It just looks like a shitty male model picture session.

Oct 10, 2025 8:11 PM

Skullwriter

Views

19080

Likes

281

Dislikes

15

I just have a question. what was the intent? it's not like they're removing guns from the movies

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now it just looks like they really enjoy masturbating.

5 months ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Who doesn't?

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Arthur C Clarke sort of predicted this. In The Ghost From the Grand Banks, Clarke has characters who made their first fortunes "photoshopping" cigars and cigarettes out of old movies because audiences found them objectionable in Clarke's fantasy future (2012) where everyone accepted and was horrified by how much cancer smoking caused.

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I could swear this was actually done to movies and TV shows at some point.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am fully expecting the next bond to be family friendly and full of AI generated imagery.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Bond movies were family friendly before Daniel Craig started getting his balls tortured on screen.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If, you know, you ignore them forcing themselves on women.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's so funny

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean the movies are already self-censored to maintain a pg-13 rating. Like, how there are scenes where bond shoots dozens of henchmen with zero blood.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They've already undone it

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eh... sort of. Apparently they've nixed the shitty photoshop images, but they're still going with stills from the movies that specifically WON'T show Bond holding a gun. Which is just... such a weird hill to die on, given the franchise in question.

5 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Right? I'm not a fan of guns in real life, but these are movies about a spy with the license to kill. He has a gun in his frickin' logo! What comes next, a Terminator without a gun? Star Wars without lightsabers?

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It seems Mr. Bond's license to kill has been revoked.

5 months ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 0

No more double-o; just seven.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

only the one for open carry

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Your license to question my witty jokes has been revoked as well.

5 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

These are hilarious bad. Do John Wick covers next.

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There's still a gun after the 007?

5 months ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

It’s actually a penis. Amazon loves showing those in everything. ;)

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

walkingdeadshhhhh.gif

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

it's a staple gun

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nobody accused them of being smart

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

james bond - license to kiss (my ass!)

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pierce Brosnan's Bond says, If looks could kill, well, i guess they're going to have to, since they aren't giving me a GUN!

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So much (lazy) effort which could've been easily avoided. Pretty sure every Bond movie has a promotional photo or at least a suitable movie still where he isn't brandishing a gun or doing any other morally ambiguos acts. And what's the whole point? These aren't kids' movies and especially in the USA I'm pretty sure even kids know what a gun is and what it's used for.

5 months ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Yup. With 5% of the world's population and more than 30% of the world's gun deaths, American kids know what a gun is.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Brought to you by 4Kids!

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

remember thumbs&ammo? https://thumbsandammo.blogspot.com

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yikes. I'm getting a Star Wars Special Edition vibe from this. Also finger guns from Littlekuriboh or however his name was.

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That guy was totally insane. Signed, a former LJ RPer.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

5 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I see at least four guns in total.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember in ET the extraterrestrial when they turned all the guns into walkie talkies?

5 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And Spielberg changed it back because he realised it looked stupid.

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Southpark did an episode on that one.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*shitty male role model

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hang on the company that worships guns and violence (not many movies without both) has done this? Fleming is probably spinning for two reasons now.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Next he's going to macgyver his way from the villains without using any weapons whatsoever

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, it's not really that big of a deal in and of itself, but it bodes poorly for other sorts of executive meddling down the line.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

BADLY - they did it BADLY

Like, I could do a better job than that and I'm a drooling imbecile with a ten year old computer :P

5 months ago | Likes 173 Dislikes 3

IDK, kind of hope that they charged a lot to do it and then did a crappy job

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They probably used AI to do it. Like Amazon would pay a human.

5 months ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

It's probably AI. Just think of how easy it will be to memory hole shit when a machine does it.

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Probably used AI.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the part that I just don't get. Like, if for whatever dumb reason they're really dead set on NOT showing Bond with a gun in their promos (which is a real weird hill to die on, considering the franchise), then hire an actual fucking artist to just do a series of cool new promo posters. They could have turned around and sold them as merch and MADE MONEY. Instead it's like they grabbed Johnny the unpaid intern and told him to crank these out over his lunch break. It's just lazy and stupid.

