1st amber-preserved dinosaur remains

Dec 9, 2016 4:00 AM

vanyathalias

Views

245178

Likes

6382

Dislikes

113

I haven't seen this story mentioned on imgur yet so I thought I'd share the cool news:

Xing Lida, a Chinese paleontologist, found the specimen at an amber market in northern Myanmar, where it was to be made into some kind of trinket. The Burmese traders thought it was merely a plant fragment inside. Xing Lida recognized it as a vertebrate and bought it.

The amber in fact contained the tail of a young coelurosaurian, a sparrow-sized dinosaur related to velociraptors and tyrannosaurus.

Most importantly, the amber contains both bone fragments and feathers, adding tangible evidence that many dinosaurs had plumage, not scales. Due to the amber's thorough preservation, the scientists were even able to decipher the coelurosaurian's pigmentation with some certainty--chestnut brown and white.

In addition to the bones and feathers, soft tissue and decayed blood were also found in the amber; unfortunately, no genetic material was preserved with it. We'll just have to wait a bit longer for some real world dinosaur cloning.

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/08/health/dinosaur-tail-trapped-in-amber-trnd/index.html

Nuuuuuuu I'm gunna miss my scaly dinos!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone always blaming me for trapping dinosaurs and plants... Maybe they deserved it, ya know?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

FEATHEEEEEEERS

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some Dinosaur Long Ago: "OH GREAT! Now there's sap all over my ass! COULD THIS DAY GET ANY WORSE?"

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

(Cut to long shot of an approaching giant meteor)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also found in strange Chinese market: Monkey Paw that grants wishes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And designer bags! Any brand you want for cheap! I give good discount!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

One step closer to Jurassic Park...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well damn. Is this the first basically 100% proof that dinosaurs had feathers? That's awesome.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

China is just usually suspect for fake fossils by scientists with an agenda. Plenty of previous confirms though.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

There've been fossil imprints prior to this, which essentially already confirmed it.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Ah, I see, that's what the prior evidence was. Doesn't make this any less fantastic though.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aight Imgur it was fun, but Dino-doomsday has come, im out

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No di-no D-N-A this time folks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lovely Plumage!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy fuck that's amazing!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Hold onto your butts...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dinosaur cloning. More like dinosaur clowning.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*DOO DOO DOO doo doo DOO DOO DOO doo doo*

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Is that supposed to be x-files or what?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

no its this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-w-58hQ9dLk

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

HAHAHAHAHHAA thank you!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you want dinosaurs??? Because that's how you get dinosaurs!!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately they haven't been able to extract usable DNA from anything that old.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How the fuck does one get their tail stuck in a glob of amber.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fell over?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Feathers are modified scales, so dinosaurs could easily have both.

9 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 2

TIL

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe scales are modified feathers. Ya ever think of that? No, no you didn't.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the scutes on bird legs are modified feathers. Crazy huh?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And they did. Most birds alive today have both as well.

9 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Indeed. My pet chook had scaly little legs, we used to duel, I'd try and tickle her feet while she flapped her wings and pecked my fingers.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's generally agreed at this stage that modern birds are surviving dinosaurs.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Classic Amber, what a slut

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well this confirms dinosaurs were just giant man-eating birds with teeth

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

From a taxonomic standpoint, the only reason we don't call dinosaurs birds is because it would confuse people

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And vice versa.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think we're pretty certain they at no point were man-eating

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

yet

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's been on Imgur all day

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 6

But some people aren't.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's a search tool so you can check

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Or just browse popular on the front page for a bit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People are on almost entire day. Even at work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, oh well. I've had a busy day so I've only been on intermittently. So I guess this is for those of us who hadn't caught it before :)

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

I haven't seen it until now. I am thankful for your efforts

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the post from those of us with busy days who would have otherwise missed this cool discovery. +1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 798 Dislikes 4

WE ALL NEW THIS WAS COMING GODDAMMIT

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Appropriate Goldblum GIF, +1

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

My contribution: v

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, DNA has a lifespan of something like 100,000 years, soooo..

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Yeah. I'm not even sure you could freeze something that far back and get DNA today. Severe freezerburn.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

freezing does not affect half lives

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not radioactive ones, but it does in this case - but not enough to matter.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what if it's infused with unobtainium WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? (that would literally do nothing)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

DNA has a half life of 500 years, wich essentially means that in 500 years half of the DNA will have decayed.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

As in radioactive decay?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not caused by the same process but the decay pattern is the same, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not what half life-means. That means that in 500 years, half of a sample will decay, and then another 500 years for the next half etc

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How is that in contradiction to Kanadabalsam's comment?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, I thought he said all of the DNA will be decayed. My bad.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't mean that it will go away immediately though. Mammoth DNA fragments have been being recovered in frozen remains recently.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It means that the amount of intact DNA will decrease exponentially. At some point it'll be too few molecules to be usable though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Inverse-exponentially*. That's an important distinction.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, it's just a negative power

