Net Neutrality:

Nov 22, 2017 4:22 PM

harrymunster42

Views

128209

Likes

2090

Dislikes

117

Oh FUCK yes, I'll still have Yahoo.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What they left out: The porn package

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This shouldn't be called Net Neutrality. This is the internet WITHOUT Net Neutrality. Stop posting content that might confuse people.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So why should I pay to promote my web addy now less people will see it or ...... Just wondering

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is still cheaper than what I currently pay ::

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the last time i checked ive seen little kids burn through 10gbs like it was candy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is fucking scary

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Soo, basically like EA microtransactions?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

would this only be in amreica?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Facebook and Twitter for free? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

for 3 months in this hypothetical

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"You're full speed quota wasn't enough? " they forgot to add the big cheesy grin at the end of that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The internet version of micro-transactions.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank God, MySpace will be free.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Bebo! No worries then..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Does anyone know if google fiber is supporting net neutrality?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is it possible to start a second internet free of all this bullshit that could happen?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's scary when you think about that Fox News could be free at the same time NY Times costs $10. The ISP's gonna have so much power.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

Its wrong though. They would not group all the same stuff together, eg Twitch and YT would be on different packages forcing you to buy both

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the joke is, all of that added together is still cheaper than the fuckin BS we pay up here in Canada. Good internet starts at $65/month

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Only difference is my phone plan has more data than what this shows. Looks like 2.5 Gb with the expansion. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I got a data cap on my internet up here to but i cant hope to reach it with 2 comps and a console running. Can go through 2.5 easy though

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check out CIK in Canada, they have fair price for internet and tv

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not available in BC to my knowledge

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All those combined is still cheaper than my current ISP.... just saying

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If you notice the last one, it says recharge on data quota on top of access costs.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All those combined gets you 1.5GB of traffic to all sites not listed before throttling you to 256kbps, what you have is probably much better

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm getting conflicting answers here. 2 pics ago said Google and Netflix we're fighting to keep need nuetrality

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't see the conflict?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its only conflicting if you're stupid...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's not a conflicting message. In this case example, neither Google or Netflix receive a dime from your extra expense. In fact they would

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have to pay extra premium rates as well to be treated "better" by ISPs carrying their data to your PC.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both Google and Netflix are pro-NN, but if we lose NN they will have to play the ISP's game and take part in these deals

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do website hosts, which got their website throttled by a ISP, get money from people paying for acces to your website?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No They would likely have to pay the ISP as well to be featured in one of these deals So the ISP would be charging both the service and user

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A website can block users from browsing by blocking the servers of the ISPs... lots of complaining customers then. Can't charge for it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do guns not solve this problem? Murica

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

notice how widely hated people never get assassinated? Only popular guys like Lincoln, Jackson (attempted) and Kennedy... strange isn't it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guns *could* solve this problem, but then there are those pesky laws/ethics/morals about killing people that make it rather... complicated.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It hasn't stopped people before

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I said complicated, not impossible.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, ISPs will charge consumers big bucks for high speed access, and also charge content suppliers for access to high speed pipes? Both ends?

8 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 2

Also likely they will have data caps. Different tiers =different costs. I can tell u 4 person house with lots of netflix, amazon video, 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Other streaming video & gaming we can and have pushed the 1 Terabyte/month envelope which My ISP claimed no normal household would ever 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Come close to using

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct.... Because money

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

So the ISPs become creatures with two dicks, simultaneously fucking both content suppliers and content consumers. Nice.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Time to turn ISPs into public utilties. This move was dumb as fuck by them

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bravo.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And how do you think content suppliers will pass on those charges?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Precisely, the end user gets hit twice.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You misspelled "fucked".

