Any thoughts ?

Dec 3, 2018 7:05 AM

lordofshapes

Views

157562

Likes

5400

Dislikes

305

Do you remember when games were made to be fun?

I'm 24, and I remember in my teens, waiting in line outside of GameStop for the release of truly epic games like Halo 2 and Gears of War. Waiting in long lines for the midnight release of a game, meeting new people and winning sweet prizes like shirts, headphones, and posters during pre-midnight release tournaments and trivias.

I remember paying $60 for a game, and in return getting so much more than that.

Over the years I have seen an industry that played such a significant role in my social life growing up slowly rotting away. Maybe it's nostalgia, or naivete or what have you, but I remember when games were engineered for maximum quality; for the pure enjoyment of the consumer.

Nowadays they are surgically engineered to accommodate microtransactions. It's only getting worse, but at the end of the day the video game industry is just that, an industry. A business. A way to make money. Truly, nothing is sacred anymore.

/EndRant

I remember subscribing to Nintendo Power and getting Dragon Warrior for free.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

I remember "downloading" games by copying the code by hand from what was printed in Ahoy! Magazine.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 5

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Dec 3, 2018 5:29 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of Jay Wilson / Bashiok's "Aren't you thankful !?" comment.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the world would be a better place whitout microtransactions

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Eh, it depends. P2W microtransactions are bad, but cosmetic and ones that don't give an advantage are good. Just look at POE or Warframe 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They do great with microtransactions. They make good money to stay afloat and offer good rewards for the microtransactions. 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even Fortnite has good microtransactions. They are purely cosmetic but it makes a lot of money and allows Epic to focus on updating the game

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Microtransactions (that aren't P2W) are actually good. They give the game a continuous stream of money that gives reason for the game to be

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

updated.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to getting old. This is the age old tale of age. At 40, I’ve seen many things that were more magical just because I was a kid.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Fuck historical accuracy, bf5 is actually a lot of fun. IMO EA did a good job.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

you forgot deadman sky hype

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

I read it as Deadman skype

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No mans sky is one of the best grabs I ever made for $30. Ridiculous single player and multi replayability

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a seriously good point.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

To be fair they could have abandoned it but instead they are regularly updating it and I’m really enjoying playing it online with friends.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You miss the point. It could be the best game ever in its current state but they lied to the fans and failed to deliver what they promised.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

And then they apologized and went to work to fixing their mistakes. Like Mimi said, they could have just abandoned it. But they didn't.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes but game wend down to $5 and majority of community abandoned it ... it looked amazing played a little , had inventory problems

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just don't buy the ones that suck? There's plenty of games that don't require microtransactions - don't play the ones that do??

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

That makes no sense to me because I can't trial games to see if they are bad.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Just read reviews? Look up if they have microtransactions. Avoid games with CD keys and no return policy.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can watch reviews. You can track the games production for years leading up to release. You can play betas.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or you can buy a game and realise it's bad then just suck it up and move on. Back in the day if you bought a bad game then you just traded

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It in and got on with your life.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are loads of great games being produced, just dont buy games that have microtransactions. Be a smart consumer.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

MTX isn't senseless given that games cost less than they used to, adjusting for inflation. MTX subsidizes poor gamers. It's just abuseable.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I rarely buy games on launch, there is 0 point as there are so many being released daily. Wait till the AAA titles go on sale and get fixed.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I have a rule not to spend more than $50 on a game because none of them are worth more than $30.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Eh, depends. Some games are worth $60. Others not so much.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if it's on Steam, never buy it day 1, it'll be 40% off before you know it.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This year has also given us RDR2, Spiderman, and God of War. So there is hope for us yet

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Next year is gonna be great too. WC3:Reforged, Rage 2, Doom Eternal, possibly Cyperpunk 2077. Maybe one day we will get Star Citizen?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's also that company that used to make groundbreaking games and just released a pay-to-pay card game. A goddamn card game, Valve.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Value is actually a very cheap company. Once Steam took off they had no reason to make any more games because of Steam's profit. 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They made Left for Dead 1&2 only a year apart. While the second game is awesome, it's basically just DLC to the first game. The Portal 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

games are fun and awesome, but that's it really. Half life was good for it's time but it hasn't aged well. Dota 2 was a complete copy 3/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

with pretty much no original ideas at all. Gmod, Left for Dead 1/2, and some of the half-life games are made in the same engine. 4/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Allowing them to easily produce several games that all share assets, allowing you to make games for cheaper. TF2 is alright, but needs 5/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While I think Steam was ultimately a great thing for the industry, I don't think I will forgive Valve for their attitude towards Half-Life.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

If they aren’t going to make HL3, I wish they would just say so. Better yet, sell the rights to someone who will.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Valve has been dead for a long time. The steam store is harder to sorry then the damn app store now.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And this is why Fortnite was GOTY

