.

Apr 4, 2022 3:15 PM

7oidberg

Views

125975

Likes

1604

Dislikes

33

Wow! Mine-blowing!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we are talking about the same army that dug trenches in Chernobyl.....

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They can probably be upgraded to mine-proof when there's none around

4 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 0

I would assume that the shot was staged so they could get some stock footage. Showing them sweeping from behind is less engaging.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The US government are champions of FAKE NEWS

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This takes a moment to hit, but when it does...it's a goodie.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I find it interesting how these arm bands have been adopted by both sides to try and prevent friendly fire incidents

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are they just waving sticks around or is that a metal detector from WWII, like their guns??

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

in fact its not that they are mine resistant, they are simple expendable like anyone over there... /s

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So this is probably the wrong audience to mention selfie sticks to. Still, definitely staged but still. Thinking caps.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could actually believe that they are making him walk through a real minefield that they laid down before. Cuz f em, that's why.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't want to say it's not propaganda, but maybe a drone is filming?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, if you listen very carefully there isn’t a drone videoing this either.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Probably filmed this on a farm just outside Moscow. No need to shoot propaganda on location.

4 years ago | Likes 757 Dislikes 0

In the backrow of the backrow, the kadyrow

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Red armband means separatist. So probably not, still obviously fake thought.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

even if they did just sweep an area first then reenact it. It's propaganda it's meant to be bullshit.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even if real, very easily done - sweep once for real, then again for the cameras. Is how lots of in the field shots are done.

4 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

It's how the famous photo on top of Iow Jima was done. All countries do this in all their wars.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Exactly

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The trick is, the detectors don't work, but they don't tell the Camera man. They let him find the mines.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're rats

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's easy when you know where you planted the mines

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the guys have any intelligence, they're thinking "This is so FUCKING STUPID!" In Cyrillic, of course. ;)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

took me a minute! :P

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was gonna say that it could be a drone camera, but I know they'd rather sacrifice a cameraperson instead of a drone, if a mine blew up*.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*assuming this is in a minefield. It's probably not lmao.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that or it's shot by drone

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yall mfers never heard of a done, have yall?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My thought was that there is no danger. The Ukrainians aren't using landmines, so the Russians can just film where they didn't plant any.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well put, and I do always love those who cite their sources. I confused mines for the anti-personnel type, which is an important distinction

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My friend doesn't get what he's seeing.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

There's a cameraman walking in front of the dudes sweeping for mines.

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

backwards at that haha

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

That's it? Huh, well...alrighty then.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If there really are mines in that field it would be extremely dangerous for the cameraman.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And there's definitely not a queue of people sweeping mines with the cameraman in the middle?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 15

Why do you even imagine Russians would sweep for mines when they're the only ones spreading mines in the first place?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

This would mean it is as war when we know this is military operation only.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There would still be no reason for a cameraman to be *in front of soldiers sweeping for mines*.

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

If there were 20 in front of him and 3 behind I think he's be alright

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

If there were 20 in front of him, there would be no need for the 3 behind. Why would 23 men be sweeping the exact same area?

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Lol! Took me a few loops to get it. (Hint: who took the photo of the first camera?)

4 years ago | Likes 226 Dislikes 7

The guy who made the second camera of course

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ahh my friend did not understand for… so long

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I'd suggest a mirror.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How did they test if the first telephone worked? Who did they call? ;)

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ghostbusters?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bell actually phoned his partner in the other room to tell him he'd spilled battery acid on himself. Testing and playing a prank

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Ahoy-hoy

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A history teacher showed us one of Hitler's propaganda films. I asked where the cameras were; he got that enthusiastic teacher grin, and

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

told us that the Nazis had to run parts of the parade 7 times to get all those angles without capturing cameras on film. Even making it

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

at all is effective as propaganda, because realizing that everybody in the crowd stayed there for all those shots shows their power.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And then you have four guys in a field pretending to look for mines. I'm glad the Russians have been so inept; wish they hadn't done evil.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Dudes just got one of those go pros on a stick

4 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 2

So why is his hand not pacing the camera's moments? It's not a digitally deleted stick. This guy isn't even using the minesweeper correctly.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they hit a mine, it would exponentially increase the "go."

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Not much the "pro" tho

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm well versed in camera tech and it's not a GoPro or insta360. The differences in wobbles between the camera and soldier mean it's a

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Camera man walking ahead of them. There is no seam or stabilisation wobbles that you with see from a 360° camera

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"But...but...it was a just a joke, dude!" Right.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was.... it was obvious to me it wasn't a gopro. Also that would infer I'm supporting the Russians claim; which nah.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sounds like we have to have a conversation about "common" sense, and how to use the "/s" tag.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0