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I say we all band together and lay our own internet infrastructure. Wishful thinking, I know.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

With blackjack and hookers...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Would take a record-breaking KickStarter, lots of lawyers and lots of political bribery. ( Plus blackjack and hookers. )

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bring it up at a city council meeting! There are a few communities in the US creating their own fibre or broadband networks.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Comcast already did this to Netflix.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Good. Netflix was taking up over half of their bandwidth but still being charged the same a small business would. NN hurts small business

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 30

Are you stupid? Bandwidth isn't remotely as limited as it once was, and that's entirely based on consumers doing what they want.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You do realise your argument is "too many people like Netflix, let's handicap Netflix to force people to buy services they don't enjoy"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wow. You have no idea what you're talking about. Just stop.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you understand how bandwidth allocation works?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What is this based on?

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

From my understanding this was suppose to be more of a "what if" than an actual option.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

See my comments responding to previous poster

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The future.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indian ISPs without net neutrality, cell phone plans that charge more for certain websites because they're high bandwidth(North America)

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

What Indian ISP ? That's bullshit. India has net neutrality, we fought off Facebook who tried to get rid of net neutrality in India.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i thunk he meant indonesian....

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

this is an Indian ISPs website. This is exactly what people are concerned about.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

This is not Indian. We have net neutrality, we fought off Facebook for being anti net neutrality in India. (Source: am Indian)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is unreadable. If this is the earlier post: it was Indonesia mobile data options and did not include the general plan.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

right-click, open in new tab, then click to enlarge. Also, your point is moot. There should not be anything beyond a single plan.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Good to know. There are already many different plans as customers differ, but folks interpreted it as cutting off access to other sites

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It can cut off access to other sites. Paying for different speeds is stupid as well, but totally different from what the ISPs want to do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

None of this is hypothetical btw, ISPs have already attempted to do these kinds of things which is what prompted the existing rules.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is saying +X rp for 100MB of YouTube. +X rp for 50MB of Facebook, etc. It's horrible.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This scenario could cost large internet companies a shit ton of money. Why are they not fighting this like crazy.

8 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 3

Think this is not going to happen? Think again. I'm in the country, have satellite. Limit and then throttle back. No netflix for me

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because the ones large enough to matter like the idea of having their competitors shut out.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean if you do some research you'll see that just about any big company is. Amazon, Google, Netflix, etc, etc

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is it being said it would help companies? Wouldn’t this harm companies cause people wouldn’t want to pay it?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There wont be a choice. You pay these new schemes or you go without internet.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They are, to an extent, the battle for the net day back in the summer was massively supported by online companies

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

im confused, arent internet providers/companies that DO WANT THIS, so they can do schemes like the example of this post?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably because they figure they can cut a deal with the telecom companies for some of the profit

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Amazon just pays the protection money knowing that startups can't afford to. Limits competition.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because the revinue they would make from people would be chump change compared to the cash they would make from shaking down other corps.

8 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 3

The poster meant companies like Amazon or stream not ISPs

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Who are they? ISPs? Or internet companies?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's the same thing

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

I mean ISP such as Comcast, Verizon, att vs internet companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

you realize google IS an ISP now yes? and odds are Amazon and FB would jump onto that wagon too.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Because they won't do this, they know doing this will drive people to find other options and if cable loses internet they're screwed

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What other options? Only option here is Comcast...I have no other option

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At current, but that's changing fast and Comcast knows that, they cant afford to make it happen faster

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

West michigan....Grandville MI...Honestly...Comcast has no competition...it's been this way since high speed Internet...it's can get 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*I can get AT&T DSL at like 1/3 the throughput with massive packet loss at peak times. Been this way 10-15 years

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the problem with this in the usa is cable companies don't have competition.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I know, but if they piss everyone off by abusing this then that will change, and they can't afford to do that

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that won't change either, because they agreed with each other to not compete so you are forced to use their service. The only way to change

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that is if one new ISP decide to spend money to wire areas. But since they'll need federal and local authorities to grants authorizations

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In France their was a similar situation a while back, 3 ISP were competing on the whole country, but agreed to keep their mobile plan in

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a certain price range. Then an exclusively internet ISP (Free) decided to venture into mobile too and crushed the prices. This sparked an

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(I used ISP while I should have used telecom provider)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So ThePirateBay is still free then?

