loldefinitelynotOP1
768
29
37
Feb 18, 2018 1:33 PM
loldefinitelynotOP1
768
29
37
alchemist12345
Also, bait account.
acausal82511
Statistics is like torture for numbers, of you beat them enough they'll say what you want
DancingJuice
Your logic is flawless
oasis516
I have a feeling the far right gun owners would help round up people for extermination.
ThisIsFrigglish
I think you've been misreading. Every time I see a "We'll be matching IP addresses and going door to door for you scum", it's been tankies.
Eolande2006
ifyouareacuntanyouknowitclapyourflaps
But guns don't save people. People save People!
thiswasnice
So the us government is going to commit mass genocide?
loldefinitelynotOP1
If we allow leftists to regain control and take away all guns, then yes
Moose101Dude
I don't think your post's point is bad, but good lord the idea that "the leftists" are going to commit genocide is moronic.
alchemist12345
Hmmm, see no Australia there. Wonder why.
bloodyitchyanus
There already decended from criminals maybe
ClassicSean
Because nobody cares about australia
LarfleezePlz
OpinionsAreLikeAssholes
http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2018/02/15/reality-check-gun-permit-background-checks
DichotomusPrime
You realize that if your government decided to turn it's full force on you, your rifles wouldn't save you. They're deadly security blankets.
HowToBeSuccessfulAsaSerialKiller
Well a lot of the military would side with civilians. It would be a long horrific civil war, just like the last one.
Teevorkio
You do understand people in the army aren’t mindless slaves following orders some would side with the people uprising and being able to 1/2
Teevorkio
Shoot back is useful it’s not going to win by itself but it would be useful
stavesacre
Guns are a form of political power and gun control/confiscation is an inherently disempowering act
TheCalvinintheWoods
Being murdered is pretty disempowering.
stavesacre
Even more so when it's the state murdering you, because then even posthumous justice will be denied.
thelovechildofhitlerandstalin
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" -mao
HowToBeSuccessfulAsaSerialKiller
Probably right before he took the guns from his opponents and murdered them.
Artebudz
I notice dictatorships and authoritarian regimes there. Wonder if that had any effect...
muddydan101
Just a small false equivalency up there but yeah we’ll run with it
redzombie
best way to institute a dictatorship or authoritarian regime is to disarm the population.
HowToBeSuccessfulAsaSerialKiller
Germany was a democracy until about '38-39
Artebudz
Hitler had declared himself as Fuhrer before then.
ThisIsFrigglish
It gets a lot easier to enforce your will on a people who have no means to resist.
SameMyNay
Oh please. Hitler did not take over Germany because the people didn't have guns.
thelovechildofhitlerandstalin
He was elected democratically, but no civillian held guns made rounding up folks a lot easier.
liesuponlies
But no one in America is actively trying to resist the government now except to keep their guns. And even then it's just a bunch of rhetoric
liesuponlies
and no action. Where was the revolution when they formed the TSA or instituted travel bans or when the EPA started seizing land? Nowhere,
liesuponlies
because claiming "I need to keep my gun to fight the government when they take my freedom" is a farce. No one is going to organize any type
liesuponlies
of resistance force, and if they do it would be shut down in minutes by a handful of marines. The 2nd ammendment was so that States could