That analogy is perfect.

May 25, 2020 8:08 AM

DaShanghaiKid

Views

147052

Likes

3099

Dislikes

112

Actually, cdc has said distance is enough, but wear a mask if social distancing isn't possible. Stop being obstinate

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its redundancy, a fail safe

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If condoms work, why do we need anal?

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

If condoms work why do we need plan B? If plan B works why do we need French toast?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

6' is the bit that's most helpful. Masks are for when 6' isn't an option, like when passing someone in the grocery store. Also, the two >>

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

>> strategies enhance each other. Masks keep your breath from traveling as far, 6' gives your breath more distance in which to stop.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wear a condom. Keep your distance from people spewing pus and/or blood. And for goodness' sake, STOP FUCKING EVERYONE YOU MEET.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This public safety announcement brought to you by common goddamn sense.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If The Senate works, why do we need the House of Representatives. If the House of Representatives works why do we need The Senate?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stupid people can understand only 1 thing at the time. Multiple things goes over their head so easily. They pause breathing while thinking.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Belt and braces.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Grampa called it belt and suspenders.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

defense in depth. I'm in IT security and I have to explain to developers that yes, writing secure code is important even behind a firewall.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If oxygen works, why do we need lungs?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's perfect if you believe that the government should regulate driving, the problem is that many conservatives think that safety laws(1)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are just another way (((they))) control us. My uncle, a dyed in the wool conservative who thinks Trump is a god incarnate thinks it (2)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

isn't the government's job to worry if he dies in a car accident. That is between him and god. (3)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She's using the word "work(s)" pretty loosely here.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dammit it's so hard to tell whether ppl are being sarcastic or just dumb

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Airbags and no seatbelt will make your face look different.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So. Many. Stupid. People.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

People never tell me their story about their accident that they died in because they didn't wear a seatbelt.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"A face mask saved my life, I'm amazed that I survived" ~ Thom Yorke, probably.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should probably have blocked out the 'Replying to' bit as well, no?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Jokes on you. This dude doesn't wear a seat belt, either.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don’t work, nothing’s 100%. They’re guidelines to keep you safer since you can’t be an adult and isolate

5 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 6

Now everyone can. I wish I could've, trust me. 3 or more months at home with 80% income?! Heavenly! But no, I'm a "hero" instead. Fuck this.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Trust me i’m not essential to anything but have had status the whole time too, i get it, but that’s on the fed, not the isolation

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like to think of em like the work brace belts. They don't actually help, but they remind you of the area that needs protecting.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They do lower the chance significantly. I think it’s like having a sneeze guard in a lumber yard. Keep some sawdust away, but not all

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those definitely do help, significantly, in fact.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I meant the stretchy ones that just remind you to not be a dumbass. I never got to use one of the actual good ones lol

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isolating has its flaws as well.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Not when it cones to containing the virus

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I love how stupid these new anti-maskers are. Probably the same stupid group that are anti-vaxxers. They're also flat earthers too.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

They're also Trump supporters. Their golden boy doesn't wear a mask and suggests injecting bleach, so they're gonna follow his lead.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Didn't he not wear a mask in front of press, but he did wear it in the factory? Keeping himself safe and lying to the public about masks?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Wore a mask, but only so he specifically wouldn't set a good example about it. He's a hypocrite in the worst way.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea, a lot of times when I look at those twitter profiles, they have a lot of trump support indicators.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“Many diseases are long gone, why do we need vaccines these day?”. Same level of stupidity

5 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 5

Uhm achthually, if diseases were truly gone, we wouldn't need vaccines, would we? If it isn't anywhere anymore, you can't get it anyway.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Variola wants a word with those idiots.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Smallpox vaccines aren't given out anymore (except to people are are directly in contact with it), so there is some precident.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

One. One precedent.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Two precedents. Rinderpest. (I have no idea what that is, but I just spent an hour down rabbitholes and now everyone must do the googles.)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's cool.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Another things that people don't understand is, tht it is not always about being perfectly safe from infection in every situation.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But by working together, retarding virus propagation, thus making everybody measurably safer.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You guys all sound like Karen

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

ok, boomer.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not fair tarataqa. Opinions are formed by individuals. Pretending everyone in a group thinks the same way is Trump-like. I am Boomer.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You all sound like Karen.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok boomer

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And if air bags and seat belts work, why do we still have so many deaths on the road each year? Wear your masks people.

