Let them eat cake

Mar 16, 2023 1:28 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

60632

Likes

1537

Dislikes

20

Fuck them. This should be grounds to toss them in jail and the effectively stolen money taken from them.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

can confirm business model is Reagfanomics corporate socialism- private profit, public risk like railroads

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

AFAIK We didn't bail the management out, the government stepped in and is controlling everything now because it collapsing is HORRIBLE

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They should be jailed. Until people who do this are locked up it will continue to happen

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Need to look at all bank records back to 2018.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let them spend years in jail.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Normal day in US financial news

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm all for giving them a break. I already got some bones in mind.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

SVB is not being bailed out, so while your post is true, it's not really relevant.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Its ok, bu outlawing drag shows,taking away peoples rights, and calling for thier extermiations, the gop will solve all problems even this

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t think people understand, these execs are not the ones the bank imploding hurts. They have their millions in pay.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They do it because they can. Our regulators and politicians allowed it, simple as that. Until this is changed, it will remain the same.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Mar 22, 2023 12:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

the right is never right

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The reason is lax regulation. The right claim it was due to the woke agenda. Whatever the fuck that means.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

woke is bad, this is bad, ergo this is woke. It's simple math

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Source?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good luck with that.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm here

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"but it was all approved of ahead of time!" Which makes it worse as they failed at their job of realizing their company was shit while

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Paying bonuses.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yuup. And now Biden is breaking his promise that there will be no drilling on federal lands. He just approved the willow project. He lied?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#AllPresidentsAreLiars

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Claw. Back. The. Fucking. Bonuses. That's the bare minimum that's acceptable here.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

+ Imprison the people who withdrew. It's not apples to apples, but equates to insider trading & withdrawing stocks.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Imprison people who took their money out of a bank they thought was failing?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, what kinda bad faith bs is this? I'm talking about the people who work there who knew. The customers wouldn't know.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They withdrew the money thinking they wouldn't be covered. That's like selling stocks when you know a stock is gonna tank. Insider trading.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 357 Dislikes 2

Warren used to attack the right things. But power has corrupted her: Now she's railing against Powell for turning off the easy money spigot

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 35

bro warren's a fucking chud lol

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 30

And here we have a right-wing troll.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Magats: "Yip! and dem dere libruls is triggered so I'S happy! Hyuk! Hyuk! Hyuk! Hyuk! Hyuk! Hyuk! "

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

They'll keep repeating the pattern of fucking over everyone for their benefit until true consequences are brought on them.

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

If people has been brought to the guillotine in 2008 and set a precedent, I'd be willing to bet SVB would have not failed.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I think the answer should be swift and terrible violence

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And I also like your username

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you kind person. Baby don't hurt me don't hurt me

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Any banks that advocated for these reforms to be removed, and then failed because of it, should not get bailouts.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They're not being bailed out, so no problem.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We'll see.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was more referring to SVB,but that link talks about other banks bailing out FR, organized by the Gov. Very different from a public bailout

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am sure those bonuses will trickle down any day now.... /s

3 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 1

The SEC has three years to claw them back. In my mind the true test of whether this is corruption or incompetence.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm sure coke dealers and call girls are getting the trickle...

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Seems like purposefully paying yourself a bonus when you know the thing is going to collapse should be criminal.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

No, see, they're rich so it's fine

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh it would be criminal if the rich hadn't written the financial laws

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Well, if it was them dumping their stock, that's insider trading and would be illegal.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Executive bonuses are approved by the board (so are employees' in a broad sense) and scheduled months in advance. No one predicts a bank run

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When you know you're going to announce shortfalls, it's easy to predict a bank run. Timeframe is the question here, how early did they know?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can predict Peter Theil's antics? The bank wasn't insolvent. They lost some money and Peter started a run on it *and profited.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The bonuses were pre-scheduled way beforehand and went to employees too, not just top people.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Source?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Oct 24, 2025 8:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Oct 24, 2025 8:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

In fairness they aren’t being bailed out. Depositors are being made whole, but investors have to eat the loss. & I’ve heard calls for…

3 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 2

A lot of people struggle with this distinction. The SVB shareholders and lenders are taking probably a complete loss here and that's how it

3 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

should be. And the govt is looking into clawing back the exec bonuses, which is also how it should be. Protecting the *despositors* though,

3 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

that's the right thing to do. It's what a responsible, progressive government should do.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

… investigations of those last minute bonuses.

3 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 0

Oh yes and we'll hear about them maybe for three or four more days and then it'll go silent and those fucks will get away with it.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They have investigated themselves and have found no wrongdoing.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Well, the bonuses were always scheduled for March 10th but ethically they probably should've withheld their payments and kept all cash they

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Could on hand for their issues.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Isn't that kind of why the SEC exists in the first place?

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

*exactly

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah there's a three year claw back that they can do.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

SEC is toothless and legislative impasse means it's not getting any better any time soon.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah & I hope they nail them to the fucking wall. But people claiming that FDIC/DIF are bailing out banks/bank execs are misunderstanding.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

They won’t. Just look at AMC

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Depositors in pyramid scheme should be bailed out?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 48

Username checks out

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is this a general, totally unrelated question?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are you trying to say "I have no clue how banking works" without saying "I have no clue how banking works"?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Like most banks, they acted poorly, but business and people need to keep their money somewhere. This isn't a pyramid scheme.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

they really did not act poorly, they made some injudicious long term investments so they couldnt get liquid when they needed

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's fair, but they also gave bonuses, sold stock days before the collapse of the bank, in that way they acted poorly.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

this is the time of year companies give out bonuses, and from what I understand the stock sales were pre-planned months ago

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s a federally regulated and insured bank. Not a pyramid scheme. Banks are fundamental to every current model of economic system. Keeping

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

banking systems stable is a very, very important thing to do. Depositors trusted the banking system, they shouldn’t be penalized.

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Yes, why pay out more than regulated...they knew the rules.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 15

Because humans are dumb panicky creatures.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A lot of the reasoning behind it is to prevent a run on small banks.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0