Karma

Sep 2, 2016 6:48 PM

SalvadorTheUpvoter

Views

205509

Likes

9814

Dislikes

280

Send interesting news articles, selfies, or dank memes. Send nudes bonus if curvy ;)

Jail the bitch

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

People like her should get prison time equal to what the falsely accused had to serve

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

What did he get though? Justice? hardly..

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I'd like to know how this meeting was set up.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Girl should serve the same amount of time as this guy, plus he should be given compensayion as well

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

With horror stories I have heard of the American justice system. please tell me he was successfully remove from the sex offenders list?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, all charges dropped. He has a corporate NFL job and he received monetary compensation and his record cleared.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This ruins someones life just as much as rape, and it also makes it so much harder for the thousands of unreported victims to come forward

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How could there have been any evidence of rape other than a he-said, she-said situation! This should just never happen. Pisses me off.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

well prepare to get a lot more of these situations when there is legislation passed about enthusiastic consent

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wasn't this like two or three years ago?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Yes and reposted numerous times

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But the guy's life is ruined. Karma will ve when the girl is imprisoned for equal amount of years, the guy is paid for his stay and

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 5

The officials who wrongly tried him are sued and face charges. Additionally, the school needs to be paid back and the guy should

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Be also additionally paid by the school and the Girl as well.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I think in a case like this the woman deserves a jail sentence

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

She deserves a boot in the ass is what she deserves.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

As if it's not creepy enough asking for nudes, people are now specifying their preferences! The hell happened to this site! #cringe

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

what a cunt

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

And then you have brock fucking turner.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I refuse to let the internet forget about that complete twatbucket.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That cunt should be in jail.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Doesn't a recording of someone without their consent become invalid in court?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Depends on the state. A lot of states allow recording by a participant, meaning that the recording would not be valid if a third (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

party took the recording without actively participating in the discussion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Possible (not confirmed) happy ending: I just read that he was offered a contract with the Falcons after his conviction was overturned.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I don't get why she doesn't go to jail for this.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

"It'll prevent women from reporting rape." is the usual disgusting excuse for this shit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

People like her are what makes society doubt women when they come forward. I hope she gets double the jail sentence and has to register.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Tells you what credibility a young black male has when it comes to any allegations. Guilty first. Sad

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why did he get 5 years and that swimmer dude 3 months??

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

Color.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

ivy league school...well off parents lol its annoying cause its such a cliche response but so true and the judge was a fucktard

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Different cases. Different judges. Different everything.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Different races.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Swimmer dude was even caught in the act by two witnesses who had no connection to the victim.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

the judge thought that he had likely not intended to harm her, despite the jury's guilty conviction. after reviewing the case, I agree.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 21

He was trying to force her to have sex with him. That's called rape.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's literally not what happened at all and you're a scumbag for saying it did.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Very, very different in many aspects.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

How so?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for asking. It was likely consensual between Brock and the woman, and she passed out while they were going at it/immediately after

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Interesting. Do your have a source for that?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This has been his story from the beginning except for the "verbal" part of consent. I think he lied about the "verbal" portion.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You might also notice the media has cut out portions of his statement but never posted his actual recalling of the events.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For him justice wasn't served, it won't bring back the years of his life lost, the opportunities he missed, or the happiness stolen away.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

All for her stupid and selfish problem she destroyed a man's life, yet we know society won't deem her the monster she is.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

False accusations are a terrible thing. If you do that, you are knowingly and willingly trying to destroy someone's life. Fuck those people.

9 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 2

Not to mention it discredits legitimate accusations. It's a big part of the reason people don't report it.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

His accuser needs to go to prison for this. There need to be consequences for her and the prosecutors for trying this case.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

What I've suggested before is that if you F.A. someone, you should serve time in jail equal to the amount of time the accused spent in jail.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

...If not more time.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

I'd say more, because you repay that time they spent, then you continue for longer as punishment for the false accusation

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Then that should be proportional to the tike the innocent spent in jail, such as a twice as long or 1.5x sentences.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why the prosecutors? If they believed that she was telling the truth, why shouldn't they have prosecuted him?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Clearly there was absolutely NO actual, legitimate evidence on which to base a case, yet they irresponsibly prosecuted him, anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Testimony is evidence. If you were robbed and no one was around, it would be just your word (testimony) vs. the robber's.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you would have no problem prosecuting and sending to prison x 10yrs someone solely on the word of somebody who claimed he robbed them?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i dont understand how this does not result in her going to prison in turn. why are girls not actually being prosecuted for this shit???????

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

"because if you punish a woman for reporting rape less will report real rapes for fear they wont have enough proof." im sure they all say.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

agreed thats a s stupid counter. obviously youd only be punished with proof of deceit, not lack of proof of rape

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That's not karma. Karma is she does 5 years in prison then works off the $ she owes him and the school district. That's karma and justice.

