how a controlled burn can restore a forest

Apr 1, 2018 12:52 PM

VaskoGeorgiev

Views

119784

Likes

1632

Dislikes

28

Some trees need fire to germinate their seeds, this is a good thing ...well except for the tard that build a house there.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With death comes life

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Kill the dead grass so it can grow and then die again?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Far Cry 5 looks awesome

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's a stupid question - how do the trees not burn down?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's evidence that controlled burn only creates an ecosystem designed to burn, that a healthier option is letting the land be grazed on.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not just be grazed on, but animals packed together for safety from predators so their stomping and their shit cultivates the land.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You first prune the trees so fire cant get into canopy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You weed your garden, don’t you?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This ecosystem has evolved to burn on a regular basis and is beneficial but PIA organisms have disrupted to protect their subdivisions, so..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..fuel builds up. Is ignited by natural or otherwise causes and burns uncontrollably, destroying PIA organisms’ subdivisions who say “why?”

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Botany bitch!!!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Need to try that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thought this was gonna be another Far Cry 5 gif, but realized the graphics weren't good enough.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tried playing at 4k while streaming. Crashed my $2000 computer lol.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Sometimes the forest needs the fire.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Alaska we had this beautiful flowering plant called fireweed which would completely take-over recently-burned forests. They smelled →

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wonderful and some people would make a sweet, red syrup from the blossoms.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, some grasses will make themselves catch on fire.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously fake, why didn't the camera burn?!!?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Since they get out of control so often, they are actually called prescribed burns now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Far Cry turkeys will survive that and kill you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG it's like an allegory for Easter! The forest dies and then 3 lunar days later it's reborn.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The primary issue with wild fires today is that we have thinned the forests so much that there is an over abundance of ground cover. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And in places where we have thinned the forests too much we don't do enough controlled burns to prevent wild fires. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hah hah!! Take that, you tick bastards!!!

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

bunnies, bugs, bees and all other little creatures

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Forest Fires in general do an ass ton of good for the environment. It’s just that people live where they commonly happen so we freak out.

8 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 1

It's 2018 shouldn't people be made out of metal so we don't have to worry about this stuff any more

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, its more that back in the 60s, Smokey the Bear became a thing, and we got obsessive over stopping them. Now we have massive overgrowth

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Nah it's because when a small one starts instead of keeping it controlled they put it out which results in years of build up and then boom.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Question to anyone who knows: how do they prevent trees from catching fire and starting an out of control forest fire?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

green wood is very hard to burn. Even dead wood can be hard to burn if you only have a flash fire like in the gif.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah ok. I thought that had something to do with it, the temperature not being high enough.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's generally okay if some trees in the interior of the fire torch up since they've been thinned so the fire can't spread from tree to tree

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ive literally said this so many times on every california wildfire post. Every single one of those comments gets downvoted. Cant fix stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

IKTF. A few times I mentioned the *scientifically supported* conclusion that overall mass extinctions are a healthy part of evolution, and

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

holy shit, the retards come out in FORCE. It's like their trigger.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Healthy to who?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ecosystem as a whole I imagine?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. Evolution doesn't work that way. We got lucky.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Prescribed burn...fires should never be thought of as controlled.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because we dont do this enough, the shit builds uo and when it does finally catch fire, instead 9f a tiny controled, you got forest fire .

8 years ago | Likes 361 Dislikes 1

Actually, if we Didn't do this the fires would not be like they are. Check this talk out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edDZNkm8Mas

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Happened in BC last year. They've started controlled burning early this year

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eagle Creek is a sad but recent example of overgrowth going absolutely nuts from one disgustingly stupid person’s firework.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is this the new norm?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in the High Rockies of Colorado and the town I live in does controlled burns very frequently. In fact, the fire service will pull 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

All of the slash (excess dead wood) into piles, which you can come and grab from for your house, and burn them once we get a little snow.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And in NY we aren't allowed to have any kind of burns, also if you live near Ithaca you can't cut down a tree.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have to be ridiculously conscientious about it up here.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Forest fires are only bad for human civilization. If we weren't here, garbage would pile up and Mother Nature would burn the house down.

