Just another day at the office...or else

Mar 15, 2022 1:39 PM

ButtBot9900

Views

115425

Likes

1515

Dislikes

55

Most large companies stand to lose way more in wealth from a stock crash caused by the collapse of the commercial real estate market than they do from running outdated and inefficient work models. So naturally they need to make it our problem.

TBH, I miss the office. So much easier to knock on my boss's door to be told to fuck off vs. scheduling time via Zoom to be told to fuck off

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh for the love of God not this again. If companies could get real estate off their books they would, it boosts ROA, ROE and ROIC.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

work from home kills old office model. remake old offices into homes. home is now office. your always at work. played yourself. profit????

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That and middle managers can't justify their existence by micromanaging and scheduling a billion unnecessary meetings

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Just think of the horror that big corporate office space might become cheaper per square foot than homes

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They're transitioning to residential buy ups and raising rents to compensate, they'll get the money. They always do.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Those workers who you know you can trust to work without supervision, fine. The rest should then get fired, regardless of how good they are

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

After 2 years at home, I'm looking forward to some office time.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This is my wife's job. Want everyone back in the office full time for "synergy", then the managers continue to WFH whenever possible

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

My boss was boosting ''company culture''. She barely comes in, and the culture is one of harassment without consequences.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Blizzard?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tbh It's nice to have a office to go to instead of staying home 24 7

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think it depends on the person. I suck at working from home. In college I had to be out of my home to get anything home. Mental traps

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's more that companies usually sign 15 - 20 year office leases and don't want to waste money on empty buildings for the next 10 - 15 years

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, this is staggeringly obvious to anyone with two braincells to rub together.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My corp office just told its 1000 employees that mandatory return to office is cancelled.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know I'm going against the imgur band wagon here, but it is much easier for me to cooperate with colleagues who are physically available.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a fair point, but do you need to do that every day? Maybe there could be once a week meetings or whatever.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The meetings are on Teams, so that's fine. It's the everyday things. It's much easier to just turn to the left and talk to my colleague. 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, I prefer working at my job, rather than at home. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post is missing a response to her tweet that was a crypto bro and worked in like real estate.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How does this make sense? Most office space is rented. If they didn't have to pay rent, it would save them money, not lose money.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

It doesn't make any sense, you're ruining the corporate greed narrative.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

ok Company A makes software and they rent an office space from Company B, if Company A stays work from home Company B loses the rent money

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

now if enough Company Bs keep losing rent money it would kill that segment of the economy. those skyscrapers in NYC aren't cheap

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Company A doesn't give a fuck about Company B

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It doesn't make sense, OP (from twitter) is making too many logical jumps to suit their narrative.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is a huge amount of middle management that I'd doing nothing and realizes they are superfluous.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is exactly why my workplace is staying wfh more or less indefinitely, as far as I can tell.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not only this, but it also impacts nearby businesses like cafés, which in turn impacts the economy.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see these posts a lot. I have some feedback on this. 1) The owners of these buildings have more than enough capital to reposition the

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

assets and or partner with an equity group to convert any real estate to another purpose. They also have the political capital to do it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

far easier than any average developer would. For a high rise of lets say 20 stories there are only so many principals in the country who

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

actually convert them to apartments. We are talking taking them from office to residential occupancy.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

2) For anything like converting all these buildings to low income housing would take government intervention and market making.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The perfect example is Michigan after the last market crash. Millions of square footage of building sat vacant and

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

With some exceptions obviously, if we did our job from home for 2 years -we can do it from home forever.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you would be surprised how few companies own the building they reside in

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Notice how it said rented out and not owned.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Point being your employer isn't likely trying to get you back to the office for that reason if they don't own the office.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I laugh whenever we get return to work plan emails. Because it's always delayed and if they ever do try it, they will lose 40-70% of staff

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Our CEO keeps warning that we will be coming back to the office soon but it's hilarious because its just talk and we all know he doesn't 1/

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

have anywhere near the leverage to get us back in there. HR and IT have arranged all of us on permanent WFH 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's been so long now that employees have all moved away. Many would have a 2+ hour commute. Some as long as 6 or 7. They ain't coming back