9 years ago | Likes 1316 Dislikes 15

In a men's prison

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Actually, karma is when she dies she reincarnate as someone living in the third world.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I were the girls mom, I'd feel like shit. The girls fear is what caused it all.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Exactly. She utterly destroyed an aspiring, talented athlete's life. This is not enough karma.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 3

5 years? She ruined this man's life. I say she gets the same sentence an actual rapist would get.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

blah blah blah this would discourage real victims blah blah blah

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

In society, a mere accusation of rape or molestation, especially that of a child, is enough to get you ostracized.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not the legal matters that are much the issue. They're being changed. It's the societal matters.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Karma is justice without the satisfaction.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Works of that money by becoming a prostitute, which would be Irony at its finest

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Pointing out the fact that she's never going to work off 1.5 million dollars by working for a school

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, Karma suggests that she hurt someone, thus increasing the suffering that we interconnected beings all face, including herself.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

It makes no proscriptions on what punishments should occur for various crimes.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thank you.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Where have you been all my life? I have been trying to explain to people that they do not understand what karma really is forever. Fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Usually what happens is they say "karma", but they really mean "poetic justice".

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then lives the rest of her life with the label of a modern day leper that denies her a decent job, place to live, and requires her 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 351 Dislikes 11

to register on a list that labels her a monster for the rest of her life but doesn't actually keep the community any safer

9 years ago | Likes 279 Dislikes 15

It's called making an example of a person. She is supposed to be a lesson to others so that they don't pull the same shit.

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 3

There's tons of conflicting evidence on whether that's true or not. The reviews of other studies I've found showed that its not.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

So...No worse than what she planned for him, essentially?

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

I think that's the point he was trying to make, although the "Lying Bitch List" sounds useful.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Eh.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Should've game him the 1.5 mil

9 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 4

*gave. Fuckin a i can't type on this little device.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yah he should definitely sue her...

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Well the 1.5 million was taken from the school district. He should definitely receive separate compensation though

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 3, 2016 6:03 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He was in high school. How was he supposed to know better?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

by not sticking dicks in things that can talk? :v

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

.. David Cameron..? Is that you?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is no one going to comment on how much this site loves any chance they have to hate on women? Not saying it isn't awful

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The community is made up of bitter neckbeards.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Even the same posts over and over because this stuff is rare but they eat it up.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Men are way more likely to get sexually assaulted by another man than have a false rape accusation.There are far more pressing men's issues

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People are hating on the accuser that had this guy jailed and irreversibly changed his life. Not "hate on women" in general, wtf?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

After the Brock Turner ruling, there were numerous posts talking about how he wasn't that bad compared to female rapists

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He gets 5 years yet the other guy get 6 months and gets out at 3 months for actually commiting sexual assault

9 years ago | Likes 636 Dislikes 11

Exactly wtf I said!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was,ofcourse, before the "athletic promise sentence reduction" laws were put in place.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

And is among us on this very day. Hurrah!

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure I walked past him at Disney world today. Or maybe some doppelganger, but still freaky that that's a possibility.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No no no mate it's not the same: that other guy is WHITE, are you fucking blind?

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 11

Well this guy is black and was sentenced in the US so...

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

So he is fucked

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Theres Imgurians on this site who actually argued with me that he's innocent. Crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Almost like there's some kind of visible difference between the two guys that could account for the discrepancy

9 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 25

Yep, sadly probably the amount of money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Almost like every single court and judge rule exactly the same way like robots.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

You seem to imply that the other kind of guy does not get false accusations of rape.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

They just don't typically get as harsh of a sentence.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How on earth was I implying that by directly comparing two specific cases?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Silly, the judges aren't racist. They just like money, which the white guy had a lot of.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Probably something to do with the fact that he's black unfortunately.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

the other guy was white

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 7, 2016 4:14 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He received those things because he was wrongfully convicted. The point is Turner hasn't even done 6 months for something he *actually* did.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

One conviction was rape, the other was sexual assault. And my point was that Turner didn't get off easy while this guy lost out.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Having a fancy lawyer makes things easier, Cosby and OJ were better off than most and I don't see too many complaints

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's not white vs black. It's Rich VS Poor. Tired of having to argue this.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Im not gonna say anything about color

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

We talking about the Rapist Brock Turner?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Rape

9 years ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 26

I'd honestly like to know the legal difference between rape and sexual assult.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Rape is probably fucking someone, SA is putting your fingers in someone's pussy, groping and kissing someone, etc.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember reading that in that state rape requires penile penetration, which he didn't do (or so I'm told). Thus it wasn't considered rape.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Sexual assault is a general term to describe a sex crime that isn't rape. He was convicted of PC 220 , 289(d) and 289(e). Links in reply.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rape as defined by California is Man + Peen ---> woman without consent. FBI defines it as Object --> vag/bum hole without consent

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That might not read as sciencey as some would like, but I appreciate the straight forwardness of that explanation.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It doesn't require that the man be the attacker. It's just penetration by a penis of a vagina without consent of at least one party.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Phrasing. With the lack of consent of at least one party?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And yet people still suggest maim and torture as suitable punishment because if you've convicted you absolutely must be guilty.

