On Saturday morning, 200 hackers at UC Berkeley gathered to save federal climate change data before it gets erased. They deserve recognition.

Feb 14, 2017 2:05 PM

beepbeepmeow

Views

598757

Likes

21422

Dislikes

834

On Saturday morning, 200 hackers at UC Berkeley gathered to save federal climate change data before it gets erased. They deserve recognition.

"Groups like DataRefuge and the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative, which organized the Berkeley hackathon to collect data from NASA’s earth sciences programs and the Department of Energy, are doing more than archiving. Diehard coders are building robust systems to monitor ongoing changes to government websites. And they’re keeping track of what’s already been removed—because yes, the pruning has already begun. The data collection is methodical, mostly. About half the group immediately sets web crawlers on easily-copied government pages, sending their text to the Internet Archive, a digital library made up of hundreds of billions of snapshots of webpages. They tag more data-intensive projects—pages with lots of links, databases, and interactive graphics—for the other group. Called 'baggers,' these coders write custom scripts to scrape complicated data sets from the sprawling, patched-together federal websites."

Amazing.
SOURCE
https://www.wired.com/2017/02/diehard-coders-just-saved-nasas-earth-science-data/

Wow. That's awesome.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well done for thinking to do this and actually doing it

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 5

Are they saving the real data or the doctored data?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Hackers"

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

yea actual hackers so ?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Wasn't somebody at NASA already doing this?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

NASA and NOAA started the moment Trump won the election. Scientists worldwide donated server space. It's all been backed up for posterity.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

As much as I love reading Wired, they are so far biased to the left they lose a lot of credibility as a source in these types of stories.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

Got a subscr thinking it would fill me in on current tech, like they used to. Ended up not even reading the last 6 i got. Left them 4 neigbr

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Read somewhere they did this also with a site for animal wellfare listing in the U.S.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's concerning that we've hit that point already where people -- and not just conspiracy nuts anymore -- are thinking this to be necessary.

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 5

Well, it's the other side that uses alternate facts this time.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative," Now that's what I call EDGI!

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

ok that was good

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I'm embarrassed to admit it took me three tries to make that comment. Kept hitting the enter button prematurely.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Hackers"

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

But Lord Dampnut says climate change is a hoax started by the Chinese to keep Murica down.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 8

His name is taboo you fool!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I can't wait to "hack" this imgur post by hitting the downvote button and adding one downvote.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

The definition of hacking is accessing something in a roundabout way. There is nothing roundabout this. The data comes from gov. websites.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

If they're writing scripts to automate the process, then it's legitimately hacking. I don't know where your definition comes from.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Berkeley is an amazing university...those non-student, rent-a-thug, anarchist fuckers aside.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

God this made me realize how incredibly ignorant I actually am

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The virginity is strong in this one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The building of the digital library of Alexandria. Hope it has a better ending.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Go Bears!!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"hackers"

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

yea actual hackers so ?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Running scripts is not hacking kiddo

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

HACK THE PLANET!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 4

Given one of the follow up lines.. ("They're trashing our rights") that might be more apt then ever

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

http://imgur.com/lFAYIvx

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mess with the best die like the rest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hacked my pants this morning......I put on my pants this morning.....I call it a life hack.....hack.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Hack

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm just hacking this reply button right here, send! Hack complete.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I heard they weren't liking science, but they're DELETING DATA NOW? why???

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 5

No they're not. This is a preemptive action. It just makes a better headline if they say it's already happened

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Technically, they're 'archiving' it, out of public access.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

They aren't

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Technically, they're 'archiving' it, out of public access.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Technically, they're 'archiving' it, out of public access.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

According to Michael Crichton, the government already erased climate change data (that which didn't fit their global warming narrative).

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

I don't have time to look into this. But since it doesn't fit the narrative, people round here won't care. It's too deeply embedded.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJJsDtSHjdE

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Any evidence of it happening more recently than 2007?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we stop using the word "hacker" to describe people doing things other than hacking?

