The Monsanto Papers: A law firm has just released a TON of Monsanto’s secret emails and documents showing how they suppressed scientific data and paid an army of online trolls to lie for them

Dec 8, 2018 4:36 PM

theshopliftingseagull

Views

163990

Likes

5568

Dislikes

117

Remember the badass law firm that won 280 million for the school groundskeeper who got cancer from being poisoned by Monsanto’s Round Up? ( https://imgur.com/gallery/IKZx69R)

That same law from just released a TON of Monsanto’s secret emails and documents.

“The Monsanto Papers tell an alarming story of ghostwriting, scientific manipulation, collusion with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and previously undisclosed information about how the human body absorbs glyphosate.” -Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/business/monsantos-sway-over-research-is-seen-in-disclosed-emails.html

You can search through the entire database of Monsanto’s Papers here: https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/monsanto-secret-documents/

“The documents also show that Monsanto used third-parties to hire an army of internet trolls to post positive comments on websites and social media about Monsanto, its chemicals and GMOs, and downplay the potential safety risks of its products.”

“Monsanto even started the aptly-named “Let Nothing Go” program to leave nothing, not even facebook comments, unanswered; through a series of third parties, it employs individuals who appear to have no connection to the industry, who in turn post positive comments on news articles and Facebook posts, defending Monsanto, its chemicals, and GMOs. Monsanto quietly funnels money to “think tanks” such as the “Genetic Literacy Project” and the “American Council on Science and Health,” organizations intended to shame scientists and highlight information helpful to Monsanto and other chemical producers.”

https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/monsanto-paid-internet-trolls/

Anybody can read the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Court Filing here: https://usrtk.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/MDLLetNothingGomotion.pdf

edit: Since the Monsanto Papers have been released to the public, I wanted to share this respected scientist's experience with being attacked for publishing his studies on GMO's as well as Monsanto's RoundUp https://imgur.com/gallery/YsmbabY

Yeah. It's Anti-trust time.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can get payed to troll?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This pleases me. Not the harassment of actual scientist, but that the corruption has finally been exposed.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

france has banned them. they know what they're all about

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Nothing new, it's Monsanto, now owned by Bayer.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Harvest of Fear: ruthless legal battles against farmers history of toxic contaminationhttps://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/05/monsanto200805

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lawyers: we really aren’t that bad

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You lose credibility if you keep using the word trolls for things like this. Use sockpuppets, shills, etc.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Apparently not, since most people here think troll is the correct word (it's not).

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

According to r/TD I'm a shill just being liberal. That word lost all meaning already.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well they did have Hillary Clinton as their lawyer for decades, monsanto owed her so much for her help they paid for her campaign.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You just made my fucking day @op. Thank you

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I don't care one way or the other about Monsanto- I'm more concerned about people's lack of understanding of modern farming +1

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 2:14 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'll look up the actual study and get back to you. Cheers.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and people just watching Netflix "documentaries." There isn't anything guaranteeing that what you're watching is based in fact, +2

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

and as everyone hopefully knows by now, movies (or anything) can be edited to support one position over another.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

v

7 years ago | Likes 333 Dislikes 9

Lmao I’m watching TBL as I type this. Good shit, man. Good shit.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

called it

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wonder how much they paid for those trolls. I can't think of ever seeing anyone post anything positive about Monsanto. They're 1/

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

essentially Satan to most people. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And as a result Bayer will cut 12 thousand jobs. That was one profitable deal.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

“Just released” but the nyt article was from over a year ago

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Monsanto is pure greed

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Literally a company that's run by super villains for super villians.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My dad works with a whole bunch of plant pesticides and grass care stuff. He says to always wear a good amount of protection.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As I think the bottles state you are supposed to do (at least the bottles here is Australia do)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People forget that the lawn care worker used like no PPE for 20 years.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

got into fist fights with my father about not putting it on our garden, I refused to use it, he insisted on it. He taught me to never give..

