Foreign Concept

Oct 24, 2016 12:30 AM

AlexRowan

Views

105589

Likes

3628

Dislikes

485

It's almost like, dare I say it? He is suggesting respect for your fellow human being *Gasp!*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We exist. We are called Libertarians.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Actually, only place where this doesn't work is regarding the antivacs. They have to vac anyways, or we're dead.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think everyone should have guns and abortions

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

If you don't like gays, don't buy one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tho to be fair, I can't shoot someone with my abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

i wish the left would apply the whole "not all muslims are terrorists" to responsible gun owners when a mass shooting happens.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Let me respond with that same genius logic. Don't like genocide? Don't listen to Hitler. There, wasn't that easy?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm way more likely to get shot by a gun I don't own than I am to be forced to marry another dude.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

It doesn't make any sense applied to those though.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Why not?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Very few people are shot by gay marriage

9 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 35

What about crew that work on the sets of gay porn? Surely a few have been shot....

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

But at least 50% of people in a gay marriage have been stabbed.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cumshots.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do not try to apply reason

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Something Orlando

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 9

Florida Man at it again.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And who has fewer abortions than the gays?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And drugs...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Especially drugs

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that's my wife's dad

9 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 0

Give the fetus a gun.

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 3

Unless it's gay!

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

Then give it two.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

For equality

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

If it's a female, give it .78 of a gun.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The solution is simple. Abortions for some and miniature American flags for others.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Don't like same sex marriage? Don't get same sex married.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So this meme is assuming this dude is against gay marriage and abortions because he likes/supports guns?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

No he's not. Don't assume.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're right. He's not, but the meme is hence my comment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

A bunch of us do. We're called rational human beings.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Don't like gay people? Don't buy one!

9 years ago | Likes 256 Dislikes 2

wait what

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone knows you don't buy gay men, you simply rent them. Appropriate forms of payment include- compliments, clothes, theater tickets...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And wine tastings!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you don't like gay people don't get gay married.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah! Get lesbian married.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've been saying this for years!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't like black people? Don't buy one! *runs away*

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

Woopwoopwooopwoopwopp

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Laughed out loud! Hahaahahaha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as a gun owner, to be fair, a bad person owning a gun will get others killed but a bad marriage or abortion hurts no one.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

Except the child who was aborted, of course.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

do you think that more than half of aborted children will grow up in loving homes? cared for properly?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they would have never gained consciousness so they don't mind.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

So it's ok to shot sleeping people then?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

if that's what you pro life nuts think a fetus is equivalent to then yes . please do and tell everyone

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"If you don't like slaves don't own one" amirite - at one time the logic was Africans were not human... 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 9

Exactly! The arbitrary declaration of what a human is has led to the worst blights on human history. The same will be for abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

a unique human DNA is created at conception, keep pretending its not human all you want, science says you're wrong 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

Is it really worth taking away rights from an already living, breathing, self-sufficient person. We already have to many goddamn people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't imagine how hard it would be to explain to this man that it's not that I dislike guns, I just don't want to be shot by a crazy dude

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 8

What type of gun control are you thinking of? I'm curious

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mental health background checks, waiting periods, limitations on private sellers, and (don't quote me on this) I think some states 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

1. already exists (since 1968), 2. in some states (and during BHVPA in the '90s), 3. in some states (plus some federal restrictions).

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are states that already have these and they don't do anything. Also your focus on rifles is entirely unfounded. Read FBI table 8

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Restrict quick slide buttons for clips and limit mag volume for assault rifles, which for recreation would only slightly inconvenience

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

California has laws on the books the prohibit quick release mags. They do this by having it so you have to take apart the gun to release 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

the mag. This is a lot more than a slight inconvenience. To get around it though, people have developed what is called a bullet button. 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

So do you know anything about firearms and beyond what you hear on CNN, or?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

-the 'and'

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Do you think the 2nd amendment was for recreation?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Do you think your AR-15 will be enough to stop the imaginary Orwellian government in your head from running you over with an Abrams tank?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Who's they? Why must you contribute to the stupid? Not everybody that supports gun rights is anti gay or abortion. Support everyone's rights

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 17

Your hypocrisy is the problem, not my affinity for firearms.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 24

No correlation between right-wingers and ammosexuals, at all.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