5 years ago | Likes 228 Dislikes 10

Frankly would opt into full body protection equipment :v

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do cars even have bumpers , FAKE NEWS! Cars don’t crash , people crash them

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Not always. There have been a couple of autonomous cars that have crashed.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't use a seatbelt, use a mask!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wait, hows the mask helping in an accident?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

F=MV. Also, idiots don’t always wear seatbelts and not all airbags work.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wear your masks, don't drink and drive

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Otherwise your drink might spill.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But driving is so booooooooring sober.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Car crashes are a hoax!

5 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 1

Car crashes are a conspiracy to make the totally amazeballs glorious leader of the free world and president of the U S A look bad. Shameful!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Wait, you believe in cars?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People in cars should wear helmets.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Racecar drivers wear a whole lot of protecting gear, including helmets. Still not safe

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fairly few deaths though considering what they do.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you censor her name the first time, why censor it the second time?

5 years ago | Likes 1396 Dislikes 3

its because https://youtu.be/CfG9SYKg0V0?t=5

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why censor it at all??

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s published public. Let it fly.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most people ignore @'s and #'s tbh. Fuck a blue text.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't want to go there, it's just stupid comment after stupid comment.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Why censor at all? She put the comment and her name out there in the public eye, asking for a response to questions.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you don't censor her name the second time, why censor it the first time?

5 years ago | Likes 182 Dislikes 1

yes

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best answer right here.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Why censor their names at all? I’m so tired of protecting the stupid at the expense of them learning just how stupid they are.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Exactly, if they are brave enough to post it, show their name for everyone!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Mob mentality is dangerous. The response was warranted but the mass amount of death threats idiots will prob send her and the stalking?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That’s a good point. On a completely unrelated note; I hate you.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dad?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 0

K-On!, for anyone wondering

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Username dot .

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This username. It pleases me.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And yes, the ! Is part of the name. Awesome show btw! Gonna go rewatch the whole thing and finally watch the second season :)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Watch the movie while you're at it!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is the movie before S2 or after?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doot

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's the point i censoring the names tho -you should know who to avoid, and who to shame for being this stupid

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Censoring Twitter is almost always useless, you can just type a tweet into Google and find it unless there are other word for word copies.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I ment it in general not only twatter(not a spelling mistake) censorship only breeds positive enviorment by sheltering absurd viewpoints

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In America, you can get sued for libel when you quote some idiot's exact fucking stupid words.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's sad - all I can say w/o getting hit by "you are an ableist" or some other social science crap.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can get sued for anything. Literally anything. Do those suits win? That's the big concern here.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because sometimes people on the internet respond disproportionately. Yes this is stupid, but the original response was all she needed.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Ye, I get it mobbing is an issue but at the same time enabling/catering "likeminded" retards(pardon) is just as bad

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

People on the internet can be cruel. The girl who originally ran the Wendy's twitter account was doxxed and harassed relentlessly with

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

people posting her personal information (such as address). She quit when someone sent her candid photos of her in public

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Mobbing is still more of an issue. If someone tried, do you think they could find something stupid or out of context you've said that could

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

go viral like this? I'm not confident something like that couldn't be found for me. And mobs, if things go viral, don't stop at justice...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*Why not

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

*why. They're quoting the format of the tweet.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If they’re quoting the format of the tweet, why not quoting the opposite format of the tweet?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They didn’t censor the second appearance - it’s still visible

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0