Not all heroes wear capes.

Mar 25, 2019 3:37 PM

MrMeeSeeksLookAtMe2

Views

150293

Likes

4651

Dislikes

78

Shout out to Maurice German for helping this cat that had been stuck on this pole for over 12 hours.
Sauce# https://www.newsweek.com/philadelphia-verizon-maurice-german-princess-momma-cat-rescue-amanda-1373627

Suspended without pay for 3 weeks/ GoFundMe page has enough to cover his wages plus $1000. Win/win.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Workers die all the time from incidents with power lines. Wouldn’t Verizon basically have to suspend him to be in compliance with OSHA?

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

“I didn’t need to be rescued. I got up there without a crane. I guess humans want to be heroes.” - cat

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok, so I adore my cat, but I wouldn't want anyone to put their life or job in danger for her.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Verizon's reaction

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

As the firefighters say for the reason they don't rescue cats, "have you ever seen the skeleton of a cat in a tree?"

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I go up in buckets just like this guy and as much as I respect him for saving the cat going up past the electric is all kinds of dangerous

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Doing what's proper, doing what's expected and doing what's right are rarely the same thing

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because something violates policy that doesn't mean it's wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Agreed

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Stuck? Or overseeing its territory?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don’t take pictures

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

You can't blame companies that have sued over and over for having rules and results like this.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Typical corporate bullshit. I hate them. Why do they have the have the most reliable network?! Why?!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Every cable company uses power poles for their lines so doing his normal job puts him “at risk”. Hypocrisy at it’s finest.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

As a verizon customer I'm aware that everything they do is based on corporate greed.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Fuck Verizon he did the right thing of course. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone already made him a job offer

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Verizon blazing a path to squander good-will generated by this generous act of community service.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nice, a go fund me was set up for him and already passed the goal (and is now closed). Good people.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Workers coming in contact with powerlines kill is the leading cause of death by electrocutions in the US....he did not have the training to

7 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 7

Where is the powerline in the picture? Stop defending stupidity.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Did you read the link?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do this safely. Verizon was right with suspending him...its a heartwarming story but those things jerk and he could have easily contacted

7 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 6

it. Ignoring it and praising the worker would just encourage others to try this in the future and they might not turn out so lucky.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

As a lineman I can assure you nobody is more aware of power lines than the man in the bucket. Especially since that's a construction bucket.

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I'm on the fence.. I love cats but also see it in the eyes of a company who could have gone though a lawsuit if anything bad happened..

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's the same logic as somebody running into a building that's on fire to rescue someone. It's noble, but you're putting 2 lives at risk

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

instead of just the one. If it goes well, great. If it doesn't, you've made the situation so much worse than it already was.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In this situation he should've contacted the fire department, who are equipped and trained for this kind of situation.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't rescue cats. It's a myth.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's likely they had to do this because of their insurance. If people wouldn't fucking publicize everything, we could do a lot more good.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's exactly what those trucks are designed for. Safely carry the employee, with attached lanyard, to an elevated position. WTF

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuck Verizon. Totally over priced for the same quality service as everyone else.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

When I go camping I am the only one who gets reception so I am stuck with it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In my area I have service literally anywhere including my friend's wifi signal death trap while my friends don't. It is overpriced though.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unpopular opinion; I agree with Verizon on this one. The rules are there for not only his safety, but the safety of everyone else.

7 years ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 87

I'd understand the outrage against Verizon if they had punished him for trying to save a human being. A cat? Nah.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Yup. Me too.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The policy makes sense. The enforcement of it in this situation doesn't.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

I haven’t seen that many dead cats in trees either.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cats also can climb down, they just forget until they are motivated.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

This is correct

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Everyone but the cat lol

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an electrician, I am very aware of how close I can be to power lines. Save the poor cat you heartless bastards.

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 4

There is/was a great group of tree climbers & linemen that volunteer rescuing trees cats. Used them once for our kitten. They use their -

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

experience so others aren’t endangered trying to climb trees or poles. There was a website with info on how to contact the closest one.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Point is he could well not be an electrician/HV qualified. Which is where there is a large element of risk.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if he is a line tech or field tech he would be qualified. baristas dont go up that ladder. you need an EE background.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't talk for Verizon,but BT techs,whilst having a EE background generally aren't HV qualified. Completely different case to data lines.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I predict job offers in his future. And a stern scolding from the friends and family members of those responsible for his termination.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 19

He'd be a potential liability for his new employer because he might defy rules again. Same reason whistleblowers never get another job.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He wasn't terminated it says SUPENDS literally in all caps...

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Scolding for what? It's a justified suspension. Applaud the guy for his actions but don't act like he's entirely in the right.

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

If he had let that cat die up there when he could have saved it this would be an entirely different conversation.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Safety guidelines aren't put in place to protect cats on poles near powerlines. Regardless of public opinion, the suspension is justified.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I didn't read the article:( what did he do exactly that compromised public safety? Was it just misuse of company property?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Article says he used the lifter near power lines - big no-no for obvious safety reasons.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

*Worker saves cat* That's dangerous! *Causes multiple collisions during winter slush* They're following company policy.

7 years ago | Likes 409 Dislikes 19

Except that was Comcast.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Verizon did it too, in my area. One kid got seriously hurt.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Dont forget Verizon also throttled the fire department's unlimited data plan during the California fires too.

7 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 5

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

As a retired Verizon Employee I am aware of how stupid their management is.

7 years ago | Likes 3037 Dislikes 20

I question this because every person I know personalally who worked for verizon as an engineer loved it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As an engineer? That's a management position.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A few years ago I got to sit in on an all hands meeting and listen to the VPs talk. I was blown away with there disregard for customer care

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Work Stories post coming soon?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a employee of any corporation, management tends to be quite stupid.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an AT&T customer: WTF VERIZON???

