BREAKING: Dozens of Capitol Hill employees have come forward to reveal they have experienced sexual harassment while working in Congress, saying there is a “creep list” circulating among staffers of male lawmakers known for inappropriate sexual behavior.

Nov 14, 2017 5:25 PM

Deadpolio

Views

235507

Likes

6806

Dislikes

141

Please world let's actually pay attention to this and not just focus on celebrities.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty much every workplace has this, sadly. Women know who the creeps are and try to warn other women.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Well it is good that they're coming forward, I'm not happy. It's sad in the first place that they even have to experience sexual harassment.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Unless people start naming names, I don’t think this will go anywhere other than back under the rug.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

They'll have to do more than that

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This comes up every ten years or so. Be nice if they did something about it this time.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Won't change anything. People will just count the dems vs reps that get named and see if "their side" is "better" so they can go "Seeee!?"

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If someone is on this list and it’s confirmed they harassed someone, how are they punished? What if they’re an elected official?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The same way anyone else who committed the same acts under United States law, if not harsher, because they're in positions of influence

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You are confusing how it should be with reality.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The UK had a similar list circulated the other day. Complete shitshow, fallout ongoing.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm only sorry it is just limited to Congress. v

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What's really fucked up is that Congress has excluded themselves from most sexual assault/harassment laws, and most laws they pass generally

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 2

Also they have their own healthcare. Like, wth man. I swear we fought a war over stuff like this already.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Good luck trying against the militarized police.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For those who don't know, most news articles on the subject mention the law. The law from '95 was supposed to stop that, generally. Yeah.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Separation of Powers. The White House controls all federal agencies who enforce federal laws. Congress can't be subject to the whims (2)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...of the executive branch. They in theory make & enforce their own set of parallel rules. PoliSci 101

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tell me more. in the form of proof

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause IDK what he's directly referencing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would just cover talking though, not any physical assault.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, "Felony" would most definitely include sexual assault.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't condone any of their actions but are we really shocked?

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

Yeah as shocked as I was to hear Tom Sizemore's name

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, and that's the problem.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Not that shocked.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No, we most certainly are not.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Not shocked, but hella glad that this stuff is finally being dragged into the open.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 458 Dislikes 3

Not a bad idea.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The 1812 approach

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

The Designated Survivor approach

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody here would try to stop you this time. The government still controls the military though.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a Canadian, have my very first upvote and comment!

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The irony is that in Canada, they’d die warm.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You honour me! v

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the dysfunctional family of Imgur

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

PLEASE can we be careful to distinguish between "accusation" and "actual guilt"? (Downvote target illuminated ... fire way, witch-hunters!)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

fuck no, I already fired up my torch

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh my god, yes, let's lynch people based on public outcry and not due process! Yay~!

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

... who'se talking about lynching here? Hell, we don't even have names yet.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Because putting together a list of 'creeps' won't do anything to their careers or safety. Yes. Their lives will go unchanged, certainly.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

The article as about such a list appearing among staffers. Nobody is talking about publicly releasing such.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Then it'll either get leaked, or it'll effect the workplace negatively and cause social pariahship. It's a bad idea either way.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/360245-female-congressional-staffers-keep-creep-list-of-lawmakers-known-for

8 years ago | Likes 121 Dislikes 4

Holy ADVERTISEMENTS Batman. The link gave my phone cancer. Is news just not profitable enough? It’s not supposed to be...

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Root phone -> Xposed Framework -> AdAway -> Ads go away. :)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 1:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Aww that got deleted quickly. I just missed it. What terrible thing did they say?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That URL indicates that there are a TON of female congressional staffers keeping this list

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

360,245 of them>

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

More sources? The hill is not very trustworthy right

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Haha never mind, the original source is CNN

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Although.... I don't know if that's much better

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The comments on that article

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I scrolled for days

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why don't you post this sources source? It is in the article... This is essentially an extension of a CNN article.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

can people just stop being cunts please? thanks.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this isnt breaking news, women have been saying this for a decade