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Funded by backers for the PvE aspect, then pulled away previous development time for the Battle Royale mode, which NO ONE wanted back then.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pve did not even get them enough money the game would never have happend to begin with it they did stay.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They made the pvp element without letting the playerbase know beforehand. At all. They offered refunds, but the damage was there.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

cuz children

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Because you’d rather know you’re getting ripped off by spending $20 on a skin every week or so?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Nobody make's you pay for a skin every week nobody it's an option you don't have to do it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really? I just puked in my mouth a little.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's the best game at what it does and a lot of fans why just because you don't like it ?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gaming industry used to be run by people who play games. Now it's run by mega cooperations getting fat off the back of legal child gambling

7 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 3

Games were never “made for fun by real gamers.” It’s been about $$ since day one. Game standards and consumer expectations have changed.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

maybe not by real gamers,but surely by nerds who try to made for fun,ill be damned id software,westwood and hideo kojima ain't these nerds.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's not true, sure the developers were gamers, the money men have never been gamers

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's always been run by corporations getting fat off of child gambling. Their casinos were called Arcades.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah but we're all grown up now and need to put a stop to it. There are honest ways to make money in gaming. Child exploitation isn't right.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Bingo. My nephew spent 200$ on loot boxes for his birthday. Almost bitch slapped my brother for letting him do it. Fucking hate gambling.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Seriously? Parent of the year! He's going to grow up with a very unhealthy relationship with money

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh god, why is this a thing now? Loot box money for birthday, instead of, I dunno... a proper full video game that will last way longer.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

No he got lefty of gifts. This was just his birthday money he had gotten, and he choose to spend it on that!

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

OMG, you should have slapped his parents. Twice.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Trust me. I wanted to.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A friend of mine bought Overwatch a while ago and bought 150€ worth of loot boxes. He's normally pretty poor and whines about not having 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

money for games, yet buys loot boxes that you can get for free at a pretty quick rate in a game he just bought. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, it tricks people. I fucking hate it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

He perfectly knew you get them really fast and that in a while he would have all cosmetics from them anyway. He's just an idiot.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its not a trick. Some people just act stupid or have money 2 waste

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Mcdonalds tricked me, now i'm dead. Damn those tricky fiends!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Easy solution, jus don’t buy their games

7 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 7

Sales for both fallout 76 and bf5 are down by at least 50% in some eu countries compared to the last entry, likely similar in stats everwher

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Adam Savage’s Tested showed the final Fallout CE product 5 months ago. False advertising is bad but being a sucker is worse.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's what EA said xD

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That might work if stupid 10 year olds weren't a thing, so unfortunately there will always be someone to sell shit games to leading to more

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I realy think we got the power here, i dont buy DLC if no one does they stop. And OFC think of some other sceme, we ignore that and so on.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A very small percentage buying DLC and microtransactions funds them. If you buy a game with microtransactions or bad DLC, you're still

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

supporting that practice even if you don't buy any of the "extra" content.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If a game depends on DLC i dont buy it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nah, no way it's going to work that easy. Advertising works too well, to many inexperienced consumers. And how do we even know when games1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

..."become great again". It is too easy to stimulate demand in masses this days. And I don't really see the thing turning around in near 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...future, despite all the fails of EA, Bethesda, ActiBlizz and others. All that is left is a hope for some gems and bits of gold in this3/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...ever widening stream of crap and greed.4/4

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This exact thing happened in the 80s and the gaming industry crashed. No matter how much ads they put out. It still died out till the NES

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This will happen eventually. It has happened in the 80ies and industry crash. Time to bring another crash to wipe out the likes of EA.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

80ies was the time of the nerds. Now shit's mainstream and mainstream is inert as fuck due to the sheer volume of consumers.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I haven't purchased an EA game since Spore. They can kiss my nerdy ass.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jun 3, 2019 10:25 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Gaming bubble and subsequent crash. The only major publisher to survive it was Activision.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cleared out all the shit and paved the way for Nintendo. That’s why Nintendo products still have that ‘seal of quality’ sticker on them.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Many competing systems, tons of crap games and no internet reviews to look up quickly what's worth buying.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I am enjoying FO76. People fail to grasp that people have different interests. I'm OK having paid $60 for the game, just as I was for NMS.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 10

I just dislike paying 60 for a game that looks like it could have been on ps 2.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SSB64 cost me $60 19 years ago. This viewpoint is fascinating.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are the 0.1% then. Theres a difference between having different taste and games just not being good like they used to.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Your opinion is correct but mine isn't? Very few of the products people whine about actually lose money, meaning I'm the majority, not you.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

They dont lose money cuase they convince suckers such as yourself to fork over 60$ for games not worth 15$ lol. LOL If thats your majority.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

1) I'm also in my mid-30s. People here are having some SERIOUSLY rose-tinted glasses. The games people remember are the ones that made it

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

2) through the selection bias. People forget all the shitty bug-ridden games that flooded the market in the 80s and 90s. Nothing is new.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Selection bias applies to the market too. They didn’t have patches back then. A game would literally be a plastic brick without quality ctrl

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Arent there any consumer advocacy groups in america that could look into all this?