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

They pretty much just admitted that they dont trust their employees to operate their own equipment...lol

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a customer, so am I.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Verizon hired a failed Ericsson CEO, who was fired and embroiled in excessive spending case within the organization. Not only that he 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brought his idiotic strategy head from Ericsson who nearly ran the Ericsson down with her bad strategy . No wonder Verizon is struggling.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a person that lives in a world with Verizon, I am well aware of how stupid the entire company, and everything about it, is.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

One of my friends got sacked & the manager said WITH A STRAIGHT FACE that he was detrimental to Verizons "Good reputation & social standing"

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Well at that point you really arn't burning any bridges if you tell him to shove it up his ass.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think he did say something like that.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How did you manage to work for them long enough to retire without being laid off?

7 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 1

The non Wireless side is unionized.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And it was good thing!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Luck... just plain old luck.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Oh man, that one hurts. Laid off after 6 years on wireless side.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I made it to 32 years. Started on the commercial side and managed to transfer to plant. Plant was freedom!

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Remember Verizon is the company who turned the firefighters cell phones off during their giant fires in California. They're despicable!

7 years ago | Likes 1119 Dislikes 18

Then they ran an ad campaign blitz about how much they love first responders to try to cover it up.

7 years ago | Likes 225 Dislikes 0

In no way do I mean to throw shade at the this fine gentleman Maurice German who saved the cat! It is Verizon that is bad not employees.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So will those firefighters respond to Verizon's 911 calls?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They actually only throttled the internet, and they did it by 99.9% on an "unlimited" plan during "congestion" though "EMS is exempt"

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

They didn't turn off the cell phones. They throttled the data rates. They could still make calls as normal, and use data at reduced speed.

7 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 3

The fire department that specifically signed up for the cheapest plan available and didn't say that they were being used for EMS?

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 76

emergency services literally shouldnt have to pay

7 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 3

I agree. Which is why they should have explained the usage of the phones to Verizon when ordered. But they didn't.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 32

Pretty easy to verify that it's emergency services by all the details you're required to give upon signing. But maybe it's different in the

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

US from Canada or Britain.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If he had fallen and hurt or killed himself, Verizon would be sued. So they have to make policies like this where someone cannot put (1)

7 years ago | Likes 752 Dislikes 70

This also has nothing to do with helping a cat

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

What? The rules or the guy saving the cat?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So in a very simplified and general reduction.... money

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

#hailcorporate

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

But the equipment is designed to lift a guy up in the air safely. That's literally it's only purpose.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

And work on equipment while up in the air.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Save that poor cat. He did the right thing.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Wearing the provided verizon safety gear in a verizon truck?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A company has the ability to make exceptions based on the situation. They ALWAYS do.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So glad I don't live in the US. Here you could do a quick risk assessment and carry on.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

(2) peanut butter on their testicles to lure cats and raccoons into their cherry pickers

7 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 11

They go up in man baskets daily as part of their job, what's the difference? Why split hairs? I get it's the stupid policies but really?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a professional, he knows how to properly and safely use his equipment effectively to rescue the cat. I doubt he put anyone in danger.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

That's the thing about professional safety. It is intentionally redundant because even professionals mess up occasionally.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He was near the power line. Dangerous as hell if a wrong move is made or an accident happens.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I hope somebody was holding his beer. No, wait...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The issue as stated in the article was that he was operating the equipment near power lines which violates their safety rules.

7 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 6

Which is complete bullocks

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

But the cable lines are on the same poles as the power lines.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

They always operate their equipment near power lines, and the power lines he is near in the photo are insulated and low voltage.

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 8

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2020 8:50 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Themselves in a dangerous situation unless it is authorized and monitored. (2)

7 years ago | Likes 439 Dislikes 28

Just say they were maintenancing the pole, its not like they dont know how to be up there.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For this same reason, I think they should get fighting out of hockey and stop having exhibition games.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Good to see someone not automatically condemning the big company "bad guys"

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 14

I mean.. Maybe not in this situation... But Verizon is, in general, a trash company.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

If he does something he shouldn't, in a place he shouldn't be at, why would he be able to sue? Isn't Isnt their argument "his own fault"?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If he was injured, he would still be entitled to workers' comp, which is a no-fault statute.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree in principle. But someone commented that if they allowed it this time, others would do it and it becomes unofficial "policy."

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never said it wasn't his fault. I was simply guessing at why he did it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But isn't using the cherry picker like his job? I see one person using thrm all the time, don't even bother putting flaggers on the street.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

It's his job maybe but this wasn't a job order. Job orders are risk managed that the company is willing to accept liability.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2020 8:50 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What kinda freak powerlines do you have in the states? Here, the powerline would have to have been damaged, to be any sort of danger.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Power lines on pylons like that aren't insulated. If there's a line of conductive material linking it to the ground, it's a short circuits.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I get it but I would assume by him misusing equip they would be free from liability?

7 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 8

Finishing a worker’s comp lawsuit. Even if the floor I fell on was marked as wet they would still be liable to pay me. So maybe not.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. That's why they have rules against him doing what he did.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Only if they actually did something about it, hence the consequences.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Company time and money still get used for an investigation.

7 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 1

Not if they regularly let employees do this sort of stuff and get away with it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In NA, lawsuits dont make any sense

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

This is America. Nobody with money is immune from liability. People who physically GET OFF indoor rides at Disney still get to sue.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. Sadly, no. If you misuse company equipment they can still be held liable. And will be.

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

yes, no one is going to sue a line worker. they will go after whoever has deeper pockets.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Which is assanine in my eyes if the worker is going against policy. But this is America.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1