I don't

Nov 30, 2016 3:28 AM

What you guise are doing there is not even close to a democratic vote by definition.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congrats Democrats. You played yourselves.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Remember a time when the US election system was not a shitshow? Yeah, I don't either.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Would you like some cheese?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Interesting to note that any state with even suspected voter suppression or fraud in the primaries went to Clinton... Interesting...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shitposter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Ironic name free thinker lmao

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The dems really fucked themselves over.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1. She won both popular votes 2. Accepted both delegate votes 3. Is legally allowed (even tho she didn't) to request recounts

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

And I am aware other third party liberals may be acting vicariously through her, but again, all legal

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Remember when the country didn't want nazis in charge so we said "fuck the electoral college, we don't want nazis in charge!" ?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

No I do not remember that. Mostly because the EC has never flipped for a different president.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dem cock ass

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

"Gee golly the elections might show some corruption".

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 10

Boy howdy, say it ain't so!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

political posts

9 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 16

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Do you know how fucking weird it is to find your own gif in a comment section

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I probably got it FROM you, maybe... 5 degrees of Kevin Bacon kinda thing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

where do i start? not the delegate count, the superdelegates. and even if she had gifted those to Bernie, he would still not have enough

9 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 13

Seriously, this is just an image of the Wyoming results.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly she started with a 500 pt lead and I can almost guarantee you that swayed the vote because talk of some one being in the lead is

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Very persuasive

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bernie was running an anti-DNC campaign, there was no incentive for DNC superdelegates to side with him even if he won their state

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 6

and finally, Hillary won the popular vote against Bernie, so really this entire post is just a failure

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

*popular vote not including voter suppressed democrats and not-registered democrats AKA the people who decided the election

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Explain, pls.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean she only won 2/3 of the open primaries where independents could vote. She lost so many of those super fair and not suppressing caucus

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are missing the point. Clinton is all over the place with her "popular vote win" against Trump these days. This post responds to that

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 32

yeah the movement was pushed by jill stein. pay attention man.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

She did win the national popular vote against Sanders. This is just the count for Wyoming

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes it's a response alright, a dumb response!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you're in the wrong place if you're looking for understanding in anything casting a poor light on dems.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Except Clinton beat Bernie in the popular vote in the Democratic Primaries. Was about 3 million votes more than him.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

hillary hasn't asked Trump to hand over electors, she already conceded ages ago. you just have an axe to grind, and its not working

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

Its just a divide and conquer online spam campaign. Trying to pit Hillary and Sanders supp against each other and split the democrates

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which is why people didn't vote for him. They didn't think he had a chance. And now we've got Trump. :)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Republicans successfully smeared a popular senator with manufactured scandals. Imagine what they'd do to a Jewish socialist.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

I think people are deluding themselves that Bernie would have done any better in the General than Clinton.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

I think that Clinton was an extremely weak candidate. I wanted her to beat Trump but I think Bernie would have had a better chance.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Midwest states thats helped trump would have voted for sanders

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What makes you say that? They bought into Trumps lies and grandstanding. Would have been the same with Bernie.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

No, because they voted for Trump for the same populism that they liked Bernie for. And those states are very liberal, so... you're silly. :P

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Worth noting that Clinton won the national popular vote in the primary by about 3 million votes compared to Sanders.

9 years ago | Likes 316 Dislikes 41

Shh, they (the idiots) don't like facts around here!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

number does not include caucuses which bernie won most of.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

*popular vote not including voter suppressed democrats and not-registered democrats AKA the people who decided the election

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

But keep at it. I'm sure these kinds of tactics will keep the republicans in power for decades.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And what percentage of the total vote is that?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In a system with caucuses that don't count every vote, where she was given a 400-delegate head start, and many closed primaries.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Maybe Bernie should have read the rules before joining the primary, rather than bitch about them well after it had started.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Maybe he did and was making an attempt to raise the national consciousness to the rules so they could be amended and improved? Hmm...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

the delegates declared early influencing the popular vote.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Which amounts to a little over 1% of the total vote.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Irrelevant in a winner take all system.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trump announced it was rigged, and that after they fixed it, he apparently had the popular vote. Which reminds me of how he claimed to

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

See hundreds of muslims celebrating atop buildings on 9/11. No one saw it. But he did. When no one else did. Only him.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I thought there were actual news reports right after 9/11 of some assholes in jersey doing this?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A very small and almost negligible amount though

