Oh

Jan 17, 2018 1:16 PM

fabidaddy

Views

149347

Likes

2525

Dislikes

172

Simplest rule in politics, divide and conquer.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

We definitely need to see the phone screencap and the burger watermark. Those can't be cropped out.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Hitler did other stuff besides the Holocaust. Just saying. Also, I'd prefer we head the next giant loss of life off before it happens.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Aaaand two years later those same people are calling Trump Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds like something Hitler would say.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also Hitler killed, like, Hitler so checkmate.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes but without hitler there would have never been hitler. So....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It was not for having "inferior genes". Hitler believed that there was a Jew conspiracy to run the world. The first conspiracy theorist

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Not to mention the "stab in the back" theory: the belief Jews purposely sabotaged Germany in WW1 (totally false of course)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

to gain important political power and, hopefully, the last.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Too late for that now, but perhaps the guy who thought Obama was born in Kenya and covered it up will be the last.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And lest we recall that the Bolsheviks, whom Hitler was directly at war with, was likely the third most murderous regime in history.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 15

The US is number 1 right?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Yes the US govt has systematically murdered 100 million of it's own citizens... Idiot. The US is a goddamn paradise compared to many places

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge and Mao's China being the top two.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

Where's the ottoman empire place?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

High, and they're gunning for a rerun.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Khmer Rouge only in relative numbers, not in total numbers. There simply weren't that many cambodians to begin with.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I find it hard to believe that cambodia killed more people than the soviet union, even if it's just in non-war related matters.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For the doubters, if you kill 1/3 of your people, you're getting top spot. Yes, Mao did a whole to more in total, but China is huge.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rough estimate was 23 million from Lenin and Stalin, Mao around 70 million...I don't think Cambodia hit that high, however still not good.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Mao Zedong - "which through arbitrary executions, purges and forced labor caused an estimated 40 to 70 million deaths, 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

which would rank his tenure as the top incidence of excess mortality in human history." 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The steady "genocide" of Native American/Indigenous Peoples in the Americas is also up there though there are some gray areas.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

him as he was acting typically for the time period, at least in terms of ideology 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not just the death toll but the reasons behind it, Gustavus Adolphus is likely responsible for millions of dead but no one blames 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But..Hitler was Hitler before the murders... Wasn't he!?

8 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 5

Well, he was a Nazi, so he was like Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Heil yeah he was!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So Hipster Hitler?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Actually, if his grandfather hadnt stepped forward and claimed his father as his son, he would likely been named Adolf Schicklgruber.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Would we just have called him adolf then!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

?*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least his dad could say he was a Schicklegruber before he was Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah but what's the point of comparing politicians to 'Hitler before he -really- did anything wrong'?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Because that Hitler would go on to become the Hitler who had killed six million Jews.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wait - so we don't like painters now? Bush II does to painting ....

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably that whole, learning from history thing

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Because some of his pre-holocaust stuff was also really really wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Bingo.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It was still founded in an idea of racial superiority, though. A central part of his platform was "Jews are the problem"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hitler did lots of shitty shit before the murders.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I still feel like people are trying to refer to the holocaust and WWII whenever they compare a politician to Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The shitty stuff leading up to the holocaust was still based on racial superiority and anti-semitism. e.g. kristallnacht

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for sharing your feelings with us!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think when you say an entire country has AIDS, you lose your credibility just a little.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Who said he said that?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The logic behind hitler caller - hitler used to breathe air and they breathe air therefore I must call them hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Well when they start attacking free speech and dismantling tools of open communication, maybe the comparison isn't that far off.

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 23

Attacking free speech? Like aggressively protesting a Condi speech at Rutgers? Didn’t realize those liberal students were Hitler, too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That’s how they came to be in the first place

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

And when you fully endorse a sheriff's use of an illegal concentration camp

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Maybe check the definition of "concentration camp".