It's probably a positive one, they do love their ammo. Need it for their guns

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Wait, are you actually trying to use "ammosexuals" unironically and as a derogatory term? Oh man, that's hilarious.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not "trying" to do anything. What do you think the term means, exactly. Something "ironic?"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an inside joke with gun owners. Exaggerating that we're "persecuted" like homosexuals and that people can't accept our "love." (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha, do you really believe that, or are you in denial about the fact that the term is making fun of your gun fetish?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/2) It's also only used by those who are already pro-gay rights because of that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't want him having guns because I don't trust him not to shoot me. Nobody is going to kill you with their abortion in the street.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Someone gets killed with every abortion. Just because it's not you doesn't make it ok.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

No *people* get killed.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A *human being* gets killed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Human *cells* get killed. Not a person. Biological material.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Those cells are the entirety of a unique individual at that point. Not being self aware doesn't make it ok to marginalize them. Same a 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So....based on nothing other than he is wearing camouflage, we just assume he's against abortion and same sex marriage? Haha okay

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 24

aaaDUUUUUHHHHHH.... totes obvs brooh

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well it's not really about him in particular. These are just beliefs commonly held together, let's not pretend otherwise, that's silly.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Pro-gun, anti same sex marriage, pro-life are all typically right wing stances. I'm not saying it applies individually, but politically 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there's only two options to choose from and people, generally, tend to embrace only one side of the spectrum. 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As somebody from a rural area in the south, this is pretty much the uniform for anti abortion and gay. Stereotypes exist for a reason.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

As someone from a rural area in South Carolina...I have no idea what you're talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(1) From Kentucky, nearly everyone I know from fat goatee rednecks to the highly educated support gun rights and gay rights. Some are torn

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

(2) on certain aspects of abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Actually the post is about the argument, not about a single persons opinion. It shows the flaws of this argument.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a simple argument for simple minds. You could translate it to "don't like to be shot, don't buy a gun". Doesn't work, right?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The standards of reality are calibrated to average, low intelligence. What is un-assumable for most is easily, accurately assumed by few.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't see any camouflage

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

THAT'S THE POIN... oh wait. he's not actually wearing any. nevermind

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That means it's working!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's the standard hypocrisy about being 'non-judgemental' which is espoused by a certain political leaning quite often when convenient...

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

...that comes directly from their big, black book of facts....RIGHT?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah...good thing you don't do that.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I lean left...which is who I think you're referring to.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The irony of this comment...lol.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The irony is that both sides say it, which is why it's a good joke!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The difference is it is very difficult to abort someone else's baby or gay marry somebody against their will. People get shot all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Well, you are aborting the baby against its will... but you arbitrarily dehumanize it for your convenience.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Hey, if an unborn baby wants to get gay married, who am I to judge?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Do you think the baby would agree with being aborted?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

That's why I strongly believe babies need to be given a gun at the moment of conception.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So . . a same sex gun that shoots abortions! Take my money!

9 years ago | Likes 781 Dislikes 11

Sounds like a secret weapon that'd be in South Park: Stick of Truth. Except the abortions are Nazi zombies.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Booya!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

shooting an abortion... feels kinda... repetitive.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So a lesbian running around with coat hangers?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah dang it my gun keeps fucking other guns

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

all guns shoot abortions if you're accurate (:

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Usually in the 40th to 80th trimester.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Technically they do shoot abortions, but... Damn. It's hard to even joke about shooting pregnant women. I'm sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 12

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 6, 2016 10:47 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

+1 for full Metal Jacket reference.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It isn't to hard! You just haven't been tainted enough to do it casually. Imo, it's nice to see a pure person around here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not that hard. I had a jolly good laugh.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your name isn't Bill then.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are weak.

9 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 4

What a gem found in a reply in a reply

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

A reply in a reply in a reply, technically.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You could just kill anyone and call it a post-term abortion.. no need to go after pregnant women.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Don't like babies, don't make one. Am I doing this right?