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

in when you are standing up for what you know was right. An no joke he would let his hands fly and I would always defend my self.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The use of pesticides seems a silly reason to hurt people, no? Like I could understand bigger issues causing family fights.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Monsanto should have burned to the ground long ago. It is pure evil.

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 7

What have they done that's so evil?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

What is your argument against them being evil? Because all evidence points to the contrary. I’d like to see how you have the secret info

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they sue local farmers who harvest crops that have any chance of having monsanto “genes”, spray harmful chemicals, hire internet trolls, etc

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

"sue" find me one instance of that, if you didn't purposefully do it their policy is remove any GMOs and compensate the farmer.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:42 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Monsanto paid people to do this. Maybe he's one of them

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nope, cute that you think anyone cares about your misinformed ideas that much

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's not misinformation. That literally came out in court documents you dolt.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not pro Monsanto. My defense of them is merely coincidental. You see I care about what's true, and it happens that a lot of the #1

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"criticism" of GMOs and Pesticides which are extremely important to feeding the planet, are attacked mearly for there the fact that #2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:40 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

They are produced by that company. Much of the critics of GMOs and whatnot are misinformed and blinded by their hatred for Monsanto #3

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Really? They're so bad that they even get trolled by shows like Futurama....hope you know it

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Ha! You might want to rewatch that episode, you see the message put across wasn't really "Monsanto is bad" kinda the opposite really ?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They portray Momsanto as good?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but not as evil.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

American beer .... riddled with monsanto products. But thats none of my business.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

Whaaaa?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh noes a known carcinogen may have trace elements of a possible carcinogen in it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What part of beer is riddled with their products?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is not America exclusive. This is a real worldwide problem but monsanto was one of the top causes of it. Glyphosate 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm going to presume any and all grains and adjuncts going into the beer. Possibly the hops too.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I grow hops and don't use any Monsanto products on mine. Wheat, barley, and oats are not roundup ready so I assume they are roundup free

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a brewer, that is really good to know.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about rye, spelt, corn, and rice?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A local brewery advertises their beer as organic. It’s not, my bud works on the farm that produces their barley. He’s sprayed so much.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 2:14 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You do know organic certified pesticides exist right? (BTW a fair number of them are nasty stuff).

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

There are some chemicals that can be used and have things still labeled as organic but many use it as marketing without certification.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. It’s in Bellingham Wa. It’s like hippy lib central. Imagine the Prius people from South Park. They are like that about organics.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have some Roundup in the garage. I think it may be time to get rid of it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

if its the off the shelf stuff, just don't sit in your hair, or get in your eyes/mouth and you'll be fine.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thanks - I don't use it that much

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bayer bought Monsanto and all their mess. Who thought that was a good idea?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Bayer, apparently.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I may be on the "Monsanto isn't literally satan" side of this thread but Bayer knowingly sold HIV+ blood products to the 3rd world so (1)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they might think their PR department is better. (2)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bauer is probably in on it. Buy Monsanto at a cheap price and take the publicity hit. Tell the public all the “bad guys”

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bayer*

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are gone and evade responsibility for all the bad shit in the past. Then repackage

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yourself as the “caring” chemical company, and continue doing the same shit you always have

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I kinda hate that opinions on GMOs are 'they're the devil' and 'they're completely harmless and need minimal regulation'

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

It's more like "They're the devil" and "There's no evidence that they are hazardous to human health."

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

The issue is that one could be made so. "We haven't hurt anyone...yet." isnt the best argument.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

We sell literal poison for human consumption (tobacco) so I think "hasn't hurt anyone yet" is still damn good odds

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hah! No. The person you replied to is correct.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

The person I replied to created an obvious false dichotomy, so is wrong in any case.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Not really. Their statement was a lot more accurate than yours.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Regulation is inappropriate in such a situation. Regulation is to be applied sparingly and only when there is demonstrable need for it.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

Like, say, in the case where a large corporation has been shown to have been tampering with data and lying to everyone for decades?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Punitively regulating an entire industry regardless of the merit of doing so to get back at a company you don't like is clearly unacceptable

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Like the government did for cars? or meat? or oil monopolies? When a company is using the veil of industry to fuck people over,