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Except for the millions of dead. Pick another dick tater or something that does it same thing.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 14

Hitler didn't kill millions on his way to power. He killed millions after he silenced anyone who could stop him.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

but he did advocate racial superiority and anti-semitism the entire time. Its not like one day he woke up and decided he hated Jews

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

At first he just wanted to expel all the Jews from Germany. Then decided on slave labor. Only started killing when the war turned

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That first part sounds familiar... He doesn't have the power to start the second point, but he continues to test his power.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Trump hasn't exactly been a champion of racial equality either...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And here you can see a further blurring of the lines between Trump and Hitler. Trump not being "a champion of racial equality" 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No but he hasn't promoted any policies like point 4 of the 25-point plan which the Nazis advocated in their rise to power

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

So I guess we should just wait until the first million are killed before we speak out, then?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Adolf, such a dick that he single handedly killed a moustache style.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just because people called Obama a communist Muslim Nazi atheist doesn't mean there aren't parallels betw. Trump's & Hitler's demagoguery.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 15

It's some sort of golden mean fallacy - people said outlandish things about Obama, so outlandish claims about Trump must be ridiculous too.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Hardly any, really. Look I don't like Trump, but he's more Warren G Harding than Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 16

Hitler was clever and a very good speaker who said inspiring things. Trump, not so good at speaking. think hitler was also smarter.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Both T & H smeared ethnic groups & blamed them for unemployment,crime & other social ills. Harding didn't say shit like "bring back torture"

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

I like your name

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, no one ever called Obama Hitler. That kind of childishness is best left to the left.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

I agree that childishness is best left to the left. But I recall fucking popup ads comparing obama to hitler and the Antichrist

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Didn't catch that on Fox News? Because they sure as hell did. Repeatedly.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I avoid MSNBC and Fox like the plague. Calling either of them "news" is fairly generous. I do have a soft spot for Kramer though.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Krauthammer isn't bad either.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Agreed. We gotta stop the back and forth, we're destroying ourselves.

8 years ago | Likes 178 Dislikes 19

Didn't the huns kill many more people anyway?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So did Stalin by a factor of between 3-10 depending on the historian.. and Mao by a factor of between 5-15 depending on the historian..

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well... there really isn’t much back and forth for the current president.. more just normal and bat shit crazy

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 21

I don't know whether to believe your username or not...

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Agreed. Human nature needs to change.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's only back and forth if you believe both sides are the same. It's been clear for decades one side wants a functioning government.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Destroying ourselves whether physically or politically to create an incrementally better world is pretty much human history.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about we stop comparing people to someone who committed one of the largest genocides in the history of the world? Stop going

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

To the top shelf for every comparison you make.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Biased and sensational media and social media isn't helping

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Conservatives have done a fine job ensuring the destruction of the working class. The back and forth is needed.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 26

v

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fucking Stop.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Stop destroying the working class with your retarded Ayn Rand darwinian trash.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

When a libertarian is calling you out...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Libertarianism is the same moronic conservative economic policies mixed with "let the states decide human rights" nonsense.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Generally libertarians just want to not have a vast overreaching government at least from my understanding

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Capitalism, unregulated by a government, by it's very nature creates unelected/unaccountable dictators with centralized power.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Exactly. I want the control closer to the people. More concentrated power leads to a turn-key dictatorship.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Totally something Hitler would say

8 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

But his name is Sergius.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah... Sergius HITLER!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nice come back, Hitler McHitlerface!

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah well you're so hitler that hitler was all like whoa that dude is hitler

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Shut up, Hitler. Get back to hiding in your bunker!

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. we have to break the 2 party lie. My party is wrong often too. Most individuals do want what is best.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The argument is over what is best though

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

None of them are the "best" Some decision are good for some, some for others, some for no one.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Often what is best for those who pay them the most, which is rarely the people they are elected to serve

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Which, sadly, applies to both major parties' funding.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It probably would to my party as well, but our goal is less gov't control, and thus less ability to get a return on investment, so small...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

corporate investments for us.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Dang this is like the first thing I've ever agreed on from either of these two sites props

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But only Trump has praised actual Nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 105

Could you define "praised"?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Do you know how I know you only watched edited clips? Or didn't watch it at all? Because you believe this lie.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 16

just like how he hates all immigrants and not just illegal immigrants amiright. CNN amiright hillary clinton amiright pokemon go to the poll

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Stop it with the whole truth thing! ;)

