The rich get richer

Apr 11, 2018 8:11 PM

WontonWrapper

Views

131165

Likes

2043

Dislikes

64

I thought senator Harris was the new voice of the people..?
https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2018/4/11/17219930/facebook-campaign-contributions-mark-zuckerberg-congress-donations
Edit: Here's the top from the list
TOTAL SINCE 2014 (Over $10,000)
Cory Booker (D-NJ) - 44,025
Kamala Harris (D-CA) - 39,990
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) - 16,400
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) - 15,900
Orrin Hatch (R-UT) - 15,200
Dean Heller (R-NV) - 14,400
Roy Blunt (R-MO) - 14,100
Mike Lee (R-UT) 13,500
Rich Blumenthal (D-CT) - 13,200
Brian Schatz (D-HI) - 12,500
Cory Gardner (R-CO) - 11,900
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) - 11,435
Tom Udall (D-NM) - 11,000
John Thume (R-SD) - 10,500

It’s John Thune

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe Zuck can donate you a phone charger.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We need campaign finance reform. Wolfpac

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

finally a facebook post that's not seen on here 15 thousand times.

8 years ago | Likes 269 Dislikes 4

Wait till tomorrow LOL but good point thanks for making it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, Ted Cruz IS holding up his Starbucks.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 2

I never knew how much I needed this gif. I thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

How do people watch this complete fucking idiot and take him seriously? It's unfuckingbelievable that he had a substantial following.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

This just in: large California business donates to California representative.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Will we ever have campaign finance reform?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Well considering the people who would have to institute the reforms are the ones benefiting from it...

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

No

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

McConnell blocking Merrick Garland means Citizens United won't be overturned anytime soon.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Merrick Garland was pretty middle row, so doubt he would have helped repeal it, anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ever, maybe. Anytime soon' probably not unless the supreme court steps in which they don't seem very interested in doing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those donations were over the course of a 4-year period. To most politicians, it would be chump change.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I may be the odd one out here but 10-15k ain’t shit ♀️ that’s not a ton of money in the grand scheme of things for a lot of people.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know people who would gouge your eyes out with a spoon for that kind of cash, and some aren't even politicians...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im laughing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, that's chump change for those kinds of politicians.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Correct. This is nothing compared to what they get from private foundations.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It may not be significant to them, but it still matters

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

I agree.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if it's not significant to them, then it's not likely to change how they act, because all the power of money lies in the threat of removal

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is actually a really small amount over 4 years but...yeah whatever.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Charge your phone

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Clickbaitbait

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

You need a system to get rich https://www.trker.com/go/108243

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wooo Citizens United! Corporations are people too!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Oligarchy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn. I plugged my phone in because I thought the battery was almost dead.. but then I realised that it’s in the image..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This post gave me battery anxiety.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just a Question, isn't this corruption? Or am i misunderstanding The term?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to work in DC for lobbyists. These amounts are nothing. Like, not even close to some donations. Oil and big pharma, OTOH...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These donations are made by individual employees of Facebook; campaign contributions lists persons and employer. It's easy to assume 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

It's Facebook as a company doing the donations, but it is in fact individual contributions by people affiliated with Facebook.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

And to be honest these are way less than what has been purported. The concept “Facebook” and Zuckerberg have paid millions to all of them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kind of crazy where people are like they have huge financial loss or gain from lines of questioning.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok so from the UK here so please tell me if I'm wrong but aren't those numbers really small fry? Like 10k? The NRA spent literally millions.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Really small. Plus, there are so many individual employees of Facebook this is a small fraction of the potential legal donations

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He wasn't under oath so who gives a feck?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

So what was the point of the questioning ??

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sound bites for campaigns this fall.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wow I’m so gullible this literally never occurred to me. I’m in Ireland so we dont have these types of questioning audiences.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To get us to ask for the government to regulate the Internet.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's plenty of reasons to hate the guy. But that's a pretty insignificant amount of money over 4 years. Especially with their salaries.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least they pay both sides, I guess.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why tho? It’s like they anticipated something like this

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It's like he's building some kind of network.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It’s easy to bash Facebook payments to lawyers. Facebook has also donated billions to charities! Sad how no one talks of the good.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The money to pols wasn't tax deductible...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Facebook? Donated billions to charities? Do you have any source for this claim?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would have killed you to put a screen shot of the amounts in your post?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Maybe. I wouldn’t kno

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Now we may never know!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/2 Facebook /employees./ The company itself did not donate this, employees of the company did, on their own.

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

2/2 But since you have to put your employers on all political donations, all anyone sees is "Facebook donated."

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

I was not aware of that. Donated a few times to candidates, but don't recall listing anything about my employme- *FBI crash through window*

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

American oligarchy.

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 11

Have u read Jeffrey Winter's book Oligarchy?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dot

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but it is now on my reading list. That will probably never be finished.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Technically all u need to read is 1st and 4th chapters tho I recommend the whole book...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so the dems got twice as much as the reps... No, FB isn't biased

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Aw, c'mon. You already knew that. Almost everyone in Tech favours dems. Just like rednecks and illiterates favour GOP.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you are going to do business in California and contribute to the congressmen, they'll be Democrat.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Why the illiterate hordes find this offensive is hilarious.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Though I've got to admit, some of the questioning was pretty good and some came down on FB kind of hard for their continual repeated issues.

8 years ago | Likes 671 Dislikes 11

Honestly I really hope congress’ since of Justice is worth less than 40,000

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Id be disappointed if they could buy a senator for 10k, I know youtubers who wont shill a product for 10k.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

How come no one asked about Guam tipping over???

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tough questioning looks good and makes for nice articles, but doesn't change anything in anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yup, tough questioning doesn't do much when followed by nothing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many of the questions came from old guys that knew nothing about the subject

8 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

I agree. And the answers came from someone pretending not to know.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can you give an example?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

"How do you make money if Facebook is a free service?"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might try watching the testimony in its entirety for an example. Jk I dunno.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Tried comparing Facebook to owning a Ford on monopoly issue.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Facebook has an effective monopoly due to the isolated nature of the platform and the fact that no one competitor does everything they do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the senators asked if they could have the right to take their data to another social media platform.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Well we do have the right to take our info else where. We just don’t get to remove what’s there already

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ted Cruz did a good job surprisingly.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

He didn't. He was grandstanding for the idiot hordes that think a private company shouldn't discriminate against nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Ted Cruz often does a lot of good things. He is one of the Republicans I like

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

...except the murders

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Yes and the murders of course. Best serial killer out there.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Especially the murders.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He was trying to make FB and Zuckerberg look like biased Liberals who actively seek out Conservative content to remove and block.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

They've got to appear to be legit to their constituents. The questions are all pre-approved so they get still get funding. Old trick

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Ten hours of pre approved questions?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you expect them to just have a few then give up?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Why not if it is a sham? Also, why give zuckerberg questions he couldn't answer then?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter how he answers. They'll go lightly on him anyway. They just want to make it look like they're doing something.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post is a pile of shit! Donations over the last 4 years has no precedence over this hearing....fucken garbage.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Tell us how you really feel

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Mark?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A few were pretty softball questions, partly just there to further a senator's agenda or "The USA is great!!"

8 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 3

Plus he wasn't even under oath. This was just meaningless political theater.

8 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 0

Nah, it was mostly a "don't fucking get caught or we gotta do this bullshit" sorta ordeal.

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

And that...is why this country is fucked.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

So....political theatre.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

It sounded more interesting before, but I think so.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0