What a time to be alive

Jan 6, 2020 1:28 PM

Blud4BludGod

Views

118319

Likes

3447

Dislikes

127

It's real, pulled from their official website's Twitter feed. I know that it probably won't help the situation in the long run, but dang.

#oof

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nearly all administrations seem to get around this by calling it a conflict instead of a war...still shocking they would call him out on it.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

As much as I hate it Trump is right. War powers act limits the power of the president except when US persons are attacked among other things

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 3

This is imgur. It's not about being right. It's about hating Trump no matter what. (PS didn't vote and won't vote for Trump).

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 11

Daily reminder not to vote Republican. And more specifically, anything other than a vote for the Dem challenger is a vote for Trump.

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 25

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The last of our five formal declaration of war was for World War II.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey USA, you guys doing okay? Have you considered couple's conseling?

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

Cold blooded.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He can do virtually anything except declare war. I don't think we ever "declared" war after 911, we just went in.

6 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

And Congress would make a bigger deal over that (undeclared "wars") except there is a general fear that it wouldn't hold up in SCOTUS.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have had a preemptive strike since 2003. The war on terror is an ideology, not an actual war. No accountability unfortunately.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hasn't america been involved in a war something like 90% of it's time.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't think we've actually declared war as prescribed in the constitution since WW2. Congress has all but ceded that power to the executive.

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes we declare war after 9/11. Very few politicians voted against it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Who down votes this? It is absolute, nonpartisan fact! LMAO

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We werent much for 'declaring' war prior to 911 either.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congress authorized action for both Afghanistan and Iraq. Similar to how they authorized Vietnam.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

President can use military force for up to 60 days without having to inform congress in advance. Obama used it a lot himself to bomb targets

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Because Congress wanted to side step it’s responsibility.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

true, but because of that he can

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By law he doesn’t need to tell Congress until within 48 hrs of the strike. Sad that the hatred and lack of trust made it happen.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He’s off his fucking nut.

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 17

Our government has to argue with each other over fucking Twitter because our president is a child. This is the worst fucking timeline

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

Soooooo, ya, we’re just tweeting declarations of war now. Ok.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 12

At least it wasn't written emojis. Silver linings.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Give it time.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bibi is as much a criminal as trump and needs this to distract from the corruption charges he is facing as much as trump is distracting from

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

His impeachment. MBS and Bibi are the ones pulling puppet trumps strings getting USA to do their dirty work, letting them claim action with

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

No risk of putting their citizens in danger. They are the school yard bullies calling big brother to fight when they get in over their head

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

6 years ago | Likes 129 Dislikes 24

OMG this is perfect.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

You're out of your element

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

If US assets are attacked then the president can respond militarily for a period up to 60 days without Congressional approval.Keep in mind1/

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Any false flag attack counts?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pres. Obama did not consult congress prior to launching strikes against Libya in support of the Coup against Gaddafi. Though he did 2/

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Notify them after the fact. 3/3

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

A tweet should not serve as a formal notification for fucks sake.

6 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 13

A formal notification regarding the initial strike was submitted to congress via classified letter on saturday. It may, or may not, 1/

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

include trump currently is tweeting out. Hope there is a leak that sheds some light into what it said or if it was written in crayon or not.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tweets are the only thing Donny has read to him so maybe this will actually get some of the Constitution into his skull.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's not, but to be the fucking president and act like a child threatening people over Twitter is just embarrassing. Par for the course tho

6 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

It's apparently the only form of notification he seems to pay attention to. People can't see him ignoring it.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Did President Obama go to Congress for every one of the 2700+ drone strikes he ordered?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I'm sorry. Drone strikes he approved, just in case people want to quibble.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And sadly he will probably get reelected

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

#notmydictator

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 22

#notmycæsar

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

#avetruetocaesar

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Didn't the congress specifically grant short-term war powers to all presidents in order to quickly respond in times of crisis?

6 years ago | Likes 406 Dislikes 11

Oh I see there's a rehash of Rome in modern times, good fun

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's part of the War Powers Act.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Key being: in times of crisis.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes and No.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

More yes than no, though. Post 9/11 we pretty much ceded limited strike ability to the executive for keeps.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kind of, they just haven't done anything about it for about two decades, which is how the last President could do so many drone strikes.