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 46

That's a slippery slope if I've ever seen it

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Nice whataboutism

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 42

Right. Whataboutism is deflective, this is just misleading

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But... Her emails

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

criticizing antifascists does not mean praising nazis, bad people exist on both sides as well as good or normal people pushed to either end

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

Like look at Antigua they are gearing up for a ‘revolution ‘

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Antifa are leftist fascists, nazis are right fascists. They are both pretty garbage but they have the right up until they commit violence

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yep just look at what happened at Berkeley

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah that was some stupid shit.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Trump's own party has compared him to Hitler and Stalin. His own party. Maybe this comparison is worth looking into. Learn from our mistakes

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 13

Every single post hitler politician has been compared to hitler

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

He hates Jews? His daughter is married to one. His FL club admitted Jews before the others. He's moving the US embassy. Sure about that?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Who said anything about hating the Jews? I'm talking about unchecked rides to power and attempts to censoring the news.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TDS strikes again.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

ure fake news, trump is best and u just jealous, trump 2020.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Haha nice 45 meme. +1 my sarcastic friend :)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Thanks mate

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Trump is not part of the GOP they've both said that

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

He was the GOP's nomination for presidency. That's like saying "oh, we're not Nazi's, we just nominated a Nazi".

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Trump was the Republican nominee

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

GOP is the Republican party...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Obama killed A LOT of people with drones etc.

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 41

If you think that's a lot, you better stay away from any information about an era called "the Cold War".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope you complain about Trumps use of drones too, because he certainly hasn't stopped their usage.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How many were enemy combatants, and how many were people going about their lives? Which was the intended target? Why is it okay for Trump>

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 9

>to order attacks on these same targets?

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

The answer is that we don't know, and we'll never know, but they made each attack with the intent to kill enemies, not innocents.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don't have clear tallies for any drone strikes, and they don't always have clear indication of the people they attack being enemies,

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But they don't intentionally target innocent people, they only kill innocents from suspicion and trigger finger.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LOT like millions? Like anything nearly comparable to Holocaust and invasion of Russia?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Or perhaps a desire to kill or oust millions, like Trump? No one can deny his xenophobia.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Every other man might have a desire. Until it becomes deed he won't qualify as a monster.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mostly people such as Pakistan's most wanted terrorists. Wanted by the Pakistani government, mind you. Suicide bombings went down by 75%...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

in Pakistan from 2009 to 2015 as a result. Yes, there were civilian losses incl. children, but these stragetic drone strikes saved thousands

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember: Hitler rose to power by leveraging anger channeled through nationalism and scapegoating "foreigners."

8 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 38

Kinda but no. He leveraged economic depravity and pinned the blame on the native Jewish aristocracy. It's far more complicated

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

And by terrorism

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Jews were not "foreigners" to anyone in 1920s Germany. They were well integrated. Jews were "capitalists." Read "Why we are antisemites"

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

"Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism." - Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Also through populist socialism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

The Nazis were rabidly anti-communist. They were the first politicos to be purged. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_victims#Leftists

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Anti communist, but not anti-socialist. They were socialists. Hitler didn't like the Marxist idea of the eventual abolition of the state

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Also he didn't like that race did not factor into Marxism. His gov't was socialist for "the people" but "the people" were only "true german"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sources disagree. "When the Nazis occupied a territory, communists, socialists and anarchists were usually among the first to be repressed"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I literally linked to a million quotes above. The problem is the distinction of "types" of socialism. He didn't like "marxist socialism"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

National socialism isn't related to socialism, Hitler even joked about the triggering of socialists because of the name.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Did you read the economic policy I linked to? #14 We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

#15We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare. Sounds pretty socialist to me. And there is more

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hitler didn't like communism. He did like socialism. Have a read through : https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

" Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not." -Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

He called himself a socialist, didn't like communism. "'Socialist' I define from the word 'social; meaning in the main ‘social equity’."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

We need to deescalate on the name calling and finger pointing. Calling small incidents racist, sexist, or "like Hitler" only makes us immune

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 12

There's a small difference between calling something racist and sexist, and calling something like Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hitler wasn't so bad. He did kill Hitler!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Calling "small" things racist and sexist is important for being aware of racism and sexism. If we refuse to see it unless it's slapping us-

