Late Capitalism

May 20, 2022 3:49 AM

mfrybeasley

Views

155297

Likes

2956

Dislikes

69

Funny thing is, the best way to prevent unionization is to not treat your employees like utter fucking trash

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So the slide towards fascism is the fault of unions. I knew it! /s

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Corporatism

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Capitalism isn't declining, it's reaching it's apex in an unregulated and uncontrolled environment.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Billionaires ain’t sheeiiit

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you refuse to join a union, you may as well kiss your workers rights goodbye. They're already stripping them away

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I'd say it's not necessarily late capitalism, it's just when capitalism is threatened. That's why fascism popped up so hard in the 30s

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Kinda see why Marx believed there would be an inevitable bloody clash between capitalism and socialism.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is late capitalism the same as late-stage capitalism? Seems to be two different things, but here means the same?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Has Bezos made any public statements on politics? I assume what his stance is, but has he said anything?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Being anti-union is a political stance & Bezos is anti-union.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If only there was someone to warn us about this for last ~150 years or so

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They were never left to begin with, a polished facade to seem neutral while setting up this dystopia. Nasty shits

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The word you are looking for is "Banana Republic".

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck billionaires

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This is the biggest issue in america right now and a lot of politicians are in on it.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It doesn’t help that they both look like Superman villains

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

#1 actually, I would say they moved to the alt right at Ludacris speed!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Republicans complain about immigrants, but who hires them? The same repubs who complain. Most contractors picking up immigrants from the/

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

local Home Depot (yes, this happens) are white repubs. So why are they angry? Because no one stops to ask who, what, when, where, and why.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Like the System of a Down song says: mezmerized the simple minded, propaganda leaves us blinded.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoheCz4t2xc Very relevant today.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I don't get why, either. Bezos could pay every Amazon employee $100k and still be richer than he was in 2019.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(I've done the math on this based on published numbers, two different times, and it just ... expands into infinity.)

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do these people and corporations need not just lots of money but all of it?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's far more than money they take

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fascism is the Immune response of Capitalism. This has always been the case. Take heart, it means they are fearful.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

also, attacks make it worse.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

2% wealth tax over 1 million (5% on 10+),60% income tax over 200K (75% on 500K),actual policing of white collar crime,no first past the post

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

And cap the maximum private net worth at something like $50m, too, while you're at it.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's interesting that comments like this are always downvoted, although as a civilization we have no other choice in the long run. Money 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

is not meant to be hoarded on such a large scale by single individuals in a society as large as ours. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As a European this would be amazing. We'd basically receive like half of all your investment capital for free.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

if you think US cant catch tax dodgers you havent been påaying attention.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not investing in something isn't dodging taxes. International corporations would stop building new projects in the US and move abroad.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

again no thats completely insane. US is WAY too big a market to ignore and we arent talking about taxing corporations atm. if ppl started

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3) and you cant avoid a wealth tax by not investing...its still wealth regardless what form your assets take

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) changing nationality to avoid taxation that is 1000% tax evasion and US is most certainly a country that could punish that

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tax avoidance and tax evasion is not the same, and if you make it shittier to live in the US people who can will move abroad.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm just wondering how long this can keep going.. I mean it'll always "go on", but in this city rent is impossible, cost of living? Ha!

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I think there will come a breaking point where people will get fed-up and start hunting down the 1%.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When civilisation crumbles.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Basically, this. When enough poor people die, and civilization cant keep going due to not enough 'workers' Then the folks at the top will /1

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

create a new system of power that conveniently keeps them in power over the ones below them. Repeat to infinity. /2

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jun 27, 2022 9:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I read a story a while back saying they wanted to create a company town. Because those worked so well before.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jun 27, 2022 9:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jun 27, 2022 9:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jun 27, 2022 9:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Ive seen creepy run down towns that are just shacks, with no services. Not on a map. Next to an amazon distribution center and nothing else

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Worked for Walmart in the 2000’s. Orientation training included anti-union videos that told u to report employees attempting to form a union