6 years ago | Likes 155 Dislikes 5

Both sides...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They used the 2001 AUMF for legitimizing the drone strikes. And they re-asserted it in 2013 when they used a drone strike to kill an

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

American citizen. The 2001 AUMF technically never expired and was never retracted so they've referenced it each time this stuff happens.

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

*American citizen, he was the son of a soon to be terrorist leader. It's speculation, but he probably would have followed is father's lead.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

yeah but he was still a US citizen who was executed without trial by a president... completely unacceptable

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Obama did a ton of strikes but don't count out Trump and how he's already doubled Obama's total

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Trump has also done away with the reporting of civilian casualties from said drone strikes

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No... obama was able to commit air support and drone strikes to Syria because he got congressional approval:

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Did he get approval to drone strike a wedding full of civilians that was supposed to be super low level targets that didnt warrant such?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Hmm, classic “what-about-ism”. “Hey, Trump did something bad”, “But what about Obama?”

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I mean... it's so popular a bandwagon to hate Trump sometimes it takes an example of things similar the popular one did to check reality.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Donald Trump is not an American. He's a foreign agent. He works for them, not us.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

Trump is a traitor and a Russian puppet! I can't believe Republicans are standing by him.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 13

They are complicit. As long as they get their incompetent lifetime judges and can force their religious hypocrisy on us they don’t care

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty sure congress will try to limit what he can do against Iran. I can't believe he said he'd destroy cultural sites.

6 years ago | Likes 168 Dislikes 18

Well considering some of his supporters have been saying for years that we should nuke Mecca just to make a point, it doesn't surprise me.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Then you might have forgotten about all the other times he advocated war crimes. e.g. murdering the families of terrorists.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I’m surprised that after all his shit you’d still be surprised by anything that toupee wearing Cheeto does.

6 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 4

Casually tweets he's ready to commit war crimes. What a time to be alive.

6 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 4

Honestly I wanna see him try then the pentagon say no. Which would cause a massive issue but I think it’s needed

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They won't. He is the commander. Unfortunately.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ugh. Let’s burn down the Library of Alexandria, again.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I can believe it

6 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 0

You can't? What about him makes you think he has any knowledge of ANY type of law, or possesses a functional moral or ethical code?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I believe that is a war crime, so I think Iran can actually file a complaint against the US.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

He did indeed say he would do that, as if he has the personal power to snap his fingers and rain missiles on innocent people.

6 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 3

This is why he's a boon to despots everywhere, he can destabilize hard to maintain political balances in a single day...

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Unless of course you are the despot he's "destabilizing" so it's a double edged sword

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you have to abandon national interests abroad for profit while also causing chaos, sure.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And if he did have that power we'd all be dead already. Thank fuck for the people acting as a filter for that prick.

6 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

Uhhh. But he does have that authority. ♂️ he can’t declare war, but he can approve military strikes.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why can't you believe that? He stated he wanted to target civilians who were related to terrorists when running for office, and got voted in

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

on that rhetoric of committing a warcrime. Nothing new sadly.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

they have already done that to themselves.... anything not muslim has been destroyed he is just finishing up what they started

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 42

I wouldn't trust Congress to pour out a cup of water if the directions were printed on the bottom.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

He won't. He's going to bomb 25 missile sites and 27 oil refineries and ports.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 24

The most important part of being a Trump supporter is not listening to the things he says.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, they listen. They just don't care...or they agree with him.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No really, if you listen to the discourse about the shit he says, there's always some rhetorical slight of hand to explain what he said

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump is a fictional character upon which the prejudices and insecurities of the masses are reflected

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was already in the news what was going to be bombed, but you be you.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Link? That would be a massive breach of security if the list was known.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Congress voted to make it illegal to remove troops from the middle East so don't bet on it. H.R.916

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Damn H.R.914

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now explain how you got from Syria to include the whole middle east.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you sure that's the right bill?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

H.R.914

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The School Resource Officer Act of 2019?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you are from the US please check your voter registration and vote on Nov 3rd, 2020! Thank you and have a great day!

6 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 15

I cannot fucking wait to come here after Trump wins 2020 in another landslide. The tears and salt will be delicious

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

More importantly: If the Dems put up someone less than ideal, VOTE ANYWAY. This is not the time to make a statement. This is a time to act.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

True. Gotta vote for Trump again. Thanks for the reminder.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 41

With all due respect, did you read the transcript and/or watch any of the impeachment testimony? Thank you for your time.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Also, did you see Bolton will testify?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Ah yes, because the war crimes really sealed the deal for you folks, eh?

