Top Ten Space Facts

May 11, 2015 10:12 AM

AtomicNinja17

Views

353014

Likes

7118

Dislikes

118

10. Space Smells

According to astronauts who have returned from space missions, space smells like a mixture of hot metal, welding fumes and seared steak.

9. Gravitational Lensing

There is a bizarre phenomenon that scientists call gravitational lensing which happens when gravity bends light to the point that objects appear in a different location to where they actually exist. A solitary black hole betrays its presence solely through gravity, which bends and warps the light of more distant objects.

8. Perspective

Due to an amazing coincidence of the Moon being 400 times smaller, and 400 times closer than the Sun, they both appear to be the same size.

7. International Space Station

At $150billion, the International Space Station is the most expensive object ever built. At the size of a football field, The International Space Station is only as roomy as a five-bedroom house, and travels at a speed of 17,500 mph. This means that Astronauts onboard the International Space Station view fifteen sunrises and sunsets every 24 hours.

6. Tall Tale

Astronauts typically gain two inches in height while in space. Due to the lack of gravity, the spines of astronauts elongate by up to three percent while they are in space. This is a similar effect to what happens while you sleep as less gravitational force is being applied to your spine while you lie down which is why we are fractionally taller when we wake up as opposed to going to bed.

5. Thirsty for Knowledge?

Two teams of astronauts have discovered a large reservoir of water floating in space that is the equivalent to 140 trillion times the water of our ocean. The water is in a cloud around a huge black hole that is in the process of sucking in matter and spraying out energy (such an active black hole is called a quasar), and the waves of energy the black hole releases make water by literally knocking hydrogen and oxygen atoms together.

4. True Colors

In space the Sun appears white as opposed to yellow here on earth. Due to Earth’s atmosphere, shorter and more energetic wavelength photons of light are scattered and deflected before they reach the ground. This means that we usually only see particles with longer wavelengths such as yellow, orange and red. This explains why to our eyes, the Sun appears yellow instead of white.

3. Crazy Weather

On Venus, it snows metalgalena and bismuthinite. The weather on Venus is extreme. The entire atmosphere of the planet circulates around quickly, with winds blowing as fast as 360 kilometers/hour. Cloud systems can travel around the planet completely in about 4 days. The winds blow in a retrograde direction, and are the fastest near the poles. As you approach the equator, the wind speeds die down to almost nothing.

2. Cool Stars

Last August NASA scientists offered a first look at a peculiar class of stellar wallflowers called Y dwarfs. Unlike typical stars, which burn steadily at thousands of degrees, the warmest of these Jupiter-size objects are just hot enough to bake cookies, and the coolest barely break room temperature.

1. It's A small World After All

Earth can be seen as a pale blue dot in the picture above – 6 billion Kilometers away. This photograph was taken by Voyager 1 in 1990 at a distance of 6 billion kilometers away. In the picture above, Earth is sized at a fraction of a pixel (0.12) against the vastness that is space. Even from within our own solar system, this picture provides some insight into how small we are in the cosmos.

In a way, it's comforting to know that the most expensive thing ever built is the ISS.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like we can fix CA's drought problem...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Need banana for scale

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The image taken from Voyager 1 is incredible. Completely unique, and it just shows how staggering the vastness of space really is.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Space is fucking neat.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A quasar isn't technically a black hole and isn't technically a star either. It's an AGN. It gets fed by a blackhole.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

*Active Galactic Nucleus, if anyone's wondering

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the sun is more than 400 times the size of our moon...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

#6 So you're saying a lot of activity around your black hole makes you wet?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Carl Sagan is the one that suggested that the picture in #10 be taken.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

His soliloquy on the photo is one of the most elagant and poignant paragraphs ever written. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p86BPM1GV8M

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

CA like damn..

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

'Coincidence' - yeah, right...

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You have to round off the numbers quite heavily to get the correlation. But it's close enough to make for a convincing illusion.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

check-mate agnostics

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

illuminati confirmed

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About the water one: Does that mean there could be a mass of water hurtling through space towards Earth, 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Technically there could be, but if it's anywhere near the distance of the mass of water in #5 it will never reach us

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because I don't think California would mind. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They'd be pretty dead, along with all of us so yeah I guess they would be alright with it. At least you get a holy shit moment before you go

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not if the water hit the point in the atmosphere where a lot of things burn up, then a lot of it would just evaporate and cause us to 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have a lot of rain. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So I get that we're the blue dot, but what about those other streaks?