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

But there is also not enough long term studies to determine that they aren't hazardous, plus there are environmental concerns.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Studies on trillions of meals fed to billions of farm animals disagree on that second point. Also if you're concerned about pesticides, (1)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But those aren't long term studies on the effects every possible GMO (cause that's a pretty broad category) could have on humans

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BT GMO is the same BT protein in organic pesticides and roundup is very safe as pesticides go (though the other components in the spray (2)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, in pesticides, but easily removed or avoided if people that are pregnant want to avoid them. BT toxin crosses the planeta and (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

might not be ironically). If you're concerned about escape to the wild: 1 most crops survive like shit in the wild, (3)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Step 1) The 'pro' GMO side need to acknowledge that when people are critical of GMO, they mean lab grown. Not 'selective breeding'. (1)

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

If someone refuses to acknowledge that there's a clear difference between the two, they should be flagged as a troll / shill and disregarded

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

What about 'selectively breed by exposure to mutagens, so its all natural but we've nfi what the changes caused'? More specificity isn't bad

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 2:14 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Because mutations caused by gamma rays from the sun and a cobalt source are different /

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never claimed that it was. The issue is when people try to claim that the two scenarios are identical.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

GMO labeling is completely unfounded. There is 0 proof that GMOs effect health in any way. Fuck of with your scare tactics

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Jokes on you, they have chicken fingers

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:56 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

CEO, board members, and all involved in things like this should have to pay.

7 years ago | Likes 1463 Dislikes 4

Golden fucking parachute!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and they wont

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pay? You think that money is the punishment that works? Something else is needed to make a difference.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We need a real life A-Tean to battle these assholes

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or go to jail, I don’t want your money, I want to make sure you’re in jail and don’t get out.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

how about both? They go to jail AND lose all their money. Both personal and corporate funds. Should be standard punishment for the rich.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No they should be hang by their nutsack.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Should be fuckin hanged

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And not just a small 50k fine. That’d be like 5$ to them.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Of course they're paying. You don't think those internet people work for free, do you?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Literally did a project on this like 2 weeks ago, and the biggest fee I saw during those trials was like 5 million dollars, and it 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

With their lives.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

YES! Scum should have to answer for their crimes

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But they won't. They never will unfortunately...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh don't worry they'll get paid. They'll get paid plenty...oh you said they should pay...yeah that ain't happening.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wealthy corporate CEO and board members face justice in the US? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah *wheeze*hahahahahahahahaha*snort*hahahahahahaha

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There's only one way that will ever happen. And sadly, nobody has the balls to go through with it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They should go to prison!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Should we bury this body or something?" "Nah, let's save it... For reasons." -Monsanto execs

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Right? Was there penalty anything more than a slap on the wrist?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“I don’t know, Monsanto has always been m really wonderful to me — my family really loves their products.” So where do I pick up my check?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

nono, as a result of their actions, they can easily pay, it should be worse than paying

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but justuce is reserved for those that have the money to pay her. They should get life in prison but may get house arrest instead.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nobody will ever pay for anything because the best either of us can do is a comment on an image board.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

1 lyk 1 prayer tho

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They will... probably like 5 bucks and a slap on a hair strand

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Should, but wont

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

wasn't even the CEO it was someone underneath him... 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

WITH THEIR LIVES!!!

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh they'll pay. They'll get to pay some fines, because if you have money you can just pay to break the law.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

bust out the guillotines, otherwise the company will find some sort of bonus to give them to make up for any fines.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

thats the entire point of corporations you know right? more so to protect investors rather than the CEO though, even though they have a say.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's already a long list of people needing the guillotine. They'll have to wait in line.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Should be exposed to the same chemicals they said were perfectly safe. Scum bags.

7 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 3

Those chemicals are safe. Read the damn article dumbass

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 104

I thought this was sarcasm, but the downvotes are making me doubt myself.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Found the Monsanto paid internet troll

7 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 1

Lol, just call everyone who disagrees with you a paid troll and you will never be wrong!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That’s exactly what a Monsanto paid internet troll would say

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

A short reminder that there is a „mute user“ function for internet trolls.