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 10

They love it!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I dont like your decision. But i respect it nonetheless.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

For all his faults, he at least makes it seem like he's listening to the middle of the country. And that's more than anyone else has done.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

listening to the least populous area and completely ignoring and attacking the major population centers. What a warped sort of patriotism

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The Midwest is one of the highest populated regions in the country... Our problems just aren't the same as New York's & California's. 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What a profoundly uneducated opinion you have.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

The Rust Belt is literally rusting away, and nobody in office was willing to help. I know a fair few who voted for Trump simply... 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

You may explain first to Mr Trump what dictator means, it's a really complicated word.

6 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 26

I read that as "complimented" at first and I shook my head in agreement.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He knows what dictators are. He admires them and wishes he could run his country more like they do in theirs.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Three syllables!!

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

No it's not, it's when you have "relations" with an Idaho Spud.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But everyone says he’s a dictator. Either he is or he isn’t

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

(After a long, defeated sigh and massaging of the temples) "...No, sir. It's not a penis-shaped potato..."

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

DAMMIT! i was hoping to create one specific to this very topic. or at least LMI. my dreams are dashed more than Greta's.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it's a potato named Richard in a boat

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm still at a loss as to what the Americans see in that whiny, spoilt, talentless stain of fake tan, teeth and hair.

6 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 19

Honestly? Themselves.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

We dont see anything. Corps see money tho

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

So are most Americans.

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

The clown was elected with fewer votes than his opponent. He has never been anywhere close to 50% approval. He's a failure of our Democracy.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Another user put it this way, He's the idiot's idea of a smart man, the poor's idea of a rich man, and the coward's idea of a brave man.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

As an American we aren't sure either

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

A lot of us here don't know either. Dude lost the popular vote and won solely based on the technicalities of the system.

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 4

Gotta love the electoral college and gerrymandering.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I fully don't understand how the votes of hundreds can be worth more than the votes of millions.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It’s bullshit!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

CGPGrey gives a simplified explaination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUS9mM8Xbbw

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So basically the Electoral College is an outdated piece of shit practice that should be done away with but it probably won't be?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They and many of you should actually read the war powers act. You’d be surprised how much latitude a President has for these acts short term

6 years ago | Likes 674 Dislikes 25

I aint reading that, give me a tldr mate

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Yeah... Congress has the ability to declare long wars, but WPA gives Prez ability to start them. Also AMAU is already in place....

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There's way more than that. e.g. there's reasonable notification requirements.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

i think the most people know is that congress has the power to declare wars, but are unfamiliar with What the Pres can do w/o that.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You can’t ask imgur users to do research and use logic. Don’t you know this community!?

6 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 35

Look at this guy, walking in and just straight-up telling everyone in the audience that they suck. Are you a pro wrestler?

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

No, I’m Ricky Gervais

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ah yes, taking a shot at the unethical business behind the glamorous world of... uh, the imgur user base.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically since the day ol' George W. Got the patriot act passed the President can do whatever the fu k they want without limits

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except the Pentagon justified the actions under the PATRIOT act which was never intended to be used against countries

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

30 days to do anything, after that Congress needs to approve, but precedent on that has already gone well over

6 years ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 1

The 2001 AUMF has been exploited to get around that repeatedly.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Congress can still tell him to put it back in his pants before those 30 days are up, though.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thought it was 60 days. Guess I'll have to check now.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You sir, are correct that it's 60 days - I was mistaken when I wrote 30

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That seems like a huge oversight. Because you can do a lot in 30 days that can't be easily reversed. Is that intentional? Or a relic (1)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

from the time when the constitution was wrote and you'd need 30 days to even call up the troops? (2)

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Intentional part of the Bush wars changes

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That particular law is intentional, from the 1960s if I'm recalling correctly. In the event of clear and pressing national emergencies, /1

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it's not necessarily the greatest idea for Congress to have to discuss things to death before ANY military force can be employed. They've /2

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But 48 hours to inform Congress. Preferably not through twitter.

6 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 1

That's the beauty of the modern world, someone could order someone shivved and the victim would be sure to tweet about it as it dies

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It literally has to be in writing, he just ignored it

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

I didn’t know the definition of “in writing” limited it to hand written letters.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

"in writing" generally means on paper.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yeah a tweet is not appropriate though. Has to be a group text.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

You'd have to link for us to even open it. Doesnt mean wed read it. Maybe bookmark it for later.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Nobody will read them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There has to be an Imminent Threat, to override Congress, or it's illegal. Days later, and STILL NO explanation!