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 25

Just accept it. "Hack" doesn't mean what it used to anymore. The longer you fight it, the more painful and hard to accept it becomes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The problem is, what people are trying to make it mean, makes it meaningless.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just saying that if you're going to call any form of scripting, "hacking", then there isn't much of a point in using the word. It's like /1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OMG GUYZ WATCH ME HAX0R! console.log("Hello World"); BOW BEFORE MAH 1337n335! /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hacktivist.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The term "hacker" originally meant something different, than you think it means. It was the media that gave it the meaning you think about.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 8

I think that you have no idea what I think the term means. They're just copying websites with premade bots plus a lot of manual work.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think you missed his point. "Hack" didn't originally mean what you've grown up thinking it means. And now it means something else. Get it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I know exactly what it means. It doesn't mean "Copying websites manually".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Honestly didn't read article, assumed "life hack"-esque. Maybe one of them wrote a script to scrape the data from the website. Close enough.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they are just copying website data from publicly accessible sites there is zero hacking happening.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

I didn't say there is. But from reading his comment I got the sense that he doesn't know what "hacker" actually means or meant, (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

you are being a douche trying to prove you are smart, doesn't matter what the term originally meant dumbass, it matters what it means now

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

even though he insists on correct usage of the term. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

But that's just me assuming that he doesn't know, since i assume most people don't. Might actually be that he does, but i hope others look

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

obviously, to the media - "hacker" means anybody doing anything more advanced than browsing facebook.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you really a hacker if you download a crawler and save pdfs?

9 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 14

Nope.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

We are all hackers.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

There are a few definitions. Like, life hacks arent hacks, they're just cheap tricks. Same as this. and also if you said 'developers' 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

you wouldn't get nearly the same amount of clicks on your article \shrugs. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To computer scientists hacker means you 'hack' crap together quickly, crackers are the ones who 'crack' security systems

9 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 3

As a caucasian computer expert, im so triggered right now. Thats OUR word!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hollywood fucked up the common usage pretty hard in the nineties.

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

HACK THE PLANET!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Zero Cool & Crash Override were the best h4x0rs ever!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

hack the planet

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HACK THE PLANET!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"hackers"

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 19

Yeah, is it really "hacking" if it is organized by the univeristy, and every gets a How To at the begining? Cant it just be a data dump save

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it actually has dual meanings - you could also "be a hack" or "do a hack job", i.e. do quick work with low quality.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

No, this is right. YOU are probably thinking of "crackers" who do the Hollywood stuff. Digital B&E

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

they are neither hacking or cracking, they are archiving data

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

it is though, making up bots quickly to archive is hacking, but it isnt cracking

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

No, it's just data farming. Building a web scraper isn't anything close to hacking.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

hacking as I understand is putting together code, sometimes very quickly, building a web scrapper would then be hacking

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

cracking=picking/breaking the lock. hacking= going through the window. soc. eng. = getting someone to open the door for you - phishing=/1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

tricking someone into giving you a copy of their key/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(Every 5 minutes) *Hacker Voice* I'm in

9 years ago | Likes 4490 Dislikes 10

"I'm going to try to hack the gibson... their firewall is trying to give us a virus... this virus DNA is exquisitely complex... okay I'm in"

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Broke the encabulator, im in.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i know the first three numbers

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HACK THE PLANET!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Acid Burn

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

("aaaaaannnnnd... i'm in");

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

... scotty

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm givener all she's got captain!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Right before he gets flash frozen.... Karma..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

In a Sam Winchester voice

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's only programmer, no hacker there. No "I'm in".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hot girl in the back room, "are you in yet?"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Access main computer file

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't that the home of the free speech movement? Wow, glorious I hope they don't go and fuck it up by shutting down free speech and rioting.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This made me spit my cereal out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a Unix system. I know this!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Access main computer file

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Clever girl.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've hacked into the main dataframe! Shelley turn on the quantum capacitor to full maximum velocity!!!1!!!1

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

I'm using a ddr to bypass their kernel but my worm almost got caught in their honey trap. It looks like I'll have to null pointer attack it!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

that gave me a good chuckle

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is what we need a favorite comments system for

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you think if hackers have sex they do the same? "I'm in.... I'm in.... I'm in"

9 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 1

they don't have sex.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ouch

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can't get in the main way. Let's try the backdoor...... Definitely got the backdoor sealed up tight.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

I wanted to make a joke about condoms being a firewall but I got nothin. Oh well I tried

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

God damnit! Mission failed, my computer's infected with Trojans. We'll get em next time boys!