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I thought this view was shot from around Saturn, and those are the rings?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Sunlight scattered by the camera.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

They're your mom's love handles

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

The shot was taken while Voyager was in orbit around Saturn. Those are the trailing edges of its rings.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah, I thought it was from farther out than that.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bonus space fact: If the astronauts on the ISS were to sing The Proclaimers hit "I'm gonna be (500 miles)", by the time they finished (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

...they would have traveled pretty much exactly 1000 miles.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So why the hell aren't they doing it we need to get right on that

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because Chris Hadfield is already back on earth.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well get him back up there this needs to happen

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dont think the moon is just 400x smaller than the sun.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Well, it is. 3 500 km of Moon vs. 1 400 000 km of Sun, in terms of diameter. Amazing, isn't it?

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Well. Some scale there, huh.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That... that is not how you measure spherical objects. You could fit 65 million moons into the sun. 400 times is way off.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

The ratio of moon to sun diameter is equal to the ratio of their proximity, making them the same size from our perspective

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is absolutely a way to measure spherical objects. "Smaller" is ambiguous and doesn't imply smaller volume. Meant smaller in diameter.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Context, my friend. The issue was appearance from earth. So diameter will give us the comparison we are looking for.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

When you are comparing size with respect to how much they occlude, diameter is all that matters, not volume.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

We're treating both as simple, two-dimensional disks. Which is what they appear to be, due to their distance from us.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Crazy how math do dat

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why aren't we funding NASA more? :(

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

because the politicians we elect don't think advocating for more money for NASA will help them get re-elected. and mostly they're right.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We'd rather have a enormous defense budget for...reasons....pisses me off too man

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The only sense of wonder I get out of life anymore is finding out more about space. Knowing that so many people think its worthless sucks.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just thinking about the vastness freaks me out in the best possible way

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Things that are rare and valuable here on earth, can make up a good portion of a planet that is 8x the size of earth. Shits crazy.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

WHAT!? NO! SHUT IT DOWN! IT WILL DE-VALUE OUR MONOPOLIES! SHUT IT ALL DOWN! KILL BILL NYE! FUUUUUUUCK!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn imagine a Y dwarf star colony in Star Wars.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The coincidence is that we're observing it at the perfect time; eons ago the moon was closer and eons from now it will be farther.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

dat conservation of angular momentum

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But WHY are we here to observe it!???? Hah, take that, atheists!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess I should have added there

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The sun was also smaller and is growing in volume.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it seems like less of a perfect coincidence when we use more precise numbers.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

140 trillion times the water in the oceans? 140 trillion times the nopeity nope nope.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Space whales.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And as it circles that black hole, California cries.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine how much the ISS smells like farts

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

My thoughts went a different way. I wonder if they get freaky up there. zero G orgy. 0rG.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I wonder if the lack of gravity/wind makes farts kinda stick to you like warm air in the space station. Breathing in farts all day.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Probably. I also wonder what 0g does to your intestines. Actually no I don't. I've decided I don't want to know.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Warm air is less dense, so I imagine it would tend to dissipate.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Warm air has more entropy and wants to reach a lower entropic state and thus will dissipate. You are going from a "high pressure anus" state

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Likely some part of the fart would still be near to you.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to an assumable lower pressure state in the cabin. Also farts contain various compounds so they might naturally separate into the air.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#5 is not quite right, a quasar is not a black hole but results from matter interactions due to the black hole

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

picture #6

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I haven't done much research on the subject but hydrogen and oxygen just coincidentally being smashed together to form water?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just seems unlikely that such small particles would constantly be coming in contact in a way that it creates trillions of gallons of water

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Do not go gentle into that good night....."

11 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 5

I don't get it. I'm just thinking of Sylvia Plath

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's from the movie Interstellar.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sunspots on the Sun spell "STAY"

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"Murph! Don't let me go, Murph!"

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

I cant upvote this enough!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MURRRPPPHHHH!!!!!!!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

omg i saw it yesterday.. the feels...

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I too had to endure a raging flow from my eyes after Cooper left the hospital room.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i started crying after he left murph the first time and basically never stopped since. really great movie!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Sigh*. Space does not smell. Space is a vacuum. The interaction of space suits that have been in space, breathable atmospheres, smell.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

A smell is an electrochemical reaction triggered by materials coating chemical receptors in your nostrils. An atmosphere is not required.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously, in a vacuum, you'd be too preoccupied to notice; and the capillaries in your nose would have burst open anyway. :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 Also, if you were to *try* to smell something in vacuum, you would only wind up smelling blood vessels bursting in your nose. Ouch.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That I already covered.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 Yes it is. Both definitionally and mechanically. Scents cannot get to your nose without an atmosphere to travel on.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wrong. There'd be no way to get matter into your nostrils without an atmosphere, of course, but I'm arguing semantics, not practicalities.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When astronauts are outside, space-borne compounds (hydrocarbons) adhere to their suits and come back with them into the space station.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/? Exactly how many hydrocarbons do you think are floating around in low earth orbit? How acute do you think the human nose is?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6/6 others. Hydrogen is odorless, therefore space is odorless, if the concept of odor even makes sense with pressures that low.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4/? their products become airborne. But these are not the smell of space, any more than a nearby auto wreck is the smell of earth.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3/? will cause chemical changes in that suit over time which may become airborne when re-exposed to air, or may react with oxygen and have

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5/? Space is almost entirely empty, with about one atom per cubic centimeter of hydrogen, a little more in some places, a little less in

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/? The largest source - by far - of hydrocarbons in space near an astronaut is going to be their space suit. Exposure to ionizing radiation

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Technically the most expensive structure ever build is the US highway system at 400 billion USD.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

Take your facts somewhere else!