6 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 21

But they said they have good reason! Why don't you just take their word for it? /s

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Congress was officially notified Saturday via a classified document; which came within the 48 hour window. source to follow. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Not to you personally, no; but Congress did receive a classified briefing.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Me personally? Wth are you talking about? Where do you people come from with your BS arguments?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Congress as a whole will not get a classified briefing. Splitting hairs

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are, indeed.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are shouting at the trees. Go take a nap.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It makes sense that a president would have that kind of latitude. The issue is that the raging immature brain malfunctioning 3 year old in

6 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 29

charge that for some reason no one seems able to depose is making short term decisions that cause disaster for global stability.

6 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 19

That seems to be more of an argument to keep that check in Congress instead of ceded to the president

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Putin's asset at work

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 14

By attacking Iran? A Russian ally?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You know Russia doesn't actually give a fuck about its allies. That country has had a longer history of betrayal and deceit than the USA

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make the US look reckless and dangerous, erego weakening our position by using Iran as an unwitting means to bolster Russian global power

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*shrug* The orange twat has a dinner with Putin's reps and then does this. What does that tell you?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Stoking conflict is pretty much Russia's thing. There's no such thing as allies in any realistic sense. Russia knows it'll be easier to -

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any factual information to back your claim up?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

*gestures vaguely* you see the shit going on right now?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I’m specifically referring to your comment “...Disaster for global stability” I’m genuinely curious to what you’re getting to there. Thanks.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

IKR. Like, bro, we got one continent on fire, another starting WW3, I dont dare find out what the others are doing less I give up all hope..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I laugh at you. Very simplistic and completely uninformed

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 31

That's easy to say and harder to prove without any proof we are all laughing at you

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Instead of condescension, perhaps a route of sharing your learned knowledge and mutual understanding might be beneficial.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

You p/a types. Just enjoy your rant. Swear an oath and pick a side.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Perhaps both sides should try that.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, no. That's not the bases mo. It's just you are wrong the Cheeto is all powerful. Bow before the Cheeto. See the coming of the Cheeto.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Informed Israel before he informed Democratic Leadership because a foreign government can be trusted with secrets more than Americans. o_Ó

6 years ago | Likes 1490 Dislikes 40

Well they're the enemy, see. They're haters against everything that is Trump.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If the US bombs someone, and the someone has a friend who can bomb Israel, the friend will bomb Israel even if it's not involved. Ask Saddam

6 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 13

I for one am not at all surprised

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Foreign leaders can't hold him accountable in any way he cares about.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and apparently told some random people at Mar-a-Largo more than he told Congress.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oy vey

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

OUR GREATEST ALLY

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't want to take away from your point but that emoji is amazing and innovative and I applaud you.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, they have proven they can't be trusted with the information.

6 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 37

Nope, Trump can't be trusted.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

I can agree w your sarcasm in an honest sense

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because we're going to war to do Israel's dirty work. They're the 51st US state and by far the most influential in our foriegn policy.....

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Honestly- fuck Israel.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

At least more than the leaky Democrats

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Informed his idiot son who posted and then deleted a tweet about it.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey Imgur historians, has there ever been a US administration with this many leaks? If so: which?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure. Abe Lincoln and JFK.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well considering every time trump lets congress know something they leak military strike secrets to the enemy, so yeah don’t blame him.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 32

Oooooooh he said the unpopular but true fact!

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 24

Trumptards have to lie about the truth otherwise they have to face that they support a pedophile.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

He never informed Israel till after the fact, the IDF was surprised when they were told after, Iran claims US told Israel first but no proof

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Wait. No one told you that Israel is just East Long Island?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

No it’s because American leaders bow down to the Israelies and most likely the order came from them

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Republicans have no interest in Democracy anymore. It's all a sham. Just enough to trick voters into thinking it, but once they've-

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

won their seats, they do all they can to act unilaterally. They are the ruling party by all metrics. And as such, they have every legal -

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

right and avenue to act as said ruling party. They treat Democrats like enemies of the American people because they are the enemies of the-

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

party's power. And as such, they convince their voters that Democrats are enemies of America by virtue of opposing the party.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He trusts Putin over US Intelligence. Not sure what anyone expected here. Just being his shitty self as usual.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 7

Well, Putin isnt actively trying to get him fired...so...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

To be fair israel is our biggest ally, rather we are their biggest ally.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Because the neocons practically let Israel run our country. Just take a look at aipac

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Not only them. It seems like everyone except who should have been told weren't.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not a defense, but he has the power to order short term action, as well as immediate strikes. Letting Israel know was likely because 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 27

This is conditional. There was no "national emergency created by attack upon the united states."

