Koalas “functionally extinct” after Australian bushfires

Nov 24, 2019 9:30 PM

8ightpointed

Views

92284

Likes

2250

Dislikes

179

https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevornace/2019/11/23/koalas-functionally-extinct-after-australia-bushfires-destroy-80-of-their-habitat/

As Australia experiences record-breaking drought and bushfires, koala populations have dwindled along with their habitat, leaving them “functionally extinct.”

The chairman of the Australian Koala Foundation, Deborah Tabart, estimates that over 1,000 koalas have been killed from the fires and that 80 percent of their habitat has been destroyed.

Recent bushfires, along with prolonged drought and deforestation has led to koalas becoming “functionally extinct” according to experts.

Functional extinction is when a population becomes so limited that they no longer play a significant role in their ecosystem and the population becomes no longer viable. While some individuals could produce, the limited number of koalas makes the long-term viability of the species unlikely and highly susceptible to disease.

Deforestation and bushfires destroy the main nutrient source of koalas, the eucalyptus tree. An adult koala will eat up to 2 pounds of eucalyptus leaves per day as its main staple of nutrients. While eucalyptus plants will grow back after a fire, it will take months, leaving no suitable food source for koalas and starvation a likely scenario for many.

Many are urging the Australian government to enact the Koala Protection Act, written in 2016 but never passed into law and molded after the Bald Eagle Protection Act in the U.S. The Koala Protection Act would work to protect habitats and trees vital to koalas as well as protect koalas from hunting.

Recent viral videos of Australians rescuing koalas has led to increased donation to support hospitalization and help for burned koalas.

The Port Macquarie Koala Hospital setup a Go Fund Me page seeking donations to help the hospital treat injured koalas. To date, they have raised $1.33 million, well over their $25,000 goal. This comes from over 30,000 donors.

Bull. Shit.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This has already been debunked. It was the last time NSW had massive wild fires, and the time before that too

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not the drop bears!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WHO the FUCK is hunting koalas?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bit of nuance. They are in big trouble in the eastern states. That said, they are in plague numbers on Kangaroo island

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#KOALAKILLER

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Journalism 101 exaggerate everything.

6 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Seeing a koala running across the burning ground will fucking shatter your heart. Here it is. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KHGgKRDHHvU

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't get too discouraged. California Condors were functionally extinct and they've managed to bounce back.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But they dumb as fuck. Let 'em go. It's not like overhunting or invasive species killed them.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Down voted for spreading fake news.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#koalakiller

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Source please

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Unfortunately they have to eat the leaves off the tree. They don’t process that the leaf is food otherwise

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Please help the koalas

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Koalas should've died off by now. The only thing they eat is poisonous to them and they carry chlamydia

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

Studies have been done showing that public-directed conservation is harmful because only cute, cuddly animals are saved, not important ones.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Koalas are important as eucalyptus trees are poisonous they keep the trees' growth in check.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'll say this every time someone posts anything about these fires, Gladys Berejiklian caused them and is not being held accountable

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm down in Adelaide, where we only have medium sized fires. There's a fuck ton of Koalas here. It's a big country.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

RIP these little chlamydia machines.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an Australian living in a Koala habitat area, what a load of sh1t

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

it's hot takes from kids who live in Sydney or Melbs or Brissie. They've never set foot in the bush in their lives.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

So we don't need to worry then, just sit back and enjoy all the cool images of the fires on the news?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

When we where in NSW a few years ago the koala rescue centres said they where near extinction as pet dogs kill them on the ground

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

And the government had taken bribes to allow superstores to build all over the place clearing huge amounts of their habitat

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Sounds like something our government would do. Especially Scummo with his "environmental protections are too hard on coal mines".

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The Berejiklian Fires are really shitty.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

She is a fucking mole

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#berejiklianbushfires #koalakiller

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So is the federal and state government We need to sack the lot of them.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did... koalas play any actual useful part in their ecosystem..? Other than food for something bigger?

6 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 9

Well they like lighting fires...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

When any thing dies off, it effects the ecosystem

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They keep eucalyptus growth down, which is significant because it grows and spreads fast and isn't eaten by much

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are a valuable food source for emus. Emu legs have evolved to be effective at tree trunk gripping and shaking.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yes. when they numbered millions, consuming the excess energy in the biomass of the vegetation allowed more solar energy hit the ground 1/3

6 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 2

changing the entire game as far as fuana and flora are concerned. Fires were not as bad as there was less material to burn through 2/3

6 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

several dozen species of insects also specialized in utilizing their unique fecal materials. everything from mold to animals were affected.

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

I like you

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

There you go, here I was thinking they were just our version of a panda, something that sits around scratching it's arse but it's cute 1/

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

the panda thing is just our ignorance of setting up the correct conditions & environment for them..have the same trouble with hermit crabs.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we go out of our way to make sure they survive, except unlike pandas they're sexual predators and will fuck anything remotely like them

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, not the koalas...