8 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 2

Firefighter put out "small" fires thoughout 10-20 years.... random lightning strike... "worst fore since the 70's"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Actually because of humans forest fires haven’t gotten worse because in early years we would immediately put out any fire that nature may1/?

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Have

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I don't rememeber what plant it was. But it required frequent forest fires to stay alive. And we put them out so fast that it was endangered

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have started and with us putting those fires out so quickly the underbrush builds up so much that there is so much more fuel for fire to 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Cause crown fires, which spread extremely fast. Also because of not logging correctly we’ve allowed many tree species to grow so close 3/?

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Together it allows for even more fuel for forest fires. In the past forest trees were more spread out because of having to work harder 4/?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Controlled. Ya hear that, California, "Controlled burn."

8 years ago | Likes 989 Dislikes 3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what I tell them. They still won't let me have a flamethrower.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, we are trying to restore the whole state.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure "control" has ever been a part of California's vocabulary.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah well us Californians are wild and reckless, why would our fires be any different

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pfft. you're not the boss of us.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha

8 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You really think that the intent of the fire changes the outcome?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a kid, controlled Burns happened all the time. Then they stopped for a bevy of ill-informed reasons. Now we have this.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

we tried to do one for the entire state ... at once; didnt turn out so well

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

On the contrary, it came out well done

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Arizona used to call them controlled until a few years ago. Now they're "prescribed burns" so it looks less bad when they run wild.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same in California.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same in Australia.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

IT'S NOT OUR FAULT!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or it is..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an Australian; you’re welcome for the trees

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a non-Californian; can you please import more of your native flora and fauna there?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What has made California start catching on fire so much

8 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 0

Same reason as fort mcmurrey here in canada. Weather, as in doubt and the land being dry as all hell, those combined is not good

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not doing controlled burns

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not enough of this.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Arsonists

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Went from drought, to rainstorms, and now to being fire?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We got a ton of rain. So we got a ton of plants. Then no more rain. All the plants died. Then we just had a ton of kindling.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

A severe drought.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Godless jesabells

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Eucalyptus trees. They build up flammable sap I'm pretty sure

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

They’re awful for many reasons but also drop flammable little acorn things and lots of dry leaves

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aren't they imported from Australia? Where everything wants to look you including the flora?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they refuse to put in fire breaks in many of their areas because it 'disrupts the natural beauty'

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Idiots

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Last year, we had lots of rain in the winter, more vegetation grew than normal, an abnormally hot summer killed it all and turned it to fuel

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for all the fires come fall. And this last winter had so little rain, I am legit concerned of our Eucalyptus trees, giant mofugas everywhere

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Controlled. Burns.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Current firefighting technics have gotten too good. Causes more fire load to remain on the Forest floor. Making the next fire even bigger.

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Multiple that by years and add a crippling draught.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

So why don't they do a wide spread controlled burn.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

A big reason is that fire exclusion is typically practiced to stop timber inventory from burning.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are people (ex: Santa Rosa/Napa fires) and/or bad terrain and/or just a hell of a lot of land to cover (CalFire doesn’t help)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same reason the fires are so bad. They do a lot around areas without populations... there is just so much open country in California.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too much fuel on the ground now with ladder fuels that carry the fire into the canopy. It's a giant uphill battle. Job security for me tho!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's very dry; giant tinderbox.

8 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 0

We dry as hell and ain’t got no water. Short version of it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It hasn't always constantly caught on fire, so what has changed

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

I did before we stopped it. If it burned frequently then they would not cause too much damage. But now it burns so hot because all the fuel

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yearly droughts the last decade or so

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Fires frequency in southern California went from once every 100 years to about every 10 years because of population increase 1)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Some sort of warming on a global scale. Not sure what to call it though.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Perhaps global hottening?

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Call it climate change so idiots can't say "If the flat earth I global warming whys it still snow in winter?"

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2