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Yeah and they have all the power of a single imgur commenter.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FTC. Problem w/ loot boxes is they’re as much gambling as baseball cards making a huge grey area. Blizz was just poor brand mgmt not illegal

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Blizzard should be higher up. Had the mentioned D4, it would’ve disappeared. It was some suit saying phone games are hot now; who plays PC?

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'll half defend blizzard saying some people are hating without knowing shit but they also did kinda caused it themself.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea,they really should have said something else...like D3 update and D4 in development. THEN said"Oh D3 is going to be on phones too."

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

D4 is in development they did not have enough to show during blizzcon wich was a major planning error.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's really it. It's not the game people are mad about, but the announcement.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think anyone ever accused battlefield of being historically accurate or realistic.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

They only started saying it was when the racists/sexists thought it could work to their advantage to fight over it. :/

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

Nah, you already had battlefield games with females and other races in it such as BF4 and BF1 but they were in context /1

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Such as when you played a woman fighting in Arabia in story BF1, BFV has women in Europe on the front line which definitely did not happen

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Now I know that developers can take certain liberties when it comes to accuracy (ie assassin's creed) but you have to be careful on which

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Yeah be careful about putting women and minorities where they don’t belong or face the semipotent rage of the eternal gamer

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

We also never had people jumping out of jets and shooting each other with rocket launchers mid air, but I didn't see complainta about that.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

CoD adv Warfare? Yeah there were lots of complaints about that one esp that battle suit

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's not really a suggested way to play the game. That's people taking advantage of physics issues.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Halo isn't "Halo" anymore & Bungie doesn't seem like the team we loved. Our favorite games & devs maybe change,but what about things like1/2

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

iirc bungie no longer made the halo titles after 3, another company did

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Correct, after 3 it was a different developer, 343 Studios.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

After Reach, Reach was made by Bungie

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's true. What the other guy was talking about is that nearly none staff of Bungie are the same and the culture of the studio is gone

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ah I misunderstood. Although when I played destiny 2 in the first 5 minutes I could tell it was a bungee game because of the music lol

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's mostly the quality of the story, the lore retcons, the map sizes and the actual gameplay mechanics being bad that lost me.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Played lately? Forsaken was a hell of an update.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're forgetting ODST and Reach.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nintendo games,Red Dead 2,Forza,Nier,Witcher,God Of War,Last Of Us,Tomb Raider,Spiderman,Even the new AC games & let's not forget about1/2

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

To keep adding to this. Persona 5, Disgaea 5, Monster Hunter (Both World and Gen Ultimate.) and so so much more!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The smaller and/or indie developers making great games as well. (Often less than $60).It's not all sunshine,but farfrom being all bad2/3

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I think we just get to hung up on the devs/games we grew up with not staying the same and blanket those sentiments across gaming as a whole.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I really love ark survival. I don’t think it gets enough praise, although it needs to be optimized horribly.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Go watch Zero Punctuation video on fall out 76,he makes a very good point, its just a phase, we have been here be for.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I forgot all about Z, he's still around?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is the only reason that the escapist is around, check their YouTube channel, it's mostly just his vids

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would require me to watch Zero Punctuation though...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The rot had already set in. Black Isle, Bullfrog... those were the days

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Bullfrog. Syndicate. Too bad that IP is a shell of it's former self.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There has always been terrible games in every generation. We are able to group together in frustration more because of social media.

7 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 7

Remember when Atari dumped truckloads of ET games in land fill? EA should do the same...

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

But with their board of executives?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't think I've seen big companies like Blizzard, bethesda and EA screw up this big the same year

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Of course, but how does that account for the current level of disconnect current game companies have? When that never was a problem before?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

I think people have higher expectations now because we know they have millions of dollars and skilled ppl but still produce trash.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't have higher expectations, gimme morrowind 2 with 2005 graphics and I'm happy.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It has always been a problem. Look up E.T. and Daikatana for (in)famous examples.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I meant the level of disconnect. Of course there will be bad games. Not arguing that. I’m talking about the separation from top game dev 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To the base consumer. It’s almost as if these major companies are solely that. Companies. Shocking I know.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but when you can fuck up a fallout game, there is some very wrong..