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but the key word is frozen. We have much more samples from the ice age than others because ice is amazing at preserving organic matter.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

True we could never get DNA from the dinosaurs. It would also be a poor choice to simply clone them anyway since the world has changed a lot

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

FRESH... Trex was a giant fucking chicken... Chickens are savage af

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Lol, unfortunately trex probably wasn't so feathery. Plenty of smaller murder chickens existed, however

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How do we know that though? Is there actually any evidence that dinosaurs had scales? I mean was there ever any dinosaur skin found?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude. T-rex drumsticks. :D Fuuuck yes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine being chased and eaten by a giant murder chicken, that would be fucking brutal.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I wrote that into a game module once. Someone out there ran an adventure in Middle Earth in which Hobbits were chased by a giant chicken. .

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

. . . I like to think Tolkien would have chuckled. "You will be listening in the night for the ominous "CLUCK . . . CLUCK . . . CLUCK."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Scenario: the amber contained some deadly ancient virus. The trader sold it and the buyer broke it open releasing the virus into the world.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fortunately the virus' genetic material ceased to exist millions of years ago, so it's nothing dangerous.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1) Actually, it was a virus that killed the dinosaurs and a sciecedino made a device to attract a meteor to whipe out the virus, but me made

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) a wrong calculation and accidentally attracted a bigger meteor than intended and so he ended up killing everyone instead of saving them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3) But this really smart little mammal knew about the miscalculation and he managed to save some of his family from both the virus and

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4) the meteor and then they basically took over the world. Either that, or the mammal actually just sabotaged the sciencedino.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5) We will never know.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to Jurassic Park

9 years ago | Likes 177 Dislikes 1

It's safer here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Loved how they explained a new discovery like dinosaurs had feathers in the newest movie

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, DNA has a half life of 250 years. There won't be any viable DNA in there. #funAtParties

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Except y/know, the dinosaurs looked a bit more feathery than scaley.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And also the method of cloning in Jurassic Park is impossible since the half-life of DNA is far too short to allow it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Best song ever plays in background*

9 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

Yesss!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

What does photograph by nickelback have to do with jurassic park?

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Let's talk about that scary ass spider that's also preserved

9 years ago | Likes 732 Dislikes 11

What about those bacterias?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is obviously one of c'thulus old shed skins..

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Can we not?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Noperatops

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's an ass spider and why are they so scary

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have you heard the myth about earwigs?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NONONO!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think he's onto something. The spider cut off the dinosaur's tail, be careful

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Can I get a link to that pretty please?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing it's CNN, by the logo on the picture.... and that sauce at the end of OP's text... You're welcome.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Are you talking about a link to a picture of the insect? It's in the first picture in the post... top middle!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was an ant

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

It is indeed an ant, according to the BBC article

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The more I look at the picture, the more I think you're right and it's probably an ant. It's still a creepy looking ant...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's some sort of spindly legged ant. And I'm not okay with that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is no one else surprised that ants haven't changed in millions and millions of years?

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

When nature works it sticks with it. Many insects, arachnids and fish especially have been nearly unchanged for eons.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Evolution complete

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A link please?!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing it's CNN, by the logo on the picture.... and that sauce at the end of OP's text... You're welcome.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Are you talking about a link to a picture of the insect? It's in the first picture in the post... top middle!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

it's definitely an ant: http://imgur.com/7c1aZHh

9 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 0

Is the dinosaur the size of a dog? I know many were small

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It says "sparrow-sized"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What is this? A dinosaur for ANTS?!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To the top with you!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I feel like everyone's avoiding talking about it to cope... because in deference to the dinosaur remains, they can't nuke it from space.

9 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 3

They use this tail for jurassic park shit, we spacex to mars, we nuke dinosaurs cause we lost control, we come back and start all over.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Unfortunetly, spaceX was blown up while we were overloading the Internet to stop troll trace.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

maybe one day OP will bless us with a link

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

A link to what, exactly? The joke I was making?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I think it finally clicked what you're talking about; a link to the insect picture, right? It's in the first picture in the post! Top middle

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Anty?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bro.. Have you never seen an ant?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's no spider...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean the ant?

9 years ago | Likes 412 Dislikes 0

What is this? An amber for ants?

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

That's what's so scary, it's a spider that's an ant.

9 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 0

Spider-ant. Spider-ant. Does whatever a spider-ant does.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You mean like thousands of spiders working together as a single mind?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Spidermind, Spidermind, the reactions to him are mostly unkind

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only has 6 legs, unless it has legs on its head.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Wow. An arachnid with only 6 legs. The future has everything!

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

2016 was a weird year

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This thread made me smile.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1