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something sorta like this is happening in Arizona with our legislature. It'll be nice to clean house.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm just worried about how when this blows over how your average male will be in an even less favourable position than before. Goodbye 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Child custody. Hello allimony. Hello bullshit misogyny. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Political correctness and even basic human decency won't resonate with the republican voter base. That was proven with trump

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 45

I bet there will be accusations against both sides, and each will say any claims against their own are fake news.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Its already happening on Twitter, bruh. Been monitoring the situation as both sides play whataboutism.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I assume half of the creeps are Democrats.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

This is nothing new, the most recent scandal was ... Mark Foley, right? The Congressional Page scandal.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Senator Menendez is on trial right now for money laundering, but part of those allegations included solicitation of underage prostitutes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the Dennis Hastert news broke a few years ago, too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of these creeps can go fuck off in a volcano forever and ever.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel ya. R or D, I don't care: get'em out! The US House spent $15mil in the past 10 years on sexual harassment suits. What in the hell!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seeing creepy losers get busted is something I savor.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

creepy old men rn

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

https://imgur.com/SeQDaEr

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I love your username.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I worked in Congress. Pretty ignorant to assume only old men do that type of stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Paul Ryan seems like the type, to be honest.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fair enough.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wonder if this orgy of sex abuse revelation will end up in the history books, like a dark turn on how the 60's were about "free love."

8 years ago | Likes 1894 Dislikes 19

stealing is still free

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah...much like the Panama Papers had an impact on financial regulation...I doubt it

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think it will be mostly overshadowed by the Trump/Russia and corruption stuff, but it will be in there somewhere.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That stuffs still going on?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

There is the trickle (flood) of new info about the campaign's contacts with Russia and Trump siding with Putin over intelligence agencies.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And now '17 will be known as "unwanted love"

8 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 4

May be a song about this. “Tainted love”

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Honestly I'm just dreading it might end up being remembered more along the lines of the "dancing plague" of 1518

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I don't see how that might parallels this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now entering the "slow down, love" movement

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That narrative was horrifyingly false then. The Woodstock horror stories alone. Or hitchhikers.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Started watching James bond movies from Dr. No and it really isn't surprising that the boys who grew up in that culture harass women

8 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 3

No meansh yesh

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I thought about Dr. No too. It is surprisingly rapey. As many other old Bond flicks.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Art imitates life imitates art

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"And so it was that the mustache twirling villains chose to twirl their penises instead!" - a history book maybe

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well the child sex abuse in Westminster in U.K. has been covered up quite well. It won't tarnish the elite

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And this, among other reasons, is why there was a Woman Fucking March! Wait, I should rephrase. A Women's March!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hell, a lot of the accusations are so old they date all the way back to the 1960's.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

So what. An accusation is an accusation. Look at the priest sex abuse, most happened in the 50s.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

The thing about the priest abuse scandal is it was a cover-up. There was a paper trail of Church figures acknowledging it as true and lying.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So if there was no "cover up" by a few bishops it would be ok? That makes no sense, they go after the priests and not the bishops

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's a matter of proving it. It's very easy to prove a very well documented conspiracy and that sealed the cases.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

OJ got acquitted. Is it "okay" that he got away with murdering 2 people? It's not a matter of "okay", it's a matter of jurisprudence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They didn't go after the bishops because there's statute of limitations for almost all crimes except murder, child abuse and perjury.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Once society realizes that this problem is equally as prevalent outside of Hollywood, in our every daylives, then maybe it will go in a book

8 years ago | Likes 319 Dislikes 10

I don't think there are as many covered up power-motivated sexual abuses in Nowheresville than in power-concentrated DC/LA.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That said, they definitely do exist. But we only get Weinstein level shit when we have mad abundance of power and fame.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think in hollywood it's a bit more prevalent since they've got a stronger ability to hide and manipulate, but It's probably still common

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

Your thoughts are incorrect

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 15

No, it's not really AS prevalent. DC and LA have youth from all over the world flocking to them, desperate for a chance at power/fame.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Yup. You get a bunch of old men and even much more young women desperate for a chance at what they can offer them, the outcome is obvious.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It is entirely AS prevalent

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm pretty sure it isn't.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Congrats on being part of the problem.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe this is even an inevitable result of the free love movement?

