about there I'd say

May 24, 2016 11:47 AM

ryanmcg88

Views

29211

Likes

1164

Dislikes

165

Even predatory animals dont eat every thing around them. They draw lines as well.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They forgot a goat

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nobody gonna talk about the dog as tall as a cow?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Repost.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At least source the persons twitter before stealing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rabbit is on the wrong side of the line

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I agree!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pigs are smarter than dogs

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Depends on what country you're from

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

One more. Horses are assholes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As an asian..... there need not be a line

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All people want to live, too. Why should animals get special treatment?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no eating pussy jokes? is imgur feeling OK?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Isn't the saying "Don't knock it till you try it?"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Depending on where you live, there is no line. Just saying.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

I think the line is a personal choice really.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's easy enough to say you'd never ever eat a pet when you've never been really really hungry.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Horse is awesome. I was stationed in Sicily. Had been there 2 years eating hamburger and steaks before realizing I'd yet to see a cow.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Says the group that euthanizes 95% of the animals they take in.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

? Thers no PETA logo on this sign?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but it cuts off before the end of the billboard.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Why not both?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

line? food and pets can be the same species. meat raised on pet food usually tastes awful and carnivore meat has more toxin buildup.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

That's why I stopped eating human.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Seeing as humans are omnivores... does that mean you raised humans on pet food?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Vegans can be useful...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Plant Lifes Matter!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Canivourus animals have a very sharp taste.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Surely there was no need to put 4 dogs and 3 cats and only 1 of all the others?

9 years ago | Likes 486 Dislikes 3

They had to though. Theyre a very un-imaginative lot

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, some dog breeds were designed to be food. I don't think this reflects that, though.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Obviously it's because Golden Retrievers are more delicious than Bulldogs, and thus lean more on the "Food" side.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, maybe I like some dogs better than others?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Like 10 of the 12 songs on an album, this is what we call "filler"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't call me Shirley.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This wouldn't be a Peta ad if it wasn't heavy handed

9 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 4

Yeah Peta. Most animals are pet's except for the 2 or 3 that we eat. Or wait... Probably the other way around.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

we may not have the starvation problems that exist in third world countries, but the more in danger of starving to death i am the further~

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

~that line begins to park itself to the left.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Clearly it's just indicating that Golden Retrievers are better to eat than Bulldogs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

two cow like objects

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Dairy and beef.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It is needed. Some breeds tastes better.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we need a strawman

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's one of the reasons I'm a vegetarian. We don't play the pet-or-food game.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

As a fellow vegetarian, I enjoy not having to play that game either.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No need to play the game. Prepared right, I'm sure dog is delicious.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Depends on what country you live in i guess. People eat horse cat dog while some worship cows.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Who worships cows?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

hindu people

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hindus do not worship cows. They are venerated and honored but not worshiped; they are not a deity in Hinduism.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

What ever. Like i know the details about hindu. Calm down for fucks sake

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Was just sharing some information. :(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A whole billboard saying I'm a vegan.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

So what do you consider billboards that promote the meat and dairy industries?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Capitalism

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

My point is that people who eat meat are far more widely advertised and don't get attacked nearly as much as vegans do.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I'm in no way shape or form a vegan, but I have friends that are.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

It's a catch 22. If you don't tell someone you are a vegan a show up to dinner, it's awkward. If you tell them, it's advertising. lol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm no vegan or wtvr but I find it curious that nobody takes this billboard seriously. It is as if there was a fear of profound thinking

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 14

Because naturally anyone who sees nothing wrong with eating some meat, but not other meat, is fearful of profound thinking. /sarcasm

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Is it so profound that dogs have a stronger companion role with humans than cows?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

The billboard's argument is that a companion role is not morally relative when it comes to making decisions on what is permissible to eat

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd try eating dog/cat, given the opportunity, if that's what you are getting at.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

This is about as profound as your statement.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

I find it curious that you find this billbared related to profound thinking.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why not?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it's stupid. I eat vegetarians. That's where the line is drawn.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Because it is stupid. Why six cats, but only one cow? Why are rabbits on the pet side?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

That has nothing to do with the argument.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Agreed. And it's usually the hypocrites who bitch about mythical preachy vegans that struggle most with this.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"Fear of profound thinking" Oh god, just how seriously do you take yourself?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

Not so much, why? Just because I phrase it like that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh? What's to take seriously? Its biased (multiple cats/dogs), meaningless, and from the hypocrites PETA. (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 11

What do you mean? An argument doesnt fall because of who says it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/2) To give it credence would be a travesty of reason.It should be derided for the nonsense it is.(see H.L.Mencken)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Because the animals to the left are more valuable as companions or workers than as food (save for the rabbit, which belongs on the right).