9 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 12

Look at all the Brock Turner posts for example. These people are terrible.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Agree. People have no concept of how many "convictions" are shams

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I mean the vast majority aren't but stories like this arw devastating. His soul must have really been tried through this...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Because people are emotional. It always bothers me when you hear high profile cases and hear people cry for physical action

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Why I can't justify the death penalty.

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 5

Absolutely the only reason I can justify, is when it involves a child and an adult, in a sexual matter and there's obviously undeniableproof

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"Beyond shadow of a doubt" is a thing, you know.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Unfortunately the cases where we use the death penalty are not always without doubt. 1/25 cases were innocent.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think it should be used in absolutely no brainer cases where there's many witnesses and all the evidence points to them.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

The problem with having -any- system in place for the death penalty is the potential for it to be abused and corrupted.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Individuals can be corrupted, factual evidence cannot. The current legal system is reckless and fragile because it is mostly reversible.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I didn't actually say anything about evidence. But evidence can and sometimes is tampered with, now that you mention it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Even though I have no problem with killing a piece of shit person, just ONE innocent man being killed is what makes it not worth it.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

So instead feed, clothe, and house monsters for 60+ years?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 10, 2016 1:51 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's sooo much better to imprison the innocent for life in our prisons where they can be raped, beat, and even killed

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

You overestimate the desirability of life imprisonment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it's worse for some but unfortunately our prisons are so poorly set up and managed that it's an evil playground for some

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the innocent man dying instead was your brother, fathet or even you would you still feel the same way about the system?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's a pretty high standard of evidence for a death penalty today. But in your hypothetical, I would be very upset with the individual

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

judge, jury, and police responsible for gathering evidence but my principles wouldn't change & they wouldn't feel different about it either

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Absolutely the only reason I can justify, is when it involves a child and an adult, in a sexual matter and there's obviously undeniableproof

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Somebody putting their hands on a kid just gets to me in a really really bad way I can't handle. They're just fucking kids

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Indeed they are.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Phrasing

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If by that you mean intercourse with prepubescent in general, I agree. But that mustn't extend to adults who have consensual sex with teens.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you have a system for -anyone- to be put to death, whether or not some may deserve it, which is debatable in and of itself, is the

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

potential for such a system to be misused and abused. What someone defines as "obvious, undeniable proof" even a confession, can be coerced

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I share a similar disdain, but was that last sentence on purpose, or just an accident?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wow, what a silly accident

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why the fuck can't we use a polygraph on everyone in court?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Polygraphs. The acupuncture of the legal field.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're garbage?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because they aren't accurate. Simply being nervous or sweating will make it think you're lying, while a calm liar appears truthful.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Listening to people lie isn't accurate either. I'm not saying it should solely be responsible. I just think it would help.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

...and which truths aren't. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People put too much faith in lie detectors though, and will assume they are 100% accurate. All you'd change is which lies are believed-1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well part of the problem is that society wants to just take the girls word for it, it seems. Rape is probably the only crime that (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

(2/2) doesn't require proof. Sure you can prove there was sex but that doesn't mean it was rape

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

Bold move on Brock day.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

You might want to look up rapes reported compared to convictions. There are states with rape kits that never get tested.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So you're saying it's the guys fault the state doesn't test their kits, and we should just take the girls word for it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wtf. No. Read. I'm countering your claim everyone just believes the girl without proof. Even with proof, many never get justice.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Missing the biggest part, he was the number 1 recruit in nation and had a deal inked w/ USC. Was a shoe-in for a NFL career, 2.5 isn't shit.

9 years ago | Likes 3346 Dislikes 18

Now, 2.6 on the other hand...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He should be able to sue and take everything she owns. Should also be sue the gov.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I want to say he went to my highschool as well, my health teacher told us the story about him aswell and was saying he was just a normal 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Highschool student in Long Beach. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Neither is money everything

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Legal system... What a sad joke.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It says the school district sued, not him. He got $142,000 in a separate case. That's shit.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

he didn't get any money. the school district got to sue.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

he should have been a swimmer.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

He should have been white

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You clearly misread what it said. The school district sued the girl...not him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He didnt get any money

9 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 1

He didn't get any compensation for being wrongfully imprisoned?

