When Greta trumps Trump

Sep 25, 2019 7:29 AM

As a smart, mature, adult and president, Donald Trump decided it was fine to mock a 16 years old who is standing up for her future and her generation.

Well, she trumped back by changing her bio to fit his words

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/24/greta-thunberg-trump-twitter-bio

6 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 10

Low-effort mockery deserves low-effort contempt.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

As a 16 year old, president Donald Trump decided it was fine to mock a smart, mature adult who is standing up for her future & generation.

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 15

That shitstain of a bully Trump doesn’t deserve to breathe the air in our planet

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Dont get me wrong, in more than willing to believe hed be an ass to a young girl, but this seems like Poe's Law to me.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Nice! I did not know about Poe's law!

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

May be How Dare You would have been appropriate line in her bio!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Leave it to Trump to belittle a person with disabilities just to feel powerful and attract applause from his followers.

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 31

It’s funny because she doesn’t see it as a disability.. so why do you? Is it for convenience, maybe?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Is she disabled in some way?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Asperger's is a disability. Is a form of autism.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not really, no. She has Aspergers but that doesn't hinder her.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

It's part of the game. Almost the entire right wing has had a shot at her. Not the science because that is solid, but at her because she /2

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

2/ is a child and children, to some, are open to strawman attacks because for some reason they have the audacity of not being older.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

"Children are entitled and lazy!" Except until they passionately push for solutions to problems, whereupon they're pawns.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

She pretty much threw a tantrum. Usually kids get a time out for that. But hey, if it pushes an agenda so be it I guess.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 33

Just because she's mad—and rightfully so—doesn't mean she's wrong. Tone is exactly a style vs substance issue.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

She is doing the same thing the dems are, yelling about a problem without providing a valid solution. Not productive in any way.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Scientists have been very polite as they humbly handed in their reports. The politicians ignored them. It's time to get angry.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Fine by me, but let's channel that into productivity instead of waving our arms around and throwing tantrums. Sound fair?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The agenda is wanting a habitable planet. Is that so bad?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is nothing wrong with that no. But pitching a bitch fit instead of giving viable solutions does nothing productive.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The first thing she always says is listen to the scientists. The IPCC has been recommending viable solutions for years.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Denying facts only speaks of your fears. You're a pussy, hiding your head on a bush.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Where did I deny facts lol? Nice try though! Btw, the name calling only makes you look unintelligent. Might wanna try a different tactic.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Get of your high horse. It's not my job to point out your delusions. Cunt.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

LOL, back to the name calling. Thanks for the laughs man.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meh..I saw part of her speech. I dunno but she was too over the top dramatic to be anything but annoying to me, regardless of content.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 14

That is style over substance. It is time to be angry. No one cares that you're annoyed. Grow up.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

I’m 100% for environmental awareness. I’m just saying she’s barking up the wrong tree. Want change? Make Asia come into the 21st century.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

Well maybe not the wrong tree. It’s the UN so Russia and China are there, but it’s not like Putin or Xi care about what she has to say.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Soak up that propaganda yo. Asia are totally coming to the party also por que no los dos?? Why only one before the other?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:52 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Cool, but that’s just India..

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The planet could literally die I say now is the time to be over dramatic

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Wanna make a big difference as far as the planet? Take it up with Asia. The west is light years ahead as far as sustainability goes.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

For its population size China is behind the EU, but far better than the US. India even has lower emissions per capita than the EU. They are

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

just really large countries, but we have to get the CO2 footprint of each PERSON to a similar low level, and in that the US and Arabic

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

countries are the worst. It's unfair if a person in the US can have 2x the CO footprint of a person in China but claims that it's not their

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Also, good luck convincing China, India, or Russia to be more eco friendly and quit trashing the place.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

My point being she is barking up the wrong tree. Putin and Xi don’t give a rats ass about some teenager crying into a microphone.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

China are leading the way in renewables and their per capita emissions are a fraction of the US. Russia are still pretty bad but they...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...have at least just signed up to the Paris Agreement which is recognition of how serious the issue is, something Trump still won't do.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's be honest, her parents should be thrown in jail for child abuse at this point for filling her head with such panic and lies

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 60

Or maybe we should throw the whole global scientific community in jail, right? Because the 'panic and lies' come directly from them.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You should eat a cactus for belittling Greta just to keep hiding your fear. Pathetic.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A) she's sixteen, not an infant. B) why are you booking? She's right. C) I'm a fan of tapas.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Mate, teenagers are capable of self-determination and independence. They're capable of understanding science and research papers. 1/

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

There's no reason to believe she didn't come to her conclusions on her own as she read science that has widespread consensus. 2/2

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

we found the trump supporter

6 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 16

As opposed to what? The democrats have brought in crazy, socialist, authoritarian, identitarians and given up on liberalism

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

who the fuck said dems are ok?

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Don't abuse your children." "Lul what a trump supporter."

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

What's next? Will i join the groups cleaning up democrat run cities because they can't even get trash off the streets with a supermajority?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

I have a degree in Sustainability. Sorry mate but none of these are lies

6 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 11

They list co2 as a driver of climate change, so yes, there are lies. Most EPA measures in developed countries aren't followed elsewhere

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 17

And cause the habitat loss/ etc,.. plus,nyou know, people need to live somewhere, farm somewhere to survive, etc

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 17

Indeed, we do need to live somewhere but look at the degree of overconsumption - overuse of resources

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

We don't need half the shit that is produced but hey we are greedy

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You should resign.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

And you should stop letting your childhood baggage determine your beliefs, but then, I guess internet people don't get to decide that stuff.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

Childhood baggage? Like religion? Yea, Im sticking to science, thanks xD

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Baggage like your rebellion against your family being more central to your beliefs than reason.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

I must have missed something, where is that coming from?

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Rebellion against my family? Aside from 1 narcistic idiot nobody likes I get allong great with my family v0v you shouldn't project.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

What nonsense are you sputtering?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You can literally see the effects of climate change. What lies are you talking about? You don't want a cleaner planet?

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 8

Earth been greening, deserts starting to reverse, people finally figured out which farming processes are destroying land and adjusting them?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

Get rid of your pink glasses

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Wow, I didn't know the internet works across different realities! That explains a lot!

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I’m sure you have overwhelming proof to this absurd claim?

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Is the earth flat, too, brainiac?

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Most of our glaciers are gone, a process that takes tens of thousands of years, has happened in less than 100. This is catastrophic.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

No, they aren't, and no it isn't

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:52 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"no they're not" really?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3