WTF?

Mar 20, 2021 1:02 AM

killbillsexwife

Views

107864

Likes

4812

Dislikes

341

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/17/man-arrested-near-kamala-harris-residence-gun-and-ammunition-found.html?fbclid=IwAR0j-d4oGF4pUKaYyJTbS40RUh50tn69ogsKquiSbBu5VJY3EFYcJccMuBg

He was found unarmed. His guns were in his car 3 miles away.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can we maybe not push OccupyDemocrats to the FP? They are very fucking low on the "accuracy" scale

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

@op this post is kinda misinformation.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Can someone explain to me how registering ammo will prevent crime?

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

It probably won't, but at least it will make it easier to pin the tail on the donkey afterwards

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They’re getting so brazen, it’s scary. Just thought it was becuz they were just stupid, but it’s obvious it’s becuz they feel unstoppable.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

Let's not show his face, don't make this asshole famous. Don't let people do stupid shit to get famous.

5 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 10

The narrative for this story is incorrect. Please do your own research before jumping on the “Republican assassin” bandwagon.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I thought we werent supposed to make killers/attempted killers famous, shouldnt we not do this?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

it's okay, he's on the other team /s

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Also, hes white. Anytime a white person does something bad, its absolutely terrorism/white supremacy.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Registering ammo sound smart until you learn you can make your own ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Wait, did he actually do something to her? Because my EDC vehicle loadout is way bigger with a hell of a lot more ammo etc

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

wtf is unregistered ammunition?

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Apparently you have to register ammo in DC

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what the fuck is "unregistered ammunition"

5 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 20

Don't get so angy

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 14

You need to register ammo in DC.

5 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 5

well, see, an unregistered thing is a thing that hasn’t been registered. In the USA different “states” and places have different rules.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

PLEASE GO TO SOURCES, the guy was close to Vice-President's home, but the gun was in his car 3 miles away.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So guy had 113 rounds in a pack, 1 unloaded rifle and a few unloaded magazines in his car? This is not the full story is it?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Counterpoint: stop showing faces and just describe them. Don’t give any publicity. Suffocate them online.

5 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 6

Counterpoint: Someone with MY SAME NAME is a repeat criminal, scammer. I'd just as soon HIS photo get published, often.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, why do we give them what they want? We should say "some nobody went to jail for trying to hurt (insert actually important person)

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Because someone might recognize them and be able to help with a successful prosecution?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I agree if they are still at large. But if they are arrested or dead. Don't show them or say their name

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good luck learning h ow to identify the next one.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But this definitely aint related to right wing extremism yall. Just a crazy dude that hates the current administration for some reason. /s

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

Dude was not arrested with a firearm, was picked up on a bike 3 miles from said gun which was in his car. The firearm charge was an add-on.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

What was the initial the charge if he was just chillin on his bike?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too close to the VP's house, I'd bet. He was trying to get some mental help, which the VP is big on.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean there are things called hospitals and therapists but yeah ok

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The guy claimed he'd tried to get assistance from both the VA and his local hospitals, as he is a medically discharged vet. We'll see.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The idiot should certainly be investigated, but she & the 2nd gentleman are staying @ Blaire House while The Naval Observatory is remodeled.

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

Irrelevant

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

So, he was unarmed, on a bike, near the VP's house and his intentions were not to harm but get help?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Yes, lets get vets the help they need WITHOUT them having to make dramatic statements. His rifle was THREE MILES AWAY away in a locked car.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fine, what charge was he arrested for?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Come on, he was probably just having a bad day.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 6

Apparently he wasn’t actually doing anything at all at the time of arrest

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Lots of people not picking up my reference to the massage parlour shooter who was described by police as 'having a bad day'.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Why werent all his mags full?