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

People called Fo3 and Fo4 fuckups. And when it was just released, NV too. Fallout may not be hard to fuckup at all.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plenty of companies have lived long enough to become the villain before. I remember when Blizzard was near-ideal.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The problem is Bethesda was once seen as a company that listens to their fanbase and customers. Now they're going the way of EA.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Circle of entertainment company, you strike gold, you get complacent, you run out of ideas and fade away in downward spiral of bad sequels.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Assassins Creed used to be my beyond favorite game of all time when Ezio was involved. Haven't even watched the trailer for Odyssey yet. :(

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/-AxZofbMGpM almost no company escapes this

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some companies actually care about their games. Platinum games, from soft. Cd project red.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There will always be a few exceptions but over a long enough timeline usually what Jobs said is true, even for his company.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rockstar, for all their hype, do make quality games and at least take some time to work the bugs out.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, they’re like one of the last major players in the industry who still have an once of integrity left.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The bugs I usually encounter in GTA and rdr2 are quite minimal. Never gamebreaking.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The "good old days" as it were eroded when publishers had the ability to patch games, in my opinion. Before online, a game couldn't be 1/

7 years ago | Likes 199 Dislikes 4

I remember every Fallout game 3 and Up needed some needed some kind of patch or fix which modders would fix way faster. 76, online...no mods

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On consoles maybe. Blizzard's most revered games received expansions, patches and updates, Quake and Doom had several releases. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The problem is that tools that were originally used to give a game longevity now cover for developer laziness on higher budget titles. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Before online buggy games with fatal flaws remained broken, unless you ordered patch disk or floppy or downloaded patch by modem.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Really? Because in the good ol days they'd just release broken games and say fuck it. Thinking devs were any better is just rosey glasses

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

You clearly never sent away for a 3.5" floppy patch

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

I did not. If it was glitched on the 486, I moved on to the next game.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So close

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I already have a floppy 3.5", I don't need to send away for another one

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

rushed for a release date by marketing only to be worked on after the fact. If the game was shit at release, it was done. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 1

That's really only true of old console games. Fallouts 1 and 2 have quest bugs and tons of unfinished content. Morrowind is still bugged

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ultima Underworld, a highly regarded RPG which was the the predecessor to System Shock, had a game breaking bug where carrying too-

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

-much inventory caused a fatal overflow that HAD to be patched and destroyed saves.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1) The price of games now is the same that it was 15 years ago. People can either expect iterative development, or they should be willing to

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

2)pay 2-3x as much. I'd venture a guess people would be more upset with paying $120 for a game than paying $60, patches, and then $60 in DLC

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Rly? I'd rather play buggy new vegas than fucking spotless fo4. The games are not only unpolished, they are just bad.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

@cloakerjosh not to mention that pre purchases even fuel this. They already got your money so... rush and start the next thing

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yep. That's not to say bugs didn't happen, they were just not game-breaking. QA has taken a big hit,beta testing isn't really that anymore.

7 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

I mean, not really. There were really shitty games during the NES era, and things not working was more acceptable. Nowadays there is less of

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

An excuse for it with higher budgets and higher understanding the ability to patch. We accept it less because it shoudn’t be a thing anymore

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Game breaking bugs are not new to the last few decades. Paying customers being treated as beta testers are though.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yep, but imagine the disaster a game breaking bug would have done on a cd or cartridge compared to now, I'd wager more went into QA then.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah beta testing seems to be a big problem now. I'm super worried they won't even pay someone to test the next ES.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Considering they fully intend to use the same 20 year old engine to make it, no amount of testing will be able to catch that games bugs.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's (supposed to be) a singe player RPG. They can't really let you play an early version of that. It'd ruin the game. They better not...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

You realize there are professional game testers whose job is to play games early?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They charge customers to beta test for them, then ignore any feedback that isn't praise.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

BGS were actually patching bugs in real time during the BETA, and the release, and every week since. who lied to you?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Old games had patches. I’m glad they can fix bugs after release, personally. Pay to win, however, can go die in a fire.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Don't get me wrong, obviously being able to patch a game breaking bug is important. I'm just speaking to how it sparked a development →

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

culture that allows publishers to push games out the door without being "finished" in order to make deadlines. Obviously a lot more can go →

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Beta testing is just a hype generator now. They let people play the "Beta" and tell them there's going to be more to it. There never is.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ouch man. That's a seriously wrong assumption. Where did it come from

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any EA game since Battlefront. CoD too. Fallout 76 is the latest example. Some bugs may have been patched, but it's still a broken mess.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when the companies are no longer run by gamers. Vote with your wallet.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 5

Hey mister I want my 8 year old daugher to be able to relate to a soldier from w2 shup up and check you privilages!