8 years ago | Likes 632 Dislikes 3

Non peering, didn't you read, serf!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

I still use Demonoid.....and a VPN.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the original server is in a Swedish National Museum of Science and Technology in Stockholm...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically you wouldn't have to pay for it, no. Since it'd be blocked/severely throttled like any other site that refuses to pay the ISPs.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

this made me lol!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not just sites, protocols too, you won't be able to use torrents anymore

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s a Swedish company based out of yo momma! The grounder went to jail (cuz of the us) and the site is still up. Long live the piratebay!

8 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 5

8 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

(Remember kids, turn off seeding after your download is complete.)

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 5

I seed the amount I download

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Be sure to be on a vpn if seeding

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your a monster. Seed to 1.5 or die

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Unless you have a vpn seeding is retarded and a good way to end up brought up for criminal charges. Just leech if you cant seed safely

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're, goddamnit

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I feel what you're saying but you seed when you download too. Cover your tracks, it's healthier for all.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"A massive 2000 mb" that's what I fear the most, capped internet data usage

8 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 2

You only worry about a cap if you have a chance of reaching it in a month - ~70KB/s guy

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Before I left Alaska, all but one ISP had switched to data caps.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As an Australian, come visit our hell-hole and see it firsthand. Ever been 'shaped' to dial-up speeds? It's amazing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And ads will be engineered by those that sell the increased data cap so that they drain more data so it runs out faster making you buy more

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

you lost me at "mb"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Download 1 Steam game and you'll blow through that "massive 2000 mb" in no time.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yea cause 2 gigs is enough for 1 game anymore

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Right, the last game I downloaded was over 50gb.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah you can forget downloading or updating steam games then, I just hate having to update a game that's a few years old

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's already a thing. A lot of people in the US have home internet data caps of like 600gb

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 2

it's 1TB with most major isps in the u.s Comcast and Cox have 1TB a month. and $10 for every 50GB over the 1TB.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

30 GB, was 15 GB. Dishnet is cancer

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I don't think that's a thing in UK, but some ISPs do have an acceptable usage policy and might throttle you or block illegal sites.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By illegal I mean strictly made illegal by the courts, like Pirate Bay... except for the thousands of proxies available.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try 50

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've got a 300gb cap in Canada and that's actually reasonably high- my parents have a 100gb cap with Rogers, out biggest telecom

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In belgium, the average data cap is probably around 100GB, "unlimited" is 750GB (unless you get business internet,which is fast as fook) .1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

at like at least 200mbit/s, but it really isn't that much more expensive than most other data plans, which are also still very fast.. 2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Compared to other countries, you have at least 3MB/s internet speed over here, i think

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Much, much less if the only option in the area is satellite.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yep. $80 per month for "unlimited" internet with a 40gb 5/5mbps cap, then it's dial up for the rest of the month.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh those poor people get shafted so, so hard

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Coming from a very small town aurrounded by corntields, finally making it to university made me appreciate how great unlimited data is.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Surrounded* cornfields* unfortunately no amount of data can prevent me from typing like an idiot

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here in Brihtun we either have 40GB (which is basically prehistoric) or unlimited. How the mcshit would you burn through 600GB per month?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm from the UK and never heard of a 40gb limit. We have 300mbps speeds... it would be gone in days

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm married. Me and my wife are both gamers. Games are approaching 100gb downloads. 2 x that for each game, not to mention

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

any streaming, video or audio, in addition to the fact that I'm a developer. Uploading/downoading new build of software constantly

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Streaming + gaming + working from home...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I hit over 1tb a month

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Count yourself lucky, I'm not even rural and I don't get home internet whatsoever. Only have phone data, cost $250 a month

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's horrendous. I pay £38 for limited phone data and £60 for 200mbs speed broadband

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*unlimited

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I live in Scotland!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0