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

Right? I mean sure you only havev113 rounds but then just use 4 mags with all but one full. I mean he's obviously as idiot so expecting him

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be able to divide 113 by 30 might be too far beyond him.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really shit cheap mags that fuck up if filled to capacity?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Ammo is hella expensive rn

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Maybe there was 150 in mags if full plus an additional 113? No clue honestly. Just my guess.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Article doesn't specify but it said he also had a speed loader for mags so I'm thinking full mags with extra ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok in DC to have a firearm you need to register the ammo with the gun.

5 years ago | Likes 622 Dislikes 15

Thank you I was confused as to why it started unregistered ammo. Up vote for good info

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank God I dont live in DC.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 15

This is not true. You cannot possess ammo for a caliber you don’t have registered in the District. Ex/ you can’t have .45 ammo w/o having..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a .45 firearm registered in the District. Source: I live in DC with several pistol and long gun permits. You don’t need to register ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you get caught with ammo for a caliber you don’t have registered in DC you’re in some serious trouble

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At first i was like "what the fuck is registered ammunition??" Thanks. Seems impractical, i could see registering a type maybe but

5 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

Registration of individually serialized cartridges on a per weapon basis just seems impractical both on the government and owner side.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I think that is the intent

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aah, an impractical law that will have 0 effect on the problem and be a greivous waste of government resources. Very helpful

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Fire gun at range* "That's No. 46220..." *Fires again* "No. 46221 is gone..." *Fires again* "No. 46222. Oh baby a triple."

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It makes it easier to identify a shooter if the ammunition is registered even if the gun isn't recovered. And every legally sold round...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is recorded by the sales person. Which makes it significantly more difficult for people to find and purchase unregistered ammunition.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? How? There's no serial numbers, it's rapidly expendable, and you can't track it. How is it registerable? Makes no sense

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

5G chips. Given the overlap in certain group I would love to see that fake news gaining traction /popcorn

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You can’t possess ammunition for a caliber gun you don’t own. Ex/ you can’t possess .38 ammo if you only have a 9mm registered in DC.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It isn’t that each round needs to be registered. Source: I live in DC with several pistol and long gun permits.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok I’ll ask, what the fuck is “unregistered ammunition”? I’ve got a lot of ammunition. None of it is “registered”. Wtf is going on?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Misleading as all hell. He was unarmed all of that shit was found in his car parked in a garage several miles away.

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 12

What difference does that make? It was a thousand miles from his home in Texas.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

Still a bit misleading, no?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

It says it was in his car. Texas LE put out a warning about him and had been monitoring him after his family reported his behavior.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

But the pic above fails to mention he wasn't in or near his car and implies by the fuss they are making that he was found in his car.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It doesn't mention he was held on an emergency mental health warrant two weeks ago either. Memes aren't encyclopedia entries.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of people in this thread have a bigger problem with registering ammo over the potential assassination of our VP.

5 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 36

A lot of people in this thread don’t know that the United States has multiple states and states have different rules. “WTF?!?”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I've seen curiosity about something unusual and nonsensical, but nothing suggesting the dude should go free because of it. Have you?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Probably because we're confused, trying to process a concept we don't understand lodged in a larger context we do

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"potential" Yea, he was thiiiiiiiiiis close...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

More like most trust that the legal system will throw that guy in the slam, but are concerned about the ammo thing being abused against

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

So where were their concern about it with Republican presidents? Or do we just scream about it when Dems are in charge?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

What

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

law abiding citizens.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Gun Loving Fucks.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

it isn't even about that. It's about the constitution and protecting your rights. Like say being able to film a police interaction.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I'm not sure why people equate guns to rights honestly. Most nations with strong human rights don't use guns to get/protect them...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think the guy in the article is bonkers af, but in terms of the commenters, that's all they're arguing about.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I was just thinking that! “American Mindset”

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

This is the face of terrorism.

5 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 34

Imagine being this fucking dense.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

it actually seems like kind of a misleading article title when you see the full story

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

A random reddit post is the full story? I have doubts. The whole post reads like a manufactured pro 2A narrative.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

You could say the same but opposite of the main article itself

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“I mean sure I brought what seems to be an arsenal. But it’s not like I’m performing reconnaissance before I come back with my car of guns.”