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

"I'm in, I'm out. I'm in, I'm out. I'm in, I'm out. I'm in, I'm out. I'm done."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"That's not iiiiiit."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"If"? You're a mean one :)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

As a hacker, yes. And yes it's awkward.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I get that ref *hacker voice*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just imagine this deadly quiet room and you only hear "I'm in" in a harshly whispery voice every moment.

9 years ago | Likes 976 Dislikes 1

and the smell of onions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

some BODY ONCE TOLD ME THE WORLD WAS GONNA ROW ME

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget the typing sounds and never using a mouse.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ASMR that shit. One hour long.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With the occasional "I'll suck the internet dry!" in a fake Chinese accent.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

With a random 'YES!" and someone throwing their fists in the air in between.

9 years ago | Likes 342 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget the sound of furious typing

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Kind of lacking the occasional "wait why did that not work? OH GOD I'M A WORTHLESS FRAUD"

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And then some dude with a Russian accent who loves flipping his pen screams out "I AM INVINCIBLE!".

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hack the mainframe to steal the files from the database.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

I wonder if gov data is still on mainframes.. Imgur?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wonder if gov data is still on mainframes.. Imgur?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

not sure about environmental stuff, but the govt has systems going back to the 50s. Ars Technica wrote a piece on it

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just to be clear. It's not just the Trump administration, it's the Republican controlled Congress http://imgur.com/x6MeA3f

9 years ago | Likes 384 Dislikes 43

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 15, 2017 11:45 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I think you may be missing the point. But you are correct

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Until more than two republican senators grow a spine, those are the same thing till midterms.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 2

Either way, erasing information is the dumbest thing I've ever heard someone consider.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The article just says "they believe that the Trump administration might want to disappear this data down a memory hole". You're just biased.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Until more than two republican senators grow a spine, those are the same thing till midterms.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Until more than two republican senators grow a spine, those are the same thing till midterms.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Until more than two republican senators grow a spine, those are the same thing till midterms.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

An informed public is the greatest threat to the GOP.

9 years ago | Likes 127 Dislikes 31

And people are foolish to think this didn't happen under the previous administration's.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Well, I mean, it's not like the left hasn't tried to get rid of stuff too. I mean..oh who am I kidding...there's no convincing ppl.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

But gunsreligionabortionemailbenghazi!!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

they'll all still win in 2018, and they'll pick up seats, because non republicans are snowflakes who wont vote for someone who isn't perfect

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

They're such fucking wimps.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It really doesn't matter who is doing it, it should NOT BE ALLOWED

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Agreed. But Republicans pull this shit. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/586/cosponsors <-Life at Inception bill

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Oh what a wonderful world we live in.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Trump is just the spraytanned cherry on the right-wing politics sundae.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 13

He's a menace to the world in general

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

How so?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So is the GOP

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Its the whole gov't. Not just Trump and the Republicans.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 39

What part of the government isn't Trump and Republican right now (excluding the judicial branch for now)?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You think hiding, obfuscating or manipulating data is a new problem? You can't be that dumb.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Exactly 0 Democrats want to erase federal climate change data. This is a partisan issue. Take your BOTH SIDES bullshit elsewhere

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 13

You're just uninformed and a fool. I'm not talking just about climate data.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

The Democrats only "care" because they can grant themselves more power in the name of protecting you.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

So true.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, we don't. We really, really believe in trying to make the country a better place for everyone. I want Trump voters to have affordable

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

health care. I want white working class people to have good jobs. I want civil rights for everyone, good schools, a strong economy.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

It's essentially called the Digital Dark Age, because history is record virtually rather than physically, if a gov comes to power... (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2841 Dislikes 45

Scary and all, but wouldn't book bannings and burnings have the same effect?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck that's really Orwellian!

