cytherians
23782
797
14
Mar 19, 2026 4:44 AM
cytherians
23782
797
14
JohnWickdidnothingwrong
I thought there were very few mentions of assfaces resort.
Filolial
Honestly don't care if Trump is mentioned 10 times or a million times in the Epstein files, the fact remains that he raped children. The files only show how far his depraved and inhumane actions went. There shouldv'e been dire consequences, but honestly don't see it happening before his death.
VindictiveBathToaster
When Trump says he’s never been to Epstein island, I actually believe him. There’s plenty of evidence that he’s raped children in the security of his own properties like in West Palm Beach that he didn’t need to go to Epstein’s pedophile island when he can be a pedophile right here on the mainland.
Now it’s revealed that his standard MO when being introduced to 12-year-olds is to take his mushroom penis out of his pants to get a blowjob from his new acquaintance.
XaoJet
ImmaCatImmaSexyCat
They're the Trump files. He raped kids. And his supporters stand by him. He started a war. His supporters stand by him. He sent storm troopers after innocent people. His supporters stand by him. He blew up a school full of little girls and another school full of little boys. His supporters stand by him.
If any change their mind, I'll be happy. But I'm long past hoping for the straw that breaks the camel's back.
Sqeezytzatziki
I see you WASHED THE SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY right out of it.
kurvarVillain
https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1bWo0NGRsdXZjbm82dGs1dzdxeWhjNjdycjJtODh1NTJsNHM2b2wwNCZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/26DMUXQypGJaHhTsQ/200w.webp
magila
Hiullary Clinton - 0 times
zHurk777
trump 1,000,000 times. um, no. AFAIK. The only number I can find is 38,000 times in over 5000 files.
Phosphatidylethanolamine
Yeah, seems a bit much... but 38k is still an order of magnitude above all others mentioned...
Wildfyre1000
EricPisch
Please use royal titles correctly it is of course ‘formerly known as prince’
MatureDendriticCell
For those who didn’t know (I didn't either) Reid Hoffman is LinkedIn's cofounder. His website is shite imho. I can't recall a time when I ever found it valuable for networking.
Guisso14
Yeah but isn't it suspicious that no trans people were there? Let's keep focusing on them and make they the bad guys in the trump epstine files. /s
bindedig
Where is bill Clinton?
YoureWaifuAShit
how are they coming to these numbers? i don't disbelieve, but the next time my idiot friend says some dumb shit about clinton in the epstein files, and i retort with 'trump 1m times', and he says "show me", i want to be able to deliver.
Ice2Ice2
Being mentioned in the files means nothing. Trumped turned him and Ghislaine into police in 2006/2007
SavageDrums
My "kill the wealthy" policy appears to be picking up steam.
ThePhystopian
I hate Trump as much as the next guy, but i think the 1m number is wrong. It was stated by a guy that searched for "Donald" "don" and "Trump". A search for "don" will give a lot of false positives ("don't", "pardon" etc). The real numbers are horrible enough, no need to exaggerate.
stillnodog
The statement in the end about Mar-a-Lago being mentioned more than all of Epstine’s properties combined was posted here a couple of days ago, without a source, and debunked in the comments so that makes me think we should take the rest of these numbers with a grain of salt…
Autittuderp
Finally. Been saying this for decades and got hit with *you are a conspiracy nut*....bruh - conspiracies are things that ARENT happening 'points here' Look!!!!
BrickaBrackaFireCracker
Alright, but how were you reading the Epstein files 20+ years ago and why didn't you leak them sooner??
Autittuderp
Referring to the billionaires being the ruling class ,Chadly.
Nuppiz
Trans people are mentioned in the files. Not as clients, but as potential victims who can be forced into prostitution by ostracizing from the general community. You know, the kind of politics they're doing in many places right now.
ToSisPoS
You can’t have fascism without scapegoats
PrincessBatCat
Surprising no one. Didn't epstien have a trans fetish or something, which is why he started the anti-trans bullshit in the first place?
ChloePrice
Transphobes are the biggest chasers on Earth.
secretdpp
This
MCNewYorkLives
Trying to keep it all to themselves! /S
KoalaOnTheJuice
BREAKING: Epstein mentioned in the Trump Files.
xerolf
would be interesting to know how much epstein was mentioned compared to the orange...
Canigetbannedagain2
Trumpstein files.
iMcFly
I wonder if he would be more inclined to release it if it was renamed to the Trump files.
ToSisPoS
But first release some concoction called the “Obama Files” and report how they were the best received, most popular, and virile files that have ever been published.
iMcFly
williamtowel
Not a troll just curious for a reference point, anyone know how many times Bill Clinton and Richard Dawkins are mentioned? I imagine far less than Trump but north of Elon? Or is it less cause he isn't in the billionaire playground? I also imagine theirs a number of other rich but less known douche bags up there on the list too.
Micro2112
https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/bill-clinton
varonicaED
According to AI, Bill Clinton more than 50 times, so you can probably take it that's it not a huge number, not 3 digits, Richard Dawkin 29 times but not in any incriminating data, just in passing discussions with other scientists also associated with Epstein.
williamtowel
Haha. That's even worse, no wonder all the rhetoric about Clinton died down. They were pushing that shit so hard on release.
cytherians
Mentions don't necessarily imply wrong doing. Sometimes there were just ponderances about a person who wasn't even communicated with. Dawkins never met up with Epstein at any of his properties, AFAIK. Bill Clinton actually did visit, but there hasn't been any claims by victims against him.