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Tbf it’s one gun

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The guy who shot Gabby Giffords in the head at a rally was a one gun shooting. He killed 6 and injured another 15.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I’m not saying you can’t do a lot with one but only one is hardly an Arsenal

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Didnt realize some states make you register ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

Cities, mostly

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DC isn’t a state, and yes they have that law.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That begs the question, should the constitution still apply in territories that get no say in the matter?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The obvious answer is to change the status of US territories and the like to have equal representation. But nooooooooo

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right, but if they dont have equal representation, why should federal law still apply? Or why should they pay taxes?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It already does (except in the American Somoas, but that because Somoans chose not to be citizens to keep their strict property and

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Religious laws, they are technically just "People's under the protection of the USA")

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Uh, where/when did you start having to register ammunition?

5 years ago | Likes 1421 Dislikes 66

In any civilised country FFS!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Yeah thought that was a typo at first. Ohh look at that you woke up all the outragers.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

"what the fuck" in Canadian

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was going to ask that...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Puts a new meaning to the phrase, "I've got a bullet with your name on it"! Only now it's my name to I guess!

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Too

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

California has requirements too. It's weird

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

“I can’t drive 120mph in a residential neighborhood. Rules are weird man.”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah but do you have to register your gas?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In DC .... Biiiiiiiiiiiiiiitch

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

California just started requiring this recently

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 9

no that's a background check in order to buy ammo. not to register ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

MD is trying this now. FBI has stated they will not do background checks for ammo. Looks like CA is using a state DB. Wonder if MD is too.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not like it even matters, there is such a massive ammo shortage right now that owning a gun is basically pointless, take up archery

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like that's not really the big issue here.

5 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 20

For folks in states where that isn’t mandatory, it’s informational to learn. This is news to me as well.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's possible for a statement to contain more than one big issue.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Do you still have to register if its only 1 ammunition.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Under the law, if you only have 1 ammunition you have to register that ammunition 30 times

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not going to lie, reading "unregistered ammunition" made me

5 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 39

"unregistered" is kind of deceptive. you can't posses ammo unless you have a registered weapon, and any ammo has to be specific to that gun

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

in DC*

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

dc is a federal city. different rules there.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dc, since the late 80s

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The United States of America has multiple states and entities with different rules and laws

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's your take-away?

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 46

like saying that someone beat somebody with an unregistered baseball bat, calling out unregistered shifts focus from the act to the tool,

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Democrat all the way, but I didn't know this so I at least wondered about it. Also I'm not even really surprised. Just glad he was stopped.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Details matter in this post truth Republican dystopia. I think it’s fair to clarify

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

This comment just sounds so fucking weird to me. Have you ever stopped and thought about what you just wrote and how fucked up that sounds?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Not fucked up at all, very few state laws require you to register ammunition, even D.C., the law is you can't own ammunition if you 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

don't own a registered matching caliber weapon, it doesn't require you to register the ammo. That's why I posed the question.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Possible measure to curb use of black talon ammo. Shit is nasty

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 13

That’s like saying laws against drunk driving are a measure to curb the use of Dos Equis

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it's exactly the same as any other hollow point ammo that every police officer in America carries.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I just searched what it was and no it is not that shit is made sk you cant pull it out easily

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Jesus, there's a lot to explain here. You want to actually discuss it and maybe learn a little, or should I just go?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I know how hollow point ammo works and i fully understand a bullet with hooks on it will be harder to pull out

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

You need to in DC.

5 years ago | Likes 767 Dislikes 9

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Like how do you register it? I know about striations, but that has more to do with the gun right?