7 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Fantastic! Thanks!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Holy shit!!! I've never noticed it!!!

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Wait, wut?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

„Mute user“, for asshats who have nothing meaningful to say.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

silly man, this is america, only poor people have to pay for their crimes.

7 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 4

Wrong. Poor and rich people have to pay. But the poor can't afford it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Sadly, no different from any other system or time in history. It's like a weed. No matter how many times you pull it up it comes back.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 2:16 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Idk seems like if you're a white cop you get one free murder of a minority of your choosing. Though there is progress

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have you tried Roundup? I heard it's effective and perfectly safe

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Oh you!

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

the tree of liberty must be periodically watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants. this is why. it will never stay fixed, we have to

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

keep fixing it, re-working it, reforming our systems each time they break, and oh they will break. i want the quote i began with to only

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

be metaphorical, and hopefully we, as a society, will get there someday. but i'm not sure we're there yet.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bayer was dumb as all heck to buy Monsanto and ruin their brand

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Then they deserve it

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I assume this is a joke, due to the nazi history of bayer....

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Or their history of knowingly selling HIV-infected drugs.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That stuff is killing bees too.

7 years ago | Likes 274 Dislikes 17

Pretty sure its not killing bees, however if I recall correctly the binding agent commonly used to help it to stick to waxy leaves does.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Get out of here with your calm information

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neonicotinoid insecticides are more detrimental to bees. Not defending Roundup though. That shit should have never been put on the market

7 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Roundup has already been banned in some countries.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I find it interesting people are arguing against this...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It's a non selective biocide, apparently.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No it's not. There is no reliable evidence of that.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

Found the corporate paid troll!

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Nope I just have a different opinion. Did you know that it's possible for people to disagree???????

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

All corporate paid trolls say that.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lol I wish I was being paid

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its killing a little bit more than bee. Ask the asian/indian farmer about their family

7 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

Ask every river and stream here in Denmark as well. They've been oxygen starved for years!

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The world will survive without Asian / Indian farmers ( tragic and terrible as that is) The world won’t survive without bees!

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

Yeah fuck kids suffering death from poisoning

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bees are stupidly important, insects in general are too.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The world will survive with out bees. Thrive no, survive yes

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Small addendum: European bees are harvest hit (by orders of magnitude) and contribute little to pollination

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course it will. It might take a few (dozen) decades for something else to find this niche and WE might be gone, but live finds a way.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Not if we keep killing everything it won't. Humans have screwed up the ecosystem to the point where life sometimes CAN'T find a way anymore.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

"just released" - August, 2017.

7 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

well, it's new to me.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

yeah I have questions about this, like what's the angle that OP's trying to push by bringing this shit up now...

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Careful guys, well be called "paid trolls" in a second!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Look at OP's other posts and comments. They're anti-GMO and a huge "organic" pusher.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Better check under your bed for those "scary" GMO!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sadly, paying trolls is common these days. Look at the political shit posts here. They’re not doing that for free.

7 years ago | Likes 837 Dislikes 33

How do I get the job? I can shitpost all day, being paid for it is a bonus.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Even just recently with the FCC and the net neutrality law. Lobby firms paid to get millions of online support. Article on one of my posts.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

AstroTurf, ever wonder why we're not allowed to question the purity and nobility of vaccines?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 34

Watch the movie Deadly Deception. Tons of suppressed research data and corruption surrounding vaccines. Downvotes here we come.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

With a title like "deadly deception" I'm sure it's super unbiased and representative.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Hard to sound unbiased when you are exposing a truth that no one wants to hear. Pro-vaxers tow the party line without doing any research.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Oh, I see. Ha. Got me. You're just trolling.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

this isn't even new. it's happened in various forms throughout the ages whenever people had a strong desire to manipulate info