5 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I've seen better photoshopping - like - *here* :P literally xD

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How can you be 007 Licensed to Kill without a gun

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He's from the UK. We used knives like a civilised society...

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

STDs?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

🎶The man with the goldeneye🎶

5 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He has a powerful ******
He charges a million a ****
An ******** that's second to none
The man with the golden ***

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pierce just looks like he's giving a handjob to the invisible man.

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

And the other Bonds just standing there waiting for their turn. Even Daniel after that chair incident is good to go. A handjob from Pierce shall never go wasted. I heard that he even throw in some lip action for a cheeseburger.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I see 3 photoshopped bond movie posters and one photoshopped generic action movie poster, weird combination!

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Correct

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Just read an article about this with an interesting take. Since most social media platforms “punish” images containing firearms, this could be just an SEO play to keep the movies ranking high in searches. Not sure if that’s true or not. And I agree that it’s stupid (just feature a different still from the film?!?). But it might not be a commentary on the guns themselves but rather a stupid way to try to manipulate search algorithms.

5 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Search engines run by companies that own part of the film industry they're "punishing"?

(X) Doubt

SEO doesn't explain this nearly as well as people think. Google is a part owner of every aspect of the film industry, but most of all of the digital film industry with being the leading server service on earth. If two major film companies claimed losses on *DIGITAL SERVICES* due to firearms censorship, Google would change that yesterday. I don't buy it.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not Google. Social media platforms. There’s some crossover in SEO practices on social media from an advertiser’s perspective.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the guns are the reason the algorithm is suppressing them, then it's still about the guns. I'm definitely pro gun control, but the strategy most people have for gun control seems to revolve around magically un-inventing them. I cannot understand such a stance.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

On the surface yes. But the point of the article was that it’s actually about SEO, not philosophy. Amazon hasn’t “gone woke”. At the end of the day it’s just about the money.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that doesn't make it any better. They did a terrible job. One of the biggest companies in the world did a shitty job at editing some photos for one of the most well known movie franchises. They could have gotten someone on Fiverr to do a better job. It shows their lack of care and effort. I've not seen much in the way of social media punishing images specifically, but any video, trailer, teaser whatever would inevitably include a gun and then still be punished. so it's a very limited 'fix'

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. When in doubt, follow the money.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 months ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

"Last night I bondburger'd your sister"? What the hell does 'bondburger' mean?

5 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It's when you meant to just slap some meat on some buns, but end up forming a bond.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I still don't know what it's supposed to mean

5 months ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

no one knows, its super hieroglyphic and probably wrong (like guy accidentally picked the wrong pictures or whatever) and never explained themselves...its super annoying because you would want to solve it because it "cant be that difficult" but even brute forcing all possible permutations of every halfway reasonable meaning of those two pictures doesnt give anything that makes sense, infuriating...we desperately need the NSA to track down that post and force the guy to explained themselves...

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the internet's consensus has arrived at "silently (quarter-)pounded". But if that's the case it's still a mystery why the original poster thought anyone would ever get it

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Same. Shot burger? Gun sandwich? Pistol bun??

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Roger Moore Food?

5 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

With the sister ? That’s disgusting 😜

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The 6th bond, the 9th item on the menu. 69'd.

5 months ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

Nice.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you. That's a pretty long walk.

5 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

What kind of fat ass knows the menu numbers of fast food burgers on sight

5 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

That's a value meal if I've ever heard one.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the menu isn't like that anymore

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And he isn't bond anymore.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How much McDonalds do you have to eat to get this joke?

5 months ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

Hey now, you can also WORK at McDonalds for this to work.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They just read the thread last time, that was the conclusion but it still had flaws. It remains unsolved.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

yes.

5 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Username appropriate

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lmao

5 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

“Lotsa McDonalds Always Only”?

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Isn't he the fifth? Or do they count Connery twice?

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its a technicality cuz of the casino Royale thing

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was a parody of Casino Royale in 1967 with David Niven as Bond, who was Fleming's choice for the role. So technically, it works. But the usual counting is for EON Productions Bonds only, which makes him the fifth.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but that also has several James Bonds in it and there was a tv movie before 1967 Casino Royale.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You are right but I'm gonna stubbornly stick to my guns on this one and close the "case" in my mind lol

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0