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is true, to an extent. If the Intel was he led an attack on an embassy, then yes, the attack is technically on the US. However 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have had him dead to rights before, multiple times, during both the bush and Obama administrations. We didnt pull the trigger then 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because we couldn't afford the political and possible war repercussions. Not saying we can now, just that we couldn't then either. 3/3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But he apparently didn't inform other European allies who have troops in the area. And they wonder why Europe wasn't happy...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He managed to tell GOP Leadership in time, though.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are the root of Americas problem with Islamist hatred. Not making excuses, just explaining.2/2

6 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 41

That's all good, but the gang of eight should have been informed.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

They were. Of the results.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

anti-Semitism alert: Blaming Jews for your country's problems.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can downvote this all you want, but Islamic terrorists exist because according to them we are "treasonous allies of the zionists"

6 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 27

It goes back farther to their hatred of Westernism and "Rome" after they were forced out of Europe after hundreds of yrs of subjugating ppl

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

It probably started there, but the reason evolved as the people familiar with that history died out.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You got sidetracked a bit there, but I *think* what you were going for was he informed them so they could prep against possible retaliation.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That may be part of the reason but it is by no means the only reason

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

That’s where it all started. You kick a people off their holy land and they tend to hold a grudge

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

I'm calling BS. Israel doesn't explain the hatred of Coptic Christian's, or of inter Muslim hatreds ie Sunni vs shiite

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The hatred of Coptic Christians and inter Muslim conflict have nothing to do with hatred of america. Israel is a core reason for that.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The Sunni-Shiite split, albeit not as violent as Christian Schisms, has existed at boiling temperatures for centuries.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Eric knew before Congress knew. Eric isn't even in government

6 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 3

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/eric-trump-tweet-iran-strike/ As much as I think that whole family is trash... plausible deniability here

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

fucking despicable.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well are any democrats within ballistic missile range if Iran? And do I trust israel .ore than democrats in Congress? Yes I do. At least

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

They have a vested interest in US security.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Well. More than the Democrats at least.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 22

Republicans are traitors.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Fuck the people who's allegiance to a political party are over that of the entire nation. You're the fucking problem.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Ok boomer.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

No because it's Israel's war. Just like Iraq and Syria, American soldiers die and American tax gets wasted to fight Israel's war.

6 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 14

You mean Iraq, the war Israel opposed the US getting into? or Syria where they told the US to back out and leave it to them?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. BiBi went for two hours begging Congress to allow the invasion of Iraq. It's on YouTube. Look it up.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

What does Bibi wanting the Iraq War have to do with anything? He was a the finance minister, not PM, not Defense Minister, etc

6 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I hope you are smart enough to know that the personal opinions of the Finance Minister is not official govt policy.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

anti-Semitism alert: blaming the world's conflicts on Jews

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ready labels to silence truth alert. I am blaming Israel the state not jews in NY or in Morocco.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Widely accepted definition of anti-Semitism: https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/working-definition-antisemitism?usergroup=7

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know nothing about anti-Semitism, except for how to proliferate it. I call it out where it is.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you know that after the US invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein deliberately bombed Israel despite 0 provocation in the hope that IDF joining 1

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

The war would cause for the withdraw of Saudi Arabia from the Coalition? 2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Do you know that there were already Mosad involved in the war on Iraq way in the beginning of the war. I remember back then seeing in the ne

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

news. And why would Dubyya plane to invade Iraq second day after Sept 11. Go watch BiBi pleading to Congress to attack Iraq. He went for

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

hours begging US to attack Iraq. It's in youtube.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Israel opposed the invasion of Iraq very publicly and protests it till the day of invasion. Bibi was just an MP at the time, not PM

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Calm down Hitler

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 18

Don’t like the truth so that’s all you can respond with? Pathetic

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Exactly. Antisemitism is and nazi accusation are ready labels for speaking ill of bloody Zionism.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I like how you think defending an ally is a waste of money.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Israel such a great ally who killed 34 and wounded 171 Americans on the USS liberty without repercussions? Or SA where the 9/11 terrorists

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Well, Ally as they might be but certainly not friends with the US considering the American lives they have on their conscience. And don't...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Let Bibi and MBS fight their own war. I like how you think it’s defending.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well, TBH, Israel is one of the few foreign powers that can get away with deliberately attacking a US warship, and killing US sailors.