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like the shit postings from the meat-industrie.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course we don't. We do it for attention.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Remember they got NDT and a lot of others to spout the same lies, not just trolls.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am shit...... where do i sign up?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I argue politics for myself, nobody pays me, so wtf kind of conclusion is that?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

well I do it for free, where do I sign up to get paid ?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That shit oughta be illegal

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You would have been better off saying the music industry

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Labeling all political post as “shitposts” is the most common tactic of Trump-Trolls. Contrary to Rudie Guillianni, the truth IS the truth.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't use my fucking bridge then fools.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yup the extremely mysogenistic posts that jump to the top of the front page with comments that are followed by tons of wtf type comments

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember when they really pushed antiblack people crap hard for a few months. Making sure to add in when someone who does something

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

posetive is russian and that when some who did something bad is that it doesn't matter. Tons of this crap.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Especially when you see some direct replies

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m not saying it’s not possible but this site’s unique system of praising sarcasm has always encouraged trolling to an extent.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In before 'This is FAKE news'.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Tread carefully with, "Everyone I disagree with is a paid troll."

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You may be a troll being paid to discredit political posts in order to keep the population docile and uncaring about political issues

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Some people actually give a fuck

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Unfortunately the root of their motivation is typically emotional not logical. And emotions generally don’t make sense.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The dumbasses upvoting them are.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I troll for free, but for no one in particular. Perhaps if I focused my trolling, I could get paid. Round up is a great poultry seasoning

7 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 5

This is super funny, i laughed out loud!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Trolls are like mercenaries of the old days

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh, we must also believe that humanity is the sole cause of climate change, even though science proves its solar output.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 30

This is where I ascribe to a kind of pascal’s wager, whilst I won’t understand the science myself, one option costs money, the other lives.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That was quite the leap from comment to reply.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Truth

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Like how it's not putting your hand in the flame that burns you, it's the fuel.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't know if that is sarcasm or not. But no one, and I mean NO ONE is suggesting that humanity is the SOLE cause of climate change.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

How much, exactly, does humanity contribute? Can it even be measured?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You know, I’ve always thought that quote was highly internally ironic, no?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know. It’s kinda hilarious. I was thinking doing a meme about it. Maybe Avengers Civil War or the lava standoff scene.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can confirm. My prev job hired a firm to 'improve our online reputation' after 'the incident'. Huge success, you can't even find it anymore.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would love to have more details...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Autodots, roll out!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, there’s no chance they’ve signed something that means they’d get sued for publicly talking about it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well, I do...

7 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 10

Me too...

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Yeah im also just a troll

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Trolls of the net, unite!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wait, are we making a union? How do we even strike? Which capital do we burn down?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Clearly you're terrible at marketing yourself.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

What is that saying? If you’re good at something, don’t do it for free?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I mean, yeah. Seize the means of production, my dude

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is what someone who gets paid would say...

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Then I’m doing it wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes/no. Part of the point of trolls is to create distrust and disinformation. People are so tired of politics they just don’t want to deal.

7 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 0

Mission accomplished.

7 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

1) You are also not helping, as you've now created a trend where people will label anyone who disagree with them politically as "Trolls"

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Found the troll.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3) You're just trying to invalidate the person, not their argument...its intellectually lazy.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

it's* Don't they teach grammar in troll school? For shame, lad.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1) I'm discussing people like you in another thread. Come have a look. You're all basically like this: "If you say something I disagree with

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Riiight, you won't fool me, troll!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) politically, you are a troll". That's the equivalent Fox News conservatives calling you "libtard", or Liberals calling you "Russia bot".

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

2) in order to avoid all forms of discussions and just instead invalidate the person. Very healthy for any form of discussion...not.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's what a troll would claim.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Remember, GMOs are (generally) a good thing for us, Monsanto's control of the field and related patents is not.