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Scary how much that phrase comes up nowadays :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It was far more popular a few years ago.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Add in letting groups of people dictate what you can or cannot access online that are not part of the government but friends with it.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Go on...

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

They can't it stopped at (2/2) not enough space for (3/2)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What the fuck are you talking about? We use rocks in Africa to record our history

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I saw this as being a problem from day 1 of "store it all on the cloud." I still insist on offline copies of everything I buy online.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have a diary I write in and I hope others do too, so hopefully historians can look through our shit in case information is wiped.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's crazy what can disappear. I collect Palm handhelds, 90% of the apps, hacks, info, etc I have are just gone from the internet like they

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

never even happened. So much work just gone. I know it's minor stuff in comparison but could see how the same could happen elsewhere.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I'm curious, why do you collect them? What makes them unique?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 And stuff like that will happen even if we try to preserve data, because ever-changing storage formats and vastly increasing amounts of

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 ...data means that storage gets more and more expensive and time-consuming. A lot of old data will vanish because of cutting expenses.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That said. The Internet Archive ROCKS! http://imgur.com/QBcxKzL (imgur in 2009) Consider donating https://archive.org/donate/

9 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 4

< 2mb

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fitting username

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fitting username, and thanks for the links

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Archive.org's importance is underestimated and it's hugely underrepresented. It must live on.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Is there an archive of archive.org?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

When I'm rich I'll make two of them: one in Antartica and one on Mars. Catastrophe-proof, as much as possible.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

THE GOD EMPEROR OF MAN SHALL RISE IN THIS DARK AGE!

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 4

I need some thunder warriors!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get the reference!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Isn't this how Rome and the Space Marines got their emperor's?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm already here...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does orange count as xeno?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Purge the mutant, the heretic.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Blessed is the mind too small for doubt!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

wait...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

(2/2)... wishing to erase history they can, with no physical backup you have the surviving generation to keep the legacy, then it's gone.

9 years ago | Likes 2341 Dislikes 22

Ever seen the movie "The Giver" ? Exactly what happens

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shit, this is really happening. Not in north korea, but here!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I make copies of my ass on the Xerox every chance I get.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You guys should read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptonomicon

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the whole point of the internet was to make data non-centralized?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The idea of the Internet is to make connections non-centralised, rather than the data.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like a read about this in a book onetime... something about 1984

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Print it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like a read about this in a book onetime... something about 1984

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...which is exactly how the government controlled ideas of the populous in Orwell's 1984. "Those who control history control the future."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a historian I agree

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's terrifying

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ever heard of a book called 1984? I feel like this is where we're heading

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People will replicated it, and if they're afraid of keeping the physical data, throw it on a server somewhere not in America.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

too bad most data is backed up on physical media somewhere. it's much harder to COMPLETELY wipe data now

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So print the internet to save the planet. ???

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You'd destroy the world, we'd run out of trees, do you know how many forests it would take to print all of PornHub? YouTube, 4chan, Yahoo?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mankind's most cherished flip books.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We can have unlimited virtual backups though. But then there is the problem of how to resolve discrepancies if the backups differ.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's torrents basically

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Always time to take up smoking...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"May I have a cigarette?"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to 1984! We have a President who doesn't accept critique, lots of Newspeak (lies = "alternative facts"), and now the Memory Hole...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm worried about scientific research being changed, placed behind a pay-wall, or becoming difficult to access. I've been doing a similar1/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

project for the last few weeks. Built up a MySQL database and I've been saving water purity reports from the state. It's a lot of leg work.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Plenty of research is behind a paywall. Plos has been trying to publish free stuff tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the internet... There is always another copy somewhere. (I'm a sysadmin, I know). And these guys at the hackathon 1/*

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Are doing exactly that. Writing something to store the data isn't the pain, it's the republishing of the data that will take time. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck

9 years ago | Likes 593 Dislikes 2

I feel like you took a deep toke about 10 minutes or so ago.