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

That only works if you can test the games first. You can't get a refund if you find out it's shit.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Or you can just follow the news leading up to the release of the game. People have always gambled their money on games as well.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I miss trailers

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You might not be able to, but others can. Just wait two days to play it. It might save you 60$.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I disagree. I still have a bunch of fun with games. I don't know why everytime some AAA dev does something suddenly gaming as a whole is 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 9

Doomed. I could name a bunch of games I had a blast with they had no microtransactions(if so did nothing) and a SP that actually added 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

Worthwhile content. I totally get some of our childhood Devs & games aren't what they used to be. Halo 5 & Destiny for example..but that 3/?

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Doesn't mean gaming is fucked.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

Success breeds followers. What we fear is devs saying "well these guys are going for easy money, we should too". It's a red flag for the 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

industry as a whole. Who would have believed Bethesda would flop so hard and the situation with blizzard is a joke. It's the greed. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

AAA gaming is going to a wrong direction. I see outcry an important step in addition to boycots to let them know what exactly they do wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Speaking from experience, for the most part the team as a whole would rather not do the things that make people mad.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But dev teams are expensive, and on live titles cannot be maintained without constant income.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yakuza series for ps4. Meaty in depth story driven bad ass action rpg. ZERO microtransactions and seasons passes. Ps4 has the games.

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Screw PS4. I'll stick to Tarkov, Verdun, Insurgencey, and Rising storm.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Switch or even the 3DS too.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So does pc.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yakuza Kiwami was actually one of the november free games for PS plus

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My fiance got into the series and it has absolutely RUINED him. He has unrealistic expectations of characters because of Majima now ?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Majima-Sama is an absolute bad ass karaoke singer. Get him Fist of the North Star lost paradise for Christmas. Sam dev team. Plays the same.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh we know. Loooord we kmow :P

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately most ps4 exclusives lack replayability. Great amazing stories.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Eh, to me Replayability is not that big of a deal. Once I'm done with the story I'm done with the game

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Single player is dead!", "HOLD MY WHISKEY!" -RDR2. Don't buy their crap, let them hurt.

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

That game is boring and has none of the charm of the original. It's just "wank wank look how good our graphics are. Your horse is dead"

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 20

Bullshit, RDR2 delivers.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I mean, there were plenty of good singleplayer games before RDR2, not knocking it but, ya know what I mean.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah it was the most recent examples, the previous fallouts were gold for single player, skyim steals lives and those are a handful.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but be prepared to be disappointed for RedDead Online

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

GTA Online was beautifully executed for the first 3 years. Year 4 continues to be a clusterfuck.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's going to be GTA Online with cowboy hats. Just watch.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Red Dead single player is easssssily worth 60 bucks. I've been playing religiously for 2 months now and I'm only 2/3 through the story.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

So religiously you forgot that it only came out 5 weeks ago not 2 months ago?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i just did the mission in saint denis where you rob the trolley station (and get almost zilch) you before or after that?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

After that the gang is too mopey for me. I just go hunting , don't have the heart to push the story ahead.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

After

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't change the fact that singleplayer alone was worth more than 60 bucks

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

They did what battlefront 2 attempted to do, make an excellent game that pulls you into their casino. RDR2 is the perfect game for that

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Battlefront 2's singleplayer can't really be compared to the masterpiece that rockstar sold for only 60 bucks. Online is flawed no doubt

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was playing red dead online. It's uh... It's interesting. Kind of fun at times, bit of a slog to unlock stuff. Decent mess around fun.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Microtransactions inbound. Let you unlock stuff early. Doesn't seem to be too big of a deal. I have server connection issues.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's exactly what I expected it to be when I was told it was being added. You might get shanked. You might get lassod and drug around like

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hector of Troy. You might buddy up with some people and kill an entire NPC population so you can sell their sheep to them.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The connection issues are my biggest problem. Between money acquisition and rate of levelling up, without being able to do missions...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It makes it take a lot longer to unlock stuff. Can easily make a couple hundred bucks a day, though. The xp is where I suffer.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I have been enjoying Nintendo and indie games this generation. I feel like I get more for my money and I am supporting game- (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 388 Dislikes 9

Just picked up Mario kart for my switch. The driving assist stuff is awesome for my 5 year old playing with me

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Driving assist still don't help my 20 yr old gf... She told me she was good Mario kart... Lol

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol. Maybe you should change it to 50cc when she's not looking.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It was on 50cc... She can't drive straight... Lol

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love Nintendo but they are still flawed and slow. Take the online service for example

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah I've been enjoying Sonys exclusive games lately, like GoW, Spiderman and Horizon

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am 32 and play my switch every day. It is the only system that doesn't feel like its trying to rob me.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Plus it has an awesome lineup of quality games. A bit of flopped indies but it’s awesome seeing Nintendo support independent developers.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DONT LET THEM HEAR THE BEST GAMES TODAY ARE INDIE, they will hide as indie devs and we will lose our last bastion

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no..fuck nintendo this generation, im honestly stupid pissed at them, ill wait to see if they ever join the rest of us

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Asian game company in general has been doing good I think

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Developers I believe in. Of course there are a few ps4 exclusives thrown in there.