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

in the faces, then we won't ever move towards stopping it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A small incident of racism is still racist. That said, I feel like a Hitler comparison is best reserved for Nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

The problem with not calling out small incidents of racism is that it conditions us to stay silent as larger and larger ones happen.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

This goes for any systemic abuse, not just racism. Justifying it as too small to matter is a cognitive trap.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I have yet to see proof of Trump being a racist.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

I wasn't addressing Trump specifically but his comments are sometimes racist. I don't know about his private behavior.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's new proof every other day it seems.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What would proof look like?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Then you apparently haven't been paying attention.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

to those words. If everything is racist, then nothing is, and then who's going to believe you when something truly racist happens?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

I am constantly telling these kinds of people "The boy who cried wolf"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I disagree. Categories do not imply equivalence. A racial slur and a genocide are both types of racism, but no one is equating them. It's --

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

-- only like saying that a lion and a mouse are both mammals.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

if we aren't identifying racism on a consistent basis, how will you know when "something truly racist happens?"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah it’s almost to the point where a guy could walk past me in a ss uniform and I would have to be skeptical

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait.... that's just what Hitler would say!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

exactly, it only serves to stop dialogue and create unnecessary division. Echo Chambers only serve to let bad ideas run unopposed

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Agreed and there are people who literally protesting free speech and impose hate speech laws which would be very arbitrary

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Trump isn't Hitler but oh god damn is he a fucking terrible President giving Warren G Harding a run for that worst in history spot.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 19

W Bush was much worse, and he was just 2 presidencies ago

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Worse... SO FAR. Bush didn't start a war until year two.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah he's a war criminal and objectively bad, but not as bad.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Honestly, not really nearly as bad as Trump if you look at it objectively

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Literally what has trump done so far that has in your mind made him the worst ever? Tweeted?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

He's done a lot basically in fact too many things for me to name. His tweeting is just an example of his slovenly behavior that mildly irks

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Me.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

oh i forgot about the internment camps he set up my bad, also nice not posting anything and just saying "he's bad because he's bad lol"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Well removed Environmental protections, been an absolute embarrassment as far as diplomatic relations, his tax plan is a joke, the fact he's

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Anti-NN. The fact he's an anti-vaxxer, his gutting the education budget, gutting parks budget,

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Granted. 45 is nowhere near as bad. But he is employing the same "Don't listen to the media, or anyone who disagrees with me," rhetoric.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Just because it's been overdone , it doesn't mean people who have seen some of this shit before should be ignored for warning us.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I don't think Hitler is quite the right comparison. Soviet Union is closer, though not perfect.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Thing ispeople acted liked the media wasexemplary beforehe camealong even though they were generally hated to begin with and have lied often

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Oh don't get me wrong, the media is shit. The problem is, he is attacking factual stories and building up a base of truth-deniers.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Example please?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

There are so. So many. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/ Even if you don't trust this website,

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah I really don’t trust them they are as bad as snopes

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

And then you have 50,000 likes and follows. I don't know who cheers on lies, but that's his base and my point.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

be condescending, but you just need to pay attention at this point on any given day.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

all you need to do is view his Twitter when he's responding to a news outlet reporting on something that obviously happened. I don't mean to

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What do we call the actual Nazis calling for actual genocide, like Spencer and his buddies?

8 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 16

Nazis obviously. Fuck those pieces of shit

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

I like you.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nazis

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

And the leader who who described nazis " very fine people"

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Our president calls them “good people”

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

Neonazis.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

What's "Neo" about them?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They werent born in the 20s, and thus are less old.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An insignificant minority with a megaphone

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 25

Miller is literally part of the white house. He leads on anything dealing with immigration. That's not insignificant.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Only with clear and present truth do I believe such allegations

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

like the administration pardoning and promoting a sheriff who bragged about his concentration camps?