9 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

To my understanding some states give zero compensation for wrongful imprisonment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He wasn't wrongfully imprisoned, he was found guilty in a court of law, courts are allowed to be wrong so long as they're not unfair.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

He means he didnt get any of the 2.6million mentioned

9 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

He got a "sincere" public apology from the state and nothing else.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

School district sued her, not him. Additionally, you think her family has 2.6m to throw away? They're calling bankrupt, neither parties win

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember hearing some nfl team gave him a tryout after all the justice had been served. I think it was a little too late though.

9 years ago | Likes 1045 Dislikes 6

Think I remember him making the first cut at Falcons camp one year, never played a game however, but at least he was a pro for a while

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

He has a corporate job for the NFL now. I'm not saying that anywhere near gives him back what he lost, but he seems to have found peace.

9 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 0

Even a year out not training will put you behind the curve, 5 years and there was like a 1% chance he'd still be top of his game. :(

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

I saw an interview with him last year, he seems to have forgiven and moved on. I don't think I'd be that forgiving, good for him.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Honestly what choice does he have? I bet it's 100% for his own sake.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can imagine after 5 years in jail you want to put it behind you, easier with a stable job in the NFL though, not sitting home being bitter

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I know he's a lot older, but there aren't any rules against him getting a college scholarship right? 24 yo freshman?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The quarterback at my school was Brandon Weeden a few years back. He played his first game for us at 25

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

High school?????

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. Oklahoma State University. And he didn't get much playing time until he was 27. He's an OSU great.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I remember correctly he could have done that if he wouldnt have went to the Seahawks camp

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya. Can't do any amount of time pro and accept college scholarship or play college sports.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Another retarded rule that will disappear when the ncaa is removed from college football

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, Seahawks. He was too old/slow though :(

9 years ago | Likes 544 Dislikes 4

SEAHAWKS!!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Go hawks!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Probably something to do with being locked in a cage for way too long. Poor kid.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah I imagine those missed practices took a toll

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Pete Carroll was who recruited him to USC

9 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 1

Well good on Pete Carroll

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Falcons also gave him a shot couple of years back. I think he does motivational speeches now.

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

He works full time for the NFL's Department of Operations.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 16, 2016 1:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Occasionally the NFL does something right. That's great.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

At 23?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

5 years of not being able to be in tip-top shape and playing the game.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

I honestly don't know why but this really broke by heart

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Dude had his life shit on. That is probably why.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Its cause a chick totally ruined a man's life because she was a little bitch and then got next to no punishment.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Relatively. Dude had 5 years of his life stolen from him, and a stained reputation. Girl is only now in debt $1.1M. Ridiculous.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe if he was a really good swimmer

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know how to say this without it becoming a shitshow, but that's the same logic that got Brock Turner out early.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 74

2/2 guilty, they should also give him something. If Banks was guilty, he would have served his time, and got nothing, as Turner SHOULD have.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know these aren't similar situations, it's just an eerily similar line of logic. It feels like we're being hypocritical here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

How, you fucking dense retard? One is guilty and one isn't

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That was almost two sentences! Good try! To quote: "I know these aren't similar situations"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

No its not? Once they found out this man wasn't guilty, they should have given him something. If they found out today Brock Turner wasnt 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Inb4 shitshow.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Except he did it, so it's not sad. This guy didn't.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

I don't disagree, it's just in both they obvs thought the guy was guilty at sentencing. A sports career can't have shit to do with the law.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 17

What's your point. There wasn't a case for either of them because of their athletic abilities. The fact remains his was stolen from him.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just the fact, that his career got ruined because of a lie. No evidence. Brock did rape the girl and got what? 6 months?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's sad this guy lost out because he didn't do anything wrong, brock lost out because he's a rapist. Nobody here is saying their athletic..

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

...ability should have came into the court, and shouldn't have made a difference

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The point was supposed to be about damages afterwards but they didn't realize the schools got the money

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Damages afterward are never going to repay a career, it's in every way inadequate. That's the risk that's taken when someone goes to jail--

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

--they lose a lot, and there's some faint chance they didn't deserve it. It was a risk Turner's judge wasn't willing to take.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Brock was given only 6 months and everybody knows he did raped. Brian was jailed with a lie. Both athletes, but only one is a piece of shit.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

*3 months. He got out today for "good behavior."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah, where does the difference in sentencing come in? Isn't this shit standardized?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope! That's America for you. If you have money and you're white, go rape whoever you want.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Don't know where Brian was prosecuted, but California had a loophole where a judge can consider background to give minor sentences.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think I read they passed a law based on that asshole which gives a standard minimized sentence.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poor white rich kid had no backgrounds of any kind, he was eligible, otherwise he would have gotten minimum 2years.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1