5 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 1

You go to the gun registration building and register each bullet. You can even name some.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

"You can even name some" But not all of them?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well duh. It's like naming a new pet: it might already have a name, and trying to change it might confuse the poor thing.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And some shops offer a sale if they're named after certain elected officials, clearly.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

As an uneducated guess I would say serial numbers on boxes to trace sale locations where you are essentially "carded" and traced from there

5 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 2

I mean I can see the reasoning behind that but it seems kind of impractical

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

It's wildly impractical, since there most States don't do it, and you can also make your own ammo. It's Feel-Good B.S.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

What if you handload? Do they go by where you got the powder, the brass, or what?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You must summit a report to the police of how many rounds you have produced that day.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

In DC, for reasons that should now be perfectly clear.

5 years ago | Likes 553 Dislikes 76

TIL.

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

It's really not clear. The guy was already in possession of it, and in position to do whatever he wanted to do.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You mean it prevented this guy from having loads of ammo?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Mar 9, 2023 8:50 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

If only there was a pro gun organization that actually informed law makers about good ideas for gun legislation rather than getting 1/

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 1

Caught embezzling money from the people who donate to them. Oh well. I'm sure new York will have a swell time with the nra

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

The people who write laws like this don't want to know the facts, any more than Republicans want actual knowledge about Planned Parenthood.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 18

If they did want to know, the Second Amendment Foundation, dozens of others, and their own constituents would be happy to enlighten them.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

It takes more than one to vote it in. Effective lobbying (which doesn't exist for effective gun control atm, thanks nra) would help that

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Right, because criminals are well known for following the law. /s

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

So why do we have laws?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Its almost like they knew that and made it a thing to make filing charges that much easier...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Lmao. Absolutely fucking not

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 77

I see nothing in the 2a about ammunition. Fix bayonets, you cowards.

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 7

I've got mine, do you?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 47

Yes. And several swords, have at thee.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Good thing I trained my bayonet drill...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm not seeing it.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 97

Oh you know, the countless members of government who reside in DC?

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 5

I mean... they shouldn’t... reside there I mean.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 38

Where should they reside? You gonna tell everyone where to live?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Since they split their time between their home state and DC, they generally just buy a home in DC rather than stay in hotels.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The shouldn’t reside in the capitol, where they work? What?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Ah yes, the elite class that must be protected at all cost.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

... government workers and officials get daily death threats. It 100% makes sense to have additional requirements to own firearms/ammo.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Is this the guy? Because if so, it isnt clear yet in this context:

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 12

Everyone knows to bring firearms and 100+ rounds to get mental health help

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

so someone with a record of mental health issues is able purchase fire arms....nothing bad could come of that

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Was the purchase before or after the issue, and what was the issue? The text lists diagnosis was reason for discharge, but does not define

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

exactly when the purchase was made (could have been done during service). Undefined context, again. Also, there are varying degrees of

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Not sure that a medical discharge would disqualify you from owning a firearm. The 4473 specifically asks about involuntarily commitment.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

^ And was there one (an involuntary commitment) ? The text states he didnt receive help, so Im inferring 'no' , there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'd like to extend him the benefit of the doubt, but that sounds like he was scouting ahead. Guess I'll wait for the follow up..

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

At a minimum, when someone does this they should be stripped of the right to possess firearms (min of a few years) and face some form

5 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 20

Jail time never authorised to own a fire arm again.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The annoying part is the pro gun people never do anything about it. They just sweep it under the rug and make the situation worse

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

shadup

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You just took everything from this post at fave value didn't you? The gun and ammo and vehicle were not on him and were in a garage not near

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup you think anyone else on this site does their own research? No they getit from CNN or fox News depending on their political spectrum

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How dare they hold ar15 rifles! And 5 30 standard found magazines! Almost like he was going to a range in dc

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Which is the capital and has high ranking politicians on every corner as they work there and some live there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

There are no shooting ranges in DC. He'd have driven past many of them in VA on the way to DC.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shit man I'm shocked the tiny city capital with strict gun controls doesn't have a range yeah no duh he has to leave state