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I wouldn't consider that a single structure.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

There are multiple reasons to think that and I can see where they're coming from, what are yours?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It wasn't built all as one project, it's continually growing and being remade. It lacks permanence.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The ISS wasn't shot into orbit in one piece though and is in the constant process of being changed as well. (Albeit at a slower rate)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But everything that would be built onto it had to be planned from the start, so it's one project.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you call that a single structure you might aswell call the reconstruction of Eastern Germany a single effort. Which costed 5x more.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Strongly depends on how you define what a single structure is, but I see where you're coming from^^

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's one tiny flaw in that claim....

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There actually are many arguments against that...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure the sun is more than 400 times the size of our moon...

11 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 10

Maybe 400 million times?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Diameter wise, not volume wise. Google never lies: http://www.google.com/search?q==diameter+of+sun+%2F+diameter+of+moon

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Huh, the more you know. Though the wording "400 times smaller" doesn't really lend itself to this fact.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Append "in diameter".

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparently 64.3 million moons can fit in the sun.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yep, but the sun is only 400 times "taller" than the moon. That's one dimension. 400 x 400 x 400 (3d) = 64 million yes.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well considering the sun is I think at least a million times bigger than earth then I think youre right

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Only in 3d. In 4d it's way bigger than that. (Hm, this might be a wasted attempt at humor..)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're trying to work out the size of the moon/sun by using the visible size and distance from us, you're going to need to compare radii

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

to distance.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Consider that our star and our moon both appear as simple two-dimensional disks to us.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure they are referring to the average diameter. Volume-wise, yes ... it is significantly greater due to the square cube law.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Maybe replacing the wording with "the footprint of the moon is 400 times smaller" would be more concise?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

diameter should suffice to describe it apparent size. the diameter is the diameter, whether you're describing a sphere or circle.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is fair, but the post does say that it's 400 times smaller, which is technically untrue. Leads to confusion (for a lot of people)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

while i agree it's not a precise answer (OP omitted the word "diameter"), it's not untrue as others have outlined.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Moons don't have feet --- that's no moon. It's your mum!

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Depends what you mean my "size". Volume, no (not by a LONG way). Diameter, yes.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Apparent diameter, true diameter is slightly different.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Given that the diameter is what matters for occlusions... I think they might have meant diameter.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In three dimensions, sure. In 2D, the sun's diameter is 1,391,684 km. 1,391,684/400 = 3479.21. The moon's diameter is 3475 km. Close enough.

11 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 1

Aaaaaaaand lawyered: math style

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is one dimension.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. One dimension is a line, two dimensions is a plane. Math is your friend.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Distance is a line, which is one dimension. Area is a surface, which is two dimensions. You're saying diameter, which is distance, not area.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Erp. Truth. Still converts correctly, even though the area of the central plane of the sun is roughly 160,000 times that of the moon.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just for clarity: any massive object can create a gravitational lensing effect..

11 years ago | Likes 396 Dislikes 2

Love me some general relativity

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The pic is actually from a galaxy lensing a background galaxy

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Hey ma! I'm bending space-time!

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Like your mom.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Like OP's Mom

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Watched a documentary on how much of a pain in the ass it was using the lensing around the moon to prove Einstein's relativity. Good show.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like your mom.

11 years ago | Likes 251 Dislikes 3

Yes, alvalar's mom is a thing that has mass.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I predicted the first comment under this word for word. I have been here far too long

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Literally my thoughts exactly. Damn you beat me to it.... 11 hours ago...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ooohh, damn! I see what you did there! BAM! Boner.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Is this why we're still able to see the sun after it's actually 'set'. Is it gravity bending light in such a way that it's still visible?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. That's just from light scattering in the atmosphere. Also why the sky is different colors.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

atmospheric refraction and backscatter.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah it is hardly a "bizarre" phenomenon

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

so the sun is white but looks yellow bc of the atmosphere, why do other stars/moon appear white since they're based on the same source color

11 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 1

Cause they're yellow...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

They don't. But they appear smaller, so it's more difficult to tell. The difference is a small one.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Partial answer: most sources indicate the star light is so dim our eyes dedicate 'rods' to picking up light instead of 'cones' for color 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

the sun would appear near white when directly overhead, yellow-red at the horizon, due to how much atmosphere the light passes through 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

if the rod/cones issue is true, i would think cameras should be able to pick up the actual colors and show the stars as yellow/red? 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

