How to survive a Bear attack

Sep 13, 2018 3:29 PM

RobertBraddock12

Views

119987

Likes

1967

Dislikes

68

I have a Jetfire, girlfriend must have been standing real close

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Gimme a 22lr. Low recoil, low noise.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gold

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not about the size of the gun, it's how you use it. ;) ... Although shooting the ground might have been fine bears are bitches.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had two. Down to one. Awesome little thing.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bill Bure does a bit about using a .22 for home defense that’s pretty funny.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10MM Auto, .357 magnum, .44 magnum. Something powerful -- if you're going to shoot the bear itself.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Albertan here. Can confirm. Bears here are as common as spiders in Australia.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: she was already complaining about how small the caliber of his "weapon" was.

7 years ago | Likes 255 Dislikes 8

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9mm.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I personally carry a Smith & Wesson 500 in bear country

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 7

You dirty fucker

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In his strong hand, the man held a rose...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is that the PP7 from Golden Eye? Solid gun just needs a silencer

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks more like a Beretta Tomcat.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Beretta Jetfire... The picture is even captioned...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't have to outgun the bear, I just have to outgun you.

7 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 6

Walking Dead... season 2?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too soon.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, actually...

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I support the right to arm bears.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Except that handguns are restricted in Canada and you are not able to carry one unless you are law enforcement

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2018 5:30 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Chicago has no conceal carry - how's that working out?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2018 5:30 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Sep 17, 2018 5:30 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

MAGA!!!!!!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I actually have a 950 jetfire and I love it!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So old this particular firearm has been prohibited in Canada for decades now. ; ) That and no carry of loaded handguns in Canada period.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Oh man if only, right?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What is the point of owning a handgun if you cannot keep it loaded? Are you going to ask the bear to wait to eat you whilst you load it?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Handguns in Canada, with only a few exceptions, are purely for target shooting.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe I'm too American here, but I feel like you're missing the point of owning a handgun.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I get that. -In Canada-, the only -legal- purpose for handguns is target shooting, except for certain people (Bank guards for example).

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For example, you may not keep a handgun loaded in your own home even.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This person is wrong. To carry a handgun, you need a specific permit. It's almost impossible to get outside of people proving a need like1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

working in remote areas where it also isn't practical for them to carry a long gun 24/7. Probably armoured truck companies too, not sure.2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indeed, I was corrected (and had also forgotten armoured car crew), but for virtually everyone else, no carry.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, fuck Canada then.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

For what? Have reasonable gun laws?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Gun laws banning guns across the board except in specific niche circles is not reasonable at all.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Why not?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's a lot of different arguments why but the biggest one is definitely that it gives the government too much power over the people.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not all of our laws are reasonable, it's really a mess of arbitrary standards and paperwork to those who actually need to deal with them.1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea, I do have my… differences with certain parts of the CCC on that, especially "by order in council" but, -as a whole- our laws do well.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For example: you can buy a pump shotgun with an 8" barrel, but buying one with a 26" barrel then cutting it down is very illegal. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am curious about this 8" pump shotgun in Canada... Do tell.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh I'm well aware many of our rules are terrible. Ex-military gun owner myself. It's a shit show. But open carry of handguns is ridiculous.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you need a gun, any caliber is better than no caliber.

7 years ago | Likes 595 Dislikes 19

Technically if you count airguns, not so much.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would it be wiser to shoot someone with a BB gun or just whack them with the BB gun?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i dont need a caliber when i need a glue gun.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will let you use a 1 caliber rock without issue then!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To all the downvoters...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you "need" a gun, you probably won't have one or it won't even matter

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's why I never leave home without it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Soul caliber?

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

*cough* 2mm Kolibri *cough*

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Better than a .45 magnum. You shoot one time and now all you hear is a steady 8kHz beep while the attacker sneaks behind you to hit you with

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But if you actually hit the attacker, they're not going to be an attacker for much longer.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

a cowbell you couldn't hear.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The one who shoots first gets the last word.

7 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

Except the one who misses

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Easy there Greedo

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sometimes I shoot prematurely

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

You made me giggle in the middle of my class

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of a line from a 40k book...."A 9mm bullet to the head generally works as well as a 40mm round to the head."

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

but did the emperor protects?????

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eisenhorn?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering some of the things from 40k that statement couldn't be farther from the truth.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9mm is fine for some infantry, such as Commisars.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Commissars use either laspistols, which hit more like a 5.56 round than a 9mm, or a bolt pistol, which is a .75 caliber explosive round.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A 9mm is more like a stub gun, used by hive gangs and gretchin.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

40mm? They would have no head.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And yet they're not any more dead.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

So... it works

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

"When you need a thing, having the thing is better than not." Yes, very true.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The problem being that lots of people *feel* they "need" a gun when really they don't.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If I knew that there were nutjobs with guns around me then I would want one too. But my Government has banned most guns so not an issue