SOLARvsFACISM
So far they've redacted all the clients, so we can't actually be sure there aren't any claims. The one they just found about Trump was unknown until PBS and the victim worked together to find the missing page numbers.
Forensickle
To, unfortunately, be fair to Elon. All his mentions are him begging for attention and getting rejected. "Oh no, you can't come, we totally shit down, sucks"
elbowdeepinawhateverthatis
Wild that being fair to Elon involves pointing out how he BEGGED Epstein to let him rape children.
Forensickle
He I didn't say he was a reprehensible shit stain that deserve oh so much should be ever be up against the wall. But wanting to do something but not, isn't a crime.
I have no doubt sexual crimes are probably on his list, just not that one specific thing.
I don't think he deserves to be defended anymore than that. And yeah, wild!
elbowdeepinawhateverthatis
I ain’t trying to call you out about it like you’re actually defending him, it’s just wild that the fact is the best thing about him in this whole shitshow is that he didn’t fuck children, but really REALLY wanted to.
blaghart
imagine that, a bunch of democrats AND republicans on the list of pedophiles, with the only shared trait veing wealth? It's almost like the problem isn't Trump, he's merely a symptom of it, it's capitalism and hierarchal economic division of resources that is the problem because it funnels power into the hands of an unelected and unqualified minority
ImTired2
*/s Back in my day we kept the raping and trafficking of children quiet and no one knew how insanely more wealthy people were. MAGA.
ZiiB
We should start calling them pedoticians to avoid confusion around this
GGGGlak
When the parties are at your house, the guy who started the partying says your the worst one, and then you run for prez to duck the first case with a vic that can't be bought off. Then win and SA the whole country mentality, physicaly, and most damaging financially by profiting through the inepting of our highest level control systems. The most recent system being our War department being used by our enemies to change the petrodollar standard off of USD. Then you MIGHT JUST BE THE PROBLEM!!
sakasiru
Well if you're mentioned 500 times as often as the next one on the list you may not be the only problem, but you are a very big part of the problem and not just a symptom. There's those who use systemic problems to their advantage and then there are those who create a whole industry out of it and use their power to push the limits further.
blaghart
do you think the epstein files are the problem? Say you punish everyone mentioned in the epstein files...do you think the system that created these people will stop creating these people?
DragonThunderUndertaking
Well they have a mental health condition that is literally out and on display. It's called hoarding.
The11thPlague
No, it's called stealing from the poor and predating on the weak.
DragonThunderUndertaking
It could be argued that those are merely symptoms of the psychopathic need to make number be bigger to the exclusion of everything else
worldrecordstudios
This post doesn't have any Democrat names on it though
blaghart
Bill Gates has been one of the largest Dem donors for years. Also it omitted both Clintons as well as Stacey Plaskett, Larry Summers, Bob Kerrey, Casey Wasserman, and dozens of others.
worldrecordstudios
False equivalency fallacy. Bill Gates has never held office.Clinton's are Old Guard and haven't been in charge for decades. Stacy used to be a Republican. Larry is old Guard& hasn't been in office since early 2010s. Same for Bob. Casey also never held office. So if these little blips of "dems" from the past upset you, then you should be really upset about how much Trump and his cronies show up in the files. In all of my years voting, I can proudly say I never voted for anybody on this list.
worldrecordstudios
By the way, out of the last three Democrat presidential nominees, how many times do they show up? How many times has Obama, biden, or Kamala Harris showing up on the Epstein list? This isn't a both sides thing. The Republicans are actively protecting pedophiles while redacting the incriminating info from the files they said were a hoax and campaigned on releasing. Don't let them manipulate you like this
blaghart
I love watching your special pleading lol, acting like three people funded by Bill Gates and who are colleagues and protectors of Clinton are immune from implication. I also love that you wanna dismiss Stacy because "they were a republican" but you're so young you apparently dont know Hillary Clinton was a Republican too. So tell me, why ARE you so desperate to deny, deflect, and defend from the crimes if the rich and powerful just becausr theyre in a blue tie?
kinarism
And as long as you keep labeling them Democrats and Republicans instead of pesos and pedos, you're part of the problem.
AShartInTheWind
I think as long as people stop ignoring the fact that this is a systemic problem that won't go away by only focusing on Republicans, then we're not going to see any change.
worldrecordstudios
There aren't any Democrat names on this post LOL
blaghart
do you think that means there aren't any democrats in the epstein files?
worldrecordstudios
I don't see Obama or Biden or Kamala anywhere and that's who I voted for. If you need to dig through and find dudes that were in office 1 to 3 decades ago, you are creating a false equivalency fallacy argument. The Republicans are in charge now and the king of the top of the list that decimates even other Republicans on the list is in power and is protecting other pedophiles. Trump rapes children
blaghart
Obama, Biden, and Kamala who were all funded by Bill Gates. And who spent their careers protecting Clinton for thirty years. And yet you wanna act like their hands are clean?