7 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 15

Agreed

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how much did monsante pay you?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I can't trust you. You could be a corporate paid troll.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Also, look into the other issues surrounding GMO's such as patents, cross-contamination/ gene transfer, allergenicity, etc.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

patents on food growth are a horrible idea

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean, while I don't disagree, there needs to either be government funding or a mechanism for making a profit off of the R&D costs.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No company is going to drop the billion dollars it takes to get a new GMO to market without some way to recoup that. Patents aren't a good

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

system here, but it's what we've got right now.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but the moment you plant your magic beans, the Earth takes them. it blows them around and the end up everywhere. that is no one’s fault

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GMO research is good; the thing is like many things, you take a good idea and put it in the wrong hands, you will always get bad results.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The GMOs themselves aren't the problem. It's that the engineered resistance to these things leads to farms dousing crops with them

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:40 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I was more referring to the effects on the human body. There’s no dangerous substance inherent to GMOs, but what’s sprayed on these might be

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That says the only thing in question about GMOs themselves is their environmental impact of whether they’d cross pollinate with nearby crops

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Them” being the herbicides with the now questionable effect on the body. Brainfart, sorry. It’s late.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, the amount of "untouched" research, that isn't paid for by someone who would benefit from a positive outcome, (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

on GMO's is lacking. Especially the long term studies. Not saying it's bad, but there isn't enough evidence to say it's safe for all. (2/2)

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Honestly, it's statistically safer that tobacco, smoked marijuana, alcohol, etc. And those are used daily by huge portion of the community

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But the people who consume those things know it. They accept the risk and people at risk can easily avoid them. GMO's arent always labelled

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a "GMO proponent," I'm pissed that Monsanto has corrupted the idea in the minds of so many people. The world needs good GMO research.

7 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 5

Couldnt agree more! I dont mind eating gmo’s i do mind eating massive amounts of herbacide and pesticides.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Yea, get me some giant apples not dead bees.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I think apples are huge without assistance of GMO's currently, they just use selective breeding

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's also a GMO kind called honeycrisp that are bigger and really good.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:41 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The point is that GMOs could, with correctly motivated research and engineering, be healthier/cheaper than their organic counterparts. (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Feb 2, 2023 1:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

But Monsanto is an evil business doing petty things, which prevents people from seeing the inherent power for good in GMOs.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But are they really? More farmers use poor practices now, get bigger crops but are 100% dependent on GMOs cause they need so much poison 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 27

That sort of practice is... what Monsanto encourages, though, when GMOs could be developed in a way that doesn't encourage these practices.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I don't mean to unfairly criticize but I'm not understanding your logic here. They use GMO's BECAUSE GMO's require poison?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You're not finding the logic because there is none.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sort of? Roundup is some serious shit, once you use it long enough it's possible non GM crops will no longer grow in your fields.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

*also I have a fever so between that and char limit it's totally possible I'm not making the most sense.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck I WISH this were true, I've dumped enough over my land that nothing should grow, but here I am with weeds for days...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How much is Monsanto paying you?

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

...You do know that organic farming also requires pesticides that are even more toxic than conventional farming, right?

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Wait, I just read that again and no. Organic farming doesn't use pesticides that are more toxic than conventional. Not today Monsanto.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"I don't agree, therefore you're Monsanto." Nice shill gambit. Here I was thinking you could be a fun person to debate with. +1

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Since you'll no doubt tell me to do my research http://npic.orst.edu/health/ovc.html

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I do, but it's lower yield and usually includes better soil practices

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

And allows farmers to charge more.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Lower yield just means you need more land for the same quantity. Sounds like extra deforestation to me.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Or you charge more for food, some people get less, some people starve, fewer people need less food.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

GM Crops are incorporating better soil practices, too. If you don't have to till the field, you're not releasing CO2 and there's less +1

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

erosion and water retention within the field. No tilling= no fuel used for the machines to do it, and no CO2 from the soil itself.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

which then drifts & kills other crops and hurts the environment. Yet they make less money. People have no idea of the real cost of food 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

It's so cheap much of it in the US goes to feed animals or make fuel. So meat is cheaper and we eat more. Also we poison our land here to 3/

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

send dirt cheap food to other countries. This hurts our land more and leads to higher population in areas that cannot feed themselves. It 4/

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

may not happen soon, but that will eventually lead to famine in those countries. Except few look at the really big picture, which is that 5/

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7