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

a guy i went to highschool with was working in an office in California, after the pandemic started and they switched to WFH 1-2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2-2 he moved back to northern Wisconsin cause he hated California plus the cost of living difference was like getting a 25% raise,

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why this meme every day? It's so dumb! Companies save money if they don't pay commercial rent and employees pay for their own home offices!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong. The company with employees and the ones that own the buildings are usually separate. This sounds smart, unless you know how CRE works

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

I mean. I've worked for both. Two-jobs-ago company owns their HQ, just built a huge expansion maybe ... 5 years ago? They stopped WFH ASAP.>

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>Current job leases their building. They're moving to primarily WFH, are now subletting and won't be renewing half the building.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I should mention, Job 1 and 2 are both mostly clerical, administrative busywork for the grunts. No reason both can't be done from home.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And this is proof folks do not.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm a manager, at a billion dollar company thats been in the room when this is discussed. Some people thing Productivity will be better. I

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Disagree. But at least in the actual conversations I've been in, it's not about real estate. Leases end. That's fairly easy to deal with.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

but productivity can be measured. shouldn't be too hard to show how productive things were both before and after

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on the nature of the work. My team works on lots of different projects at the same time with blended timelines.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wrong. CRE works by companies signing multi-year leases that they have to justify to their bosses by putting butts in seats.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But leases end. If you can say I'll save a huge amount in 3 years, my boss will take that all day everyday. Expense reduction is key. Thats

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The scale where we plan. Across multiple years. I've done 8 year forecasts before.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't forget that we spend/consume less from home. Gotta get out there and keep that economy pumping so the rich can get richer.

4 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 4

I’ve spent more working from home these last 2 years

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We do not. Consumer good sales shot up something like 30% in lockdown. We buy just stuff instead of gas and food.

4 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

No commute means more free time, which means more hobbies, which means more spending on hobbies.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Consumer good sales, is that all areas or just limited ones?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All areas, but limited within the type. E.g. "clothing" went up, but it was pajamas and sweats.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And department heads like to see a big room or people they have power over. Without that, people start to question why they are needed.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Also home office is not good for everyone and it definitely reduces the exchange between people, which fosters innovation

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Younger people are able to shitpost in chat systems like teams. For them it does not mater where they are physically working from.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

No

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Are you assuming my age?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If you have issues with collaboration remotely then that typically means you have issues communicating casually with tools like teams.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Younger people are more comfortable with remote collaboration platforms because they grew up with similar communication platforms.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

True within a department, but you lose it with those outside your team. The random interactions that spark innovation and collaboration

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most large companies don't own their real estate. This is extremely misguided. They lease.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

They aren't talking about the companies owning their own buildings.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And they pay the lease whether it's used or not.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yup. But they can also plan ahead to say we won't have this big fixed expense after the lease runs out...

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And who do these large companies lease from... other large companies, and investment funds. Nothing about this is misguided.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Ha. If you think the companies that lease are worried about taking care of their landlord, think twice. Every company is just worried about

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Themselves and what is best for them. They aren't going to hold on to their lease to help out the landlord.... Thank you for that laugh.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You are forgetting a vast majority are multi year leases most common 3 to 5 years. Some being 20 plus

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not forgetting. For the shorter term leases it's a sunk cost, and often you can pay a penalty that's still worth it. Bringing your workers

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Forgot to mention leases longer than 5 years arent very common. What if the area becomes much more popular, landlord can't increase rates.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just think, we might have to turn all those unoccupied buildings into low cost multi-family housing! Can you imagine the horror?!

4 years ago | Likes 643 Dislikes 7

Honestly this happens more in entirely democrat controlled areas. Dems want it until it’s in their backyard

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll live in the backrooms

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One does not simply *help* the poor!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I pay MY taxes to bomb families out of their homes, not get them into affordable housing. I forced you to have those babies. Not my prob /s

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If they could be walkable communities with local gardens to buy fresh produce that’d so dope

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Commie! lol kidding of course

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They would rather let the building rot than to help other humans.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a nice thought but they would be terrible living conditions. Not up to code for plumbing for one.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Won't somebody think of the share holders!