8 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 86

The end of free love was the biggest mistake.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

I think AIDS imparted a cooling effect

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'd suspect that it's something the opposite. That movement had an impact in allowing women to report that sort of thing.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

This doesn't have much at all to do with love. In the free love era, women were willing participants. This is about power over others.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, the issue was even worse before that. If anything it helped people to talk more openly about their sexual desires or encounters

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 4

Nah, free love was about female empowerment and choice in their sexual partners.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Considering the workplace sexual harassment was common in the 40s and 50s, long before the Free Love movement? naaah.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

I'm talking out my ass, but I'd wager it helped lead to these revelations more than anything.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I kinda wanna say that abuse of power for personal pleasure and gain has always been a thing in government. Not sure where I'm getting that.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Check European history. Lots of examples there.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. The super religious are worse. They blame the victim for seducing the upstanding member of the congratulation. Their own family 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

will urge them to silence least they be seen as tainted goods. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Camille Paglia writes about this, actually.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no. it really isn't. sexual harassment and abuse has been going on since day 1.

8 years ago | Likes 209 Dislikes 25

And the 60s was that on supercocaine...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Could have made it worse.

8 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 34

You mean the politicians from the era of "i'm high, she's high, she'll probly giggle and play along if i come on strong" isn't translating?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Bitch it might be.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Yes. +1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

doubtful. the sexual revolution of the 60s is why we have feminism and people being ok with non-heteronormative behavior now.

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 23

Only the latter part of your statement is universally good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if anything it made all this the reason for people to speak up and start holding sexual predators accountable.

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 11

That's like saying women being able to vote led to the uneducated white women majority vote for trump. Completely groundless accusation.

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

well, technically...

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, well ;) You know what I mean.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile in Australia: Our politicians are concerned with their eligibility because of duel citizenship

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Don't forget gay marriage and refugees that they don't want but they won't let NZ help with lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I only have so many characters. But this one impact the pollies more than the people

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Duel citizenship? Like they're citizens of a country where duels are legal?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mostly their parents were born overseas and they are consider duel citizens by default, a no no for our politicians

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but it would be more fun if the duelled

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait, you mean its not just Hollywood where this stuff happens?

8 years ago | Likes 483 Dislikes 9

The military just went through this a few years ago. They're first with everything!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Yeah turns out it’s: v

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well as the saying goes...Politics is just Hollywood for ugly people.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Man all this shit is WAY overdue . We have had hints regarding this behavior stemming back decades..

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Even McDonald's managers make their fry cooks shake dat azz

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rich dirty old men who think they're above the law will be rich dirty old men who think they're above the law.

8 years ago | Likes 232 Dislikes 4

They don't even have to be rich. Any modicum of power is enough. Not old, either. And I'm sure there are women who do it too, just less /1

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

It's easier to assign a specific set of traits to a villain. In this case, rich, old, fat, white men.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, that's who in this country has the power - the odds would dictate that's who is most likely to abuse it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

common because they tend to have less power. /2

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

It's almost like it happens anywhere there is a power differential between aggressor and victim...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or Westminster?!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Sexminster*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The papers recently missed out on the headline "From Holywood To Holyrood" because the MSPs also started an enquiry. I was disappointed.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Half of Theresa May's cabinet have been forced to resign over sexual harassment charges since the Weinstein story broke. It's everywhere.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm glad to see it being taken seriously for once. Strangely, I think we can think Trump for some of this.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So much outrage over his comments has called attention to the issue in a way such that it cant be dismissed anymore.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought we'd aired this out with the Anita Hill hearings. If you're looking for love, do it outside the workplace.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Suprise! Humans with power abuse power to get what they want. Welcome to cynicism. The food here sucks, but the booze is aight.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Aight

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not pessimism if you're constantly proven right.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But every nics thing is a surprise. We're just better optimists.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep, some people don't get this and want to characterize this as a trait of a particular political ideology.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Twitter being Twitter, is "picking sides" on this issue basically accussing the other while defending their own. Fucking disgusting.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Twitter is a platform. They don't choose what gets posted.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are we really shocked by this revelation? This is about the opposite of a revelation, more like confirmation of something we've 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of course not. I never understand these "not surprised" comments. Nobody is acting surprised.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

always known. What's worse is they keep the list out of public view and those people are still in the hill. I hope they publish the list 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except America has proven its indifference by knowingly voting a sexual predator into the highest office.