9 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 1

I wish. I just hadn't heard of any of this shit and I pooed my pants just a tinge

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 1

I definitely did this, and this was definitely my reaction. You must speak from experience.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

>:() same

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, except there are so many other countries that actively preserve and back up this kind of data lol. What a baseless fear.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 17

Until those countries also have dictators. Or suffer war and are annexed. The world changes. Then there's the new theatre of war - cyber.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Because dictators are an inevitability. /S

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

this is also pretty dumb, because there are physical archives of 80%+ of all gov computers with a delta of ~ 1 month (prob more in reality)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think it's a fair scenario, granted more tilted to the future than now. As for your archives if they are stored by the gov, well....

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And THIS is why we need net neutrality.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

He who controls the present controls the past, and he who controls the past controls the future...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that's the case with print records too, except it's easier to preserve digital documents than physical ones.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

actually no. sure, print records will degrade, but digital records will reach the point of "can't be deciphered anymore" MUCH earlier. >

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

> add to that the inherent volatility of digital storage, and you're one nuclear winter away from losing everything forever.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

actually no. sure, print records will degrade, but digital records will reach the point of "can't be deciphered anymore" MUCH earlier. >

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But have coping a books take as long time, wet can scan it as replicate it much faster now. Then we can make 1,000's of copies in an instant

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also store 10,000's of volumes on something the size is a postage stamp.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone have something that can read these Zip disks I found?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It has already happened with much of the information on there. It is mostly the same (why its hard to detect) but a good deal has been

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

subject to revisionism. You dont just have to go to china trying to research starvation in the great leap forward or the armenian genocide

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in turkey. We are going to have to fall back on previously published works for many things or we may not even realize what we think is

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fact is actually subtly altered fraud. At least with print you can change future publications but the past ones remain.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This TERRIFIES me more and more every single day.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Which is why we should have multiple archived backups of the internet at all times.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

NSA already has one. I think the UK is working on their own as well. No fisting porn though. That's bad. Ban all Fisting Porn.(UKbannedit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The more I've worked with tech, the more I've kept physical records and written things down because of this realization.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

learn to get physical offsite backups. get with the times.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

learn to get physical offsite backups. get with the times.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I have it. Can't store my photoshop documents in a cabinet. get with your own ass.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

why not

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cloud backups! External backups! The more you work with tech, the more you should backup.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Have all of it, have physical files too because as your advice suggests... more backing up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yeah good luck printing 12TB of PHP git repos. physical files aren't necessary with enough redundancy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

unless you decide to do a physical back up ie print. but its not cost effective

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 buy tinfoil. 2 buy box. 3. wrap box. 5. Copy data to blu ray. 6. enjoy your new version of the tinfoil hat

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not what you described...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is why the word "essentially" was used.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everybody needs to go read Oryx & Crake by Margaret Atwood

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Seconding, and adding Year of the Flood as well as The Handmaid's Tale.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

and Mad Addam obviously to make the trilogy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am adding Invisible Cities for no relevant reason.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats a crock of shit, you cant delete anything once its on the internet, you can block it but not delete it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Server owner can delete anything. If no one saved a copy, it's gone.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Do you know what a darknet backlog is? Its a save state of websites, the website is saved as an html file for back up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Sounds like 1984 to me with the Ministry of Truth

9 years ago | Likes 314 Dislikes 3

The Ministry of Truth is Hollywood.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Or Fahrenheit 451

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

the Trump admin is not nearly so competent as the 1984 government, although they do have a lot of mindless fascists supporting them

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Never underestimate groups like those behind Trump. He's just a puppet and figurehead. There are massively intelligent people plotting.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, a person, and his name is Putin

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you control history, you control the future.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's pretty normal if you look at the last 2000 years of history. also, keeping digital records for more than a few decades is actually >

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

> MUCH harder than keeping books/scrolls.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

agreed, it's VERY difficult.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's not a new idea, just that with everything moving online or digital the ease of implementation has increased somewhat.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

Mesopotamia did the same thing, except it involved chiseling people out of stone carvings.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am reading this book at the momeny, truly fantastic so far

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You're gonna be really disappointed by the ending

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I do not think that I can get disapointed anymore after I looked at my life :^)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's scary that politics is messing around with science. Facts are facts whether you want them to be our not, that's the beauty of science.

