It's just a theory

Apr 17, 2017 6:51 PM

TheLastImgurian

Views

79750

Likes

1260

Dislikes

59

This is the internet. Your logic means nothing here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

"The truth is out there, deny everything"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Get rid of all religion and in 1k years there's no religion. Get rid of all science and in 1k years the same scientific results appear.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

BUT ITS JUST A THEORY. Yes. Like gravity. Care to jump off a building?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Akhams razor

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*before picture loads* A GAME THEORY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Well, theoretically you're not wrong, but my says, and agrees, that ."

9 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 17

I'll take 'Dinosaur skeletons were put here by the Devil to tempt us' for $800.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

But my magic book tells me that this is right and this is wrong!!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Unfortunately, this thinking process doesn't work here in imgur.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then you get the arrogant asshat who argues that accepting scientific theory requires its own kind of faith, and that atheism is religion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How do we now this theory behind theories is correct? Or is this all just theoretical?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Philosophy of science.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We don't focus on simpler theories because they're more likely to be true, but because it's more resource-efficient to do so.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sounds more like a cult than a theory

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

It was a circle with the first bit of evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Then someone puts their thoughts on a Facebook Mommy Blog group, and it becomes law.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A Game Theory!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Science is critical thinking, and once you get all the info you can, you put them together to form what seems most likely, not what is true.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There's a vital element of creativity in there, too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lately I've realized that creativity and inspiration isn't found, but realized. A product of one ceasing to second guess their thoughts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I love this post every time it's posted, but an interesting counter, or corollary rather to the assumptions part is how hard it can be...1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

to identify those assumptions. I cite the wonderful gifts that shows how a rotating wheel can be viewed as a series of oscillating...2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

points along line segments.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or... or... this is Imgur/internet and facts mean nothing because we have opinions. Fact = downvotes ; incorrect loud opinion = Yay!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Science means not being afraid to say "we don't know...yet."

9 years ago | Likes 297 Dislikes 5

what a dumb comment

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Science never says that we know they just say what they think is most likely correct

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

Science means trying to prove yourself wrong, not right

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

But idiots will use the "theory" part to argue it must not be true. I know of a guy who is vehemently opposed to the idea of evolution.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Sad that they don't explain this in schools. Everything they teach is "fact", instead of, "this is the best we've come up with.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

All models are wrong, some are usefull

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I had a teacher say this... Who coined this?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

step three should say hypothesis

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The hypothesis would occur before the experiment in step 1. Theory explains a set of established observations.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

still not s theory at that point

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a thoroughly compelling argument. Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the last step would be a theory. it's a very strict term. Even when things seem to work it would be call an hypothesis. It had to be (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thoroughly tested, replicated (proven in math), be consistent with everything else we know. The boubdaries also have to be mapped.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last step is a continuation of the third step, but with more hypotheses demonstrating additional evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Faith has no place in science because everything in science must be allowed to be wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 14

Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation so that belief can be preserved. -Tim Minchin

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 13

Faith means strong belief in religious doctrines based on spiritual conviction rather than proof so obvs goes against the scientific method

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

I would argue that all scientific breakthroughs are based on faith. They strongly believe something is possible before any evidence exists.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 23

All scientific breakthroughs are based on evidence. They don't just go "hey guys, i think this is how it should work". 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Scientists have predictions based on mathematics and older working theories, they just test those and conclude the accuracy with evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You've never come up with or tested an hypothesis, have you?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I wouldn't.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Different kinds of faith man. Some faith is religious, other is willpower.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

I respectfully disagree. It comes from the Latin root Fides which has not religious association. Just means to believe or trust.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I'd say it depends on the context, but I respect that evidence.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The vast majority of scientific breakthroughs don't conform to that. Most scientific breakthroughs start with an observation of something 1/

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

previously unexpected and an attempt is made to understand why that thing happened. No faith required. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Also, everyone forgets scientists have careers and reputations, they don't have infinite timelines to test. They have to believe something.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. But if faith = believing with no evidence. Exerting effort and energy with no proven evidence is moving forward with faith it will work

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. When you perform an experiment you accept that there's a chance it won't work. No faith is required. Think of it this way. I can exert 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

effort and energy into throwing a basketball at a hoop. I don't need faith that it will go in because I accept that it might not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0