8 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 17

I think most men in power unfortunately do these things. But trump is on an entirely different level, worse than the current celebs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it was "convenient" that so many came forward during the presidency and they didn't buy double digits. Fucking wankers

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Uh you guys are forgetting about JFK -- serious womanizer, drugged many women. It's well documented.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes, I remember the election of 1992...

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

History repeats itself.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We've done it three times in my life. In 1992, 1996, and 2016.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

We wasn't knowingly at that point.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Only if you were under a rock. Or listening just to the MSM. Juanita Broaddrick was talking to anyone who would listen.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Before he'd become president?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yep.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yup

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... THIS might be what saves net neutrality. Absolutely nothing we did.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

How would it save NN?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Buncha congress members have to resign? Get replaced earlier than they wouldve with special elections? Maybe with folks not quite as bought?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

oh sweet summer child. This shit happens all they time,everyone knows about it and it never changes.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, and everyone knew about Harvey Weinstein for decades too. The times they are a changin.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

sure they are. Didn't we just elect a pres who admitted to sexually assaulting women?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

plus they claim NN is to stop Sexual crimes from taking place over the internet and i doubt people would be willing to vote any sort of 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

regulations into affect to stop sexual crimes if it's being pushed by people accused of commuting some themselves 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Drain the swamp!

8 years ago | Likes 615 Dislikes 34

You mean: "Let's have everyone in Congress accuse their political rivals of rape!"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Don't say that. It means 'put business CEOs in charge of all the executive branch divisions'.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lock them up!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Swamp the drain!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seems like that's what the male lawmakers we're trying to do, if ya feel me. Drain. Their. Swamps. Talking about splooging. Yaknowwaddimean?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

If it's like a swamp at all then someone needs to go to the doctor.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasnt trump on that list and the White House is saying they are all lying?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't think the list was released.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Could have it done right away with Austin Petersen but apparently no one wanted him to take over the government to leave everyone alone.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*shreking intensifies*

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Drain the boys

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I think that's what got these guys into trouble in the first place.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

fuckwad

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is mesmerizing.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When Trump said "I'm gonna make America great Again" what he really meant, is he'd be so terrible, we'd start holding everyone to account

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Stop voting for republicans and democrats.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, vote for socialists!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I did

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hooray!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 295 Dislikes 11

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"NEEEEERRRRDDSS!"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Take my +1, dammit!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I actually laughed for like a solid 30 seconds. Bravo

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 14, 2017 10:57 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Tumblr would be the gif up top. This is a pretty standard response.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What did he say?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Golden

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

I don't think captain "grab them by the pussy" is the one to lead the creep draining.

8 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 26

He was referring to how women would throw themselves at him bc of money and fame, he was saying how if he did that the women wouldn’t care

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 61

That's not what he said. He said he did it & they didn't stop them. Why they didn't stop them we don't know but that's not appropriate.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Don’t really like the guy, but listen to the whole conversation. Not a fan of things being taken out of context

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 41

Cool story, bruh.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

I wasn't taking it out of context. That's the exact context for why he's a creep.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

Knowing a high net worth is something many women find very appealing makes someone a creep?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

The context is that first he said he kisses them, he doesn't even wait. Then he said he grabs them by the pussy, they "let" you. So he /1

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

first admitted to kissing them without consent, then he claims they let him grab them by the pussy. Did he stop in between the /2

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Classic trump haters down voting anything with the truth. Your the reason we have him and will continue down this path if you don’t listen

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To views or In this case truths that you don’t like to exist #

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you've never made a lustful comment about the gender you're attracted to among friends???