3 years ago | Likes 222 Dislikes 2

Me too, they forced us to sign a form “promising” to never unionize in order to get hired. Weird ‘control’ way of framing it, quasi legal.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I needed a job and this was not my first try so you’re put in a bind from the beginning.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You must live in a red state. I worked for them in the early 2000s and never saw a video telling me to report employees attempting to form 1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I live in NY

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who was Gov when you worked there?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Paterson

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was it a (R) or (D) state government?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha. We also got a paper we had to sign saying we wouldnt join a union. It was like the D.A.R.E form pledging not to do drugs

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Kroger was also this way when they opened new stores in the mid-Atlantic Kate 90’s too early 2000’s.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That should be flat out illegal. Interesting times indeed...

3 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

Law enforcement in this country currently only serves businesses & rich folk, the rest of us are left to rott.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure it is. But that won't stop you from getting fired if you report them. And they probably just have to pay a small fine.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

If the only punishment is a set value fine that just means its legal if you can afford it.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

If you live in an at will state they can fire you for no reason at all.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

There are reasons that they cannot fire you for, but the burden of proof is on you.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yup. Which means they can do whatever they want.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's why people give the advice of document, document, document when people post about work problems on this site.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't get distracted by the culture wars. Follow the money.

3 years ago | Likes 434 Dislikes 8

I'm not following the money. At the end there is an evil witch that will eat you with lots of paprika.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The "culture wars" are not a distraction if you're not a white dude. Motherfuckers want to kill you.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

You just gotta tell that to the actual fascists who are committing mass shootings in the name of white supremacy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not "distracted" from fighting wealth disparity by fighting for things like abortion and equal rights. I can do both.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And when you catch up to it, be very quiet and get your net ready!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Ape together strong ???

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's tricky in the USA, because there isn't a Poors Party. There's a party for culturally okayish rich people and a party for rich fascists.

3 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 3

This is totally wrong, what there isn't is a party for the middle class. The Dems have delivered for the actually poor for decades.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Every single fakeass lefty whining about the ACA (100% free HC if youre poor) or student debt relief (vast majority goes to UMC) is a fraud.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Both your parties have repeatedly chosen to spend billions on bombing brown people over helping your homeless, for decades.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

One of our parties spends over $60 billion annually helping our homeless. https://www.hud.gov/budget

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

There are plenty (like DSA). They are just not winning many elections.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's a two-party system by design. There's no path for a third party without a new constitution, so this is all we get for the foreseeable.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I don't disagree.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ranked choice voting can be implemented at the state level as Maine has already done. This would end 2 party without by in from congress.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No war but class war

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

The smartest thing the rich right did was convince poor people that 'others' (black, gay etc) were the enemy instead of them.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

what about the rich left? People think they finally see the truth, yet are still so foolhardy.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I worked my ass off, wrecked my body. Now I endure 8/10 chronic pain daily from years of construction work in order to start my own company.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

To say that the rich are the enemy, is to say that any one person could potentially be the enemy, be the bad guy.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If my company becomes über successful and makes me very wealthy, am I now everyone else's enemy? Am I the bad guy now?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The enemy isn't those with wealth. It's those in perpetual continuance to have power and take yours. Money is only a means to achieve power.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They mean buying politicians & laws rich. If you own a construction company, you're not the level of rich they're talking about.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(2) It'd be more accurate to say exploitative companies mistreating workers. If you as an employer treat workers fairly, then you're good.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Communism is the result of the working class developing class consciousness. Fascism is the result of capitalist class consciousness.