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 14

Exactly. Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

Yup

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Don't want to die in birth from that horrible problem your having? Too bad! Both you and the baby have to die because abortions are bad!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

Actually, the church doesn't consider that to be an abortion. They consider it to be a side effect of saving the mother.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yeah...that's exactly what abortion people fight for.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

It's not what they think they're fighting for, but it's what they'll get.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually, the church doesn't consider that to be an abortion. They consider it to be a side effect of saving the mother.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Any source? I'm genuinely interested to see if they've said that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've only talked to some priests about it. But I'll definitely see if I can find another source for you!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Here you go! Thanks so much for asking. I'd love to know what you think of the article :-) http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_hist_c1.htm

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Interesting read. Thanks :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Could always just not partake in the act that causes pregnancy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

As a misanthrope, I whole heartedly support the death of humanity!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're right, it's much better for people to perpetually crap out children that they are unable to feed. It works so well for stray cats.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Shit happens. You can't just tell an entire population of people that they have to ignore their basic urges and deny themselves comforts.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I agree, it's ridiculous to expect humans to act civilized and not in a manner similar to stray cats. Responsibility is for bitches.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You are the uncivilized one, here. Humans are supposed to be intelligent enough to empathize with one another...hm.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Want to over exaggerate to try and make your point? Too bad. Rape, incest and mother's health are exempt. Most pro-lifers recognize that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Just like most pro-choice thinks late term isn't good, with the exemption of health of the mom.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"Over exaggerate?" As opposed to exaggerating just enough?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Commonly used term. Surprised you've never heard it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I've heard it. That doesn't make it any less redundant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter what you want. The republican party itself wants it all illegal. You should know the citizens don't choose, our govt does.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Personally, I'm in the "safe, legal and rare" camp.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But I hear lots of Republicans say that rape, incest and health of the mother are exceptions. I believe the current nominee has that belief.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just ask anyone at those pla par clinics that have been closed down thanks to republicans or in general how they tried to get all of them.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Except that other people having guns may actually affect you. So yeah.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 31

I am to concerned about the lack of space in peoples gun safes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Abortions affect us too. Like I don't like when shitty people have shitty kids. Could've gotten an abortion and saved some annoyance.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

I think abortions affect fetuses too .right !

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 17

are you a fetus?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

what you just said proves my point .

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 25, 2016 4:02 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Comparing Syrians to things that have never been conscious. You cry over wasted sperm too?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 25, 2016 4:02 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

We should also apply equally to all issues then, too. Like slavery.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 21

Takes away others' rights. The whole point is that we all have the right to our own decisions

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

I mean one of the two examples is very arguably (depending on stance) killing a person so that would certainly take away their rights

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not depending on the stance, anybody that says otherwise is evil and incredibly selfish. It is the arbitrary declaration of what a human is.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

No one can use your body without your permission, regardless of their age. Whether a fetus is a person is irrelevant.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Truth.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm assuming we're talking about guns as tools self defense. If a gun is used for self defense it's required that they fear for their (1/2?)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2/3) life. That means a criminal decided to take your life. Now what do you do? Let him kill you? Or defend yourself with whatever force is

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(3/4) NECESSARY to keep your life safe? That's where most people go wrong, btw. They're too quick to escalate to unnecessary force and it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except that very much impacts the other independent human involved.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 13

No such thing as an independent human

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

Thought it was pretty self explanatory.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

How am I not independent?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whoooosh

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Unlike getting shot?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Just like abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 21

Boom

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

No, actually it's not. Because a fetus is not independent, it is entirely reliant on the host. It isn't viable.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 23

It is like taking someone off life support, when you know for a fact that in just a few weeks they will be perfectly fine. That is murder.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

But it will be, how do you not feel horrible about murdering someone before they could even taste life?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Low functioning mentally disabled people are not independent either, does that make it ethical to euthanise them?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 16

They are physically viable with science, they are not reliant on a single host. A fetus is not viable, even with advanced technology.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

Except a whats a viable fetus is pushed back every decade. I think at 20 weeks you baby is highly unlikely to die if born premature

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It doesnt matter, nobody with a soul would take someone off life support if it was known for a fact they would be fine in a few weeks.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, that's not true. It's highly likely to die.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A fetus on the first trimester is not a human/person.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Also, you wouldnt take someone off life support if you knew for a fact they would be fine in a few weeks. Abortion is no different.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There was a video on Reddit front page recently. The fundamental question is: why do you think women want abortion?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Arbitrary declaration of what a human is has led to the worst moments in human history. The same thing is happening today with abortion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

First part is true. No disagreement. But it doesn't blend so seemingly with modern times.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*snigger* Oh, wait - you were serious, weren't you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they aren't a person, but they are a human.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As human as vaginal lining, or a clump of cells can be. No one would ever call their liver/bones/heart human.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A fertilised egg does not a hen make.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What with the whole is greater than the sum of its part thing for the human body.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0