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jan 6, 2020 10:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Don't forget Operation Susannah. Israel would turn on the US without hesitation if they would believe that it would benefit the Israel state

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So people of the Jewish state of Israel did this?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is your argument that Israel isnt the US's closest ally in the region?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

You mean a Ship 100 Miles from where the US told Israel prior to the attack, in a war zone, that refused to respond to hails? That ship

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

The first rule of firing a weapon is to know what you're aiming at. Israel either didn't verify (bad) or didn't care (worse).

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

a ship in a warzone heading towards enemy territory right after your supply depot was shelled in that area, that doesn't respond? ID enough

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

and as soon as they realized, they stopped, offered help (which the captain refused), and notified the US govt and offered reparations

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're facts are significantly wrong (and you know it) but how does your version change Rule 1 of weaponry: Know what you're aiming at.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Citation needed

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

USS Liberty 1967. Do your own fucking research.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

This was so much easier. Plus I’m on a job site with spotty cell coverage. Thanks, no need to be a dick.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Dude do your research properly. It was an accident during the 6 day war. They thought it was an Egyptian ship.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

An Egyptian ship flying a US flag the size of a minivan apparently.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Diplomatic cables from the Israeli ambassador in Washington state they knew it was an American vessel and still decided to attack it.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I haven't heard a single testimony from the survivors that hasn't claimed the incident was deliberate.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You mean how even the IDF admitted they knew it was a US ship and elected to ignore the intel? Then conveniently said they failed to notice?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The burden of proof always lies with the person making the claim you'd know that if you did your own research

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

When someone demands claim with a dismissive tone from the getgo they show they have bias already, no one is beholden to teach a wall.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Friendly reminder: trump was legally voted into office. We elected him. He is nothing more than the product of a broken system. And an idiot

6 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

The American people did not elect him. A broken system that gives more power to empty land and 8 states than actual Americans did.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Your absolutely right. But we are still responsible. We dont have to sit here and take it, but were all too afraid to actually start 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A revolution. People might say that's dramatic, but honestly most revolutions dont start until it's too fucking late.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Revolutions, historically, don't really work well on average. The only cure is for the populace to get smart, and get motivated. Democracy-

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're not correct. Trump did not receive more popular votes than HRC. Here's what happened: the Electoral College appointed Trump.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The vote is state by state. I suggest reading the Federalist papers to understand the value of the Electoral College.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which. They. Can. Legally. Do.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

but the president isnt elected via popular vote the electoral college is to get a more broad voice so high population areas dont

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

garentee the election look at what district voted for who the vast majority of the country voted trump district wise

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your statement is true in more ways than you may know. A less-broken system wouldn't have left the middle of the country with no... 1/2

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

2/2 ...one listening to their issues for decades on end.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

In my life, the White House has been occupied by a: Republican: 24 years. Democrat: 16 years.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And a Republican hasn't been placed there by a majority vote for 32 years

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can understand and certainly forgive one-time Trump voters. He's a con-man, and people get fooled. The real test will be the next vote.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Respectfully, and I mean that genuinely, I disagree. If someone is not seriously researching before they vote, they should abstain from it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably half the people voting, and I dont believe that is an exaggeration at all, never vote outside their party or even consider it.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Americans are so obsessed with saying "voting is your patriotic duty". Its not patriotic to participate in a system that is destroying

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

didnt Israel steal a bunch of US secrets? or is that not true

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

And the US has stolen plenty of secrets from Israel. It goes both ways, the difference is only one side complains when the other does it

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

what were those secrets again? remind yourself.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How Israel spied on Saudi's in the 80's and 90's (Multiple spies and gave the info to the Saudi's), Israeli military tech in the 90's, etc

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

also in the 80's the US spied on Israel high command during Lebanon and handed that info to the Lebanese, resulted in IDF casualties, etc

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And in the 50's the US was much worse on how they spied on Israel. Israel didnt start spying on the US till the 80's

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, they were given to them but they did sell them to China

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They never sold anything to China, an Israeli scientist who was convicted of espionage did.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oof still not good

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but big difference between one bribed scientist and the actual govt like the person accused

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0