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 129

Found the Trumpy!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, what real man hasn't said that he can grab a woman by the pussy any time he wants and that they'll love it.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Wasnt really a statement of lust. More bragging.

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 5

Exactly. Compare "I'd like to wring his neck" v. "when people piss me off I strangle them to death."

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I don't care about the lustful comments, I care about the inappropriate actions he's bragging about. Regardless of their legality.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1) If I'm on set, on camera, I'm not just "among friends". 2) I have, but not since, like, middle school.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

1) Wasn't he supposedly in a locker room when that particular statement was made? 2) I'm sorry...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 20

Since when are you mic'd up and in a locker room? Only ever in the post game interviews and I think that doesn't happen anymore.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, he was on a tour bus before a shoot. Have you not seen this? https://youtu.be/wFEqVARTYkY No apology needed, I'm fine being respectful.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

As a male, yes I have made lustful comments. But I’ve never bragged about or committed sexual assault. You enabling piece of shit.

8 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 12

v

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I like the way you think. Have a cookie

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

This is going to be a non partisan list. Both sides are going to have people on it.

8 years ago | Likes 773 Dislikes 14

if it isn't then there's bullshittery afoot

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just wait until we hear that one side had 51% of the complaints and the other side had 49%. You know someone will turn that into a story.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Good

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If that list is revealed, I think you'll be surprised at just how weighted it is to one particular side.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would have put money on Wiener, aka Carlos Danger.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

He's been out for awhile now

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

No, he's in now. In jail.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Curious what the R/D Over/Under will be.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love how Trump's just matter-of-factly listed in there with all the other wankers

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

finally both parties meeting in the middle. I wish it was for something a little better but it's a start.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Initial reaction: "Um, duh?" Delayed reaction: "oh... yeah a lot of people are going to assume it's mostly one or the other."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It'll be skewed heavily in favor of GOP members though. Dems have a lot more women in congress and they're less likely to be aggressors.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Of course, did anyone expect that misconduct would only exist as a result of political affiliation.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Since when does sexual assault have sides? Wrong is wrong. Period.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

True. The Dems will become unelectable, the repubs will become unbeatable. At least thats the evidence so far.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Maybe, but only because returdicans have shown that they don’t care if their candidate is a pedophile, as long as he is also a returdican.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

What evidence

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Liberals like Loiue CK, Kevin Spacey ect. lost millions, are pariahs. Trump got elected with what, 16 claims, and Moore is likely to win. 1/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I got no sympathy for any of them, but it certainly appears sexual assault/misconduct are deal breakers for only one side of the spectrum.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except the two liberals are celebrities and the two conservatives are politicians. Though I will agree that republicans seem to care less

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And once all is proven and all who are guilty are found guilty, may they fucking be thrown out of power.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Um, ok.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There's gonna be one democrat and then every current GOP. Calling it now.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Democrat af. PURGE, BABY, PURGE.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As long as we agree to "purge" people from all parties.. Let's start with Roy Moore shall we?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep, this shit is going to be a reckoning.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

will be about 60/40 split right leaning, slightly higher rate then party representation.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Keep in mind that the dems have three times as many congress-women; almost a third of the party.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

keep in mind, women are just as capable of sexual abuse as men.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Well, yes but it's usually more subtle. Mostly not the sort of thing you could go to prison for.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For sure, but it happens less often https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150701093858.htm (gotta read a second past the head line)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not seeing a problem here.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conservative here. I'm all for tar and feather treatment, whichever party they are in.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

I would actually laugh if Paul Ryan was on the list.I think he's a pos.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Some of these guys might enjoy that, even pay for it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Back in the old days, the burns caused by the hot tar + the wounds caused from removing it = usually fatal.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know, I was making a joke about kinky sex.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Including roy moore?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I was scrolling through a post of his on Facebook and the cringe was real. Lots of praying and amen-ing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Alabamian I voted for Mo Brooks not this creepy ass pedophile.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who are you go a vote for in December though?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have no fucking clue. I'm really mad about the whole deal as a whole. Roy is of course a pedophile and a religious extremist (opnion) -

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 2:26 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What about the trump supporter who was approached? Or the thirty others who corroborated her story? Or the relationships moore does not deny

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 1:39 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

*and legal documents

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Like, even if you take Roy Moore at his word, he is still a 30 year old dating 16 year olds.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

but somehow fox news will turn it into a liberal sex conspiracy with whataboutism.