7 years ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 2

Plus Nintendo is supporting indie devs which has given the devs an outlet to the industry outside of PC.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm still playing Shadow of War on gravewalker difficulty over here.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I enjoyed Detroit becone human a lot.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

That game was so good!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't necessarily disagree, but a common complaint is a lack of originality, and most of Nintendo is remakes or sequels.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Nintendo is one of the cheapest,most conservative companies out there,you're just very loyal sheep.How's that 50$ Mew and 5th trip to Kanto?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 35

Say what you want about Nintendo and their rehashed games, at least they stick to their principles and release products w/out predatory MTs.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well splatoon and arms and Mario + rabbits bot, odyssey and my 30 dollar trip to alola actually where pretty enjoyable thank you very much

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nintendo as a game developer is one of the highest quality studios out there.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Highest *quantity. Rehash after rehash, starving you for good hardware so that graphics attainable a decade ago are enough to satisfy you.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Maybe quantity as well but mostly quality. Yes they are doing a great job on mantaining their popular franchises and steadily improving them

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Like a good little sheep, you just keep repeating "No.No.Good quality." While I provide examples of their cheap practices. You're a drone.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

It's also hard to call them conservative when they just made the switch, and where the only ones trying new shit with the wii and wii u...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And making a 3d handheld and the whole carbord shit that while definitively expensive is at least creative and the amiibos, I can keep going

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They are conservative when it comes to game design and content use. And your enjoyment is subjective.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Again splatoon, Mario +rabbits, botw and odyssey, which of those is conservative and how???? By literally doing something new with each?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You want to talk objective instead of subjective? Well then in all fairness nintendo is the most out there developer and has always been 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is doing a shooter in which you don't try to kill conservative? Making one of the most experimental games with all the mechanics of odessey?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I've been mostly about indie games and Nintendo for years. All I need is my PC for single player and my Switch for MP games, and I'm good.

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Same. Agreed 100%

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean jesus christ, no AAA game in years has come close to beating games like Hollow Knight.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hollow Knight is absolutely amazing. The amount of quality content you get for such a low price makes me feel like I'm stealing.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm so fucking excited for the Hornet DLC. I will gladly pay Team Cherry for all the content they've developed for Hollow Knight.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've bought it several times 'cos I want to support them that much. No shitting. Bought it several times and gave away as presents.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The new doom has been the best game in years for me.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah it seems now Nintendo has finally gotten their head out of their asses and woke the fuck up. They were going downhill for a while.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

The WiiU has the largest library of Nintendo game that spans all of their previous generations. Best console to play the legacy of Nintendo.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still love my Wii U. I dont know what everyone was complaining about

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The Wii-U is the best console to experience the legacy of Nintendo. It has the largest line up of Nintendo games. (All 3D zeldas)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The WiiU was a great console. Had plenty of good games, and an amazingly diverse virtual console. Terrible name and marketing drowned it.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yesssir. My WiiU is put away because I have a terrorist of a 2 year old, but I'll get it out in a couple years and enjoy it with him

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Great plan!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They literally never stopped making great games and innovating, their risk just didn't pay off that time or do you need a list of examples?

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

This is a good point. I rarely buy AAA games these days and usually only on sale

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Agreed, only buying games on sale on my side. Except a few really great ones like Spider-Man or Tomb raider.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn straight. No point in day one

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What it's my video game and I need it now?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By all means, do as you please

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, nowadays wait a week and they are -50% on price....

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or like BFV and F76 go on sale literally one or two days after launch.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How mad day oners must get at that

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aside from EA's awful PR, the BFV "Controversy" is only surprising in that people expect historical accuracy from BF. BF1942 had jetpacks.

7 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 7

They didn't expact historical accuracy they literally were just angry about the presensce of women they didn't even try to hide it

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

100% this.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you! Historical accuracy is not and never has been the intended purpose of these games. It’s such a stupid complaint.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Women fought in ww2. This was a fake controversy made up by women haters.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It was just a caste of “political gamers” empowered by gamergate and their disdain of women and black people. BF1 doesn’t belong on the list

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 12

And it is actually pretty fun fps..