6 years ago | Likes 342 Dislikes 10

Seriously, the most delicate animal ever. I heard that one crying and lost my sh*t.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

When I was a kid my teacher told me koalas were being made infertile to control the population. I guess it's controlled now...

6 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Can't seem to find a source, so maybe she was bullshitting us. This was back in the early 2000's.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I thought it was their strain of chlamydia that resulted in infertility?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m legitimately so sad. I hope we’re next and the earth miraculously recovers and nothing else dies b/c of humans.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

To be fair we're in no way destroying the Earth. Just it's ability to host us. It'll keep doing it's thing long after we're gone

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont follow this logic. Are you implying we should be next cause we killed the Koalas or all the donations?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

we as humans deserve to be extinct.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

We should be next because we ruin and kill everything.... We are a plague the earth would only be better without us

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

Calm down

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

this is why im glad we wont be alive to see you rot in hell lol and you’re kids ??

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Every time I hear of another species that's close to or actually has gone extinct, I get even more pissed off and sad.

6 years ago | Likes 464 Dislikes 16

You, me and every other person on this earth are at fault!

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

This was on the front page earlier and ton of comments said it was in 1 small area

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pretty soon the only animals we'll have around will be in farms.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Life has made it through 6 mass extinctions, we're laughably full of so much ego we think we can destroy it all and make it uninhabitable.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We'll kill ourselves and take a lot with us, but it'll be back.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well don’t google “vaquita” then. You’ll be super sad. Estimated to be around 10 left.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This one matters and it's both sides' fault. Cons are slow to act. And liberals listen to idiotic greenies who fight proactive forest manage

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

-ment which would have prevented such a disaster.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

It's mostly the fault of the current nsw government cutting funds and laying off park rangers including the few people adequately trained -

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

In Forest management and bushfire prevention https://youtu.be/17cxH9p-xps

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Mostly ie both. And exactly how I said. The tree huggers cant comprehend the nature of forest fires, and the conservative types are fine

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

...what happens if you step back and realize the earth has eliminated 99.98% of all species that have ever existed all on it's own?

6 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 16

It's the rate not the total that determines the balance point. Eating 1% less calories than you need means you will eventually starve.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's also over billions of years, not the last millennia.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

on average it's 140,000 species per year since about the 2nd millennia.a sizable % is not attributed to man. most have gone undocumented tho

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

This is also like saying you've spent 99.76% of all the money you've ever made, who cares about spending $10k, oops there goes your savings!

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Assumes $100k avg pay per year from 18 to 60 with 10k liquid savings: 10/4200k=0.9976 I used 60 because it seems you are old and don't care.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

now multiply that by 108 billion

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not the money i've made....the collected earnings of the entire human race against the $10k

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd think "Damn, better save the 0.02% that's left"

6 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 5

That is simultaneously badass and touching.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If it's natural selection, it was meant to be. Sad but true. If it's caused by humans on the other hand?

6 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 5

That presumes that humans are not a part of the natural process.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

We kind of aren’t. We’ve developed to the point we have far too much influence on our environment.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

I get where you're coming from, and I kind of agree. But we're also born of this planet, and (so-far) the peak of it's evolutionary /

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not for the world though. People assume because of what we're doing that's it's "destroying" the world. It isn't. We're destroying ourselves

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

How could we NOT be natural? We just fell on the favorable side of evolution. We are genetically 80% similar to cows and 60ish% to bugs.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Always check your sources. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2203655-no-koalas-are-not-functionally-extinct-but-they-are-in-trouble/

6 years ago | Likes 246 Dislikes 11

@Mechman13 posted a good link below in the comments as well

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your source is from May - you know - BEFORE the recent fires. His source is dated yesterday. Always check your dates.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

@OP

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Thank you for not foolishly believing the first this you see on the internet. Always check and verify all sources

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

But I wanna be mad!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks. But your article is May 2019 while OP is November 2019. Is yours out of date?

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

Open the article. A note at the top explains the functionally extinct koalas claim popped back up in Nov 2019 after the fires.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good point, May was before the fires began.. situation could have changed by now

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Also follow the money trail. This post says right in it that it's for money. It gives the name of the gofundme to send money to. It's money.

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

And it’s disgustingly successful at it, judging from the amount garnered already...

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well the donations came in after a woman pulled a burned koala off a burned/burning tree using her own shirt and mamadenternational news /2

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post is just that, a post, don't think this person is any kind of official and if they are they're doing a huge disservice to the goal.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always double check them sources (forgot /2) /3

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And in case you want to check your sources' sources, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-scientist/

6 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 3

.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nice!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your article is dated for May of this year. OPs was from yesterday.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I think you mean the previous posters article

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You're right, I did. Thought it was the same person.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Seems pertinent.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

For you retards downvoting me:

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

lol, Sarcasm?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No? Not sure why the downvotes, I was agreeing with the guy

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love that this website exists! Such a good system. Wonder how trustworthy it is. +1

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

We need a website that checks the sources of the site that checks the sources of other sites...

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Who watches the watchmen?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

watch..women?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0