3 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 12

Yes, but communism was exploited almost as soon as it was implemented. Capitalism is no different and will take time to recover from.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

you know, communism isn't the opposite of fascism, any more than socialism is the opposite of capitalism. They're just artificial theories.-

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

Pretty sure those are actually opposites. You can call them artificial, but something will happen whether you label it or not.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We have other choices, and we can come up with new ones.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

You seem to be reacting out of fear. Would you like to talk about that? Are you maybe unfamiliar with anarcho-communism?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

No lie, just too nicw to be mean, to nieve and socially awkward to know a joke. Please explain anarcho-commu.... Google

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, it sounds self explanitory but ppl get into shit for avoiding the fine print, so. Im gonna learn some things new today. Yay!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well they're both heavily Authortarian. How about Anarcho-syndicalism

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Anarcho Syndicalism is awesome but communism is not, in fact, an authoritarian ideology.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except they're not authoritarian. You might be thinking of Maoism or Stalinism-Leninism. All Socialism & Communism are, is more democracy 1/

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

2/2 in more places. Specifically in the work place. It sees owners as the dictators they are & says these things should be democracies too.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Fair! Iirc we also haven't seen "true" communism supercede a fully industrialized cap state.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fascism is the ABSENCE of class consciousness, replacing it with racial & religious identity.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Just because Hitler said so doesn't make it true.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Imagine believing that status is "irrelevant" in a fascist society then calling the other person "ignorant of history" lmaooooooo.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's true because it's true. The fascist expropriate the capitalists in the outgroup, incorporate the capitalists in the ingroup. Class...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

status is irrelevant, only righthink and identity.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

class consciousness doesn't preclude fucking over members of one's own class if they're a threat to that class.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

There is no way to reconcile fascism as a defense of class interests when class interests are clearly irrelevant 2 determining in&out groups

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

Right wing minions are too stupid to see they are being manipulated.

3 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 7

They're not. Their values are being catered to. Their values are evil.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

"values" /S

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah,they value white supremacy. They value it a lot more than econ policy that will help them materially.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The system is working as designed. Keep em stupid, keep em scared, keep em outraged, and it's just slavery with a few extra steps.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rand Paul is aware Russia has influence and manipulates him.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No introspection whatsoever. My uncle thought Don't Look Up was a riot until I told him and he confirmed the president was a MAGA stand-in.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

As easy as it is to write off any followers as ignorant, I think there is belief that "that could be me! On this path I could make it!"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Goes for the left as well. Cultism and populism are at an all time high.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

but but but but but but SoroS (./s)

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not a coincidence that these are the same people who follow and donate to religions.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They don’t care as long as the rich are on the same side.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

If they could just own the libs, they'd all be rich.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cuz sum day I'll be rich too. /s

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's hard to convince people otherwise when you can't stop insulting them. Nobody wants to listen to a jerk, even if the jerk's right.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

Sorry for calling the part of racists homophonic cunts racists homophobic cunts

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

*hands you your "I'm doing everything possible to make things WORSE while feeling smugly superior" card*

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

^he's right though. Convincing yourself everyone who disagrees with you is an easily dismissed scumbag is generally unhelpful

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, let's be nice to them. I'm sure they'll come around to logical argument /S

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes. Yes they do. Daryl Davis does it all the time... in spite of "allies" actively undermining his efforts.
https://imgur.com/qIhNiUJ

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Louder for the people at the back. I know how hard it is to be kind in the face of hate but we have to be better than them.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Only up to a point. At some point, it has to be understood that war has been declared and is already upon us.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Democrats issue in beating them is that Dems have morals they won't compromise. Rethugs have no such limitations on their behavior.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I dont disagree, but it sure feels like that attitude got Trump elected. Even using kid gloves they want to shoot you anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tho also, kindness didn't get Trump elected. Apathy and hubris did.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even I'm starting to admit there's some people who are just garbage people. But there's a lot more who are isolated, or just kinda meh ppl.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/ the rich are our enemy. They are actively hostile to us.

3 years ago | Likes 591 Dislikes 9

That was depressing to watch, and in fact i stopped after a while, i don't need more depression...

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Who are "the rich"?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Japan did it in the late 40s and it was hugely successful... America it's you turn to start eating the rich.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Homeless and veteran are two words that don't belong together

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

W.o.w.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To the DVs on my comment, read the full thread. You people haven't experienced hunger apparently. Every point made is valid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Always have been.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I keep it with startrek and say that we actually don't need money or a financial system at all. It's all just in our heads.