AreYouAWizard.gif ?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then why do close up photos of the sun (solar flares and other fun stuff) look red, orange, and yellow?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

those are artificially colored by the photographer to show contrast and detail

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Also, don't we call starts yellow, white, blue based on energy output?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Sun is a Yellow Dwarf, but it does emit white light.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

true, but that's before their light passes through our atmosphere, blue is a hotter star, red is cooler.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's dependent on the wavelength of light that is strongest coming from the star. If I remember correctly.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Based on the wavelength their emission peaks at, which is tied to the temperature in the upper layers of the star. Bluer is hotter.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Although atmosphere does scatter light, the sun looks yellow to us because it's peak radiation is in the yellow wavelength. It appears 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a bit of column A, some of column B.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

white in space because it also radiates in many other visible wavelengths, making the yellow less obvious, but it's still mostly yellow 1/3

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

even if you can't tell. Also not all stars are the same color. With your naked you can see some stars are clearly blue, even to us. 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I REALLY need to know HOW they smelled space since you can't breathe there.........???

11 years ago | Likes 574 Dislikes 18

Easy, the door was open to the moon... Then when they got in they closed it. Then they took off their helmets. Then they smelled.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

When astronauts are outside, space-borne compounds adhere to their suits and come back with them into the space station.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

iss circulated air.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the airlock smells like after EVAs, I'd suppose.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

..not to mention what is responsible for that 'burned steak' smell

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

during one shuttle mission, Chris Hatfield stuck his head out a window and said "HOOOOOOOWEEEE!!!! that smells like burnt stake and welding"

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Space doesn't smell of anything. Smell requires air.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Strictly speaking, smell requires particles to coat the inside of your nostrils. But in a vacuum, you'd be too preoccupied to notice. :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it requires molecules, and there are plenty of those.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just wind the window down for a bit

11 years ago | Likes 258 Dislikes 1

.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Roll 'em up

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Are you crazy? Like literally crazy? The A/C is on.

11 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

yeah it'd be a waste of fuel

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

yeah it'

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Dec 8, 2016 12:52 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Turn your back to Space and make a wish

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks fam

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Holy shit

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it is reference to the moondust brought into the LM that then oxidizes in the atmosphere in the capsule...

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Apparently it smells like a real man should

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

They ask whoever it was knocking on the airlock door

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised no one commented on yours... brilliant!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sweet reference bro

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

did they knock three times?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

On the ceiling because they wanted them.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They can smell what they're suits smell like after they go back into a pressurized environment

11 years ago | Likes 655 Dislikes 16

Fairly certain that it might be because they going well into the hundreds upon reentry

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Hot metal" and "welding fumes" well no shit they were probably welding shit on the space station. Why else would they be outside of it?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well the steak can mean only one thing: we know where all the abducted cows go...

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

We should test other objects for space smell

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This one was patently wrong, smell is conveyed through air, of which there is none in space... Space smells like nothing- it does not smell.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not entirely true for all of space but where astronauts would be yeah, there wouldn't be a smell outside of what they created.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mine smells like farts. - some astronaut

11 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Inside...and out.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*their

11 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 8

Hey guys! I found the

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

That's only how the suit smells after being exposed to vacuum, temperature changes, harsh sunlight and so on. But it's as close as we'll get

11 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 2

Challenge accepted.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wonder what itd do if you got a jar of it and brought it inside the station...

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

im pretty sure if you got a jar in space it would have only like 5 molecules/atoms in it

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you got a jar of nothing and opened it in the station, it would fill with air.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

You'd have to smell it real quick

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Implosive compression (shattering) upon taking it inside? Or maybe explosive decompression upon taking it /outside/.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

I would love to see that

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Either one!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, most glass jars can withstand the difference in pressure which is only about 1 atm; not that much.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's only how the suit smells after being exposed to vacuum, temperature changes, harsh sunlight and so on. But it's as close as we'll get

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

And the airlock chamber, which also gets exposed to vacuum. (Yeye character limit I know :))

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Goddamnitclown...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dangit. +1

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't the suits just smell like suits?

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Well the snozberries smell like snozberries, so...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure if your suits smell like a mixture of hot metal, welding fumes and seared steak.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean hot metal, welding fumes, and scared steak?

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Does scared steak taste better than seared steak?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I like my steak terrified

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

:( u took my line

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Isn't that just the smell of the suits, space station materials, etc.?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Vacuum boil-off from the suits and airlock chamber. Space has too few molecules for your nose to detect.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The smell was from the Apollo Missions after they returned from EVA the Moon dust on there suits started to Oxidize

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

their*

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Correct This They're going there in their car.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ha I have you now Nazi Scum

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1