Big bang

Sep 6, 2021 9:24 AM

Big Bang [OC]

I thought it was cute then I zoomed in on the sign.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I'll bang your wife while I'm at it. Nice

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sheryl !

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

A bit to static comic for my taste. Copy/paste in Garfield style.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

No wife, just cats - and our collective answer is *no thanks.*

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm just here for the "please don't hit glass" sign

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This sounds like pro-zoo propaganda. Evolve zoos away from cages and into nature reserves.

4 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 5

We already have nature reserves. Zoos are actually important for genetic preservation and education. But some are shit.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Makes me think of DMB The Proudest Monkey

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That took so many turns. I know my “oriente”

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People whine about how hard it is to be human. Then they need medical help or entertainment or just security and then suddenly it's the best

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*when they can get it

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have read a number of very shitty erotica stories where people fuck monkeys or apes. Its not very good.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ooh, King Kong fanfiction.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A number... meaning that after the first, you read another... and another... SICKO! Got any links?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

https://www.asstr.org/~/Kristen/beast/index.htm have at it boss.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not literotica? shame on you! jk

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Listen. Eventually normal erotica doesnt do it for you anymore and you have to read more and more taboo stuff.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I mean they have penis bones so it might be a unique experience i guess. Fun fact: Species with baculums tend to have a homologue for

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the female of the species, being a clitoral bone. Cuz thats how development works, its cheaper to generate things that can flip to either

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

gender rather than specialized tools. Hence the existence of things like male nipples lol

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that it starts with the question "why haven't you evolved yet" shows that the cartoonist doesn't understand evolution. 1/?

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 14

AND they think monkeys can talk!!! They really just have no idea what science is. It's a good think they draw humorous comics instead.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

cartoon drawist no use big brain

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

It’s called a metaphor…calm down

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or that they're writing a comic.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

(never thought id use this for anything other than weebs)

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Evolution is not like some RPG "leveling up to always become better". Evolution is adaptation. We evolve to adapt to our environment. 2/?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

Sometimes that means gaining traits (like becoming smarter) and sometimes it means losing traits (our tails). 3/4

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

It's survival of the fittest, not smartest. Evolution is adaptation, not necessarily improvement. 4/4

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

You must be great at parties. /S

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Lucky you.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

They have evolved every bit as much as we have (or maybe more, if you go by number of generations as an indicator).

4 years ago | Likes 216 Dislikes 4

well, we killed, out-bread or bread with everything too close to us evolutionary.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah saying they're unevolved is saying intelligence is the only stat you can max out. They're stronger than us, for one,and better climbers

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If they had evolved as much as we have, then they would be able to control their environment the way we do. They don't, because they haven't

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

You're setting some completely arbitrary characteristic as a measure of evolution. That's not how it works.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is presuming that intelligence/consciousness is the ultimate goal of evolution, instead of just one way to survive and pass on genes.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Evolved” just means they fit really well into their niche, they don’t have to do everything humans do to fit into their niche

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don’t you scientific around here, buddy.

4 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is news to me. Would you mind esplainin it like I'm 5? Thank you in advance if you do.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

No such thing as "more" or "less" evolved. Evolution doesn't have a direction or a ladder. Like the monkey says, monkey works fine for her.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Evolution is passing down genes. If you're breeding, you're winning. Animals adapt to their environment because the adapted have advantage

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

When animals evolve similar traits it's its cause those traits helped them 1) attract a mate or 2) survive long enough to bang anyway

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"More evolved" doesn't really have any meaning. "More complex" or "more intelligent" are usually what is meant.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And to add to that, nothing evolves into one thing, but rather just becomes a common ancestor to multitudes of evolutionary branches.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If something gets more intelligent, or specialized, or faster, it's just because that ancestor had cousins who were separated geographically

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Us and monkeys have a common ancestor- but we didn't come directly from them. And as the other commenter pointed out, 'more evolved' is a 1

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

flawed concept to begin with, seeing as evolution doesn't have a destination. 2

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Technically speaking everything alive has a common ancestor. LUCA (last universal common ancestor)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but contextually we're talking about the misconception that humans evolved from monkeys. The post clarifies that we have a monkey (1)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ancestor that is common with the monkeys of today, but we aren't directly descendant.(2)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Evolution doesn't have a destination, it just does what works. And since their lives are shorter than ours there's more room for change.

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

Bacteria lead incredibly short lives compared to ours, and they reproduce rapidly, passing down new traits that helped helped survive.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

This is why bacteria can quickly overcome the antibiotics we use to kill them, they aren't trying to become sentient, just staying alive.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

bacteria comes in and we're like "hmm, you're in my space bud, you should die about it"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Evolution is random. What survives is usually what gets to pass down their genes, so over time, the "better" traits get more prevalent.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It’s not random. The rolls of the dice are random but what nature picks is not. So if nature is picking ones eventually all the dice it 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

2/2. All the dice nature has will be ones. It’s not random its inevitable.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Strictly speaking it is a random variable. Which traits are selected for is not random, but it's not deterministic either since the input(1)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's not inevitable, otherwise we'd all be coalescing into one species.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nature does not pick. And as a metaphor for the environment: That has been changing as well at any time.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on how you define random. One school of thought is that natural selection isn't random because more desirable traits eventually tend

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to be expressed more, but then that'd only be defined as random if by random you mean all options have an equal chance. Mutation A may be

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0