Rich Vs Poor

Apr 1, 2021 5:50 AM

cutenavvi31415

Views

187166

Likes

6345

Dislikes

150

Thank you so much guys most viral this is my highest upvotes post since my birthday. Send me nudes

Just dont vote for people who are tied to the rich

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Where is the hyper downvote when we need it?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is exactly why I don’t believe Dems when they say they’ll only tax the rich to pay for their plans. The middle class always gets boned

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

That's what they want you to think

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“When sh*t’s worth money the poor will be born without a**holes”. Not sure who said this but it makes you think.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Are we trying to say we the poor would permit this? If it were in our power?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just how the federalists designed it! If I see James Madison in the afterlife, it's on sight.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't ask their permission. Tax the rich and build a better society for ALL of us

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

?noredirect

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

Always remember politicians serve the rich, not the people that vote them into office.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This is true.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, if we vote for it and it doesn't go through there *is* still a solution..

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The system was not changed to be against those who are not wealthy. It was designed and maintained to be FOR those who are wealthy.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nice cropping shitlord.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Politicians Vs people. (Do not let politicians and the goverment divide us.)

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lol just get their vaccines, consume their media, use their banks, eat their shitty processed foods, vote for their puppets, fear each other

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 16

Lie and cheat

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I upvoted so hard

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Also Never be deceived by Imgur hyper votes

5 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 1

I was NOT able to hyper vote this comment!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's just so fun

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What's with the hyper vote thing ???!!!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I only got 4

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Never be deceived that the rich would let you vote if it actually mattered. I'm not saying you shouldn't vote. I'm saying we can't fix /1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This rigged system by voting. I'm not condoning violence either. We simply need to unite and find a new solution to modern day slavery

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yup

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's why you take it from them

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don’t even want to take away their status as “wealthy”. I just want them to stop mucking everything up.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

i'm cool with people getting to 999mil, then every penny more goes to health, education, etc

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But that's the point, what use is their wealth if they can't use it to extort poor people into working for them?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lucy Parsons is one of my favorites. She advocated for the removal of class structure and the wealthy via dynamite.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I'm afraid it cannot be done in any different way. :/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Amen

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet you lobby like hell to raise taxes on the middle class while they protect their wealth in charities?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

The worst are the old money, the ones you never hear about.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Shame on them for giving to charitable causes!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Warren buffett and bill gates lobby to raise taxes on themselves

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They lobby to raise tax in high income earners but they don’t earn income.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Whatever lip service they give, their words then allow the dems to say that people who make 250k aren’t paying their fair share

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They probably aren't but 400k is the target point right now

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never be deceived that you shouldn't vote.

5 years ago | Likes 178 Dislikes 10

H Y P E V O T E

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Right! its been done before, how does everyone think the new deal happened? working condition laws? The anti trust act? People voted.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

aye

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Never be deceived into thinking a vote is your only option, or that your 'successful' vote can't be circumvented or corrupted.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Remember that even Lenin ran in elections. Being for radical change doesn't mean not voting.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Lenin was kinda the post child for radical change, though.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the thing, he still participated in crooked, bourgeois (or even feudal) elections

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

haha you think political parties are different than one another

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 40

If you don't vote, they stop giving a shit about what you think. Don't leave power on the table.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Hush, GQP troll.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

piece of shit

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

It's wishful thinking. To understand the true amount of shit we are in is uncomfortable so most tend to live in denial.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

No! Capitalist party #1 is obviously far better than Capitalist party #2. They're so different. The end result of their policies isn't

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

Functionally identical.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

With voting reform people would be able to actually vote change in. As it is you have the two most corporately favoured 'options' only.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Can you think of one example of people voting through meaningful change?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Define meaningful. Brexit was one, but that was a bad change, brought about by Murdoch media and Russian shilling

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What was clipped out of this image?

5 years ago | Likes 441 Dislikes 0

Her scandalous ankle.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Her left ear.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The name of the book : Darude Sandstorm.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Apr 1, 2021 12:27 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a scam

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for calling attention to it. Idk if OP even noticed.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Just like, a BUNCH of dildos. All over the place

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

J.g. Wentworth

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"do you want to tax the rich ( ) yes ( ) no"

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Your right to vote

5 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 1

what? You got 3/5th of the quote, what are you complaining about ?

5 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 4

Sorry

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oof

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

And she’s a woman so you only get 79% of .6

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

underrated...

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Mom?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 670 Dislikes 1

Therrrre it is.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They literally cut both parts about unions. Was this cropped by Jeff Bezos?

5 years ago | Likes 383 Dislikes 2

I'm an Amazon employees, I love working at AMZN. They pay us money and fairly treats us

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 2

My Amazon job is the best. I prefer it to seeing my human children at my domicile. I hear unions shove toothpicks under your fingernails.

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Amazon cropped this image.

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Oh my god fucking lol

5 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

Right? Like wtf was it cropped

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

union bad company good

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The part about how unions want your money instead.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 35

unions: "if you pay us 50 bucks, we can make sure your employer pays you twice what you make now" thekig: "no thanks, i like being poor."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nope. Unions want to help you earn more money and improve quality of work conditions. It does take money to make money, in this case.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

You're not wrong. But why should I care about union dues, when I take home more money, have better benefits, health and safety practices....

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Employment protections that shelter me from harrassment, discrimination, constructive dismissals. I get regular wage increases....

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

That are pre-negotiated. Regular vacation, regular vacation time increases with seniority. Matched retirement fund contributions from my

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Minimum wages are not pre negotiations.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Employer. And those union dues? They pay for the union to run their organization, salaries on the union side. AND, most importantly,

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

I don’t remember the oracle saying this

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

She didn't. She coded it in the cookies.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are talking about the Oracle of Omaha? Warren Buffet?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She bears a fleeting resemblance to the Oracle in the Matrix. It's mostly the haircut.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

matrix

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the movie

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there was only one unfortunately

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's almost as if term limits sound logical yet they keep voting against them...

5 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 19

we already have term limits. they're called elections. politics is a skilled job, and skilled people should be able to stay in it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Term limits assure not quality but turnover. With a big, dark money funded bench, will make worse. Elizabeth Warrens don't grow on trees.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Campaign finance reform, like the current HR1 bill, is much more important than term limits. Money in politics is the main culprit.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Term limits means the most experienced people in Washington would be the lobbyists.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Nah, though a maximum age limit wouldn't hurt.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Term limits ARE NOT logical. They are a band aid solution that will make corruption worse, not better

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Term limits sound good but they won't fix shit.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Term limits don't even sound good. They're a solution in search of a problem, used to scam fools into voting for con-artists.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They do on first scan but yeah thinking about them at all kind of ruins the magic. :P

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes we need the rich assholes to rotate in and out of government jobs more often! That will surely solve our wealth inequality!

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

/s

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not sure how term limits will help this specific issue.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

The more often you change politicians, the harder they are to corrupt. It is not solving the problem, but it helps.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

But I never said limit after one term. But 4 terms is too much. Democraty is passing the baton to others

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not really

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From the comments it seems that I was wrong.Still, I think that a term limit would help lowering the average age of our dear leaders

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The opposite is true. There's been a decent amount of research on it.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

i think you underestimate the power of the dark side

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not true. It takes time to become effective and counter all the games played by veterans and lobbyists. In fact it's been proven 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

numerous times new politicians are more easily swayed by lobbyists. This would have the opposite effect. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Not really, changing often also has big draw backs. National security information would be compromised with high turnover

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Other countries don't seem to have this issue

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

What other comparable country? Would you be able to provide a source indicating this isn't a problem? Would love to read more.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0