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But can you really blame them for wanting protection when their life could be potentially at risk?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3. Admittedly, this is skewed by the way guns make suicide attempts far more successful than attempts by other means, but the fact remains.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5. And then of course there are a few dozen cases every year of a curious toddler getting their hands on a gun and someone getting shot.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7. But few mistakes are as likely to leave you permanently crippled or, um, *dead*, as ones involving a gun. Don't risk it unless you MUST.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1. Not per se, but I can blame them for seeking a "solution" that actually puts them at greater risk instead of truly making them safer.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6. You can blame the toddler ones on parental error... but that's the problem. Everybody makes mistakes sooner or later. Even Homer nods.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4. If there's no immediate threat to your life, showing a gun can also cause the other side to escalate to lethal force out of fear.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is why I have a Concealed Handgun Liscense, which requires me to know the laws related to carrying and drawing my firearm, as well as

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3. your protection isn't risking the comfort of those that don't deserve it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2. escalation of force. I'm of the opinion that if you want protection, don't open carry. Get a CHL (or CWP, depending on your state), so

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2. Statistics show that people in families with guns are more likely to be shot by their own weapon than to defend themselves successfully.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[Citation needed]

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

67740 sucessful defensive uses per year vs 548 fatal unintentional shootings per year in 2012 sounds like a pretty good deal to me.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bears aside, I carry a small .380 with hollow points. Single stack. Hides very easily. Will stop humans.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

so cool man, I'm you glad you are ready to murder someone

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Yea, because that's synonymous with self defense

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which humans?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.9mm, hollow points 17 +1 plus two spare mags. I was a boyscout.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Nine tenths of a millimeter? Wow... Now THAT is a mousegun...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

:p

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually, 22LR will stop humans. It almost killed Regan.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But does it do it reliably enough to bet your life on?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Any gun is better than no gun.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not criticising, just asking. Why HP's? The .380 is a slow round at the best of days, HP's needs speed to peel. Why not FMJ, that way >

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you're ensuring penetration at the very least, when the liklihood is your HP's will act like FMJ's anyways.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean like a James bond gun ppk?

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The ppk is not that small and kinda heavy. Lcp or sw bodyguard is wayy smaller and lighter

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i actually own both of those. i carry the lcp a bit more often cause its lighter and simpler (no safety)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly that, actually

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

what kind of .380? I have a Bersa und a Ruger LCP-what i really wanted was a Beretta 84 but they banned in my (POLICE) state (caliornia

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

What got that banned?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh, what happens in california is, the state requires some safety features on certain guns like a mag safety on some guns and other 2/

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

dumb stuff just to make it harder for the manuf to sell guns here. Ruger gave up entirely..also the manuf has to pay a fee to get on 3/

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and stay on "the list" of state approved guns. It's a fee for every kind of gun they sell, and beretta just didnt pay the fee required to 4/

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Walther 9mm short. Older gun. I have a beretta too but I'm partial to the walther because it is single stack and im a softy for james bond

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

noice! I'd have paid any price for a new walther in .380 but you just can't get them here.bersa's just a cheap Argentinian copy

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I inherited it from my grandfather. Another reason I have a soft spot for it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

S&W .380 body guard is what I picked out. GREAT little gun.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

For bears... don't go any less than a .45

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

10mm

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anything less than 3,000ft-lbs won't reliably penetrate a grizzly skull. Brass solids are your friend.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing less than an 88mm

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What kind of bears are you hunting? T-34s?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tigers, too

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Carry 10mm ez

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I carry 44mag for that nothing less

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Or that. More punch than a regular 45 actually.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Oh yeah. And it’s a revolver so it never jams

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hollow points made to kill. A bullet will stop someone anyway, but they still have a chance to live. Hollowpoints increase bloodloss. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Hollow points were made to stop over-penetration. A hack with a CPL doesnt need to be any more dangerous to bystanders than they already are

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hollow-points smush and shatter when they hit and often won't go through them a lot of people shot in the head with hollow points still live

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At that point, you arent just defending yourself, you are making sure they die.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

Actually in the case of the .380/9mm short. HP's probably aren't the best idea anyway. They will only expand at quite high velocities.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Plus the tiny barrel will cause the round to leave at lower speeds, so that's an extra handicap. FMJ ensure better penetration.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hollow points reduce penetration. That’s the main point of them, not to increase blood loss. They’re made that way so they dump their

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

energy in a person or animal that is shot on purpose, not overpenetrate and hit a person behind them by accident. That’s it.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Thank you. Dude's acting like once you have to shot somebody you should be nicer to them by using a less lethal round.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it comes to the point where I have to pull the trigger, then it's life or death. Yes, they are made to kill.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

They are made to kill *after* the fact by blood loss and internal injuries, incapacitation is key in a home invasion. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Youre just making sure the cops find a body rather than a guy crying for his mom and regretting his mistakes with a bullet in his gut.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You think every single aggressor immediately gives up the second they're shot? When someone's shot it's basically a countdown until the 1/x

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They hit with more force, increasing the stopping power. I care about ending the threat - hollow points maximize that.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But oddly, I have trouble getting gun "enthusiasts" to admit that a gun's primary purpose is to kill things.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Gun guy" here. A given firearm's purpose may be to kill. Hunting rifles take game, duty rifles respond to threats/targets, carry guns 1/x

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

etc etc. But there are purpose specific firearms for things like target shooting and competition. Looking at it from either the design 2/x

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0