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 25

List isn't even out and already you're making it partisan circle jerk. Your attitude is why people voted for Trump...also SCOTUS nominations

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

You're a bit late with that prediction, mate.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

WHAT ABOUT BILL CLINTON?! HE GOT BLER JERBS FREM MERNICA LERWENSKY!! AND I BLERM HILLARY! /s

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

I think you have autism

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sort of the whole point here Is to embrace a bipartisan perv purge. If your gonna make excuses for your side your doing it wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm perfectly fine with that. In fact, better than fine. Both sides are fled with terrible people, for the most part.

8 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 2

"Very fine people on both sides, both sides..."

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly, people who believe that their side is perfect are insane

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Drinking the fucking kool-aid, full-on bat shit insane.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good. I am a leftist and there is no way I am shielding or making excuses for scum. Same should go for conservatives.

8 years ago | Likes 409 Dislikes 5

But some will. Just look at Alabama.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It won't though.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kim Jong-Un here. I just want to nuke you all.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its been a while since I‘ve seen the word leftist without the addendum cuck. +1

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Judging by who our president is, i doubt they care. Unless its pedophillic. Towards boys.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Violate another humans rights, get skewered

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

congress in general on both sides needs a serious purge. I honestly want a clueless amateur hour. it would be less dangerous.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No right, no left, just the United States of Fuck those guys(figuratively)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You must hate Bill Clinton.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

I really do. And the sad part is, I voted for him in 1992.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I'm left leaning and I hate him. But his sex scandal was minor in comparison to losing jobs in trade deals with China.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You think he only had one sex scandal?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You think I give a shit who has sex with who when thousands of people lose their livelihood? That's High School bullshit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conservative here, yeah, burn them.

8 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 1

Sadly the republicans are seemingly coming out in support of a possible pedophile...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Aye aye boss

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Entirely curious, but does this apply to roy moore?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Of course not, fake news, just kidding, fuck that guy.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

YAY! Entirely curious (and I suspect youll know more than me) given the mountain of evidence, why are so many conservatives still behind him

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Moderate here.

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 1

Libertarian here.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Attack Helicopter here. Throw them on my blades.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

You'd like that, wouldn't you?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 3:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

“I moved on her like a bitch and when your famous, you don’t even have to ask” Definitely mostly liberals

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 3:36 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

My “one example” is president. Every accused predator is Hollywood has been dropped faster than a fox sitcom

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey, joseph married mary when she was 14, Roy Moore is clearly fine

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 15, 2017 3:36 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah. I work in DC and there is not a partisan divide. I have a list of congressmen who I would NAWT get in an elevator with alone.

8 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 2

www.nawt.org/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Publish anonymously?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's so satisfying that we're at a place where people feel confident about stepping forward with this stuff. Stay safe!

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Where do you work? I'm by L'enfant right now, cringing at the museum of the bible

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Chevy chase ish. Traveling to The Hill cuz of lobbying things every other week-ish.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also. UGH. MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why NAWT. What’s that mean

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

Absolutely NOT. Just emphasizing how they'd be pronouncing the word here

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It’s a HARD not.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Haha. I got downvoted for asking a question. Typical

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

I'm downvoting because you lack the ability to pick up on context clues and social cues, oh and crying over fake points.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

She doesn't want to get her pussy grabbed when the elevator door closes. What else could she possibly mean?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

He's asking why she spelled it "nawt" instead of "not".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If that's the case, its not very well stated, that's why he's getting so many down votes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0