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Possibly. We are missing a LOT of facts before such a judgement. If he was flagged because of a threat to Kumala, yes. If it was a (1)

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

(2)more mundane arrest warrant....probably not. He was arrested outside of the complex with the cited arsenal several blocks away.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

(3)He might keep all that in his trunk at all times.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Serious question (the site isn't working). What did he do? The headline just says he was arrested with a gun and ammo

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Apparently nothing except posses the ammo and gun. He was also like 3 miles away for the house

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

It's a bit murky, but had a warrant out for him and was arrested near the house with weapon/ammo nearby. Honestly, it was a bit of a knee

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

jerk rant on my part...just exhausted from what seems to be a regular occurrence of people bringing guns to places they really shouldn't be.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Unsure if it's what you meant, but going to jail for certain crimes (dependent on state) *does* revoke your right to own/possess/purchase >

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

> firearms. It's important to ensure you're convinced before that right is removed, considering it's an Amendment right. Doing otherwise >

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*convicted. Damn autocorrect

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

> sets a dangerous precedent where any Amendment right could be revoked before due process, such as freedom of speech/protesting.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree with that. As I said in another reply, I had a bit of a knee jerk response to it. I don't mind guns or gun owners, but it

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

never ceases to boggle my mind/frustrate me when I see people carrying semi auto rifles in public places as a show of force, and that

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

of probation/jail time. I'm so tired of idiots who think it's acceptable to brandish about guns as a way to intimidate...and a country that

5 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 9

The gun wasn’t so much “brandished to intimidate” as it was “locked in a car several miles away and thus not near the VPs house at all.” 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I don’t know the whole story, but there’s some fucky-looking simplifications going on in OP’s post.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Mar 20, 2021 9:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

hasn't done the best job at punishing people who act this way.

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 10

You are now canceled.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 24

It’s called Terrorism

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 12

You are now canceled

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 17

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

You most definitely are now canceled!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

It's called an over reaction. The rifle was locked in a car 3 miles away, and the man was walking around on a public street. Tiny octopus is

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

just shaking his head at this, because this is why the right wing thinks that we liberals have some sort of agenda.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 713 Dislikes 31

sure it's more complicated, but as a psychologist, him going there "because she supports mental healthcare" is a stupid argument.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Better question, why is someone with documented schizophrenia allowed to buy a firearm??

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why bring a weapon in the first place?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Self defense. He didn't bring the gun to her place.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Self defense from whom, when traveling from texas to dc, to see a specific person?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, all told, i can see him being unfit - and so he will be systametized - and our systems suuuuck. Thin edge of the wedge folks.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Thanks for posting this, and clarify the thing. Reading the post seems the guy WAS carrying the gun close to Vice President's house.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Dude was unarmed when found. Link in thread.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hope that the face of the one who posted this will be publicly shown one day, blaming him of any shit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, then he IS a boogyman with a rifle, isn't he?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I hope this gains traction and recognition.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

so what youre saying is that @OP is the equivalent of a magatars but to the other side

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1. It was a medical discharge just last year, 2. he DID receive medical help, and was prescribed meds that he stopped taking 3. He thinks

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 1

he's being "being followed" "possibly by the gov't," so I don't think he was going to the VP residence to 'ask for help.' That redditor is

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

wrong on some points, leaving out context on others, e.g. he claimd "for self-defense" after alleging he was being attacked by "an overseas

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

group." Source: https://wtop.com/dc/2021/03/man-arrested-with-gun-outside-vice-presidents-residence/ Also, as someone from DC, no one parks

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

in Chinatown (center of downtown, very expensive parking) to bike 3 miles where there's free parking lots

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Well shit, now how am I supposed to be outraged, jumping to the conclusion that he is a white supremacist wanting to kill the VP?

