough

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and reddit probably. But i don't need to open either of those up to know that they are cesspools of scum.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The correct response to all Disney live action trash

3 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 6

Exactly. In fact, the assmad screaming of incels and racists over the movie is more entertainment than I'd ever get from the film itself.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Oh its live action? Yeah my interest just dropped into a different dimension.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

YAAAAS

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I may have cared if they didn't keep her a redhead but they did so I don't which is funny as I'll never see it.... I like redheads ....

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

All of you are my people

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

while i agree, i was surprised by the alladin one. wasn't as good, but they at least didn't straight up completl butcher it.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Or completely copy it word for word. Take some creative license at least.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only thing I truly didn't like about the Alladin remake was that weird unique song that came out of freaking NOWHERE.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Jasmine's song? Not only was it weird but it hilariously made no difference to the plot despite it being her big "girl power" moment.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah that song. It totally made no difference and broke the flow of the film.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same, but I still wonder if dreads would work underwater.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only dreads would work in sea water.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Explain? I don't know all the physics behind dreads, especially in relation to water.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sea water causes hair to go brittle so the only way to have long hair is to clump it together. Such as in dreads.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1) Studios keep pulling this "People hate our film cause they're racist or misogynist" crap to deflect any critique of a crap film.

3 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 6

In this case, it’s because they’re racist.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 21

Yes. Every single person who doesn't LOVE this movie? Racist. Same with Ghostbuster remake, right? All just HATE women. You fell for it...

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

But yeah, 100% of people who bitch about movies with a lone manufactured controversy are bigots.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

There are people going on and on about race. But like other race-baiting, it's a small group that got amplified by social media.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd believe it was just trolls, but a good chunk of america is really fucking racist.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't give a shit about the movie. Still super sus to get all mad about a black girl playing a fish. I mean why else be angry?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why make it the norm that watching/like not not watching/disliking a movie into a political issue? This isn't the first movie doing it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We're not saying that, but your insistence that we are is telling about your own insecurities. We can tell the difference.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You're reading a lot into me and you're entirely wrong. But go on, tell me how you know me more than I know myself. It's telling.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ghostbusters is a great example because you people bitched and screeched about it being inferior before it ever came out.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

2) Ghostbuster 2016 got that ball rolling and I don't understand how so many people are still falling for it.

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

3) I swear a week after this comes out and the numbers are bad they'll again blame the audience for being racist like CW's Batwoman.

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

People would need more than a 3 second attention span to care

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did you see that ludicrous display last night?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bots and idiots on both sides that don't realize they are being played like a fiddle by the PR agencies.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

1) It's an unsustainable system. Real critics can't come out and call a bad movie a bad movie for fear of being called racist which erodes

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is your second example of a film that was review bombed to hell and back before it ever came out.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Have....have you watched it? I have. It's bad. Like, really bad.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I’ve seen it. It was better than 2, but not as good as 1. But that’s not even the point I’m making. You people trashed it before it came out

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

So yeah, it’s sus as hell when y’all pretend it’s not because of bigotry, but you have hard opinions before you even see the thing.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

"Ariel should be white, damnit!"....Really? What color are mermaids in real life?

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 17

I don't know. I keep getting distracted by the venom sacs

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sorta blueish-grey.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

You know, the same color as jesus. That ought to solve *any* arguments.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I assumed the problem was them changing Ariel to black instead of making a new mermaid princess.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

You assumed wrong.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The latter would have been such a better option. It's a much less artificial way of promoting diversity, makes for a canonical POC lead, and

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

would be new content rather than just recycling an old story.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And making it a live-action remake when they have a really bad history of those, like Lion King and Pinocchio.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

best scene

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There was a black mermaid in one of the spin offs

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would’ve been great if they used her and make a “The Wiz” type movie set in the Caribbean with Rihanna as the main voice

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but that would mean they actually have to try for once and not copy-paste most of the story...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Seeing as how she is a daughter of a Greek god. If you want to go that route, this is the best answer.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a mess in the first Disney movie. She's a Danish character, with a Greek father who live in the Caribien sea, but still next to Europe?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Honestly, as long as it turns out good...really not worried lol. It is force casting to try and prove a point that I fear. I just want a...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...good interpretation. I mean...what Tiana was turned white? Would we get the same reaction? I just want a good movie, not force fed...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...someone's ideology.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 21

I'm gonna be mad if Ariel doesn't get eight Legs

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Sure sure...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you under the impression The Little Mermaid was a real person?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No. Just that someone came up with an original character once instead of twisting someone else's.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've argued this already, they still find a way to make it about race

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Id care more about how the actress potrays the role shes in over what color she is.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

From that clip she has major pipes ?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It might just be the scene in the pic but i'm not sure if her pipes would make me get over the literal fish eyes haha

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just wish the lighting was better. I didn't get the feeling that she was underwater in this shot

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Give it time. Between trailer and release a lot of postproduction happens

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And if other VFX of this nature is anything to go by, it'll end up looking grey as fuck.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok so a white person is the best who auditioned to play a Tibetan monk. Do You give him the role, or chose someone of that ethnicity??

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Like Tilda swinton in that marvel movie?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Give him the role and just put make up on him

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Wait till the fine out Price Eric is white and there's going to be an interracial kissing scene.

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

Too bad Prince Eric isn't Princess Erica, the Caucasian Lesbian.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Bold of you to assume that Prince Eric will play a role in this remake.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Could be princess Erica

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But, he is, they cast a white dude for the role.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's going to be in it, but not really that important according to the makers, as they don't want Ariel to be motivated by finding love.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And he looks just like him. That's some weird fan casting.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Their heads would collectively explode.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

They wouldn’t, though. They’d just be like “NUH-UH” and keep repeating the same bullshit

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Their record needs fixin.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm kinda curious about the first argument presented here, considering this is a character that is almost 200 years old and was initially 1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

described as "her skin was as clear and delicate as a rose-leaf, and her eyes as blue as the deepest sea" and has been represented as such 2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

ever since. Then to change that description now, isn't it Disney that is bringing race into it by altering the character after 190 years? 3

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Are you serious? In the 200 year old version she dies at the end by becoming sea foam. Stories change, human civilization changes, we are

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

allowed to alter stories to reflect modern times.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Rose-leaf i incorrect, it's a mistranslation from Danish of "skær som et rosenblad" which actually translates as "a rose petal shine/tint".

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So her skin is white (mentioned elsewhere in the novel), but with a bit of pink like she is blushing, in the original story

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't mind them changing her skin color, but it is hilarious that other people interpret that mistranslation as meaning her skin was green

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is one version. Fairy tales are old as fuck oral traditions. What's written is one version. Hans Christian tales aren't religious texts

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Never said they were religious texts, just trying to point out the ridiculousness of the argument that people opposed to this are the ones

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"bringing race into it".

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0