3 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 6

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yup, and we've resolved the problem of scarcity distribution already, it's called queues. Leave monetary exchange for luxury goods.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

As long as there is scarcity, there is money. And there will always be scarcity. Even StarTrek had gold-pressed latium.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The issue isn't wealth, it's regulation. And that's why the US is crumbling.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

That had no value within the Federation. It was used to trade with the hyper-capitalist Ferengi...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Inca empire had no money. Ni form of currency whatsoever.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's not true. There was no standardized valuta, because, yes, basic necessities were provided. But there was trade. Just, by its nature..

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

.. off the books. Informal.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They do have matter replicators though, that helps with the regional scarcity bit. We have poorly distributed abundance right now

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

We have expertly distributed poverty

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

I agree and dislike Musk, but this happened: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/elon-musk-un-world-hunger-famine/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 31

Which is why I'm not a fan of saying 7.5% of X could solve Y. It does get the point across though, tax the rich... or eat them.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 18

Interesting how everyone hates on this comment. If a check could solve World Hunger billionaires would do it as protection money.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Protection from the very people on this thread downvoting this comment. It would be cheap for them right? That's the point of the graphic.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

My point is simple, I don't like these comparisons because it takes efficient systems and a lot of work to feed the hungry. Not just money.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

My family growing up had food insecure before and refused welfare assistance due to pride. How do you solve that hunger? How about

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I also believe that part of the problem is only one kid in the class does the entire group project i.e. the work is hard and ignored.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 17

What the hell does this even mean in this context?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It takes work to feed people. Not all hungry people seek help, why do videos of people actively finding and distributing food to those in 1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It takes real effort to feed all of the hungry and food insecure, not just money. The best most organizations can hope for is cash for guilt

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

their communities get thousands of upvotes? Because it's uncommonly great right? That's my point. Not everyone is going to a food bank. 2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Why even ask then? You know it sucks to try and actually engage and then find out the other person is just trolling you. That helps no one.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No replies and just downvotes. You are the other troll on this thread. I reply each time with rational thought out replies and you don't.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So a tiny handful of people who are under or unpaid put it all that time and effort that is for the most part not valued by society.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

In other words, the 1 kid in class doing the group assignment.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But it didn't happen. They came up with a plan, he did nothing. Nothing happened.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He never actually donated the money to WFP in the end, just a load of public posturing and then he bought twitter instead

3 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

That's because a check doesn't solve anything. Like I said, taxes, min incomes, policy, etc solves this issue. Billionaires do pay for

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

goodwill every day. You think Musk and Bezos wouldn't want to shout from the rooftops they ended world hunger so they can keep their

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

billions in peace? The money would help, but it's not a solution to the underlying problem and that was my point.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tried to buy twitter. Hasn't gone through and has since lost about 30% of his total wealth.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's easier to found Amazon or Tesla than it is to end World Hunger, because the problems you are solving are more obvious.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 14

That lifehacks Black dude hands a carrot to a homeless guy and makes an exasperated face at you.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is that simple isn't it? Cool, have him send me a video of the same in North Korea. DVs come from the willfully ignorant here I'm afraid.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Musk didn’t found Tesla, he bought it and the title of founder.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Haha, true, "easier to buy Tesla..."? "Easier to be born wealthy and connected"? Now I'm laughing and can't correct my sentence.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

What problem(s) is Tesla or Amazon solving again?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My point isn't clear and that's the problem. People literally don't realize that not all hungry people even ask for help. They don't realize

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

that just getting food into some communities is incredibly challenging and takes time and effort. They don't see the invisible problems

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Logistics and transportation. Amazon is one of the most logistically innovative organizations on the planet. I'm not saying they are solving

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Logistics and transportation? Those are so entirely vague that they could mean anything.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

problems that need to be solved in our society. I said they solve obvious problems. People want stuff fast, how do we get it to them faster?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

An obvious problem with clear things to tackle to solve right? So my point is perfectly valid? Yes, yes it is.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1