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think trump just actually believes these "things" happen. And to think this person who has delusional problems has his hands on the button

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Boy, oh boy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also worth noting the leaks proving she essentially rigged the election...but it's not really gonna make a difference... we're doomed.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 26

Right wing played the Bernie or bust people like fiddled and got them to buy into the rigged primary BS

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Total bs you are spewing, the leaks showed there was planning on strategy, but Hillary was not even involved, you are full of bs!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

When in fact, there might have been bias, but Bernie ultimately just didn't run a good campaign. The DNC didn't sabotage him.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 21

Down vote due to excessive kool aid overdose and poison from use of CNN

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well, except for the leaks showing she didn't rig the election. You're right about us being doomed though.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 19

The primaries? It was pretty much confirmed... wiki leaks showed it in the emails.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Got a link to the specific emails that pretty much confirmed it?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No they didn't. The DNC never sabotaged Bernie's campaign. And the emails show they never sabotaged his campaign.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

I know what I read... but I didn't bother down voting, and I'm not "throwing a hissy fit" I simply disagree with you.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But in the end, there was no sabotage. The primary wasn't stolen, and Bernie fans were played like fiddles to think it was.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

But hey, you keep throwing a hissy fit and instantly downvote my replies. Still doesn't change the fact that Bernie ran a bad campaign

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

At most, some DNC members had a bias.And given that Bernie changed party affiliations a few months before the primaries, it's not surprising

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

How much of that was driven by her 400-0 starting spot? The world may never know.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Maybe if Bernie wanted to change the primary rules, he should have started his campaign more then five months before it started

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Bernie announced his candidacy in May of 2015. Hillary announced in April. One month equals 400 delegates?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. Because that's how super delegates work. They're basically endorsements. They endorsed the Democrat.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More than welcome to dislike them, but those were the rules in place when Bernie changed party affiliation to Democrat so he could run.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

didnt she also have more votes vs obama 8 years ago in the dnc election?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Caucus voting make exact number impossible to know. Their race was far closer than Bernie's. Some estimates put Clinton ahead. Some Obama

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

huh when i looked it up the other day it said she had more, but honestly i didn't care enough to delve to deep and verify it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also worth noting that there were numerous reports of voter registrations being changed/dropped without voter consent.

9 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 16

Just the new policy in general, of some states requiring pre-registration as a Democrat, all to block new voters in a grassroots movement.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yeah, because they didn't want a Donald Trump character to come out of nowhere and win their nomination by getting votes from non-Dems..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Let's also not forget that in many states independents, Bernies largest audience, could not vote in primaries

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 6

Well dammit call the FBI, make a report and turn over any evidence that you have, OR YOU ARE FULL OF CRAP!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's also not forget the Alamo.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They could, but they chose to register as independents instead.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

America isn't ready for socialism, the old are brainwashed against it but they outnumber the young who see what capitalism does to society.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is why registering as an independent is fucking stupid. i know it's symbolic and stuff, but seriously don't do it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Well, close to half the states have open primaries allowing anyone to vote for any party. So no it's not stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You have to be part of the club to vote for club president. I am all for opening these laws up, but that's the way it works in some states

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

In California I'm registered independent, but got to vote who ever side in the primary..I voted Bernie.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is all exactly why I say we need to break down the system a bit. Much like a game of Jenga, just pull the right parts to build it up.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes. Thank you for saying that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but they were all illegal votes -Trump

9 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 6

The funny thing is, the same lying memes cause my Bernie Friends to say the same at the time. Fake news is going ruin us.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Illegal immigrants, felons, dead people!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sure and they voted Democrat? Because only Democrats are the crooked ones, you are pathetic!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well it doesn't take a genius to figure out who illegal immigrants would vote for.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What are you babbling about?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm 2 for 3 and I didn't vote...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 30, 2016 8:43 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[citation needed]. 17,000 is a huge number to claim for the entire US, much less 1 state. Studies have shown the count is under a hundred.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

They deleted there bullshit comment

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/alleged-voting-dead - NY, 2004, 2600 accused dead voters, 0 proven cases.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah pretty sure you're confusing real life with an episode of the Simpson's

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

They deleted their bullshit comment

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't believe you, but if you can provide a link and source I'd like to read it.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Quick google search doesn't even turn up breitbart links claiming something so far fetched.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah already did a search. Waiting on a link...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0