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I know the story he was the sheriff who was enforcing immigration law but was being told to ignore it and was arrested forcarrying outthelaw

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Except Spencer doesn't call for genocide, some of his supporters do, closest he goes to that is talking about an ethnostate.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 22

Question: Did Hitler actually openly call for genocide, or simply the expulsion of the Jews?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

His and the nazi parties actions speak for themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He called for the expulsion of Jews originally, then later the Nazis decided that killing them would be more efficient.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

In fact on his website he calls for a "peaceful" genocide.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 10, 2018 8:51 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

do it bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

You got downvoted anyway so you might as well make your point.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jul 10, 2018 8:50 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I've been meaning to read that article for years now, thank you for linking it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun(?) fact: the 6,000,000 figure is just for the Jews that were killed. Total estimate for people killed in the holocaust is ~17,000,000

8 years ago | Likes 529 Dislikes 26

Not that it was on purpose, but 95% of mentions of the death of 11m people only referring to their 65% of it is the greatest PR coup ever.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Not to discredit the holocaust victims, but the Japanese did far worse in the pacific. Jews and europeans werent the only victims of the war

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

Not to discredit the Japanese, but people have been doing horrible things to each other long before the great wars.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

25MM Russian deaths, military and civilian. 30MM Chinese deaths (from Japan, an ally of Germany during WW2).

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I always heard it was around 11 million. Where did the extra 6 mill come from?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wonder if the carbon footprint got bigger or smaller from all the fumes

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wouldn’t exactly call it “fun”

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you including the millions in China?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Jesus. The Holocaust does not refer to the entire fucking war. The Japanese killed the Chinese, not the Germans.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

King Leopold II killed 10 million Africans in the congo in the late 1800's. But they weren't white so of course the world ignored and forgot

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Do you expect me to apologize on his behalf?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

People are hurting because white lives are treated as though they're the only ones that matter. Honor this person's grief.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

They are virtue signaling by bringing up the past neither they nor anyone else was part of. Also, your statement is very broad

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish we got taught the truth in school - including this one. 10 M Africans! Damn... P.s. Imgur is like Reddit - ignore h8rs.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do you assume people would be okay with that today? If not, how does that relate in any way to issues today?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. And he wouldn't have stopped with those groups either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dwsYWF7TXI

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

and everybody forgets 20 million chinese: source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I was too soon with my comment. Pleasantly surprised it is already mentioned in the comments!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was done by the Japanese. Not the Germans. And they didn't die in the holocaust.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they died during WOII. Is there a difference?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to mention the tens of millions that died from starting the deadliest war in human history

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You guys— it never even happened.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 29

#HitlerDidNothingWrong

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

German here! It very much did happen you twat waffle

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We all know that,and are making fun of the ppl that don’t, you literal waffle. C’mon now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tha nazi pistol my grandpa has didn’t come off the fucking internet.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I watched a show where some dumb fuck insisted they were work camps for the lazy.. ppl believe that.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes, but Stalin and Mao killed many more. Now you never hear they're bad people, now why is that?? https://youtu.be/nUGkKKAogDs

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

How is that fun?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speaking as a Jew... yeah, this is spot on. The Nazis murdered Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, physically infirm... they were big on murder.

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 7

Communists!

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Speaking as normal person. How are you more competent on this topic than the other persons? Does being jew grant you magic wisdom or sumting

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean like, they were more big on "purer" genes. Murder was just justifiable means, in their opinion at least.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Outspoken non-Nazis were probably the first. And loud atheists were killed too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Catholics, too. The Nazis made nuns dig their own grave ditches before gunning them down.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

From what I googled they weren't murdered because they were Catholic nuns but because they were Russians.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Speaking as a dog, this makes no sense to me and I believe that 140 characters is way too little to further a meaningfull discussion on the

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And they always forget the Polish Catholics...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was pretty much their favorite thing

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The Jews were the central focus, though. They are specifically mentioned over and over again in Nazi policy and propaganda

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Agreed. That's the point - anti-semitism is intrinsically connected to other forms of bigotry. As MLK pointed out.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Jews were the scapegoat of the nazi regime, who they blamed all their previous problems on. But everyone different was fair game.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I'm not trying to diminish the wrong done to others, but I think its important to remember the particular focus on anti-semitism

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hitler gave a famous speech entitled

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Fun fact, Germany still has a lower then average amount of mental illness then the rest of Europe. Eugenics might be disgusting but it works

