The car from “ The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen “ 2003

Aug 25, 2024 4:10 PM

MedicalScience

Views

32708

Likes

732

Dislikes

8

That movie has so much potential, and was such a let down. Remake that and leave good movies alone.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I know the movie was dumb, but FUCK do I still love it. Such good memories.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

one could say it drives like a submarine

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

@OP It's not a car, its an "auto-mo-beel". Nemo said so.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not a car. Au-To-Mo-Bile.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This car still fkn slaps, best car ever and more cars should look like this

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really really wanted to like this movie when it was released and I still give it a chance every few years when I see it on TV, still ain’t any good though.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I loved the version of Mina Harker in the film. https://youtu.be/KBybuhDN-0k?si=bVem">6JLYV">https://youtu.be/KBybuhDN-0k?si=bVemsCo3lVB6JLYV -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv6wh2R8l8c

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Seems like a minivan would have been more efficient…

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The movie that made Sean Connery give up acting.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He was quoted something like "I was offered The Matrix and I didn't understand it so I turned it down. I was offered LoTR and I didn't understand it so I turned it down. I don't understand this, but dammit I'm not going to turn it down."

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I swear I saw this in Burlington, On last year!!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sean Connery ruined that movie.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No turn . Only straight .

2 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 5

Yup, not like that distribution had ever been used in real life...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless of course, it steers from the rear. Probably not I just thought I'd mention it.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It would turn like a boat, but it would turn.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, the front set of wheels all visibly turn in the first 30 seconds of the movie you can see the car. But not by much...

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

How many gallons to the mile?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can I point out how ridiculous this car chase was, since they were in 19th century Venice, which doesn’t have 1. cars or 2. roads.

2 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

It also didn't have nuclear submarines, hulking man-beasts, vampires, invisible men, and ageless invulnerable fops. I'm not sure that roads and cars are a bigger leap than any of those. Also, Venice absolutely has footpaths wide enough for a car. People don't just gondola everywhere, they walk across the Rialto bridge and wander St Mark's Square.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

It’s a nice car, though.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Dude, the Nautalus ran on nuclear power. And they did have cars in 1899. Sure you still had to wind them up, but they existed.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

actually they mostly ran on batteries; the electric car predates the internal combustion engine

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I heard that the actual car cannot turn.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is false.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had to park on the lawn because it's too long to park anywhere else.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Don't ask questions, just get in. We're off to make no sense whatsoever."

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The original "The Homer"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

does it have to have rear wheel turn?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not necessarily, if both front axles can steer it should be fine

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They can.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

League of Overcompensating Gentlemen?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I mean, it definitely is a sausagefest.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Reminds me of Donald Trump; it's a poor person's idea of what a rich person would design for a car.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Except I would totally drive this over a Cybertruck.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The production design of that movie was far better than the writing.

2 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 1

Except for Mr Hyde.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bravo, Edward!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea, it certainly isn't a masterpiece, but I think it's more fun than it gets credit for. I wish they'd give it another go at some point.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

There's definitely worse out there. So much worse. But it sucked. It deserved to be much, much better than it was.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sean Connery turned down LotR, regretted that decision, and did LoEG to get in on the fantasy train. Whoopsies.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

And I'm sure everyone is pretty happy about that...

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He fucking retired afterwords saying he "clearly doesn't understand what Hollywood had become"

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Is this some sort of Sarcastic Comment?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Poor handling".

2 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 1

I donno, the idea was good enough for F1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrrell_P34

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats a transformers

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't exactly catch on though, did it...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it got banned because it gave extra traction while turning

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rules were changed to require cars to have four tyres

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmmm.... doable. That one has dual front axle steering and gets a turning circle of 17 meters at 7 meters length. OTOH, the rear axle is much closer to the front axles than in Nemo's car, and it does have power steering.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is that the Euro version of the new Chevy Yukon?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Close. "TPZ Fuchs" of the german army. So an armoured personnel carrier. This version should be the 12.8l V8 with 320hp, there is another with close to 500hp. Neat trick here is you can take the engine out and run it outside the vehicle, for field maintenance. Source: am ex tank driver of the german army. While this was not my vehicle of transport but the M113, some things stuck.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not only Germany - I was surprised to read in the Wikipedia article (when I searched for a picture) that the US used it as M93A1 Fox, also in Desert Storm. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuc">er)#">https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuchs_(Panzer)# and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TPz_Fuchs

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most probably yes

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Why anyone would put 2 axles in the front I have no idea. Put the extra axle in the back like a sensible person.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or have it steer from the rear.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LOL no. You do not want to turn the steering wheel and have the ass end of your car fly out sideways.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You call it a safety hazard. I call it a fun feature.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe both front axles steer?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They would have to, which wouldn't really work without really powerful power steering (rather unlikely in the 19th century, to say the least). Usually in a powerful RWD vehicle you want the extra tire in the back; if I'm not mistaken, a lot of vehicles (dump trucks, for instance) do this. You would want to drive all four rear wheels for a vehicle like this. How they made an engine powerful enough to be traction limited back then is basically magic, but so is everything else in the film.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0