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I think the more annoying thing was that EA was trying to shut down all criticisms, whether legit or not, as "sexist" gamers

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Most were sexist gamers, lol

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Except the criticisms were "EA RUINED BY FEMINAZI SJWS" which you know is sexist

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Secret Weapons of WW2 expansion had jetpacks. Although the main game wasnt anymore realistic as we had paratroopers firing bazookas mid air.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Still a great game that I had a lot of fun with, especially with mods.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it didn't. The expansion "Secret Weapons of WWII" did.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 12

Expansion =\= new game.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

No shit sherlock. The point is that the expansion contained crazy/silly stuff. So saying that BF1942 is unrealistic for containing jetpacks>

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

An expansion is still part of the game, numbnuts.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How about how barbed wire damages tanks? drives me nuts on Omaha every time.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Battlefield 1942 you could ramp the Enterprise out of the ocean onto Midway Island and waste the map using the ship's AA guns. Yes, it-

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

-isn't exactly INTENDED gameplay, but slavish historical accuracy would be that the ship gets stuck once you reach the shallows instead of-

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The expansion is still a part of the game, so the statement that 1942 had jetpacks holds. BF was never about historical accuracy.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Especially from that exp forwards it's been about silly multiplayer fun in [insert setting here], damn if it is not historically accurate.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

> is a moronic statement.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

In the defence of BFV they took alot of feedback on their cosmetics on board and sacked off the guy who made those comments

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

If they give me hair options for my ladies I will be fine. And a slight upgrade to medic weapons. The game is pretty good, even if ya know..

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The purists are freaking out about history and accuracy and some employees said some dumb stuff.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but then EA held a Christmas party to celebrate BFV, and put up the worst comments they could find to paint the angry fans as sexist.

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 7

I don't much care for all that controversy stuff. A couple little tweaks to the game and it'd be great. I really enjoy it, to my surprise

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is assuming they were even "found" and not fabricated.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

People shat themselves over seeing a woman soldier. Even if they made them up, the comments were there to find. Easily.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm not even joking. They literally had a giant screen with #everyonesbattlefield and a bunch of sexist and toxic comments surrounding it.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

I mean my overarching opinion of it is that both sides were equally moronic for different reasons, but eh, what happened happened really

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

It's not even a "both sides" issue. EA chose to ignore the valid and level-headed concerns and instead brought attention to the trolls.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

There were no valid concerns from both sides. There were plenty of women in WWII. Any slight research shows you that.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Even some of the 'level headed' arguments were pretty moronic tbh. Realism in battlefield is a joke, it's offensive to veterans is moronic/1

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

Women fighting in WWII as a historical inaccuracy isn't a level-headed concern in a game where battles are made up and physics are ignored.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I mean tbf alot of those guys WERE being sexist. They have EA what they needed instead of providing actual debate, like total tools

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 13

It's not hard to find sexist idiots when you go searching through YouTube comments. Trolls are as common there as mosquitos in a swamp.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Oh certainly, but they ultimately did provide that content, and it was immensely prevalent

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The majority of the complaints I still see about BFV are still just "women are in it". So I'm not really seeing where they're wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Which is ridiculous because even the slightest amount of research tells you that there were plenty of women serving during WWII. Idiots.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

Yeah but when your making a historical game you WANT it to be historical you don't rewrite history bc of your politics

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 14

But, you have to realize, most of the companies back when took a massive gamble financially on their games success. They opened up to

7 years ago | Likes 650 Dislikes 9

I'd argue that its a bigger gamble to put out half baked games that constantly harang players to spend money on shiny cosmetic bullshit

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It’s also amazing how many companies went bust back then. They’d release a small number of games, then *gone*. No stability for game makers.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gaming companies are getting so bad I might have to take up other hobbies. Like destroying the environment.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Gamble my ass. What was the *terrible risk* they took? Oh yes, "having to get another job & pay rent like the rest of us". Woo-hoo. Fuck 'em

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 49

You sound bitter. Who broke your heart? Let it out, there are plenty of shoulders to cry on here.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Eh, plenty of game companies failed horribly, bankruptcy, debt, etc.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

It's still risky today back then they didn't even have a real market and no systems were in place had to make their own software.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like anything that goes mainstream.. Early adopters do it out of passion.. Once the trend wave hits, it's about pandering to masses for $

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

The depressing thing is the developers, the people making the game, still do it out of passion, but the company is shackled to shareholders.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I’m not to sure about that. My friend works for a big gaming company and they drive them all in to the wall more or less

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends.. are they the original team.. or was it a java herder brought in to add to his resume? Plus Dev burnout is VERY real..

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But it's not pandering to the masses. If it were, the games would be better, microtransactions wouldn't exist, etc.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Games are made to cater to the lowest common denominator. This translates to kids and casual players, who don't care about quality as much.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Woah woah woah... as a casual, I resent that. I don't microtrans, I don't PVP, I want quality in my games.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hardcore gamers aren't the masses.. kids and casuals are.. the gamers are vocal because passionate...