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

There could be other factors contributing to better mental health rates/lower mental illness. Not all mental health is hereditary either.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Compared to it's surrounding countries? Such as?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lower than average amount of mental inless? Or just a lower amount of REPORTED illness? "Are you crazy?" "NEIN! I AM FINE! NO NEED TO CALL!"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was taken into account. It's just thinks like schizophrenia is hereditary so by taking those out of the genepool...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would imply that the reason for their mental health was that all the most violently insane were members of the Nazi party and died>

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are plenty of practices that work but are unethical. Slavery is an efficient society model too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Slavery isn't an efficient work system for mental work though, slaves don't work that hard for a variety of reasons.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Americans still use it in prisons and rest of the world use it by proxy with Asian countries. They don't work well but they're cheap.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was more like 30

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Idk where you got that number, but it is not even close to true. They believe the numbers are from 6 to 11 million total.

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 29

It was around 20 million

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Well 6 to 11 is 17 so you do agree quite, it seems

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I think you mean 6 plus 11

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not quite... 6+11 is 17, 6 to 11 means 6,11, and all real numbers in between.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6 to 11 is 5

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think you mean 6 minus 11

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s a negative.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

11 million is a conservative estimate. Some historians believe the number may have been as high as 20 MM. 6 MM are Jewish victims only.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

6 millimeter Jews? Oh the humanity!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I'd say I shouldn't have laughed at that, but... that IS Jewish style comedy. We use laughter to deal with crap.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Nothing like a bit of dry comedy to get the blood flowing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MM, not mm. A capital M stands for mega or thousand, hence MM. It's a pretty common abbreviation and shorter than "mio."

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's actually kinda interesting, here we just use M to show million, you've just blown my puny American mind

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Estimates seem to range from 11Mil up to 20+Mil, just depends on who's doing the tallying. Fact is no one really knows

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 4

Uh.. even Jewish people say only 6 million or so Jewish people died. That's after years of counting and bring the number down constantly.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

I don't think anyone's disputing the Jewish deaths. We're talking about total deaths across all demographics

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Dead people, where even are they?

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Over there, over there, and up there.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Scattered in the air outside of the furnace, mostly.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You're thinking of Poland err I mean Pollen

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thats what the + is for

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Pshh Stalin killed more than that of his own people and he was our allie.

8 years ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 19

That we know of

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No he didn't. Most historians agree that Stalin killed something like 3-7 millions

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Around 24 millions comrades I believe.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Including genocides targeting certain races and cultures.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Pshh Pol Pot killed half his population.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He your ally because he was the main force fighting Hitler.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Comrade Pingu laughs at Stalin and declares 200,000,000!

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

really ant to know if there is a skit to this

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There r a bunch of pengu memes where he’s a communist from the Cold War.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"You underestimate how many people live here and how little I care about them." -Stalin to Hitler

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

He also has more people to kill. We got to look at a per capita example

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mao still holds the record

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

What's that you say?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mao didn't put up death camps in order to kill people. He just sucked at reforming agricultural and responding to the effects of his reforms

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Could we stop comparing or competing for "worst dictator ever" or "worst killing ever" to make an ideological/political point today? Tnx

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

To paraphrase Izzard: "kill your own people? Sure, help yourself. We've been trying to kill you for ages." Hitler killed people next door.

8 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 2

Tsk tsk tsk. Stupid man.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

After a few years we're not gonna stand for that.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"After a couple of years, 'we won't stand for that' will we?"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Mar 26, 2018 4:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I believe the structure of the joke is that he killed people in neighbouring countries in addition to his own, but I dunno, call a cop.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He didn't exactly kill them, his stupid policies led to famine in which they died. Context matters when talking mass murder.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Some of the famines were bad management. Some of them were bad management on purpose.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The sad thing is how quickly people forget this and still push for similar policies today. You can’t fix stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

People always make these crazy claims. Like how the fuck would they go about killing 80 million people? The nazi death camp operated 27-7 1)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2) and they killed 10 million. There was no KZ camps in USSR, they had the gullags but they weren't death camps