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Sometimes people are both. Not saying that's the case here, but people aren't their mental illness. They have beliefs, political ideals ...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

and prejudices aside from their mood disorders.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lets try and make this more popular

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You mean, this sourceless Reddit post written by an anonymous person who tries to steer the debate away from gun control to mental illness?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That actually makes sense... we see shootings and potential shooters everyday but no "I successfully defended myself" stories.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because most of the defensive use doesn't make the news. CDC study found that defensive use outstrips criminal by at least 20x yearly.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Minimum 600k, up to 1.5 million incidents per year where someone with a gun defended themselves or someone else, compared to ~15k murders.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2.5 million:

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, no, no, he owns gun that means hes a murderer who just hasn't acted yet.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The counterpoint is nice and all, but random text on reddit is NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This is source for the arrest, not a source for @tlamstrike counterpoint

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a veteran with (much more mild) mental health problems, The mental healthcare provided by the VA is lacking in almost every way, and...

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Sure but does that make you wanna stack guns and ammo in your car and drive to DC about it? It shouldn't

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Wrong. Why should the soldiers be the ones dying (suicide) about it? Spend someone else's blood.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Even then that's only when it's available.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I worked in a pharmacy & every interaction I had with the VA was hell. People came to us to pay money for RX's that would be free at the VA.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The quality of care was just that bad - always out of stock on meds, miscommunication with Docs leading to unmedicated folks.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like it might be important information.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

Yeah when I read that the car with the gun was "some distance away in a garage in DC"...

5 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 1

Yet the post says he was arrested near her house WITH the gun and ammo. Puhleeze people!

5 years ago | Likes 126 Dislikes 1

He, the post reads weird. I took it as him having it all in his car, but it feels like it was made unclear on purpose just for the scares

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

yea thats on purpose. i read it as he was arresten inside of his car with gun&ammo. the are not lying but intentionally misleading. assholes

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

tbf, they worded that perfectly to avoid it technically, but insinuate it still; always about the implications with masses. too bad

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

Any sources for anything said in this random reddit post?

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this seems a little far-fetched. A Texas resident travels to DC to ask for mental health care and "protection"? With an assault ...

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

rifle and hundreds of bullets in his car, while being sought by police (according to the news article) based on an intelligence bulletin ...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

stating that he might be up to no good? Seems like the usual game of derailing the gun control debate by bringing up mental illness.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not debating that - but that (annonymized) reddit comment is relativating the whole thing & shared so much and taken as fact by many i feel

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds just a bit too convenient. You NEED a rifle for your protection? From what, Cheeseburgers?

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Insurgents, he was in DC.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

So he packed a rifle and drove TO DC? With the rifle? In an attempt to "Defend himself" when he was going TO a place? Kyle Rittenhouse much?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Robbers, gangs, criminal activity, bad actors. I could go on

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Is there a journalistic source for any of these claims?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks, but this essentially says the same as other news articles. Car full of ammo, assault rifle, sought by police after worrisome ...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

statements to relatives. Nothing about him desperately seeking mental health treatment or other claims made in the anonymous Reddit post.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It does clearly state that he was unarmed when he was found though. unlike the linked cnbc article that makes no mention of it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well fuck. Shows what I get for jumping to conclusions. Gonna go find an actual source now.

5 years ago | Likes 167 Dislikes 1

Please post the source you found if you could?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly this censored out username post on reddit holds the same validty as journalists 'inside sources'

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Not unless he’s getting the info directly from a person involved.Because if he’s not then he’s just summarizing what other journalists wrote

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again. This is some random ass person with zero way of verifying it and you still believe him? You really pushing that agenda hard.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Nice ad hominem, but you completely ignored my point. Unless that commenter got his information directly from a source then all he is doing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

using *their* unnamed inside sources. A summary is less credible than the original article, which is less credible than the source.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Whenever I find something on the internet that sounds remotely questionable, I always snopes it.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Probably should do actual research instead of relying on other people to tell you what to think

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's why flat earthers exist. No amount of amateur google research is gonna be as good as professionals who study that shit for a living.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh no this is isn't about factual discoveries this is about politics you can only trust the direct sources.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1