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The masses are ok with Diabolo/Fallout/Battlefield because they play an hour here and there and feel they got their monies worth

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm a casual but I'm not going to play Diablo on the phone. That's a broad generalization.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Steve jobs had a interview where he answers why market leaders fail. It's because once you have 100% market share, the marketing dept takes

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

over, and runs the company instead of the product department. Why make a better product when there's no ROI - thus marketing makes decisions

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

To be fair, Steve Jobs was a lot of what is wrong with most businesses today. Look up his business conduct and shudder.

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Yeah you are a fool.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 37

Wow my eyes are opened, this argument has changed my viewpoint completely

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You sure gave me the razzle dazzle with that compelling argument. Might have even changed my mind with your overwhelming evidence.

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

I'm not saying he's flawless. However, a quick google only dug up Elon Musk levels of misconduct. Got some recommended sources to read?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"noting also that he did away with all the company’s charity program" OK damn. I was curious too about him, but wow what a POS. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sorry for the late reply, I appreciate @Aesurah stepping up in my place to toss a few links up. For that you have my upvote.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No problem, I learned a few things I didn't know, so thanks back at ya @Delvonshi

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Public trading and became beholden to people that have absolutely no love for gaming. Just money. Shoehorning bs into properties to

7 years ago | Likes 447 Dislikes 4

The whole serve the shareholders above all else is a bad thing. As long as the shareholders are happy, they can do anything.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Both of the games mentioned in the post were 1P Microsoft titles, which was a public company then. Activision and EA had both been public +

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1P? Assuming that's an abbreviation for single-player: Halo 2 definitely wasn't. If it's single-party, doesn't Bungie count?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1st party, as in developed by Microsoft.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So meaning primary developer is Microsoft, but allowing for supporting developers?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

- for a decade or more at the time as well. Zenimax (Bethesda) still isn’t. There’s no evidence whatsoever to suggest going public has +

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

- anything to do with this.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup I was reading a stock board and when it came to the diablo mobile people were like "Well if it goes up when it hits china, cool..." lol

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If something takes off there, even for a small window, it's considered a success despite the West dumping it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably cause 20% of humanity live there.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's another massive problem the gaming industry is facing. They're not working for western tastes and pandering to China.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Then the Chinese government cracks down on the Chinese company they had to partner with and they get screwed, and whine about free markets.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boost profit shares. It's sad and on a path to destruction.

7 years ago | Likes 301 Dislikes 3

Yeah. We're headed toward another video game crash like back in 1983. Hopefully Nintendo can save us from this one too.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Nintendo is a shining beacon

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True. Stockmarket fuck shit up. Always about more money, not quality or sustainability.

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Sad part is Steam proved the opposite true. Focus on quality and put it at the right price point and you print money but their too big now.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Chasing profits not quality means you will end up with neither.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah... this mentality is why I stopped buying presales and wait a month after release before investing. I have saved so much money and rage

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More than that - once the original developers realized what was happening, they refused to sacrifice their artistic integrity for cash and /

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

jumped ship. Game companies used to be populated by gamers. Now, everyone in positions of influence and power have lost touch with their /

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

consumers, and it's a mad dash to appeal to the lowest common denominator to stay on top. Seriously - AAA is screwed. Look to the indies. /

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Either way the users are determining the Profit in the end. If everybody gets sick of their bullshit they will have to change.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You hit the nail right on the head. Big game companies no longer risk going out of business with one shitty game like companies did 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a few years ago. Now, you can toss out a shit game, nickel and dime those who buy it with day 1 DLC, season passes, micro transactions, 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

loot boxes, etc. and report back to the shareholders, "Look how much money we're making!" 3/3

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a seriously underated comment. And I'm glad I read it. I've dreaded the end of gaming as I've known it, but you never know

7 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 2

Look into V1 Interactive. A bunch of good talent has jumped ship and joined Lehto from Halo. I'm excited/optimistic to see what they do.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gaming as a whole will never die ,it's simply too big to die ,it's like saying sports are going to die off ,it's just not going to happen1/2

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People used to say banks were too big to fail and the housing market was too big to crash. We know better

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

though formerly beloved companies such as blizzard and Bethesda could die ,which is a sad thought.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Nothing to dread as a consumer. Just dont buy shares in shitty publishers or games before the reviews and reactions are out.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's when the major franchises embrace shady practices in mass that the gaming industry as a whole suffers then titles get bought out.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's ok. We still have the indie devs making great titles.

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

If I ever get to release some of my projects I will never allow myself to be bought by some of these BS companies. It's to sell your soul.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are a few gem studios out there. More often though I see "indie" studios imitating "AAA" styles to make smaller cash cows.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

It's sad because you see the same trend when the indies get big. It's something about the passion and risk that makes the greats.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0