9 years ago | Likes 670 Dislikes 46

So you must've missed the latest scandal and data cover up. Yes politics are huge, you're just blaming the wrong side.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

It is terrifying. Because those who can convince others of absurdities can get them to commit atrocities.

9 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 19

which is why all your friends are resorting to violence in the streets, it truly is amazing the sheer absurdities you used to convince them

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's been happening for years, most scientist are funded by the government. If they choose to disagree with what were meant to believe...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

...they become a laughing stock among the scientific community.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

NOAA falsification. Don't let information get in the way

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There wasn't any falsification. Why don't you actually read what the whistleblower said and get back to us?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're telling this to a group of people who believe there's 1,000's of genders.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

But my book says "____________" . . .

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I'd need to read up on this specifically. But the argument isn't science deniers. It's the questioning of fallible humans interpretations.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Science is truth. But to pretend we as humans always have all the data to undeniably prove that truth? We are constantly wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who ever said politics haa anything to do with truth

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let me get this straight, US gov is deleting research data it paid for because they didn't like what the data told? WHAT THE FUCK?! Insanity

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Not for the current Republican party...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Not to defend Trump, but science results can change with new technology and/or scientists

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

They 'change' by building upon or disproving previous work, not by erasing it from the record. Big difference.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Facts are facts"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It can. In the case of environmental research there is an overwhelming consensus though, based on decades of tedious research

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

"Facts are facts"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Facts can be wrong. We used to think cooties were a real thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

that's not how facts work. facts are facts.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Facts change.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

No. A fact never changes that's what makes him a fact.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I said Morgan Freeman is alive now, that is a fact. If I said that in 75 years, I would be wrong as he is in fact dead.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you can point me to an actual scientific paper that says that I'll believe you. But i don't think that was ever a reality

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I meant as children.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That's not a fact. That was ignorance, the opposite of facts

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Things you believed as a child aren't necessarily facts just because you thought it was real.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, I do suppose I chose a rather poor example.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I agree, but this didn't start w/ Trump though. Ex: huge whistleblower case now detailing how NOAA manipulated climate data to high a pause.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 47

at direction of Obama

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is false. The whistle blower only took issue with the fact that the scientific research paper used a research data set rather than 1:

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

Validated the NOAA study's results. This is a fake issue that's been intentionally falsely reported by radical right blogs 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 9

Frankly you're part of the problem as your summary is false: http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/no-data-manipulation-at-noaa/

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

so 1 govt agency gets another to cover its lies, nice and neat, try again.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An operational data set. He never claimed the data was manipulated improperly. And multiple independent studies from other scientists 2/

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 8

aw, love how you try to twist the truth to your will and hide the fact that you lied

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God damn it dude now you're just spreading misleading info, there wasn't any falsification of data, he critiqued how it was stored/accessed

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Well that san opinion. Come on. Why do u think you're left wing slanted info is any better than. Y right wing slanted info? Plus this is...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

I like how it's "left wing" to listen to intelligent ppl who devote their whole lives to studying one subject

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This isn't a left wing/right wing thing. Why don't you actually read what John Bates said, and get back to us?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because the actual written statement is publicilly available.... And it says exactly what the guy above you indicated

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That, and there's no profit in OT for those claiming change. As opposed to, oh, I don't know, Exxon. Those Fuckers. Follow the money.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

...imgur. A site that limits me to 140ch statements at a time. What I said is true but not complete. Not my job to be 100% perfect here.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

It's almost like the people who love to try and quote facts and science don't care to research the whistle blower story. Weird

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, what you said is not true. Again: the issue was *not* with falsified or manipulated data.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

...unethical reasons. GW is a driver for 100s of billions in new taxes on us and I didn't articulate the possibility that bc of that...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

My main point was to note that administrations going back to the start have manipulated/withheld/etc data from the public for various...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ok, you're right. manipulated maybe be a strong word.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

...we must be skeptical of what the govt says bc history shows they can't be trusted. I didn't illustrate this point well w/ the NOAA exampl

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3