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

i guess those ~4million who died there wouldn't think so

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yup, Hitler's goals were to eliminate entire races/cultures. For Stalin, it was mostly just a result of a bad plan. Still evil,yet different

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It wasn't even particularly bad planning, as it was the only plan the USSR had - China was bad planning and could have avoided starvation, >

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Just read what stalin did around eastern-europe. His goals did not differ from hitlers goals. Kill natives, replace them with russians.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

yes, there was famine in the gulags ...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gulags accounted for just over 1M deaths. General famine from the inferior policies of communism/socialism killed most.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The thing is though, for Stalin they include numbers from famine, and not just the orchestrated ones.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

It always amazes me when internet "historians" claims; Stalin killed 80 million. Ok, how?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

That claim is ridiculous because during his reign the population of Russia was around 100 million.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Well, it wasn't with a knife that's for sure! He still be killing people

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Or you could add that the famine was "orchestrated".

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Some of the famine was a result of the Nazis invasion; some were because of measures employed by the russians to prevent german resupply

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Look, I'm not saying he was a good guy, I'm just saying his death toll is grossly exaggerated.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Some parts, some parts are the opposite. And it is very hard to get the exact numbers. Just like Mao's "We have killed 66 million people".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“When you call every opponent Hitler, it’s disrespectful to you, it’s disrespectful to them, and honestly? It’s disrespectful to Hitler.”

8 years ago | Likes 932 Dislikes 7

That last one is why I'm calling people Hitler from now on, it's worth the sacrifice

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Dishonor on you, dishonor on your cow...!"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know it, i know it, everyone knows it

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dishonor on you, Dishonor on your family, Dishonor on your cow.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disrespectful to anyone that fought Hitler is more accurate.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Exactly. No one should disrespect the Fuhrer

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The unfortunate truth is that it's worse than that. If everyone is hitler, then the definition of Hitler doesn't look nearly as bad.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

But no one gives a shit about disrespecting Hitler because he was a piece of shit

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Who's quote is this?

8 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 1

time traveling hitler

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Er ist wieder da.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Es war nicht alles schlecht.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jon Stewart. Great speech.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Michael Scott

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is disrespectful to everyone. Hitler was a good enough speaker to try taking over the world. But nobody is as good nor will kill like him

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

But how was his art?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ze greatest

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nein!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poor. He would've been better as an Architect but he never finished highschool, which was a requirement for the school's Architect branch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hitler was on a whole different level than probably anyone else in all of human history.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 33

Lol no, he's just one of the ones who lost hardest and loudest, but there are people throughout history who are just as bad, if not worse.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Never assume the monsters are unmatchably monstrous; they're human, it can happen again.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying it cant or wont happen again, or that similar hasn't happen, just that his regime had one of the most horrific combinations.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not really lol

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Wrong wrong wrong.. no disrespect but Stalin and Mao had higher outright numbers. Po pot didn't have the numbers but personally killed a lot

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

And don't forget Steve

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

From HR?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

FUCK Steve

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stalin and Mao's policy were responsible for a lot of death, but in most cases they weren't intending to kill their own peasants.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It was how they applied their agricultural policies to dominate. taking from farmers in ukraine. Destroying fields in shaanxi province.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2. These were agricultural decisions that were purposely done to force submission in certain regions. Inducing famines to have order.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of the deaths in agricultural reforms from both Stalin and Mao came from the famine that they caused. They revolted because of that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They intended to kill a hell of a lot people. Easily as much planned death as the Nazis

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If it's just "intended to kill", half of the countries in the world would have several "Hitler level" leaders in their history...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a German it always feels like most people don’t even know about the inhumanely pragmatic planning that went into the holocaust and 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It’s hiding from the people. Of courses other dictatorships have higher numbers, but industrialised genocide and a world war are unique.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well, there's also Genghis Khan who slaughtered large swaths of Asia

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My point about Hitler is the sheer combination of everything. Not that he killed the most or something.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't mean to spark a comment backfire on you. To simplify: pol pot was the sickest, Mao has the most kills, and Hitler=most efficient

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2. In terms of worst ever, i don't think he's even in the top 3.... that's how sick or dominant stalin, mao, and pol pot were.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0