On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog

Nov 4, 2022 12:36 PM

when your audience cares nothing for truth or facts, sure, who needs verification?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Simply put, its not verification any more.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

It's like Elon is trying to take the actual marketable qualities of twitter and remove them.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coming soon: Red checkmarks for verified people, only $50 / month

3 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 0

Maybe they will be white check marks for $100.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool, looking forward to being verified as Elon Musk and just posting socialist propaganda every day

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Fun Fact: Twitter implemented the blue check system because they were getting sued for people impersonating public figures.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you are still using Twitter, you are part of the problem. Just delete your account and shut the fuck up.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Silly @OP why would a doggg go on the internet? A doggg on imgur what a ridiculous idea ha hah ha

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Everyone get out of my way. The new Donald Trump is in the house, and I'm bringing blackjack and hookers with me.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lets see how many donation can I wring out from my adoring fans b4 those idiots know

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is both horrifying and Schadenfreude.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So if i make a musk twitter account and am verified does that mean i own twitter?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im just saying, if i can get verified as elon musks gaping saggy asshole, that might be the most entertaining 8$ ive ever spent for 1 min

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

So who's going to get verified as Elon Musk then?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They're on to you. That L is actually a capital i :)

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

so in theory someone could make a fake elon musk account and get the fancy checkmark beside it?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just one more side project Musk is gonna run into the ground and forget about with only half of it complete. What a fucking tool

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I already planned to buy the Tucker Carlson check so this makes it easier.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And what were you gonna do? Publish verified facts? You monster...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty much

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excited to see how much of shit-storm Twitter devolves into.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, the check mark will just mean 'verified payer,' or more accurately, 'verified punter.'

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Musk is just trying to get away with dozens of verified alt accounts so he can go back to manipulating Tesla stock and blame trolls.

3 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 0

He has to cut all costs because he leveraged his loan with tesla stock. And twitter doesn't make money. So hell need to leverage more

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

He's a billionaire that has complete control over one of the most influential social media platforms in the world. Stock will be the least >

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

< of the things he'll try to manipulate with it.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It will mess with tesla stock price as he has to pay out a bunch of twitter stock from fired staff too. Its a hemorrhaging of money.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Oh, no doubt it's nothing but a loss. But I think he feels that his larger goals will eventually make the loss worth it.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not just IF Musk will destroy Twitter, but how quickly.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but Russian bot troll farms will be happy, they have been fighting the verification check mark since it was established.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go Elon, Go! You got this.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what if for one month we all bought one and were all Elon Musk?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Paying more for a checkmark that loses any value as a checkmark in the same go. Great thinking

3 years ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 0

A tenth a percent of your net worth.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost like paying $44B for something that loses almost all its value BECAUSE you just bought it.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

RIGHT. I can't wait to see HOW many fake accounts of celebrities & politicians pop up. Seriously, Twitter is going to TANK.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How much would you pay me not to put on a mask that looks like your face and film myself w my pants off screaming the N-word?

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Not really the sort of thing that turns me on enough to pay for it but i won't stop you either

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Musk is a genius, dont you know

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

there seems to be this weird obsession the right have w/ the blue check as a status symbol which i personally don't understand since the 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

check is supposed to indicate a verified identity and it makes sense that prominent people would need to be identified as legitimate.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats exactly why the right is obsessed for it because that criteria makes it hard for them to get and then spout nazi shit and keep it

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True capitalist thought processing at work

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the whole point. He wants to let people pay him so they can impersonate democrats...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, Russian bot troll farms get to come back... they won't stop at pretending to be dems, they will go back to impersonating celebs, again.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It will first be used to undermine democracy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well that saves money. Besides, why bother to "fact check" anything on Twitter (soon to be rebranded as 4Klan)

3 years ago | Likes 696 Dislikes 2

twitchan is available

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Isn’t that just twitch after hours? ?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the point. Now fake news can be 'verified' and even more people will believe it. This is why he bought twitter.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Won't work. Reputation is really easy to lose, do you see people quoting weekly world news, the Enquirer, or the Daily Stormer? Same thing.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I've literally had people quoting "Rebel News", as well as Stormfront and Breitbart on this site. Motherfucking Stormfront and Breitbart.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the thing, we could easily change the landscape by adding our voices to drown out the nazis much as we did with imgur!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe, but who would benefit? Thank you but no.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bypassing the 140-char limit…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Question: Wouldn't the person who profits by this be Elon? What about walking away, finding our own place, and letting Tw become Myspace?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Let them destroy themselves and see what they can "create" without our input or sanction? (Yes, such a John Galt thing to do.... Ironic)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4Chan is already 4Klan. Twitler, maybe

3 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 1

Twitzi?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shitter

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

*shitler

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Volxempfänger (catchy Umlaut!)

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's /pol. 4chan has okay spots, except for the aforementioned & /b. But b/ is shit tier trash, it always has been and they know it.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Also 8chan is the nazi hellscape people who think /pol is too "leftist" & it's just cheese pizza to the right of that.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Didn’t twitter get a lawsuit because of impersonation and had to establish the blue check because of it?

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

They did see a lawsuit, but it was settled out of court, and Twitter itself implemented the system after the fact.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

So, the system was still established because legal stuff?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, yes.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This. The whole point of the verified account system is to keep the celebrities that use the system happy. They don't want random people /1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Or maybe where death threats are coming from.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

impersonating them obviously. But they generate a ton of app engagement so Twitter is motivated as hell to keep them happy. They're like /2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

free content boosters. I don't think I've ever had a tweet or reply get more than a handful of likes or comments. But the verified handles/3

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

£10 a month to pretend to be Musk sounds like a bargain...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's been suspending any accounts that pretend to be him.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No surprise there. Free speech for me, but not for thee.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I miss the time when no one cared about Twitter.

3 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 3

I live the glory days by still not caring about Twitter. Beyond it being a boat anchor train wreck around Musk's neck anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Give it a few months

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just wait, that time is coming back, give it a couple months.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

still don't; never did

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well you might like the direction Musk is taking it, then.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If journalists would just give it up, we wouldn't have to hear about it anymore. They're hopelessly addicted.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Zero-barrier digital publishing, in retrospect, was far too much for our species to handle.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The one where only those owning a newspaper or TV channel had a powerful voice?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I miss the days before the internet. We were mostly blissfully unaware of all the dumb around us.

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

When was that?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We definitely knew there was dumb around us, but we thought it was because they were uninformed. How wrong we were.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think there was less dumb because the dumb wasn’t near as able to connect, validate, and rile each other up to new levels of dumb.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I remember back in the day whenever a certain friend would say something stupid someone in the group would generally say, "Shut up Jamie."

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

(2) And that was the end of that. I miss those days sometimes.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This, social media gave these crazies a platform to connect and become an echo chamber for.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You mean the time when people cared about [insert time appropriate social media platform]

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

When social media wasn't a news source or subject.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Back when USENET was USENET, and the nobody cared if you were a dog.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey MySpace was awesome and Tom is a saint!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, we can still go back to MySpace

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0