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

also eating predators is inefficient.Hence not eating cats/dogs

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

How do you define what's more valuable? Don't you think it is egocentric to look at others and say "How can they serve me?"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is actually economically more valuable. This is not an opinion. A good working horse is expensive, and it does not play for itself 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

slaves are also economically more valuable. Should we have slaves?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now you're getting into a different argument. One of self-awareness. Self-awareness has only been observed in chimps, dolphins, and magpies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 with its meat. It does, however, pay for itself with its labor. The same goes for all traditional beasts of burden.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The rabbit should be on the other side of the food line!!! Though seriously, it's a cultural thing, not a moral thing. I don't think there's

9 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 8

Rabbits are such pests, they shouldn't even be anywhere near pet line. Just takes 1 person and you got rabbits fucking up trees and stuff

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My parents used to call rabbit "French chicken" just so they could trick me into eatting it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Eating carnivores is wildly inefficient which is why I'm against eating them though

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

When you live in a place where cats and rats run rampant, eating them is no different than eating coons and possums in the south.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

morals are a cultural thing.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Moral subjectivism is bonkers. Is it morally permissible to perform female genital mutilation just because it is done by a certain culture?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is in their culture, which is why people of your/my cultures may feel that their culture should be forcibly altered to resemble ours.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

anything bad about countries that eat cats or guinea pigs or horses or whatever. They just have different cultural values than we do.

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

It's not what you/they/we eat that bugs me. it's how they are treated, it's worse in some places but it's a global problem.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

this is funny because you should see how the US meat industry treats their animals

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Im the futherst from an animal cruelity activist. But i do have to agree with you.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

did i just see an agreement....ON THE INTERNET?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As long as its not the dog, cats should be fine as long as you only eat each one 8 times.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Why dog is bad but pig is good?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's counter productive for meat production when you habe to feed your animal even more meat.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So it's effectiveness issue? Might be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have you tried bacon?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Have you tried dog?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What about eating that racoon, guy?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You misspelled raccoon even though you can clearly see it in my username. >:( But in all seriousness it doesn't bother me.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Damnit!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like raccoons a lot but I understand that they're destructive animals and don't hold it against people that kill them.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Catching them and releasing them somewhere else is easy enough to do, though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

This guy thinks catching raccoons is easy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Animals don't possess the cognitive functions to desire life. They try to survive because it's a biological impulse.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 13

I'd say that the "desire to live" is a biological impulse we have (as well as rest of the cognitive functions). It's a very thin line.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except humans possess the capability to not want to survive as well.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that alone isn't a good argument. Some mentally handicapped person might be the same way & we still include them.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Good point. I wonder if the handicapped are tasty?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because they are of our species. None of these animals are.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Right, but you 1st suggested certain cogn. functions as the relevant criterion, not species-affiliation.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Did I exclude species being a potential factor as well by that? Pretty sure I didn't. It's simply the foremost criterion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fair enough. Just wasn't clear from the context.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Now draw your line, kill, skin and cook chosen animal. Certain countries would basically be vegan if they had to slaughter their own :/

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

I have never killed an animal to eat it, but I'd happily do it if I wanted meat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Only cats, dogs and horses are the animals I have not killed, skinned, butchered and cooked. Hunger changes people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From that list*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, if it came down to it, I would totally hunt a cow.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being that I'd have to quit my job for all the time I'd spend doing so, yes. But not because I haven't hunted and killed my own food.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

i would but i would definitely have to learn how to skin an animal first that shit is a lot harder than it looks.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Rabbit is in then. Just cut through the skin in the middle and peel back. You can get the meat without opening the body cavity.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Damn kids don't even know what they are eating, the connection and respect has been lost... buy, consume, sleep, repeat

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

If I had to slice one open for dinner tonight I would instead of eating a salad. I tried going vegetarian. I was so hungry lol

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You forgot to vape and crossfit, only the hunger will vanish. On a serious note I think some people just need high octane food, I know I do.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I vaped briefly but it's too similar to smoking & I'd still smoke. I quit both 18 mos ago. I don't crossfit, but I do lift. So ...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're 2 for 2!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, because when people had to slaughter and dress their own meat, everyone was vegan. (This is called sarcasm)

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

Sarcastic maybe but the growth of the meat industry is an interesting read. When we killed and ate our own meat it was a treat now 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Most western countries eat meat 3 X per day 7 days per week & no thought on the affects. I'm not vegan, work in catering n see this everyday

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Because it's cheaper and affordable now that factory farming has been introduced.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

They're saying that if everyone today had to kill and prep their own meat, lots, if not most people would turn vegetarian/vegan

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

And what part of that basic logic do you struggle so much with

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow, you really think I'm an idiot, don't you?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

That may actually be the case, it appears.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6