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

It was kind of a big deal when a 30 story former office building was converted into housing/apartments here a few years ago.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

lol they will be turned into housing. but it won’t be low cost. it will be spun as some post modern urban ruggedism with an appeal to the>

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

moral goodness of using old offices as apartments. and a nice big price tag to go along with the happy little story they sell you.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you don’t really think they’d let the poors into the biz districts after all.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Zoning laws make something like that very challenging, unfortunately

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's almost as if the entire system is designed to fuck us.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Well also so people aren't forced to live in buildings not meant for living. Some of it is done for good reason. Not all, but some

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Those are building codes. Zoning laws require single family homes to be built in most places, making low income housing difficult. NH is 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Passing a law that will allow up to a 4plex be built on any plot serviced by city water and city sewer.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As if.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you have enough money to turn an office building into housing, you have enough money to just build housing.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the horror!!!!!

4 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What next, a *dun dun DUUUUN* stable salary for everyone? Or a *thunderclap* increase on the minimum wage?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is the case w/my company. "We built a $35mil HQ2 building in 2019, may as well fill it w/people to make it look like a good decision"

4 years ago | Likes 135 Dislikes 1

My company is similar. They built a fancy new office, it’s 2 buildings on a bunch of land, and like 6 months after opening covid hit.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And they won't want to train their managers on how to remotely manage, leading to many using the spy software to see what everyone is doing.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

My company literally bought new office in the middle of pandemic (late 2020). I'm sure the deal was in the works long before then but still

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The wfh transition had gone really well, we had record profits last year, and they still planning to send everyone back later this year

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh and before the panic even hit, they already have a 2nd office building in another part of the city with multiple empty floors

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

mine made a better choice in when they built the first of what was to be two buildings they stopped before they built the second one

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My best friends company completed the new 30 mill building Feb 2020. They are forcing everyone back now.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Forcing is the operative word.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Do they have one of those signs up that taunt the employees with how much better working from home was?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not sure. She quit like 2 weeks later and got a 25% pay raise while doing so.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Same. Should have saved the money and given out raises instead.

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 0

What is raises?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HAH yeah I got a 0.57% raise last year after implementing cost savings for the company of north of $1mil year over year.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Should’ve not told them and redirected the money to yourself

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, you took an involuntary pay cut.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

yup. I'm building up savings so I have enough $$ to cover bills so I can take my time looking for a new job.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I think companies that don't let workers continue to work from home will lose employees to companies that do. And they don't need buildings.

4 years ago | Likes 284 Dislikes 1

And some people will prefer to work from the office and can replace those who move to companies with remote working.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sure. No one wants to work anymore in 3, 2, ...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Many cities lure big companies with tax breaks on offices that must remain occupied. These "savings" are passed to the workers in inc taxes.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

My company tried to implement a 3 days a week in the office policy to start June last year. Within a week it was 2 days to start in August.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

By September it was "two days a month" with incentives for those who went in more often and a side of "please stop threatening to quit".

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Look who's got the power now, bossman.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And then those companies will get bought out by big conglomerates and they'll change their policies!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah I’m software dev and my manager is trying to get us back in - so ridiculous

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats very true in IT

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hey. It’s been four years, and although I agree with your concept here I’m really curious if you’re seeing the same thing I am, namely that the companies that allow people to work from home full time are getting harder and harder to find.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm still working from home five days a week. Am I looking for a new role? No.

4 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nice.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is how capitalism is supposed to work

4 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 0

And it will. Just give it some time for competing businesses to emerge that want you to work from home.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Free-market capitalism, not whatever we have now.

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Competitve capitalist vs conspiring capitalism. we have the later.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

medieval style oligarchs trying their damndest to influence & control modernity, failing, and putting our planet at risk as a result?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Adam Smith free-market capitalism, not modern right-wing "free market" capitalism.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Late stage capitalism, fascist capitalism, corporatocracy, one last burst of speed towards the edge of the cliff, unfettered greed

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Too bad that it will kill us all before it ends.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ooh, this reminds me of another one - terminal capitalism

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does it bug anyone else that we have to give 2 weeks notice but they can fire us on the spot?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

huh? Who lied to you about having to give 2 week notice?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most companies pretty much demand it of you.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And what are they going to do if you don't give a 2 week notice? Fire you?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It looks bad to other employers.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So don't tell them

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's ok, you don't have to tell other employers and you have no "permanent record" for them to look up. 100% do not have to give 2 weeks

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0